Jin_Sakai1386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

Launching without a heavy hitter is bad and launching in its current state is bad. Regardless it needed to be delayed.

-Foxtrot1386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

Gee. I can't imagine why it was delayed

If they released it in that state with so many people stating the obvious before launch the backlash would have been even worse.

Jin_Sakai1386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

Them even showing Halo Infinite in its current state was mind boggling. Did they not see the backlash coming?

-Foxtrot1386d ago

Maybe they thought Halo and the hype was enough to quiet the criticism.

The irony about it is if they didn't hype up the event, the beefy specs of the Xbox Series X and so on the backlash against the game probably wouldn't have been as bad.

RpgSama1386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

But DF said that it looked like trash because of the time of the day and that the game was in the shade!! Does this mean that what DF said was a lie?!!

Lol, I will never trust anything Alex Battaglia has to say again, he lost all credibility when he excused the game for looking like that by saying that obvious BS.

UltraNova1386d ago

Wise choice. MS made it impossible for 343 to deliver while restricted by last gen consoles with their non-stop "most powerful" campaign. Hopefully 1+ year will be enough to overhaul the graphics engine to meet the high expectations set by MS.

ABizzel11386d ago

They basically just handed PlayStation the generation...again.

I have mixed feelings about this, because they clearly needed this game at launch, as they have nothing else outside of multiplatform cross-gen 3rd party games. But it's clear the game needed more work, and since they're rumored to be going the Destiny-lite route with the campaign, they clearly needed to make sure they have the content there to support this type of GaaS launch.

I'm kind of surprised they didn't just delay the single-player and launch with Multiplayer.

bouzebbal1386d ago

Good decision.. Those graphics would have killed the franchise for good..

Mr Pumblechook1386d ago

HOLY-MOLY. What exclusive game will be the big draw for Xbox Series X at launch?

LordoftheCritics1386d ago

At least they stopped smoking whatever they were smoking.

Or did they?

darthv721386d ago

Im not goibg to lie.... this stings, but totally warranted. Id rather a full fleshed out game than a rushed experience that is patched in after the fact.

SullysCigar1386d ago

I mean it just looked SO bad.

This had to happen and I'm sure it's for the better for the game...but for the XSX? That's a different matter entirely, as they just lost the one hope people had of any excitement (assuming they didn't have a PC).

UltraNova1386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

ABizzel1,

Now MS has no choice but to wait and undercut Sony, if they want to stand a chance, and by that I mean lose to just 2:1 not 3 or 4:1.

The wait continues...

morganfell1386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

"Good decision.. Those graphics would have killed the franchise for good.."

Too late, 343 is going to take care of it even if Bonnie has to choke the Master Chief to death with her own hands. Remember, this was not only HALO Infinite we saw but 343's utterly supercharged game engine. People are overlooking that it wasn't just the demo that fell flat. The world also watched as the entire technology wing of the most powerful and well staffed studio in the MS arsenal blew up on the launch pad.

CaptainHenry9161386d ago

It was going to get bad reviews that's why

fr0sty1386d ago

"Maybe they thought Halo and the hype was enough to quiet the criticism."

Hit the nail on the head. "Slap the halo logo on it, they'd buy it if it was a turd." is their mindset.

FreeFallFrenzy1386d ago

They should have focused primarily on getting it optimized for the XSX, get it out at launch, then work on all the other versions for 2021. Not having the heavy hitter will hurt them at launch, but I'm sure people will still pick up an XSX once it comes out in better form.

ThinkThink1386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

duplicate

ThinkThink1386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

It's pretty clear that the delay was to make sure the game ships with Ray Tracing. Thought it was super weird that they announced it would be coming in a patch separately. That's what you get for trying to rush to a launch date. At least it will be a better game in the end, at least from a visual standpoint. I'm sure Covid didn't make any of this easier.

@Rpg, that's not what Digital Foundry said. They said that the lighting was flat, which it was... because ray tracing wasn't in yet.

morganfell1386d ago

“ They said that the lighting was flat, which it was... because ray tracing wasn't in yet.”

But a next gen game should look better than current gen games without ray tracing. Ray tracing should be a boost, not the foundation. People should stop isolating that quote from digital foundry and look at some of the other things they said about the horrible graphics in that demo. The sort of things that Ray tracing isn’t going to fix.

Unspoken1385d ago (Edited 1385d ago )

Why would launching without it be bad? The previous consoles launched with barely any titles. 🤣🤣

It's infinitely better they delay for a better product.

rainslacker1385d ago

They knew they had to show Halo. I mean, Sony had Spider-Man AND Horizon....two games which sold bucket loads. One which featured one of the most iconic super heroes of our time, the other a sequel to a much lauded new IP's this gen, which was visually stunning. Oh....and GT7.

MS had already used it's non game play trailer card for Halo, and people were expecting game play because of how they handled the show before. MS backed itself into a corner due to a series of events of their own making. If they didn't show game play, they'd be criticized for it. If they did, they'd be criticized for it. I can only assume they thought the brand recognition and popularity of the series would have people overlook the graphics enough they wouldn't have to deal with it too much. Given how their most loyal fan base has defended all the other crap they've put out this gen, I can see why they might be under the impression they can do whatever they want.

1Victor1385d ago

Microsoft have 3 generation in the gaming industry by now they should have known that holding games at the end of the generation and switching them as release day game while showing gameplay on PC don’t work 🤦🏿

+ Show (19) more repliesLast reply 1385d ago
caddytrek1386d ago

I honestly expected them to just shovel it onto gamepass say it's GaaS and call it a day.

gamer78041386d ago

It was going to be delayed before they even showed it. They were trying to appease critics of the previous show and show gameplay

sprinterboy1386d ago

That'll be like most series X games unfortunatly

caddytrek1386d ago

gamer7804

What?

Oh... you're throwing crap at the wall to see what kind of Microsoft based defense will work... Keep trying, that's too ridiculous.

moriarty18891386d ago

me too. watch this turn out to be another crackdown 3 with multiple delays and then a subpar final game.

RauLeCreuset1386d ago

@gamer7804

Where did you get that from, and when did you come upon this knowledge? You were all in on making excuses for the showcase build, so it's interesting that you're now stating it was going to be delayed before they showed it and laying blame for what was shown on trying to appease critics.

https://n4g.com/comments/re...
https://n4g.com/comments/re...
https://n4g.com/comments/re...
https://n4g.com/comments/re...
https://n4g.com/comments/re...
https://n4g.com/comments/re...

morganfell1386d ago

@RauLeCreuset,

The game was in mid-beta. There is nothing they did not know developmentally at the time the demo was shown that suddenly surfaced in the last few weeks except worldwide fan disappointment and criticism. Either they knew it was going to be delayed or they are lying about why it is now delayed. Pick one.

morganfell1386d ago

@ RauLeCreuset,

Addendum- not disagreeing with your takedown of him at all. You are spot on. He is only correct now in the same manner a broken clock is right twice a day. And he is only correct about the delay. That show was not to appease critics.

Sunny_D1386d ago

@RauLeCreuset

This man has the receipts!!!

SpeedDemon1386d ago

@gamer
I don't know about that, did you not see the state of the Master Chief Collection when they realesed it? The game was unplayable for months and it took them several updates to get it running right.

VariantAEC1385d ago

@caddytrek Look at the state of the game... Do you really think no one noticed or did MS entrust demo reviews to the blind? We knew this would likely happen especially considering MS constantly flexing the power of their system. Not they HAVE TO DELIVER when Halo Infinite comes out in 2021 (or 2022).

The Wood1385d ago

Gamer.7804. . . Please take a seat on the naughty step

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 1385d ago
ClayRules20121386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

Agreed, it needed to be delayed. But man, does this just hurt Microsoft & the XSX’s even more...I genuinely hope the delay helps the team produce better results for the finished game for fans who’re genuinely excited for it. I genuinely mean that. I am not a fan, and was not impressed at all by the demo, but it’s a darn shame that what was shown just looked as lazy as it did.

And gamer7804, where’s your proof of those claims it was going to be delayed before? And they wanted to “appease” critics of the previous show and show gameplay? That’s not how you do it, peroid. If you don’t have something to show, that’s of a respectable standard/quality, you just don’t show it. Nobody expects it to be darn near flawless of course, but nobody expected “THAT” which was sad. With all the talk of how powerful XSX is there’s no reason to have had results that display that. I mean, but again, talent comes into play. But so does the fact that it’s being done on last gen hardware as well, which doesn’t help its case. But regardless, it still shouldn’t have looked that bad.

But Microsoft and whoever the dev team was (343) was it? I’m not sure. Decided to show off gameplay and so many gamers weren’t impressed and millions clearly noticed.

1386d ago
1386d ago
Marquinho1386d ago

👏👏 Hard decision but if they wouldn't be able to deliver an experience up to the series, then it's the best one to make.

It does hurt XSX release window, we'll have to see how it performs, but it's not as if the competition had a big game for console launch. Actually, releasing a "small game" can be double edged in the mid term.

Sunny_D1386d ago

Here comes the spin. Lmao

Outside_ofthe_Box1386d ago

Lmao this is the second time you're talking about the "competition" 🤣

I thought you were a PC gamer that owns both consoles? Sure don't talk like one lol

This news is definitely hurting you more than you let on

CaptainHenry9161386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

You crack me up 😁 it hurts don't it

Christopher1386d ago

Yup. Gotta be hard for Sony to only release with a Spider-Man game. Not at all a big game, just the best selling super-hero game of all time.

rainslacker1385d ago

You do realize that Spiderman game is going to push console sales right? It doesn't matter if it's a short game, or just some DLC expansion made into a stand alone game, that's a heavy hitter.

Even Halo wouldn't compete with Spider-Man on the larger market, because everyone knows spider-man, halo is just a gamer thing, whose last release didn't really help the X1 much.

morganfell1385d ago

Sony has at least one if not two more shows to go - one games and one technical teardown. Anyone that thinks they aren't sitting on an announcement is dreaming. They want a bomb drop for the price reveal and preorder announcement. You can bet one is coming and it isn't Miles Morales.

Marquinho1385d ago Show
Marquinho1385d ago Show
RazzerRedux1385d ago Show
Marquinho1385d ago Show
RazzerRedux1385d ago

lol....stop pretending. I know you live to be obtuse, but it doesn't work.

"👏👏 Hard decision but if they wouldn't be able to deliver an experience up to the series, then it's the best one to make.

It does hurt XSX release window, we'll have to see how it performs, but it's not as if the competition had a big game for console launch. Actually, releasing a "small game" can be double edged in the mid term."

Where was the covid-19 concern there? So much for "Life is more important than videogames" in that post, huh? Nope. Concern for the "experience". Concern for the "XSX release window". Pointing fingers at the "competition" and its "small game".

Covid019? Nope. You didn't express a single thought about it. And then you have the nerve to wag your fingers at those who responded to YOUR points for not being "better". The hypocrisy is amazing.

Marquinho1385d ago Show
Outside_ofthe_Box1385d ago (Edited 1385d ago )

@Marquinho

What the F? Are you serious?

The FIRST thing out of your mouth when this news hit was 'welp it's not like the competition has a good launch lineup anyway. Their best title is a 'mini game' it can be a double-edge sword in the short term derpie'

Isn't that an example of being more concerned about the 'football match' than anything else? Why bring up Sony/Spider-man at all if you don't care about the 'football match'? Just say this was a tough yet best decision for MS to make and move on. Why drag and poke at Miles Morales into this at all, unless of course you care about the so called 'football match'.

Now suddenly you want to take the moral high ground, "I'm above this" nonsense. You're not fooling anybody. Nobody replying to you is laughing at this news. They're laughing at YOU for trying to drag Sony/Spider-man down along with it to make it seem as if the delay isn't a big deal. That's beyond pathetic.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 1385d ago
Father__Merrin1386d ago

I wonder how DF spin this? First they said game is ok it's just the gameplay was in the shade of a mountain area I wonder how they "cover up"

The Wood1386d ago

It's just exposed their frailties. To be fair they didn't hype it but they should of definitely said it was closer to last gen then next gen

Christopher1386d ago

DF were the ones that said Microsoft should delay it, though. I'm confused by people here only hearing bits and pieces and not them saying this exact thing.

medman1386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

After seeing the reveal in July, they should delay it until 2022....it's horrific. Better yet, give it the Scalebound treatment and be done with it. Garbage and trash. But so may so called gamers were claiming it looked great and they were so excited for it....typical. Stupid is as stupid does.

Bathyj1386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

Holy fkn sht. Honestly I almost feel bad for them. But then I remember they would have tried to pass this off as a finished game if not for the backlash.

Even at $1 a month that's not good enough. It's not good enough for your fans and it's not good enough for Halo and it's certainly not good enough to compete with PlayStation.

Get your crap together Microsoft and if your games aren't ready you should delay your console as well. On the plus side if you're late to market you can undercut Sonys price like you so desperately want to

I'm a little stunned that they actually delayed it. This is such a huge blow. And I can't see a month or two making that big of a difference. They've had 5 years and got to this point full stop and they expect people for this game for 10 years? I'm believing the rumours about the development hell. Its only thing that make sense

morganfell1386d ago

Early 2021? No. So it will not be a few months. Likely around the old E3 time frame so look for June. They can undercut Sony's price...right as Sony starts really showing some heavy hitters coming in 2021. And that is the issue. MS is going to be perpetually behind the 8 ball. I am guessing we will see those big titles as well as PSVR2 next year. The hits will just keep coming. In addition that fanbase that was on the fence for this fall...not on the fence anymore.

Petebloodyonion1386d ago

@Morganfell

"But a next gen game should look better than current gen games without ray tracing. Ray tracing should be a boost, not the foundation."

Please can you name 1 PC game that have more polygons compared to the Vanilla Ps4 version.
or Simply 1 PC games that has more polygons on Ultra setting compared to low settings

Microsoft has stated several times that games would functions like PC gaming where X1 would equal low setting and Serie X = max settings.
So again name the 1 PC game that had more enemies on Ultra settings, etc..

Christopher1386d ago

What a fallacy to make it about just polygons and not texture quality, AA, lighting, shadow quality, and tons more. You know, all those sliders people have on PC that go from low quality to ultra quality? Or did I miss the "number of polygons" slider in my PC games?

rainslacker1385d ago (Edited 1385d ago )

The thing about settings, is what those settings do is entirely up to the developer. If that was MS standard for max settings, then PC gamers are not going to be all that eager to buy or praise their games.

Come on now....you know if Sony had shown something of that visual quality, you'd be all over it saying how bad it looked. I can't take any Xbox fan seriously who participated in the trashing of Sony's games this gen only to say there was nothing wrong with the look of Halo.

I also can't believe that the xbox fan base is so naieve as to believe that RayTracing alone would fix the graphics issues. That just says to me that any one who believes that really shouldn't be taken seriously when they try to talk about anything technical, because they obviously have no clue what they're talking about.

Now, to name a game. I can't really do that on PC. I don't play enough there. But Days Gone on PS4, which is nowhere close to a PC that can do max settings, had 100X the number of enemies, with better AI, better textures, better animations, and better lighting....all at once., and the graphics in that game were much better than what MS showed.

But hey, at least Halo was 4K/60 right?

To that end, I challenge you to find a PC gamer, who isn't obviously a Xbox fan boy in disguise, say that what MS showed was anywhere close to max settings.

Petebloodyonion1385d ago

I never said that the game was looking next gen or great. It looks like an Xbox1 game and that I agree.
But the game was made initially with the Xbox1 in mind.
Now can I expect better texture, ray tracing, better shadows, etc... Of course but no I expect the game at the end to looks the same game.
And Like I ask Morgan... Please find me the PC game that looks day and night on ultra high settings vs PS4 or Xbox1.

Also MS seems to praise 4K/60 frames sec (It's their choice) but just mentioning that the best PC cards at the moment can't seems to run properly RDR2 at 4K/60 frames with all settings. Were talking 1000$+ cards here
so yeah perhaps the resolution and frame rates was more important to have in the demo compared to texture, shadow lightning.
Here's the gameplay demo in 4k of halo
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
Here's the gameplay 4k of RDR2 on 2080 Ti
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Christopher1384d ago

***And Like I ask Morgan... Please find me the PC game that looks day and night on ultra high settings vs PS4 or Xbox1.***

Ignoring the whole it's maybe 1080p30fps on current-gen consoles versus 4k60fps on ultra on PC and you can't truly see that in a video...

Any PC game with real-time ray tracing, DLSS, VRS, MAS, CAS, MVR, mesh shading, and more. Games like Metro Exodus, BFV, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and more. They look "night and day" unless your definition of that is "not like the same game at all" or something, in that case you should be arguing for Switch graphics here, because I'm fairly certain TW3 on Switch still looks like TW3, but it looks "night and day" from PS4/XBO as well.

Petebloodyonion1384d ago (Edited 1384d ago )

@ Christopher
" Ignoring the whole it's maybe 1080p30fps on current-gen consoles versus 4k60fps on ultra on PC and you can't truly see that in a video..."

Please explain to me why suddenly this explanation matters when we talk PC game vs Ps4 games but by all god should not be used to explain the graphics of the Serie X?
Nor the Dynamic lightning that uses more computing power like the ppl at Digital Foundry explain?

Like I said I don't agree with Ms choice of 4k/60 frames per second at all cost when even the best graphics card atm are struggling to make it steady.
And even Ps5 Spiderman will have a performance mode ( read less visual) to achieve the 4k/60 frames per second.
https://gadgets.ndtv.com/ga...

And plz remember that my initial post was related to basically someone who said that the game should look way better than a current-gen.
Would you agree that your statement makes Halo (the 4k version) a better-looking game compared to a current Xbox1 game?

Christopher1384d ago

***Please explain to me why suddenly this explanation matters when we talk PC game vs Ps4 games but by all god should not be used to explain the graphics of the Serie X?***

I don't think this is in doubt. It matters.

But...

***And plz remember that my initial post was related to basically someone who said that the game should look way better than a current-gen.***

It should look better. XBO is already doing 4k30fps with games that look great (RDR2). With four times the power and Custom RDNA 2.0 . . . it should look better as well.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1384d ago
gamer78041386d ago

it is disappointing to see them not hit their date, that said both consoles don't have really any heavy hitters at launch but both will have some great looking games to play like cyberpunk, ac, etc. and halo will hopefully be a knockout game in 2021 which is still coming up quickly.

IRetrouk1385d ago (Edited 1385d ago )

Just stop lol, Spiderman is 100% a heavy hitter, the first one broke records for goodness sake, the second one will shift ps5s, like it or not.

gamer78041385d ago (Edited 1385d ago )

@/iretrouk to me it’s not a heavy hitter with regards to being a brand new game. Of course Spider-Man sold really well and a lot of people really liked it. That’s not what I mean, it’s more content but it’s in the same Area with assets from the first game but enhanced for the ps5 with miles story added. You can absolutely be excited for it though

CaptainObvious8781385d ago (Edited 1385d ago )

I think a few people are missing a major indication of what this bombshell news means.

We all know MS. We know how they run, we know how they operate. We all know how stubborn they are, how they will lie and mislead if they think they can get away with it, how they absolutely HATE losing and will do anything in their power to one up the competition.

They are well aware of how monumentally bad this news is and how it's going to hurt them, sending a shock wave that will last the entire generation.

So for them to delay their only decent launch title and effectively hand Sony another generation win means...

...means that the development of halo must be so much more worse than we think and what the rumours of development hell are saying. If MS had at least a very rough looking GaaS halo that was still playable they would have absolutely still released that at launch with gamepass and saying they would polish it after with free added content and promising to do better in the future, thus appeasing the easily placated xbox fanbase and call it a day. You know it, I know it, MS fans know it.

But halo must be in such, and I mean in SUCH a poor state that even smoke and mirrors MS thought it would hurt them more to release it at launch than delay it.

Just think about that for a second. MS thought it would be better to delay a FLAGSHIP generation LAUNCH title than to release it in the state it's in.

Donnie811385d ago

Yeah godfall is gonna sell loads of ps3s oh my bad ps5s.

GaboonViper1385d ago

500 million, 5 years, the beast that eats monsters, pathetic.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 1384d ago
Battlestar231386d ago

Good the game didn't look great graphic's wise in the last trailer the games needs a lot more time in the oven a they say.

ClayRules20121386d ago

Yeah, it really does need more time in the oven. I really do hope the results deliver something great tho for Halo fans in the end who’re genuinely excited for the game.

rdgneoz31386d ago

And it has been in development since about 2015 when story planning started and in 2018 they released the first footage of it in the Slipspace Engine demo in 2018 ( https://twitter.com/Halo/st... ). They're gonna have to do a lot of crunch time to up the graphics to look like a true next gen game.

1385d ago
ClayRules20121386d ago

@rdgmeoz3

Indeed, they certainly will. I remember Microsoft going on about how Halo Infinite was going to look so “Next Gen” it was going to blow people away. Unfortunately, it blew minds how bad it looked. Hopefully the extra time will allow them to accomplish just that. Hopefully Microsoft and 343 themselves won’t be speaking on the visuals and will just focus on their work, pour their talent and skills into really making the game shine the way it should’ve at its reveal, and this game can be talked up in a way fans can be genuinely happy about and the team can look on with genuine pride in what they’ve accomplished in extra time they’ve been given. But, we shall see.

solideagle1386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

Even 343 admits it needs time. All the naysayers who said no no it looked fine or it's all about gameplay or it was early build etc etc should calm down now.

"A delayed game is eventually good, but a rushed game is forever bad." Miyamoto

Fun: Sony might have to triple down the production now :D

Bobertt1385d ago (Edited 1385d ago )

I think the problem is they are pushing for it to be cross gen. That is stupid for a flagship title which is supposed to get people to buy your new console. Plus if it's supposed to last 10 years why make it look outdated at launch.

IRetrouk1385d ago

I said from the start cross gen would effect halo and any other game that had to deal with running on old hardware, was told it was all gravy with the sliders🤷‍♂️

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1385d ago
Zodiac1386d ago

Good choice. I’m sure it was a very difficult one considering it was a launch title, but I’m glad they’re going to give Halo the work it deserves. Doesn’t bode well for the XBX launch though.

gamer78041386d ago

Honestly I’d rather them delay it to make it visually better. Cyberpunk is going to be a massive game and take a lot of playtime anyways and it’s out during launch

nowitzki20041386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

Man you guys keep falling for their tricks. What happened to the "it was an earlier build" argument.. Or do we need to keep moving those goalposts?

Ur comments 18 days ago are hilarious.. You were convinced it was an earlier build.

aconnellan1386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

“What happened to the “it was an earlier build” argument?”

What tricks?

343 came out and said it wasn’t, not much to be confused about - he thought it was until they said it wasn’t.

It being delayed is good news for everyone (except for the Series X launch, RIP their heavy hitter), even for people were defending it at the time

RazzerRedux1386d ago

"343 came out and said it wasn’t,"

Wait....what? So Greenberg was flat-out lying?

https://wccftech.com/halo-i...

gamer78041386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

@nowitzki. You know two things can be true at once.... it was an earlier build but the approx one month old build (but still the latest working demo hence the discrepancy between greenberg and 343). would still need a lot more work done than one month in addition to the Xbox launch date would give. I said that repeatedly it needs work. Nearly every game has been getting delayed. Why are you so angry that they want more time and try to speak for fans of the series and berate them?

nowitzki20041386d ago

I am not angry believe me, I have been sitting back for about 10 years and laughing at the shit show.

gamer78041386d ago

@nowitzki oh okay so you aren’t angry you just like to falsely berate people for your own amusement, gotcha.

Christopher1386d ago

@RazzerRedux:

Is Greenberg's mouth moving?

Yes? He's lying.

No? He's just thinking about lying.

gamer78041386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

@Christopher Greenberg wasn't lying in this instance, both can be true. it was the most recent demo build, but it was a few weeks old. granted there probably wasn't drastic changes in the working dev builds vs the demo build they showed, which is why they are delaying the game.

rainslacker1385d ago

I honestly believe that if it were just visuals, MS would still release the game. But there were other things in the last showing which showed the game wasn't anywhere near ready. The enemy AI alone indicated that. Some extreme game engine issues with the texture pop in are never isolated incidents, and tend to be a core issue that needs to be resolved, and that would effect the entire game.

morganfell1385d ago (Edited 1385d ago )

"Greenberg wasn't lying in this instance, both can be true. "

No they cannot. And note the date of this post:

https://www.343industries.c...

"But while it’s easy to get carried away about the prospect of playing Halo Infinite, it’s worth taking a minute to think about the enormous work put into this playable preview of Halo Infinite. While this is just a section of the final game, it took a herculean effort to make sure this little corner of our Ringworld was polished and pretty enough for its premiere! The art, lighting, design, environment, graphics, production and engineering teams involved in carving out and curating this little slice, are nervous and excited to show people a glimpse of what we’re building.

There’s a lot to digest in this sneak peek, from gameplay, to gunplay to physics to audio and much, much more, but today we’re going to talk about graphics specifically – the engine, art and technology that brings this latest iteration of Halo to life."

Now read that again

"...it took a herculean effort to make sure this little corner of our Ringworld was polished and pretty enough for its premiere! The art, lighting, design, environment, graphics, production and engineering teams involved in carving out and curating this little slice, are nervous and excited to show people a glimpse of what we’re building."

Polished.

He didn't say this is an old demo build. He said all the teams made sure this was polished...for its premiere. Its absurd the backflips Microsoft supporters will do in order to try and explain away their bald face lying. In the immortal words of Nathan Drake, "You've been played."

gamer78041385d ago (Edited 1385d ago )

@morganfell of course that section was polished to the degree it could but it still has to be a working slice and Might not be as up to date as others. All you said was correct but that doesn’t refute at all what I said at all about Greenberg also being truthful there

morganfell1385d ago

What? Did you read your reply? How is the polished piece not as up to date as the rest of the game? This slice should be more up to date.

If Phil didn’t watch this demo multiple times in the weeks before it was shown he is both incompetent and an idiot. Everyone in charge watched this and felt it was good enough. That alone is an indictment.

People act like someone grabbed a file off a computer at the last minute. Multiple levels of the company worked on this, polished it, submitted it, and then the management said this is good enough for our supporters. You know, the richest company in the gaming world? You know how people are always talking about how Microsoft could buy the moon. That company. The fact is the rest of the game should be up to that point but it isn’t. The fact they said they polished this slice means the rest of the game was lagging behind this which means they likely knew going into the show they were looking at a delay. Phil, Bonnie, Greenberg, all of them deceived everyone or at the very least gave a second hand effort. And MS supporters are magically okay with this. Xbox fans should want them gone.

gamer78041385d ago

@morganfell have you been in software or game development before? This is how it works nearly everywhere, you have lots of different builds, internal, sales, demo, and then customer client builds

morganfell1385d ago

Stop with the subterfuge already. This is why no one can take you seriously and discount everything you say. We are discussing the build that was shown. Period. The demo. Period. End of story. They felt what was shown was good enough. They polished, it, used herculean effort. Said it was ready. Then Goombah Greenberg lies and says it was an old demo. No, no it wasn't. He lied. He knowingly lied or he was talking about something concerning which he was uninformed and therefore incompetent. Pick one, liar or incompetent. Phil approved this demo. He ether said its great or he pushed out a substandard product and did so knowingly. Which is it? Pick one. Nothing changes the fact everyone from the top of Xbox down through the devs saw this demo before hand and said, "That's is good enough for our fans because its polished."

gamer78041385d ago

@morganfell I’ll take that as an emphatic no that you have no Idea what game development is like let alone software dev. Everything else you said was conjecture or just attacks on the basis of unverified self polling apparently. Unfortunately due to these empasses this conversation is appearing to not go anywhere productive, have a pleasant day.

morganfell1385d ago

To get this out of the way as it does not matter but yes I have been involved. Anyone that has been on the board long enough would have their proof.

There is no conjecture. These are either or situations you refuse to address. They are matters of irrefutable fact and logic. Go ahead and stick your head in the sand. Some people do not mind being deceived. There is no other route. Greenberg lied about it being an old demo, or Greenberg is incompetent or 343 lied when they said they put in Herculean effort to polish it. Which is it?

Phil did not know what he was looking at or did.not care his fans were getting a substandard game. One or the other. Which is it?

There is no conjecture but rather the facts 343 themselves provided. “We polished it” That is not conjecture but rather 343’s words and their position. And you cannot excuse it by tracking off subject by taking a position that is in fact the opposite of reality. Premier game demos are more polished than the rest of the product. 343 themselves SAID SO! They stated they worked on this slice specifically to get it ready. They had to get it above the standards of the rest of the game. So now is 343 lying when they said they polished this slice and all the teams worked on it or is 343 incompetent?

The Wood1385d ago

Dude. You still need to pay for those bounced cheques. Your hypocrisy and spin was clearly highlighted. Take a seat bro and reflect on what you said in the face of those criticising the showcase. You see how shilly you looked?

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 1385d ago
Zulu1386d ago

Don’t think any of this bodes well for the next generation. Neither console has a big exclusive at launch. Sony have come out and said miles morales is a not a full blown title, maybe delaying the consoles themselves might be the best solution!

1385d ago
Zodiac1385d ago

I don’t know if I would recommend that Sony delay the console, but I agree that neither seems to have an exciting launch.

monkey6021386d ago

Can't have been an easy decision. They needed this but that gameplay reveal was a train wreck for them

nowitzki20041386d ago

Trainwreck? You can clean up nice after a trainwreck and make it look like it never happened. I dont think they can do that here.

ClayRules20121386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

Yep, you certainly can clean up nice after a “Trainwreck” Nathan Drake did just that after his trainwreck in the Himalayas, boy was that a beautiful Trainwreck tho. I kid, I kid. On a serious note tho, I really hope the team can overcome this, but I really don’t know if they can either. I mean, the extra time is nice, and I genuinely hope they can, I do. For the fans, for themselves and that they can actually put whatever talent they do have into overdrive and really bring something really fantastic looking to fans and that they can be proud of. Only time will really tell tho.

-Foxtrot1386d ago

"including the ongoing COVID-related impacts affecting us all this year"

Yet...if the backlash to the showcase didn't happen, I highly doubt the COVID impact would have been so bad then huh...

rpvenom1386d ago

agreed. it's definitely the backlash they received thus why they had to delay.. which is the right thing to do so all the power to them. xbox players need this game to do well. a lot is riding on this franchise. and not like this is the only title xbox has but i want this to meet the AAA standards this franchise deserves is what i mean.

Bruh1386d ago

I forgot that you're a world class software engineer, please do inform us how CV-19 has not impacted game development good sir

tinchotin1386d ago

The game was going to look like that independently of covid. We have seen better looking games release like tlou2 and ghost of tsushima, and upcoming like Cyberpunk. All of them looked better than halo years before.

SlothLordPootus1386d ago

Oh. I'm sure it has impacted development, but not 2 weeks ago they were saying Halo Infinite would launch with the XSX. You can't tell me that in the last 2 weeks they've all of a sudden realized that COVID has had a big enough impact to delay it to a general "2021" date. Either they knew they would delay it and wanted to extend their Halo launch marketing with a straight lie to their consumers, or they got feedback from viewers and realized they needed to do something about it. It would've been a much better play to say, "We've heard your concerns, and will be taking time to reevaluate and optimize aspects of the game to deliver a product that meets our vision as well as the players' vision for the future of Halo."

caddytrek1386d ago (Edited 1386d ago )

The claim is that the game has been in development for 5 years with a 500m budget (I don't believe either claim) so what were they doing for all that time and with all that money?

rainslacker1385d ago (Edited 1385d ago )

Perhaps instead you can inform us how what would have been now at most 5 month delay in production due to Covid somehow means that the game could release at an acceptable state when it needs another year to year and a half of devleopment time, with that 1 to 1-1/2 years being without any serious issues cropping up.

MS sent it's employees home mid march. Many still worked from home, even in their studios. While this isn't the best way to develop a game as it's not as fluid, it doesn't mean all production stopped. Game developers already work remotely with outsourcing as it is, so it's not like the concept is new to them. It does take some setting up and adjustment for those that usually go into the studio, but the workflow is going to be the same....especially since their studios would be using MS products to handle resources....as most companies do actually. testing is the biggest pain.

Covid I'm sure did impact the games development, but it isn't the reason the game was in the state it was in.

It also certainly wasn't something they realized in the past couple weeks after the showcase. If you actually believe that, then you will also have to admit that the higher ups at MS are completely clueless when it comes to the production of games, because it was blatently obvious the game wasn't ready to go, yet they were more than happy to say things were going fine, and do as much damage control as possible to curtail the criticisms.

Covid was the easy and convenient excuse for them to use to cover up troubled, or at least already delayed development. Even assuming this was close to what they had when Covid shut downs started, the time frames don't allow for it being ready for XSX launch.

@Tin

You bring up an good point with GoT. Sony sent it's employees home at the same time as MS. Like within a day or two of each other. With CP, I'm not sure how CDPR was impacted by Covid, as I don't know the situation in Poland, but surely they are outsourcing so their production probably was affected. Most of the industry was affected, yet games are getting released this holiday. I know of some games which have had delayed announcements due to Covid....which is probably why this year seems kind of dry for new game announcements....despite a new generation only months away. Normally at this time, with a new gen coming, we'd be overrun with news, interviews, trailers, and all sorts of other marketing for new games.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1385d ago
spicelicka1386d ago

Does it matter? Either consumer opinion affected the decision which is good, or it was going to happen anyway, or it's a combination of both.

RgR1385d ago

It matters. This is a sign of incompetence.

Either they did not expect the consumer reaction which is unbelievable. Or they did not know they needed a delay a few weeks ago which is also a bad sign.

However...it is good for the game.

spicelicka1385d ago

@RgR

It matters if we know the truth, which we are only guessing at. For all we know, they were planning on delaying it anyway and showed the game the way it was to gauge the consumer reaction to help with the decision. i agree that not expecting that consumer reaction is ridiculous, but I think there is no indication that aside from graphics the game wasn't on track. It's very possible that they're only delaying it to improve graphics, which from their perspective were ok.

Regardless, it's a great thing. I wasn't happy at all with the way the game looked.

Relientk771386d ago

C'mon Foxtrot, you gotta love that classic Microsoft spin.

The Wood1386d ago

sorry. . This is year 5. . .c19 was from the end of year 4. . .343 just ain't bungie

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1385d ago
Show all comments (379)
110°

Halo Infinite's Split-Screen is One Step in The Right Direction

Halo Infinite has spilt screen PvP, but it's still missing another classic multiplayer feature that should be completed before Halo 7.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Jin_Sakai2d ago

Putting on PS5 is another step in the right direction so the player base can grow.

anast2d ago

How many years has it been?

80°

Halo Infinite’s Survive the Undead mode is a COD Zombies love letter

Halo Infinite’s brand-new Survive the Undead mode is a masterwork of Forge creativity, and Call of Duty Zombies fans need to play it.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
70°

The Best Multiplayer Xbox Game Pass Games to Play With Friends

Xbox Game Pass has some great single-player experiences, but nowadays, it's all about getting together with friends and family. Thankfully, there's a surprisingly extensive library of multiplayer titles on Game Pass to bring everyone together.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com