470°

PlayStation boss claims publishers "unanimously do not like Game Pass"

Game Pass is "value destructive," according to Jim Ryan

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
darthv72350d ago

....and yet they keep on agreeing to the terms and releasing their games on it.

lelo2play350d ago

I don't think Microsoft forces 3rd party games to be on Gamepass. It's optional.

Obscure_Observer350d ago

"I don't think Microsoft forces 3rd party games to be on Gamepass. It's optional."

He´s a hypocrite. Publishers don´t like Gamepass but Sony has been releasing MLB games on that service three years in a row.

If publishers don´t like Gamepass one can only wonder what those publishers think about the new PS Plus. Smh.

Christopher350d ago

***but Sony has been releasing MLB games on that service three years in a row.***

That's not a Sony decision. MLB Advanced Media publishes the game on Xbox, not SIE.

4Sh0w349d ago (Edited 349d ago )

Classic case of downplay what you can't compete with:

#1 Gamepass is the best deal in gaming FOR THE CONSUMER. Beyond that who cares what a greedy exec that prefers me paying status qou $70 per title thinks of it.

#2 Why would a pub or dev be talking to Jim Ryan about Gamepass negatively, ps doesn't have it??? so either he's lying or that pub/dev is biased because if they truly believe that there's no gun to their head forcing them to sign a Gamepass deal. Plus the pubs/devs who signed Gamepass deals say differently.

#3 Plenty here don't understand how Gamepass works. They act as if the *expected lower per unit sales means devs don't get paid. Gamepass is structured so that a dev gets a garuanteed check up front, sort of like in house studios or exclusive deals to pay them for putting the game on Gameass because by default its going to sell LESS copies because subscribers/gamers don't *need to buy it. That's literally the business model of every sub service & it works well for all parties involved. If a pub/dev thinks or projects their gonna sell, sell, sell a shiiii ton, and thus expects huge profits that a Gamepass deal can't compete with= simple skip Gamepass and there you have it the option of a status qou game release....me I'll keep saving $300+ a year on Gamepas, thankyou.

Eonjay349d ago

@4Sh0w

The best deal for the customer is PlayStation Plus. Just by the numbers. You can have all of the subjective opinions you want though of course but objectively, you can not beat the value of PlayStation Plus Extra and Premium.

shinoff2183349d ago (Edited 349d ago )

It's more that game sales on xbox are done by alot. Publishers don't like it cause I eats up actual game sales.

Obscure

I guess you could say that to an point but some reason or the other sonys base is still buying games.

4Sh0w349d ago

Eonjay

I hear you but this is why I disagree with that:

Now while the games themselves is of course are subjective, and we can quibble over ps having over 500 vs xbox over 400, https://www.makeuseof.com/p... or quibble over the delivery because I learned ps3 games are streaming only, seamless pc experience, etc, etc, BUT Gamepass wins hands down because it is OBJECTIVELY a better service when you can play *new exclusive content day one, I mean seriously ps plus is a service that you essentially pay to play a back catalogue of games, the best of which if you're a ps fan you've already purchased (like Gamepass) BUT if you want to play ps5 games day one like most every ps fan does or anytime soon you gotta fork over $70. This effectively means in the most practical terms, like 90% of the ps5 owners I know that, they really don't save at all on games with the new tiered ps plus service because sony knows nobody buys a ps5 to wait a year or more later to play ps5 new exclusive releases= That is just too, too big a difference to be overlooked and its objectively worst from the consumer point of view.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 349d ago
blackblades350d ago

Its possible to release on it and still not liking it on it. Then theres other that dont release on game pass at all. I know team ninja likes it and willing to keep doing it. Just for getting the game into more hands I guess like wo long and maybe sell the dlc to them for the $

Lexreborn2349d ago

Unfortunately, wo longs sales figures for a multi platform release with Wo long were pretty flat. And, in turn the high number of Gamepass users actually cut into a sizable chunk of profits.

It had 3.8 million ppl try it on Gamepass and a million sales last reported. And we know that MS probably gave a 3rd of the profit they would normally get for a multi-platform release that is niche. That’s enough to kill hope for a sequel to me, but I could also be wrong so who knows.

Yi-Long349d ago

@Lex; I assume once Wo Long leaves GP, those who play and enjoy the game will probably pick it up in a sale. (not everyone obviously, but those who are big fans)

I only played and enjoyed the demo. I don’t believe it’s as good as Nioh 2, but I plan on picking it up once it drops down to 20 bucks orso. Also waiting on what they’ll be doing with the DLC, so might wait/go for a Complete Edition if that ever comes out.

Profchaos349d ago

@lex true however the sales potentially could have been better once a game launches on a sub service it sends a clear message to players on other platforms the game isn't worth full RRP so hold off until it's available for free on your platform

349d ago
JEECE349d ago

Sigh. A lot of musicians hate Spotify and feel that it undervalues their music, but almost all of them still agree to its terms and keep releasing their music there because they know that in a world where it exists, most of them will be unable to sell their music in the old way.

Videogames are not quite to that point, but with certain prominent exceptions, publishers are faced with the prospect of not being able to sell their games on Xbox in the same quantities they used to, relative to the install base, thanks to GP. Certain titles now are just perceived as "Gamepass games," and if they aren't on there, people on Xbox just won't really play them. So those publishers of course want to take the guaranteed payment to go on Gamepass, rather than release a la carte and sell a small number of copies.

AngainorG7X349d ago (Edited 349d ago )

Gamepass is his fear that’s why all this negativity

neutralgamer1992349d ago

So now Xbox fans know more than PlayStation ceo? Didn’t take two ceo said the same thing multiple times?

Death

You think publishers are doing it out of love for GP or huge upfront money from MS?

MLB the show is a special case. And the game isn’t published by Sony on Xbox yet and this is a big yet Sony gets to keep all the profit from MLB on Xbox

4sh0w

I guess publishers can speak with you instead because take two ceo himself said GP wasn’t a viable option for AAA new games

S2Killinit349d ago (Edited 349d ago )

@Darth
Yeah possibly because they have no other choice that to cooperate with one of the major platforms.

@4show
No it is not the best deal. There is an argument that gamers are paying more for the same amount of gaming. Not to mention the recent price increase, as well as future price increases.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 349d ago
Christopher350d ago

Unanimously is a bit strong. There are definitely genres where GamePass is perfect, especially for GaaS games with an initial cost. I mean, MLB The Show is a prime example of a game perfect for GamePass.

StarkR3ality349d ago

Just using your comment as an example Chris, but anyone praising Sony they get nothing but likes. Be critical of them even if it's level headed and objectively well thought out, you get downvoted to hell.

Just shows who this site belongs to.

Christopher349d ago

Have more pride in your ideas than what others think of them. Likes and disagrees are meaningless in the end. I've presented nothing but facts and been disliked heavily by Xbox fans. That's just how people are in general.

northpaws349d ago

Justing using your comment as an example StarkR3ality, you have 6 likes and 7 dislikes, I don't see how it is "belongs" to anyone.

It is just XBox gamers thinks whenever XBox articles got dislikes, it is only because people are biased, cannot accept the fact that MS/XBox/Gamepass/Phil just in general did many things wrong and not doing something healthy for the industry.

I never heard a PS gamers address Jim as."Lord Jim", but I heard a lot of XBox gamers said "Lord Phil", that's how what kind of delusional world some of them are living in.

shinoff2183349d ago

Stark

There's not much to say , you can't limit the site. Like when you enter it ask you a question xbox or Sony , you click Sony and it tells you cannot enter already full. Is that what your looking for ?

The site is full of Sonys fanbase because it's got more fans worldwide (worlde wide web) by a large margin.

Petebloodyonion349d ago

@Stark
Why bother with the like and dislike or what crowd the site attracts?
Heck if you prefer an" Xbox Crowd" then go on Destin.
Personally, the only benefit I see from the "like/dislike" is it shows if your comment makes ppl react or have them read it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 349d ago
shinoff2183349d ago

Damn did MLB the show turn into a gaas, game. I haven't played it since like 18 or so

Christopher349d ago

It's more about ongoing mtx options. It's not required but it can definitely help and a good number of people do it.

JackBNimble349d ago

The multiplayer always was gass, to have a successful team online you pretty much need to spend money.

I don't play MLB but my brother did , and put in over $1k to build his team. The worst thing about it is Sony shuts down the servers shortly after the next additions are released so everything you put into your team is gone.

To be honest I'm not sure how long they keep the servers up , but I don't think it's longer then 2 years.

King_Noctis349d ago

There are multiple genre and different type of games on Gamepass. To say just one or two type of game is perfect for Gamepass is just ignorant imo.

zsquaresoff350d ago

No self-respecting game developer wants to give their hard work away on a sub-standard subscription services, basically created for the cheap xbox gamers who wait for hand-outs on gamepass.

lelo2play350d ago

I'm sure actors like Ryan Reynolds, Chris Hemsworth, and many others, are crying their a*se off from the millions they make by releasing their movies directly to subscription services like Netflix or Amazon.

Nitrowolf2350d ago

Those are individuals though, who were going to be hired and a pay a ton of money for whatever project they did. Plus a bulk of those movies have been by the very platform itself, so yes why would Amazon complain about releasing a Amazon studio movie day one.

Also, How many of the people outside of the big actors are actually making bank. It's not like we didn't just see a bunch of layoffs, and now strikes going on

shinoff2183350d ago

That doesn't even make sense. Lol. Pretty sure the Ryan reynold movies on Netflix were Netflix films lol. He got paid to act in it. They were made by Netflix. Poor analogy poor try

lelo2play350d ago (Edited 350d ago )

@shinoff2183
Do you realize how many movies and TV series are on Netflix, that are not made by Netflix?

@Nitrowolf2
Imagine Ryan Reynolds, Chris Hemsworth and their AAA movies. Netflix finds it justifiable to pay them several millions because they bring new subscriptions to Netflix.
Now imagine AAA games... Don't you think AAA exclusive games will bring new subscriptions to a service? If you don't want the service, there is always the option to purchase the game.

Mr_cheese349d ago

On the topic of amazon, even they see potential outside of their streaming platform.

"AIR" is a great movie that ended up being a lot better than they had planned so instead of going straight to prime, they gave it a short cinema run and then moved it to prime.

jwillj2k4349d ago Show
northpaws349d ago

@lelo2play, it would be the movie studios who would cry, not the actors, they got paid already, it is just like how individual developer of a game doesn't care whether a game is on gamepass or not, because they are salary based.

If Netflix, Prime Video, Disney Plus....etc are indeed better platforms, you wouldn't see any new movies on the theatre. Even Disney releases their new movies few months after it is on the theatre, why? Because they don't want to miss out the initial sales, which is similar to what Sony is doing, at the end of they day, if Disney Plus announce that they will release every single one of their new movies on Disney Plus day one, do you seriously think that wouldn't affect their overall revenue? I am sure the total subscription users would go up, but overall revenue would go down.

zeuanimals349d ago

Sure, actors who have contracts for millions probably aren't complaining, but the writers going on strike literally are.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 349d ago
4Sh0w349d ago (Edited 349d ago )

"No self-respecting game developer wants to give their hard work away"

-Yeah because all those games on Gamepass are the result of developers suddenly saying "Hey Phil we're charging Sony full price but for you our games are on the house!"

-AND you ps guys calling gamers cheap for taking a great deal that saves them money is ironic coming from a fanbase that whines frequently about digital vs physical because it cuts off the used game market...bawhahaa, that's *rich

lmfao, I love it...and lol 20 people agreed with you so far demonstrating how pointless votes are on this site. [Snapshot so I can share laugh at this later]

shinoff2183349d ago

4show

Your second point about digital vs physical is way way off base. Most of us complaining are complaining due to preservation. I want physical cause in 10 years 20 years I still like to play older games. Sure some argue due to used games but your missing the main point. Also ms has been shoving digital down it's bases throat for years I understand xbox fans not caring , even going as far as arguing against physical like it affects them personally

4Sh0w349d ago (Edited 349d ago )

shinoff2183

Once again, you trying to re-write history, I'm sure some care about preservation but by and large the outcry dwarfs that concern in favor of "used games"= I can't sell it to get a discount off of a new game. Here just recently take a look:

Abear21 now there’s no way to recoup part of that $70
Foxtrot “and now there’s no way to recoup part of that $70 you paid” This
TheColbertinator No used copies. Very clever.
https://n4g.com/news/255692...
franwex It is, but at least you can still buy used or sell used.
Zhipp you really don't lose anything buying from steam as opposed to buying a single-use disc from a retailer.
https://n4g.com/news/255711...

-No comments about it was bad because they wanted to preserve their physical copy. The funny thing is this news piece was wrong it was "mysteriously deleted" because Starfield does have physical discs, all that flamebait for nothing....this is how the industry is trending and if you look at FF16 with physical sales down 74% I guess what even the vast majority of ps fans *outside of sonyn4g of course like the convenience of digital too....I'll wait where you show me a thread where its mostly about preserving games, then I'll show you a ton more *past crying about "used games"...bu, bu OMG microsoft! Seems like all you do, worst you're just flat out wrong about things that can easily be proven BS.

StarkR3ality349d ago

They're not forced to do it though.. Phil himself said if they don't want to they don't have to.

Are we forgetting PS plus exists? It's like complaining someone's fat when you yourself are obese, doesn't make sense when you're doing the same thing 😂

Tacoboto349d ago

"give their hard work away on a sub-standard subscription services"

Except that Microsoft pays them an amount upfront and then payments based on usage.

"basically created for the cheap xbox gamers who wait for hand-outs on gamepass"

*Checks out comment history* Wow you really do crawl out of your hole to obsessively attack Xbox or Phil Spencer. Comes off very similar to mentally unstable Twitter rants.

darthv72349d ago

Tell that to Big Twelve Studios / Annapurna as they did exactly that for their new game Stray when it came to PS+ on day one. Or is it okay when Sony does it and not MS...?

There are plenty who like using these sub services to garner exposure for their wares. not only do they get upfront payment for putting their game on them... they also get a commission for units downloaded / engaged.

King_Noctis349d ago

Some people on this site are just a bunch of hypocrites.

JackBNimble349d ago

And what do you have to say about extra and premium?
Is your only argument "day 1" ? And if Sony starts doing day 1 I'm sure you and the sonyboys will move the goalposts just like you all do about sony games going to pc.

You all said it will never happen and down played xbox exclusives because they also ended up on pc.

By the way , I bought a month of extra at the end of my subscription and I can say it's an absolute garbage service with mostly cheap shitty games and only a handful worth playing.

King_Noctis349d ago (Edited 349d ago )

So why is it that companies like EA, Capcom, and Atlus keep putting their games on Gamepass?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 349d ago
XiNatsuDragnel350d ago

I agree with Jim Ryan with the caveat it works with indies and niche genres.

BriBri349d ago (Edited 349d ago )

For indie Devs the problem is there's no transparency on what a good deal looks like for having your game on gamepass... If you worked 2 or 3 years making a game with a squirt small team would you accept 10k from MS?

How about 20k? How many sales will you lose (or possibly gain from three exposure)? What did similar devs with similar games get paid?

Nobody knows and therein lies the problem.

DarkZane349d ago

If I was an indie dev, I would need at least 2 more 0s to the number you just said, so $2,000,000. I am pretty sure an indie game can easily sell 1000 copies at $25-30 and make that 20k easily. Successful ones like Stardew valley would make a ton of money and refusing the check MS gives is a good idea.

Big publishers would laugh at Microsoft unless Microsoft offered them tens of millions. The money they would make from sales, dlc/microtransactions are a lot higher than whatever scrap Microsoft would give them.

BriBri349d ago (Edited 349d ago )

@darkzane Indie Devs don't take all that money though, their publisher takes between 20 and 50% and then sales tax and corporation tax are also deducted. Most indie games fail to sell above 1000 copies and Stardew Valley is a unicorn. Before it was released nobody would have had expectations of it being so popular.

Indie games that make over 1 million dollars for their developers are extremely rare, I would guess at less than 0.01%

I've worked on successful indie titles that made less than 250k total and that was twice as high as their publisher's and developer's expectations. Believe me, a million dollars is a pipe dream in such a crowded market place and game pass is not helping the vast majority.

ApocalypseShadow349d ago

Smaller publishers don't mind because it's a handout that minimizes their risk. Getting a check from Microsoft is like welfare for gaming. Larger publishers like Take Two have voiced their opinions that it's detrimental to their sales. A game like GTA would increase subscriptions for Microsoft but be a losing proposition for profits. And Microsoft isn't going to pay Rockstar millions in potential sales for the game to be on game pass.

The majority of big publishers and developers would not release a multi million developed game on game pass. And they haven't. Only Microsoft because it's their service.

BriBri349d ago

Sadly if subscription services ever replace one off purchases then we'll see budgets for games drop drastically and gaming will become a homogenous borefest.

ApocalypseShadow349d ago

Correct.

And there's a fan base that seems gung ho in funding the game industry demise. Just like they were fine paying for online.

Show all comments (78)
410°

Phil Spencer Confirms More Xbox Games Will Come To Other Platforms

Phil Spencer confirms that more Xbox games will be available on new platforms during a new interview after Xbox Showcase.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
shadowT2d ago

Starfield, Hellblade 2 and Halo...

Cacabunga1d 22h ago

Perfect Dark and Gears and the game with the girl and the huge croc

Eonjay1d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

That last article where everyone is having a baby over a showcase is ridiculous because the Xbox showcase was really a multiplat showcase...

MrBaskerville1d 20h ago (Edited 1d 20h ago )

@Eonjay

I think people are just happy that they gave us something to be excited about. It being multiplatform stuff makes it even easier to rejoice as everyone gets to enjoy it. This show was really what Summerfest should have been, just with less of an xbox focus obviously.

These shows are fun to watch because we get to be excited about new games.

With that said, I imagine Perfect Dark, South of Midnight and perhaps state of decay 1-3 would be possible candidates for ps5. Doom might also be a given. They didn't really try to hammer home its exclusivity.

Eonjay1d 20h ago

@MrBaskerville

Totally agree. I did enjoy SGF though unlike the majority. My personal taste is more eclectic than most. I found stuff at each show to enjoy.

Cacabunga1d 18h ago

Eon

Come on man, yes it’s multi but as a PS5 and switch owner i enjoyed the show yesterday far more than i did with State of Play.
Most announcements came from nowhere to me, and MGS was a massive surprise to finally see some gameplay.
I’m excited to play some of the games on PS5 one day!

Like i said earlier credit where credit is due.

CobraKai1d 15h ago

@Eon
That’s something i have to get used to. I have to see it more like when Ubisoft does their showcase vs Days of Play or Nintendo Direct.

I wished some of these games stayed exclusive. Make it seem like my Series X was a more worthwhile purchase. I use it more for backwards compatibility now so it’s not entirely bad.

fr0sty1d 11h ago

Where y'at Obscure? https://ibb.co/qWLK4Zp

You sure have been quiet lately! https://ibb.co/Xk7Y5qj

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1d 11h ago
MajorLazer1d 20h ago

Elder Scrolls 6 for PS5, please. Also I'd like the Forza franchise, I owned all four of the OG motorsport titles and FM4 is still one of, if not my favourite racing game ever.

VenomUK1d 10h ago

NO. This can’t be true. The Xbox influencers on X/Twitter & YouTube who got angry at Phil Spencer then forgave him, guaranteed no other Microsoft games would come to PS5.

@ColtEastwood
@DestinLegarie
@SnapBlastPlay
@MrMattyPlays
@RyanMcCaffrey

ocelot071d 8h ago

@VenomUK

I have seen that colteastwood on x. If you look ul embarrassment in the dictionary a picture of him as a example would be there.

I think people deservidly give obscure a bashing on here. But Colteastwood makes Obscure look like a PS5 cultist haha.

RaiderNation1d 20h ago

The two Ori games as well. I have a feeling those will get announced too.

RaidenBlack1d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

Why forget Sunset Overdrive?
Also there are older titles like Dead Rising 3 and Ryse Son of Rome.

gigoran81d 18h ago

they can keep their starfield. yawn

RaidenBlack1d 10h ago

Single-player Bethesda games usually gets better over time with future patches and DLCs

just_looken1d 7h ago

Why not xbox is the new sega a direction they should go towards.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1d 7h ago
italiangamer2d ago

Satya Nadella wants that PlayStation's money, Phil Spinster now is as relevant as MySpace

purple1012d ago

Phil Spencer (February 15th 2024):

"Looking forward so 4 games no promise beyond that, so if you're on those other platforms and you see these four games coming please don't take it as some signal that everything is coming, it's not."

Phill Spencer (June 9th 2024)

'Our commitment to our Xbox customers is you're going to get the opportunity to buy or subscribe to the game, we're going to support the game on other screens. And you are going to see more of our games on more platforms and we just see that as benefit that the franchises we're building and we see that from players and the players love to be able to play'

Jingsing2d ago

I won't be buying any Xbox games anyway, Not going to subsidize their vision of changing gaming industry into streaming everything via a netflix subscription and they are the only choice. Remember when it comes to Microsoft "It's us or no one" You can't complain after they have taken over either.

Shane Kim1d 23h ago

Especially when they "give" it to Xbox users and expect playstation users to pay full price for it. Like second class citizens.

Ironmike1d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

U won't be missed

Einhander19721d 11h ago

Ironmike

He will be missed, if he wasn't going to be missed Microsoft wouldn't be putting the games on PlayStation.

Make up your mind xbox guys, do you want to brag about Sea of Thieves success on PlayStation or do you want to cry about all your games going to PlayStation?

neomahi1d 22h ago

So, the benefit of having an Xbox is the option of a subscription service that's more like a buffet and not a deluxe plate. By staying loyal to Xbox means day 1 "free" games of your choice. Xbox is a service.

If rumors are true Xbox is going the 3DO route, Xbox is basically a PC. I mean, since PlayStation caved and started using off the shelf parts to "make it easier on developers", which is a croc as were how far into this console generation and the only devs to really support PS5, kind of, is Insomniac, San Diego, and Santa Monica and we've seen nothing from other devs. PS4 was supposed to be easier so PS5 would be even easier, right? But what've we really seen from Sony first party when it comes to PS5 games? Nothing, they're all still possible on PS4. Xbox? Same thing. Hi-Fi Rush was possible on at least Xbox One X (another lie from Xbox with No one gets left behind). Wow

MrBaskerville1d 20h ago

The original comment still stands, as long as they withold one or two series of games on xbox. Most could come but that still wouldn't mean that you could expect every game to arrive.

I suspect they want people to speculate, because then you don't know whether you should wait for a ps5 port or buy an xbox. Every game is Schroedingers exclusive.

Eonjay1d 19h ago

The interpretation of his first comment is not to expect more than these 4 games. The interpretation of the second comment is not to expect any game to be exclusive to Xbox.

His communication is all over the place. The fact that we can't decipher what he means is what people are complaing about. He should simply say, games are coming to PlayStation but we don't have a set policy that applies to all titles. Sometimes less is more.

Crows901d 19h ago

Well seeing as most Xbox games aren't worth it then it's probably fine

ChasterMies1d 15h ago

You can go back further to last year’s Kinda Funny interview with Phil. Microsoft has been slowly getting the Xbox user base ready for this. It’s like the parable about putting a frog into a pot of water and slowly turning up the heat. We will be at boiling when Halo comes to PlayStation.

gold_drake1d 15h ago

thats what i mean when i say hes a big bullshitter, girl doesnt rly know what hes talking about.

Yang_kai1d 5h ago

@purple lol that was a nice 720 doughnut, spin around for a month only to turn his back after the heat died down a bit

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1d 5h ago
-Foxtrot2d ago

There’s this small part of me which wants to think that the reason for Sony being so calm lately, especially after Microsoft’s showcase, is because they know this themselves, and they could know more than what’s being said publicly.

neomahi1d 22h ago

But, Lego Horizon is on the Switch. Why is Nintendo the only comfortable one here. They're not even on PC

Extermin8or3_1d 21h ago

Stupid take. The Lego game has been made by a Lego studio with advice on the IP from guerilla games. So part of the negotiations/requirements to make it happen will clearly have been done kind of multiplatform release.

LucasRuinedChildhood1d 17h ago (Edited 1d 17h ago )

That Lego game definitely exists to get kids to want to buy the proper Horizon games on PS5/PS4 (plus the multiplayer game). It's basically a giant advertisement. And kids love the Switch.

gold_drake1d 15h ago

nintendo is comfortable because their first party games sell in the tens of millions.

Extermin8or3_1d 21h ago

They definitely know more than is being said.

italiangamer1d 20h ago

Sony gives them the PS5's development kit so they know exactly which studios are making games for their consoles, or at least they can make an estimate based on the number of kits requested.

People just loves to talk but in a couple of days this showcase will be already forgotten, and by the way 90% of the stuff shown is multiplatform.

just_looken1d 7h ago

If they wanted xbox cash they would allow gamepass on PlayStation 5

Or just let microsoft buy sony as they could without any issues to there bottom line.

just_looken1d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

@hof

Are you still in your pre 2010 bubble?

Microsoft is a trillion dollar company without playstation sony would have gone bankrupt years ago that is just facts.

Microsoft q1 2024 made 23.3 billion
https://www.theverge.com/20...

sony all of last year without buying a entire company remember q1 2024 for mircosoft as in spring so sony all 12months made 85 billion.
https://www.macrotrends.net...

Microsoft after buying various companies including acrtivison made 212 billion for 2023
https://www.macrotrends.net...

Sony has not made any big purchases were Microsoft continues to do so in the ai space and gaming space even in the military.

So yes microsoft could easily buy sony and not bat a eye.

romulus231d 4h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

Their bottom line is irrelevant a Japanese company like Sony is not going to sell out to an American one so you can go ahead and let that little dream die. Kind of ridiculous to make comment such as yours in an article about the fact more xbox games are coming to other consoles, so who is it that's really hurting for cash here? It's rhetorical you don't have to answer, everyone already knows the answer.

just_looken1d 4h ago

@romulus23

Hurting for cash? blinder on maximum

There doing this to make more cash like the court leak that showed ms wanted gamepass on PlayStation to expand its customer base its all about making more cash.

Right now they are losing out on the full pie by having it on the playstation store but if they buy sony then ms get's 100% of the sale.

Also a japan company not being owned by america? LOL you really do not know what happened after the 40's do you

Or want happened to Toshiba recently

If they toss a bag of billions at sony japan they will accept it

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 4h ago
+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 4h ago
truthBombs1d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

It seems the idea is to have other platforms(PS and PC) offset the cost of game pass.

Xbox users get the games on game pass while others pay full price.

Gamepass seems to be Xbox's idea of "exclusive".

These guys are so inconsistent with their messaging. It's difficult to know exactly what they want to do with their games. I've stopped caring. I just focus on the games.

Hofstaderman1d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

This. When I saw day one on gamepass for every game I asked myself how will they make money? Answer: release on PS5 and get your sales from there and if lucky leople will sub on PC and XBOX. To ensure consistent subscriptions, space out the games. Either way MS has well and truly effed itself and Phil is a snake standing there pretending they all exclusives.

Show all comments (90)
30°

Interview on Indika with the Actress for Indika (Isabella Inchbald)

Interview with Isabella Inchbald, Actress for (Indika) in Indika which is an emotional, thought provoking journey through a nun's tale in questioning her religion.

Read Full Story >>
gamerheadquarters.com
480°

Mark Cerny: When making consoles, we're not trying to build low-cost PCs

PlayStation legend Mark Cerny discusses PS5, the challenges of making consoles, and his 42-year games industry career

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
darthv724d ago

Well... they used to design their own chips. Emotion Engine, Cell, RSX... when they switched to using X86 based chips is now more akin to low-mid cost PCs than before. It may not look like a PC but it pretty much is one. I'd bet it could do productivity stuff just fine if they allowed it to.

Cockney4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

I think series consoles are closer to pc than playstation seeing as they used the full suite of rdna 2 functions, didn't Sony strip a lot of that away to streamline their machine to be games focused? Its probably lacking in the office and productivity department, don't ask me what their custom chip does or doesn't do I just remember reading a lot about at the time, "rdna 1.5" was the call and yet what we see is pretty much level pegging as far as games go

GamerRN4d ago

Actually, stripping that away doesn't streamline, it hinders. Those features are actually helpful for gaming.

And they didn't strip them out, they just didn't work closely enough to be able to use them all since specs weren't finalized. Microsoft took an inside line on that one.

The reason why things are equal is because Xbox rarely has games designed on their box, they are usually designed on PS5 and ported over. So Xbox loses the power edge it has to making up the poor optimization.

It's ok, I think the lesson is you have to have a significant increase in power of 30 percent or more to be noticeable. And you have to sell enough to become the lead console for development otherwise you lose that power.

Einhander19724d ago

@GamerRN

PS5 outperforms series x because it uses custom chips to process things that on xbox need to be done by the GPU/CPU.

Things like Tempest Audio, and it's custom compression chip for SSD as well as having a separate chip for upscaling using checkerboard and presumably FSR runs off it as well.

OlderGamer173d ago

O please stop the myth that the seriesX mythe is the only console that is using the "the full suite or Rdna2" is already debunked al long time ago.

Number1TailzFan4d ago

The consoles use video ram as system ram as well since it's all shared, so nah.

4d ago
Christopher4d ago

You should probably read the whole quote and not just go based on the title.

darthv724d ago

I have read it... I dont think anyone can build a PC that equates to the performance of a PS5/Series X for anywhere close to their selling point. Not for a while at least.

And my comment about them switching from custom chips to more PC related just adds to that fact. whether people want to believe it or not... Sony has built a low cost (not spec, there is a difference) PC.

neutralgamer19924d ago (Edited 4d ago )

We need better games on these consoles. This generation has been such a huge letdown so far. Moving forward these current consoles will be supported even when newer Playstation and Xbox are in the market. AAA games have been so expensive to make and it seems fun is taken out of games and loot boxes take their place. Try playing a NBA 2k game it's like a casino with slot machines

just_looken4d ago

The cost of making these games is a scam

Nba 2k19 to 2k14 its like madden the budget to make went stupid high but the fundamental of the game and the game modes never changed.

Anything now even basic intersection construction is tens of millions but pre coivid few hundred grand.

2018 here is $400 landscaping now here is the pink slip to my car.

I swear the cost of everything is the same but there taking of that huge profit top for there own pockets.

Einhander19724d ago

The PS5 is incredibly customized.

The SSD, the Tempest Audio, the APU itself is a mix of cross generation AMD hardware in order to be more optimized for gaming and cost efficient.

The PS5 Pro also has features from cross generation AMD hardware with RT features from RDNA 4 plus it's own custom upscaler PSSR.

PlayStation 5 Pro features next-gen RDNA 4-based ray tracing engine, allows 2-3x faster RT
https://www.tweaktown.com/n...

PlayStation still uses custom designed hardware.

darthv724d ago

honestly... I dont know why some are taking offense to it being called a low cost PC. It really is... and low cost is a good thing. the article did not say low performance PC... that is totally different.

Einhander19724d ago

I'm saying they still are designing their own chips, they just use AMD templates.

The PS5 APU has features from RDNA 1 2 and 3, and the PS5 Pro adds features from RDNA 4, and the CPU is the same with it own customized features.

Then all of that is paired with other custom chips.

just_looken4d ago

What you all said my rig in my bedroom can do it no issues

That plastic box has a 2020 cpu with the pro using a 2021 6700

The custom is do to them being dirt cheap with a 2 prong power supply so they made a cpu/gpu combo chip aka apu.

Get a amd laptop with there new mobile chips get the same performance.

VincentVanBro4d ago

You’re right but downvoted for some reason.

just_looken4d ago

Its this site even the head admin banned me for awhile being but hurt over my "anti" sony comments.

n4g is pro sony nothing sony will ever do can change that.

Pyrofire954d ago (Edited 4d ago )

When you only look at the big flagship chips that seems true, but there's a lot going on in a modern console that takes advantage of being a dedicated kit. The various elements put into how the pipelines are connected shape the direction of games. End to end decryption and data streaming is something big that PC can only kind of do and with less certainty for example. Dedicated audio chip that rivals the main CPU in the PS4 is a big paradigm shift, devs used to fight for cores and audio was often last priority, whereas in traditional PC design the main CPU does both of those jobs of processing audio and decryption, while also performing all the other CPU based tasks.
It's not the custom silicon that used to be what made consoles but there's a lot more to consoles now. Data storage was not even a consideration and almost no RAM was on old consoles. Now there needs to be an enormous amount of SSD storage, and RAM to make these games tick with how much is demanded from them.

just_looken4d ago

@darth

Your comment show how many sony blindboys are on here

You are 100% correct but to add on the gamecube-ps3 also had a gpu/cpu combo back in the day unlike modern consoles that are just glorified tablets using apu/igpu's.

I miss the ps3 era start of ps4 era that sony was awesome

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3d ago
MIDGETonSTILTS174d ago

Yah, hence the majority of the PS5’s hardware investment going towards an SSD instead of a GPU.

There are countless custom pc gaming rigs out there, and I bet none of them took an SSD-centric approach to their design, like the ps5 did.

just_looken4d ago

LMAO wow sony blind boy's are mad in love

That is called direct storage windows 10 has had that for over 5 year's every computer with a nvme based ssd has had that tech for years.

https://www.thewindowsclub....

The ps6 will then have this new amazing tech you all will go crazy over resize bar
https://www.howtogeek.com/8...

But that tech has been out for 2 years all 40series gpu's intel gpus and the new amd cards have that tech.

There is nothing a ps5 can do over a 4+ year old computer 2019 rig want resize bar? get a cheap amd/intel card for half the cost of a ps5.

MIDGETonSTILTS173d ago

Clearly you did not watch Cerny’s first ps5 breakdown, so you don’t appreciate EVERYthing Cerny did to leverage their extremely fast SSD.

bigfish4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

I can see where he’s coming from re ps5 not just being a box with parts like a pc. They must also spend an awful lot on r & d just to design the thing so it has aesthetic appeal and typical Japanese with some sort of Philosopy behind the design. Would also think other factors around the custom airflow and the like would cost a lot given that it’s not a standard box shape

gold_drake4d ago

true, but the alternative is, relatively, a expensive ordeal.
unless you dont game at all ha.

mkis0074d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Just spent 2000k on a 4070ti super 7800x3d 1440p gaming pc. Honestly consoles will never be replaced at this wide a gap in price. I plan to get a ps5 pro too.

just_looken4d ago

@mk

You waisted 2 grand you mean

At 1440p a amd4 chipset with a 5600x3d combined with a 6750xt even a 6800 can push 1440p just a much for half the cost or less used/new and or sales.

I have a 75hhz monitor in my bedroom 1440p playing games maxed out spent around 1200cad but aio 5800x3d 32gb of ram and a 6750xt 28 or 30 inch monitor.

Every time i hear pc so expensive i just laugh you can spend less than $500 buy a used ebay rig fix it up or a office pc toss in a cheap low profile card.

Pyrofire954d ago

If you look into the hardware beyond just the CPU and GPU things start to look different, and there's plenty beyond just those two parts, those two parts even are modified to their own design in some degree.

Show all comments (55)