440°

60% of PlayStation Plus subscribers may opt for annual 12-month memberships

Sony corporate appears to indicate that more than half of PlayStation Plus subscribers choose to buy 12-month annual subscriptions, likely due to costs.

Read Full Story >>
tweaktown.com
Obscure_Observer211d ago

So most PS+ members prefers long therm subscriptions rather than pay monthly fees.

Interesting...

MrNinosan210d ago

Most PS+ members are happy with their subscription and therefor save almost 50% instead of buying monthly, yes.

crazyCoconuts210d ago

I can't believe Xbox Core/GP doesn't even have an annual membership, thus no way to save by paying annually. They're not even competing on price.

GamerRN210d ago

I pay annually for Gamepass Ultimate, and it only costs me about $97-105 US a year.

porkChop209d ago

@GamerRN

How? There isn't an annual subscription. There's 3 months which is at least a little cheaper, but not annual.

RAFTECH26210d ago

Very odd that they are building gaas games around this.

Implode?

Eonjay209d ago

This comment doesn't make sense and feels like a stream of consciousness. What is 'this' and how does it relate to Gaas? What is imploding and how does any of that relate to 60% of gamers picking yearly over monthly or anything that OP said? Just make sense.

RAFTECH26209d ago

It’s simple. What do you need in order for gaas to be successful? Online players.

What do you need to play online? PlayStation plus.

Figure it out. It’s not rocket science… it’s common sense.

Eonjay209d ago (Edited 209d ago )

Concord, Hell Divers 2 and FairGame$ are launching on PC day and date where Plus is not required. You are right to point out the obvious that online games need online players to succeed. This is probably why they are launching on platforms where Plus isn't a barrier to entry.

So your non-argument is invalid. You also failed to explain how they will implode. There are 47 million Plus subscribers and potentially even more Steam users out there. Games like Marathon are even coming to Xbox as well. The only thing that will make or break Gaas will be the quality of the experience on offer. And it's not rocket science.

blackblades209d ago

Gaas are usually F2P, F2P games dont require ps+ to play online.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 209d ago
Barlos210d ago (Edited 210d ago )

Not really. It works out cheaper to do it annually rather than monthly or quarterly.

jznrpg210d ago

It’s a lot cheaper so yeah. We have an option try and spin that. Plus you can buy the the year even cheaper on sale.

UltimateRacer210d ago

Been doing that for years, especially around Christmas holidays there always a sale on Plus subscription, usually 35% - 40% off.

ironmonkey210d ago

Yeah most ps players kinda actually play games and finish them rather than that trial version they call gamepass. Tried it and it sucks, thats alot of sucks in that gp library.

PhillyDonJawn210d ago (Edited 210d ago )

Interesting indeed. Someone's got some explaining to do. I see why sony going gaas route

Einhander1972210d ago

What is the point of these detractions? Yes we know that PS+ is a lot cheaper than Game Pass, but that doesn't change that PlayStation is generating around 40% more revenue than Microsoft.

And PlayStation just gave it's monthly report and it's Game and Network Services were up 20%.

BTW when Sony announced the newest PS+ system they themselves said that over 80% of users opted for the yearly option.

PlayStation has always been the cheapest place to game due to the sales which include bonus discounts for PS+ users including most big pre-orders which often allows you to get $70 new releases for $60 or less which I never see anyone point out.

PlayStation always has thousands of games on sale, and with PS+ you often get 60 to 95% off on games that are on sale, especially during double discount sales where they add even more PS+ discount games than normal.

So thanks for pointing out that PlayStation is the cheapest place to game.

northpaws210d ago

@obscure

You know basic PS Plus is just Xbox live Gold subscription right? The trend started by Xbox to make people pays to play online. The one where eventually PS gamers get 3 decent games per month and Xbox gamers get 2 crap games per month, remember?

I know you are always trying to find an angle to make Xbox looks better, but you have to aim better. Find a different article, this is not the one. I will PM you when I see something that you can use.

ocelot07210d ago

Yer? How's that interesting 🤣🤣🤣 29315;🤣🤣. Days of play when ps+ is 40% off on 12 month subs. Why spend £10 a month when a year is near enough half price?

Eonjay209d ago

I mean it makes sense. Also when the offer Plus discounts they always are on yearly subs. Much better deal than paying monthly. More obvious than interesting.

FinalFantasyFanatic209d ago

If I like the service to stay subscribed, it makes sense to get a discount for a yearly sub rather than pay the extra monthly.

RedDevils209d ago

Why wouldn't you? Don't like to pay cheaper for something you uses/enjoy. Monthly for those who are not sure or are casual players that want to try out before committing.

raWfodog209d ago (Edited 209d ago )

Yeah it would make no financial sense for me to pay $10 per month when the yearly for Essentials is $80 per year. But even better, I’m good through to the end of 2025 since I already stacked subs through discount offers.

Profchaos209d ago

Because those 12 month subscriptions typically go on sale twice a year with around 30 percent off and they stack.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 209d ago
ChasterMies210d ago

The cost for the Essential Plan is now $80/year for the annual plan or $120/year for the $10/month plan.

Abear21210d ago

Should be on sale in a week, the only way this is worth the money

potedude209d ago

I have around 1600 days banked of PS Plus Extra. Keeping buying them on Black Friday or when they're on special. Screw paying full price!

BeHunted210d ago (Edited 210d ago )

Xbox Live 12 months subscription is about £34.79 on Cdkeys. $80 seems expensive.

It's works out cheaper buying games when they're on sale, expecially on Summer Sales, Black Friday etc...

Einhander1972209d ago (Edited 209d ago )

Ok, I have to point out that I checked Deals with Gold which is 52 games and most of the games are around50% off. Which costs $60 and no longer gives monthly games or anything you can keep.

I went onto my PS5 and the PlayStation Plus deals includes 552 games, and while that's too many to average out, the majority are over 60% off.

PlayStation Plus deals are always there every month, and offer discounts on everything including pre-release games, for example I Spider-Man 2 was discounted to just over $60 if you preordered and had Plus.

fxa5209210d ago

I opted completely out of PS Plus after the 33% price rip off by Sony. I am sticking with single player games.

Not only that Sony is losing my PS Plus sub, but i will also stop buying online games such as COD and FIFA, which I used to buy on yearly basis.

Let you wallet speak gamers, dont let Sony rip you off with the 33% increase in prices.

OptimusDK210d ago

I did the same. There is only one way to not reward this.

Abear21210d ago

Agreed but I’ll probably bite if they drop the price for Black Friday

Barlos210d ago

Same. My PS+ expired a couple of weeks back and I haven't renewed and have no intention of doing so. I only really used it for the odd game of GT7 and Quake 2 online but that's about it.

thorstein210d ago

I buy it on Black Friday even though my PS anniversary is December. I basically pay the old price now.

210d ago
NotoriousWhiz209d ago (Edited 209d ago )

For those of you not interested in playing with friends, this is fine. For those of us that do want to play with friends, we sign up for PS+ because we have to, because we want to play with friends.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 209d ago
anast209d ago

Try to make sense, at minimum.

210d ago Replies(2)
EvertonFC210d ago

There is always a bf, Xmas or January sale ps plus sub, just wait for those every year is what I do.
I've never paid full price for PS Plus.
I don't know what's so hard to fathom.

outsider1624210d ago

I always do that during Xmas or January sale. I always get it at 50% off.
From 60$ to 30$. Now that they incresed it to 80%. It'll probably be at 40$ (@50% off)

Show all comments (57)
260°

PS5 Fans Beg Sony for a More Fulfilling Livestream in the Aftermath of Xbox Show

Perhaps unsurprisingly, PlayStation’s social media is already being peppered by disgruntled fans, desperate for the format holder to step up its livestream game.

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
Valkyrie20241h ago

I think there will be one when they will be revealing the PS5 Pro imo. Also you have to remember that all the games at the Xbox showcase were multiplatform whether they were Xbox/PC only (still considered Multiplatform) or later revealed to be releasing on PS5 too.

Valkyrie20241h ago

Also not once was it said before or after any of the trailers in the showcase was the word Exclusive or console exclusive used and that is pretty telling imo.

1h ago
purple1011h ago

Xbox Game Showcase Games Content/Games Coming To PlayStation:

-Call Of Duty Black Ops 6
-Doom Dark Ages
-Dragon Age The Veilguard
-Fallout 76 Skyline Valley
-Expedition 33
-Metal Gear Solid Delta Snake Eater
-Sea Of Thieves Season 13
-Flintlock The Siege Of Dawn
-Diablo IV Vessel Of Hatred
-The Elder Scrolls Online Gold Road
-Life Is Strange Double Exposure
-Mecha Break
-WUCHANG Fallen Feathers
-Atomfall
-Assassin's Creed Shadows

1h ago
gold_drake53m ago(Edited 53m ago)

yeaaa this also.

but to be fair, they could have easily shown off some of them

42m ago
crazyCoconuts4m ago

Gotta wonder if any of the others will come to PS as well... Wish we'd know what their strategy is at this point

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4m ago
-Foxtrot1h ago

They need to buck their ideas up completely and rethink their State of Play shows in my opinion. If it's because they have nothing to show as any announcement will be years off then fair enough but then the question is why are they in that position.

Sony knew when Microsoft bought all these studios that eventually Microsoft would harvest all these games that were in development at the time of their purchase. They have had plenty time to prepare yet it just feels nothing has really come out of it so far. In the years since Microsoft bought Obsidian Entertainment, Ninja Theory and Double Fine around 2018/2019 it was clear they were ramping things up which they were as they went onto buy Zenimax in 2020 and then a couple years after Activision, two publishers with so many studios and IPs under their belt.

In that time Sony has decided to buy studios like Bungie, Haven and Firewalk Studios which are all GaaS related and haven't really put anything together to counter the new IPs Microsoft had acquired.

Everything from Sony at the minute is either third party games or this heavy PC focused most PS5 fans don't really care about.

However. If I was to be fair though and look at the other side of the coin at least they haven't announced games recently that could still be years away which is something that people seem to be giving Microsoft a pass with.

Yes the Microsoft show was great and hopefully it's given Sony a kick up the backside but most of the games shown like Fable, State of Decay 3, Avowed, Indiana Jones and the Great Circle, Perfect Dark and South of Midnight were games that were announced last year and before. The only brand new thing that really surprised me that's an exclusive was Gears of War.

Sony need to start going back to what made many people buy their consoles from the beginning, their first party games you couldn't get anywhere else with great single player experiences. Not every games needs to be AAA, they need to find a good balance.

Flakegriffin7m ago

This is the most accurate statement ever.

Christopher1h ago

Xbox definitely had better third-party showings, but I really just want Sony to start showing us first-party titles. There's got to be something new they can show us, right? And it can't just be one or two games, it has to be at least half a dozen.

I mean, at least we know Bungie isn't sitting idly by and Insomniac is doing Wolverine. But ND just cancelled their MP TLoU plans, what are they working on now let alone the second studio they have that's been quiet for 4 years now? Sucker Punch? Bend?

Did all the big studios have ideas that were canned and start working on new things? Was Jim Ryan that bad of a CEO that they veered that far off the path and are working their way back to it?

-Foxtrot41m ago(Edited 36m ago)

"I mean, at least we know Bungie isn't sitting idly by and Insomniac is doing Wolverine. But ND just cancelled their MP TLoU plans, what are they working on now let alone the second studio they have that's been quiet for 4 years now? Sucker Punch? Bend? "

If they hypothetically announce something like Ghost of Tsushima 2 and give us a release date within 6-8 months of it's announcement, something like what Bethesda did with Fallout 4s reveal at E3 then I would TOTALLY get their plans and why they've been so quiet. However if they end up announcing their titles and the release dates are still so far off despite being so quiet for years then I'm at a complete loss with it.

Having a change in strategy and only wanting to announce games when they know they are 100% going to release the same year is the only thing that will make sense and something I can totally get behind.

"Was Jim Ryan that bad of a CEO that they veered that far off the path and are working their way back to it?"

I'm still convinced his GaaS plans are why he took early retirement, after seeing issues with NaughtyDog being put on something they weren't comfortable with I think higher ups knew putting all their existing studios on these games was a bad move. Obviously they've had to see some of them out until the end but I think he's why some of these studios are so quiet because they've wasted time on live service stuff that just wasn't working.

31m agoReplies(1)
FanboyFeats24m ago(Edited 20m ago)

Better third party?

Is this clown really trying to say concord and Lego horizon looked better than Indiana, avowed, perfect dark, gears, COD BO6?

It’s killing him that Xbox beat out PS.

But remember guys, he isn’t a Sony fanboy!

😂

Resign already! N4G is better without you!

ocelot072m ago(Edited 2m ago)

"Is this clown really trying to say concord and Lego horizon looked better than Indiana, avowed, perfect dark, gears, COD BO6?"

Lady's and gentlemen, I give you the clown on his alt account haha.

Is this clown really saying people are not allowed preferences and opinions?

I can say honestly that out of all the games announced in the last week or so Astro Bots is the game I I'm most excited to play. Doesn't mean Microsoft didn't have a good showcase it's just called having a preference.

P_Bomb25m ago

The time for silence is over. At least, I’m over it. Open the first party floodgates, while I’m still alive lol!

ocelot0714m ago

Apparently they have one in September.

Show all comments (23)
70°

MOZA Racing revolutionise racing with the MOZA R3 Wheel and Pedals, Designed for Xbox

Looking for a new racing wheel or sim set-up? MOZA Racing have got your back as they look to revolutionise the racing scene with their MOZA R3 Wheel and Pedals. And the best bit? It's Designed for Xbox!

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
160°

Meta Is Doing With VR What Apple And Sony Have Struggled To Do

Shaz from GL: "Where Sony is ramping down support for PSVR2, and Apple are reconsidering their future with the Vision Pro, Meta and the Quest 3 continue to shine."

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
ApocalypseShadow4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

I'll admit that Facebook is doing more for VR than others. But they also have blown over 50 billion dollars so far and growing in R&D, building the meta verse, buying up exclusives and underpricing their products below build price, to kill competition in the stand alone space. Sony and Valve aren't willing to go into the red at an unheard level to capture the market. We know Sony could build a stand alone device that beats Quest just by the features in PS VR 2 and the new stand alone headset they built. But the new Sony would rather build a device they can profit from day one.

But, Sony so far has profited on hardware and on software. They just don't seem willing to spend the money on marketing, selling under build price or spending millions on making in-house VR exclusives for PS VR 2. Which sucks big time. They're just letting 3rd parties and indies run the show.

Article also doesn't mention that Apple's headset is more a developers product than a mass market item. To say they are looking into making a cheaper one for the next iteration is speaking the obvious. Duh. That was always the case. Build something the public sees as quality not can't afford, then make another that the masses can afford. TVs, cars, cellphones etc all were once expensive. Now, they're cheap to buy with many options to choose from. And Apple isn't even selling VP as a VR headset. I'm well aware that Apple's true intentions is to build a device that pushes AR with VR as an option. Not build a VR device. Because they know eventually that they want to replace the cellphone with AR glasses or an AR headset. If they cared about games, they would have launched as a gaming device.

Lastly, Facebook launched Quest 3 last year. But has not mentioned how many they sold up to this point. Why is that? Besides Quest 2 selling more by being cheap, the market can't move forward until they start selling more Quest 3 headsets than 2. Maybe the new exclusive Batman and Hitman games will help. But we'll see.

Abnor_Mal3d ago

Not dead, but definitely on life support from the third party devs and PC crowd who may just purchase the headset.

Although I saw someone say that the module adapter will no allow haptics and adaptive triggers to work, but I don’t know if any of that is true.

Babadook73d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Nope. Not yet.

It’s tough to say what its future will bring. There is still decent support. It seems to have sold decently too. Sony seems absent in a direct way though.

Jingsing3d ago

The issues Meta have is they are Meta. I'll never buy a Meta product, Every Quest headset they release is always a case of it's not quite there from a hardware perspective and the game content is mostly from indie devs. Selling what should be a AAA experience with C tier games is a non starter.

helicoptergirl4d ago

Meta is also Billions and billions in the hole in regards to VR. If Sony were to do what Meta has done, they'd be bankrupt

ChasterMies4d ago

Meta is losing billions on a business that theh will probably walk away from like they did the Facebook phone. Temper your expectations of your investments in Meta’s hardware.

franwex3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

I do wish Sony would release more for PSVR. It’s a neat product, but they don’t support it much. It may have the same fate as the Vita.

I know it’s two completely separate products as Vita was stand alone, and PSVR is a companion to PS consoles. More 1st party support would really boost it though.

InUrFoxHole3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

They are done supporting it. They're relying on pc to do it for them. Sony even paused production because it's not selling

Abnor_Mal3d ago

They paused production to get rid of inventory, doesn’t mean the headset isn’t selling, it’s just not selling as fast as Sony thought it would. But with their half assed approach to the headset and lack of first party games, it’s not surprising, saddening, but not surprising.

Meta out here buying up all the exclusives, this is the only part of the gaming market where I feel exclusives should not be a thing since the market is “still in its infancy”.

InUrFoxHole3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

That's exactly what it means... you think people are buying a headset with min support for the price of the console? It's done man. Sadly because like the vita the tech is good and deserved better

Chocoburger3d ago

I own PS VR 1, and it is packed with tons of games to pick from in nearly every genre you could think of. While the technology may be rudimentary compared to newer headsets, it still works, and is fun to play, which is what matters most.

Its a shame that PS VR 2 is having such a slow start, because the tech behind it is brilliant. Its currently on sale for $100 USD off, that needs to be a permanent price drop.

We need more first party games on PS VR 2, the fact that Jim Ryan shut down Sony London Studios right before he left was moronic, they should have been upgrading their hit game Blood & Truth for PS VR 2! What a stupid decision.