180°

Is It Worth Keeping Old Consoles For Backlogged Games?

Some gamer's may think that owning tons and tons of video games is a good thing to have right? well there is a downside to this believe it or not.

Read Full Story >>
goodnewsgaming.blogspot.com
gangsta_red3230d ago

Not everyone has the shelf space to keep consoles. having the games is easy enough since DVD/Blu Ray cases are easy to store and have lying around.

Even better if your shiny new console provided ways to play older games. Whether it's native, through emulation or a paid rental service. I'm all about convenience.

Crimzon3230d ago

Yeah, backwards compatibility is a must, especially in an age with so much digital content. It's not like you need to keep your old phone/computer/music player etc. around to play old content when you upgrade, is it? Video game consoles shouldn't be the special exception to this. It's an established rule with the vast majority of digital content.

Buy digital music? It works on new devices you buy. Purchase digital apps? They work on your new phones when you upgrade. Purchase digital games on PC? They work when you upgrade your hardware. Buy digital movies or TV shows? They all work when you upgrade hardware.

This used to be the case for video games as well, but now certain companies are trying to move away from that and just so happen to conveniently have ridiculously priced remasters and streaming subscription services to do the exact same thing? Disgusting.

And besides, who wants to have a whole bunch of consoles under their TV? Do these same people have a whole selection of phones in their pockets that they carry around everywhere? Do they have five or six desks with different computers on for doing work? A stack of media players depending on if they want to watch DVDs, Blu-Rays or digital content?

psplova3230d ago

LOFL. Give it a rest dude.

johndoe112113230d ago (Edited 3230d ago )

I'm not gonna get into a debate with most of the absolute nonsense in your post because it would be pointless, so I'm just gonna touch on one part. Also, although I'm replying to a statement you made I'm not aiming this directly at you because that would also be pointless because of your obvious bias, lack of understanding and inability to be reasoned with on this topic. I'm aiming this at the people who will read your comment and not recognize it for the attempt at trolling it really is.

"streaming subscription services to do the exact same thing? Disgusting." The PS Now service that is being referred to here is not just an attempt at backward compatibility. Backward compatibility on gaming systems means that newer models/versions of the system will be able to play games that were designed for older models/versions. For example the xbox one being able to play 360 games. That is backward compatibility. Companies do this in order to entice gamers to upgrade to newer consoles while giving them the assurance that they would still be able to play their older games.

Herein lies the reason why PS Now is NOT designed with backwards compatibility as the reason for it’s existence and why the above comment can be identified as absolute trolling. PS Now is designed to give everyone, even non playstation gamers, access to the entire catalogue of PS games from the ps3 back to the PS1 era. PS Now is already available on TV’s, Phones and PS systems with PC support coming in the future. If this was meant to be backwards compatibility then they would have just limited it on the PS4 ALONE, like certain other console manufactures are currently doing.

This service is designed to entice more casuals and even non gamers to experience Playstation gaming, as it is known that hardcore gamers tend to keep their old systems after they buy new ones. It is actually a great way for sony to make money off of their ps catalogue from people who wouldn’t have cared otherwise. They can actually make gamers out of non gamers. The reason why they do not have PS4 games on this service is to not hamper the sales of PS4 systems. The consoles are still aimed, and will be preferred by the hardcore gamers.

Simply put, PS now is NOT an attempt at backward compatibility and seeing that the poster above is so concerned about space for multiple consoles, he should actually love ps now because you don’t even need a single console to use it.

MysticStrummer3230d ago

"Yeah, backwards compatibility is a must"

History has proven it isn't.

OT - I used to keep my old consoles and games, thinking I'd eventually play them again, but it never happened so I stopped that practice for the most part. I still have my PS3, but it's mostly because I'm too lazy to unhook it for a trade in. I also don't have a need to free up that entertainment center shelf for something else.

Crimzon3230d ago

So this method of playing old games on new hardware is completely different to that method of playing old games on new hardware? Interesting. Since you're taking the time to troll, I'd love to hear your argument that water is not wet as well.

Bathyj3230d ago (Edited 3230d ago )

Actually it used to be the case where consoles DIDNT have BC. That company you hate so much made it a mainstream feature that you now demand.

We all know BC wasnt possible with PS4 because the PS3 was so exotic so give it a rest. What do you want Sony to do, put a Cell chip in every PS4 so it can play old games?

Personally I'll always have a PS3 under my TV right next to my PS4 because I've never owned a standalone Bluray player so its no big deal for me. I kind of doubt you want to play old PS3 games anyway so no BC isnt a big deal to you either.

BC is an issue when consoles are new and there arent many games. 2 years into a life cycle you should have plenty to play. Its great XBOne is getting it now, but you should be more worried about whether there are enough new games on the system than how many old ones you can play.

Crimzon3230d ago

"We all know BC wasnt possible with PS4 because the PS3 was so exotic so give it a rest. What do you want Sony to do, put a Cell chip in every PS4 so it can play old games?"

Absolutely. That's how they always did it in the past, the PS2 had the PS1 CPU inside and when the PS3 launched they had the 60GB version with the PS2's Emotion Engine inside. They gave consumers a choice and said that if you want BC, here's a more expensive version of the console that's available. Surprise surprise, more people bought the 60GB version than the 20GB version without BC. They should have done exactly the same thing with the PS4 if software emulation was too tough for them, just have a more expensive version of the console with a Cell processor inside to enable BC. I mean they were making a big deal about respecting consumers and wanting to give people choice before the console launched, after all.

"I kind of doubt you want to play old PS3 games anyway so no BC isnt a big deal to you either."

Typical fanboy trolling. Why would someone want BC if they're not going to use it?

Ezz20133229d ago (Edited 3229d ago )

"Yeah, backwards compatibility is a must"

Yeah, i agree
i mean without it you would miss on a *rare* game like Call of duty ?!
http://www.gamerevolution.c...
It's the most wanted game from Xbox gamers after all.

Anyway, History show that BC is something that most ignore/don't care about it.

gangsta_red3229d ago

@Ezzz

"Anyway, History show that BC is something that most ignore/don't care about it."

I must have missed that history lesson, care to point to a link that proves your point?

Because it seems most people are requesting games to be BC compatible.

https://xbox.uservoice.com/...

Not to mention it was one of the top 5 most requested feature on that forum by most people. Maybe it's some alternate history that you're referring too.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3229d ago
TFJWM3230d ago

I have every system and game(cept ones that were "borrowed" by friends) I ever bought back to the Atari 2600. I do not keep any of the old systems hooked up thou. If I really want to play an old game thou I usually just dl an emulator.

Cindy-rella3230d ago

Lol. "Not everyone has the shelf space to keep consoles"

If you havent the shelf space to keep consoles you should be worried about sorting out your life if you havent the space for something so small.

To answer the question, i think its a smart idea to keep old consoles if there are a lot of backlog of games someone would like to play.

Gazondaily3230d ago

"If you havent the shelf space to keep consoles you should be worried about sorting out your life if you havent the space for something so small"

^^ The man with infinite shelf space.

Are you telling me that having a setup where my PS4, Xbox One, Wii U, PS3 and Xbox 360 all in the same space could not pose a problem? Your solution is to build a bigger shelf? Right...

r2oB3230d ago

@ gangsta_red

Funny you mention shelf space when the Xbox One is a console that demands so much of it. Between the size of the console, to the cable box you have to have plugged into it to use the TV features, the external hard drive you have to hook up to it to expand the memory, and/or the kinect that is nearly the size of some consoles; it's no wonder some Xbox One owners don't have shelf space.

It must be really convenient to have multiple devices plugged into one device in order to fully utilize it's advertised features.

Gazondaily3230d ago

"it's no wonder some Xbox One owners don't have shelf space. "

Well there you go. You're in agreement with him. The Xbox One is so big it already takes up so much space so he needs more and BC helps him in that regard.

kneon3229d ago

You left out the external power brick

gangsta_red3229d ago

This guy r2oB just proved my point! LOL

Exactly, the Xbox One is soooooo big that I can't possibly have that and my 360 slim on the same shelf. Plus add in the cable box, my PS4, the Kinec, my PS4 camera and any other little nick nack and now you see the importance of BC.

Now you see where I'm coming from.

_-EDMIX-_3230d ago

@Crimson- " They gave consumers a choice and said that if you want BC, here's a more expensive version of the console that's available. Surprise surprise, more people bought the 60GB version than the 20GB version without BC"

What?

http://community.us.playsta...

and

http://www.amazon.com/PlayS...

Sooooooo you don't know what your talking about.

"Just like the 60GB model, this system has full hardware backwards compatibility and will play the vast majority of PS2 games"

and

"Yes, you can play PS1&PS2 games on it"

Um.... I see.

"Yeah, backwards compatibility is a must"

No...keeping your older consoles is a must. MS BC won't be native, PS Now isn't BC bud and its not native, you need to stream it and it doesn't even support all titles soooooooooo want those old games? Keep your old consoles, easy.

Soooo keeping your old systems is a must, it beats streaming, it beats limited BC.

(I'm not sure why your still on this PS Now being BC when its on other systems, must be payed for and for streaming)

Its not free, its not BC, you can't put in a PS3 disk in a PS4 and it works...thats not what its for, thus its not BC lol.

" who wants to have a whole bunch of consoles under their TV?"

Real gamers bud, I'm sorry fanboys don't get that owning consoles is sorta part of the hobby =)

Also....you don't got a box to put them un when they are not in use? Who said you need to have every last device under a tv?

Sooooo you think PS Now is for BC, don't see to get its a pay service that works on PS3 along with PS4 along with some tvs..

You think PS3's 20gb doesn't play PS2 games and think that Sony had 1 with BC, one without LMFAO!

You also seem to think that you MUST have them all out under your TV on 1 shelf (as if a closet doesn't exist in your home)

....I'm sorry but your credibility is pretty shot on this one, your post are pretty meaningless if your defense is a bunch of lies and misinformation along with stupid, stupid logic.

My PS2 in my closet says hello, turns out it can be played if I take it out of garage...turns out it doesn't need to be under my TV for it to be used afterwards...crazy huh?

@Gangsta Red- "Not everyone has the shelf space to keep consoles"

Sooo you don't have a box? Don't have storage? Who said it needs to be on a shelf? I have my Wii and Gamecube boxed up, but bring them out to play older titles when need be, same with my PS2 which I brought out recently to play Killer 7 and Onimusha 2.

Stand back guys, Crimzon and Red believe all your consoles MUST be under the TV, they can't be stored, can't be put in a box else where etc.

Whats next? Inputs

Red be like "Most TV's don't have the inputs for all those systems, they only come with enough AVs, HDMI's etc so it can't be done ever in life bro" lol

Gazondaily3230d ago

I don't think I can be bothered with boxing and unboxing my old console and constantly taking them out of our loft.

freshslicepizza3229d ago

it's called convenience. just like how blu-ray players can also play dvd's. it's called convenience. one unit to play both. no need to go back to the xbox 360 controller and have two separate systems all wired up if you can just use the xbox one. unless of course your game is not compatible yet.

i've never seen someone spend so much time trying to downplay a feature that is free and also the number one requested feature by it's owners.

gangsta_red3229d ago (Edited 3229d ago )

Uh oh, here comes E-Mix with the simple solution of packing and unpacking every time a person feels nostalgic.

Good for you, but what's good for YOU isn't necessary or practical for everyone else. Something you can't seem to fathom in any of your long winded replies.

And you seem to have missed the part where I said ...

"I'm all about convenience."

Such a lame fight of desperately trying to downplay BC. But yet you say...

"Red be like "Most TV's don't have the inputs for all those systems, they only come with enough AVs, HDMI's etc so it can't be done ever in life bro" lol"

That was hilariously stupid and just shows how lame you really are.

_-EDMIX-_3229d ago

@Septic- "I don't think I can be bothered with boxing and unboxing my old console and constantly taking them out of our loft"

Guess your not a gamer enough bud. The excuse is pretty tired.

Got many consoles, I have no reason to give them away or sell them....I game.

I don't just game for 1 gen and then start over, as much as you and your fanboy buddies are trying desperately try and make it seem as if its some difficult impossible task to save your old systems.

First....BC is a MUST because of your large library....so not keeping the system that plays those games is not important?

Sooooooo you do know that MS BC with XONE likely won't support ever single last 360 game right?

Sooo even a 360 to an XONE with BC is superior vs JUST BC.

You can't say a feature is SOOOOOO important to you, then not have the actual system. If you don't have a 360 and sold it....clearly its not that important to you.

You merely can't have it both ways, its either it wasn't that big of a deal thus you didn't keep your 360, or its sorta a big deal...thus you kept your 360.

I don't get the whole "I sold it" or "I traded it in" then...."thats why BC is important" ???? LMFAO!

SOooooo the feature your saying is important is also the one you willingly gave up and sold or traded in etc?

I don't mean you in general as much as I mean the silly argument regarding its importance.

Its ironic that the 3 making the excuses on why one shouldn't keep an old system, are the same ones stating how important the very same feature in LIMITED FASHION is SOOOOO important.

The irony is just too much.

Know why BC means nothing to me?

I own a PS3 and PS4.... my older systems are so important to me and my hobby that its not an option to sell them, they have value to me, thus....they are not sold, they are not traded in and shelf space or input space isn't some factor into not keeping them LMFAO!

If I don't have the room for them, I merely box them up and only bring them out when I'm planning to play certain games.

Words like "couldn't be bothered" don't factor with me.

I game, its what I do. I have old consoles in my gauge because they are clearly worth something to me and are part of the hobby I'm in.

I'm sorry but its pretty clear that those who are trying to exaggerate limited BC on XONE, don't really care about the feature as much as they care about telling folks about the feature...if it meant that much to you....you wouldn't be without it in the first place.

Ask me now how badly I want Sony to put BC in PS4? (stairs at PS3 slim next to my PS4) lol.

Z5013229d ago (Edited 3229d ago )

I SALUTE YOU SIR. SOMEONE GETS IT.

"You can't say a feature is SOOOOOO important to you, then not have the actual system. If you don't have a 360 and sold it....clearly its not that important to you"

Agreed. They love those games so much, they got rid of the ONLY console that can play them ALL.

Brilliant!

*Ask these same guys how often they want to play these old games.

Like really. You're playing or WANT to play Omega Boost & Jersey Devil everyday. PUH-LEEZ

*... And if you do. Wouldn't you keep the console under your tv anyway?

BS excuses are BS

Ezz20133229d ago (Edited 3229d ago )

I like your posts

They are pretty damn long though lol.

gangsta_red3229d ago

"Guess your not a gamer enough bud. The excuse is pretty tired."

Yea, because everyone has to game like you right.

"I don't just game for 1 gen and then start over, as much as you and your fanboy buddies are trying desperately try and make it seem as if its some difficult impossible task to save your old systems."

For some unknown reason your reading comprehension as usual just seems to slip over your knot. Not everyone has the same set up as you, not everyone owned every console like you, not everyone has a huge house with a separate gaming room to fit every console like you and your fanboy brethren make it out to be.

"You can't say a feature is SOOOOOO important to you, then not have the actual system. If you don't have a 360 and sold it....clearly its not that important to you."

Wow, DAT LOGIC!

Maybe you're hurting for cash and sold your 360 to put towards an X1. Maybe your 360 just doesn't work anymore, maybe you never had a 360. But nope, 'ol Mix here has everyone figured out and it's just that simple guys:

If you sold your 360, that means BC wasn't that important to you to begin with.

I mean lets not even consider how BC was the top 5 most requested feature on the Xbox forums. Naaaaw, obviously no one wants BC because it's as simple as keeping their 360 right next to their X1 like Mix here says EVERYONE should.

"Ask me now how badly I want Sony to put BC in PS4?"

And here's what it comes down to folks...No one cares what YOU want Edmix. But the majority DO want BC for their X1.

For a person who doesn't own an X1, doesn't need BC, you sure are on some type of holy crusade trying to prove to everyone how they don't need it too.

Bud.

_-EDMIX-_3229d ago

@mold- "it's called convenience"

Yes...convenience, its not a must, merely "convenient" lol

Its a MUST for me as to why I still own my PS3 along with my PS4.

I'm not downplaying its "convenience" in fact I agree, it is purely that...."convenient" .

A must?

Would you not by an XONE because it wasn't there?

No and no.

If its a must, then clearly keep your 360, its pretty simple bud. You can't try to make BC this huge deal as for BC to be a huge deal, you would have needed to not have a 360 in the first place....

But that within itself is catch 22.... soooooooo the feature you going crazy about wasn't enough to buy used cheap online?

Oh....

Soooooo the feature isn't worth the money? If thats the case....how much is XONE's BC feature that is limited?

If it means that much to you, you'll actually never be without one, if its such a big deal, you won't sell it, its really that simple.

You and your little squad keep trying to have it both ways and it just doesn't make sense lol.

I value my PS3 backlog quite a bit, enough to keep my PS3, enough to have it side by side with my PS4. Why? Well clearly its a feature for me WORTH BUYING, WORTH KEEPING, and WORTH NOT GETTING RID OF!

How did you go nuts for BC? Soooo your happy about a feature that limited? About a feature you could have the full version of a year and half ago for less then $60? Really? Sounds to me like your happy about a bragging point, your happy about a bullet point.

Like I stated before, ask me again how I feel about PS4 and BC....

gangsta_red3229d ago

All I'm reading is ME, ME, ME, ME.

"Soooo your happy about a feature that limited?"

A feature that's free and growing everyday, Yes.

"About a feature you could have the full version of a year and half ago for less then $60?"

Yea, and play it on your X1 without having to unpack and pack your old console, Yes.

Why does this concept escape you bud? Ooooooh that's right you have every console available to you for you to unpack and pack again. I forgot you got it so good and everyone should have it just as good as you too.

Or else they're not a gamer.

Dat logic!

Like I said elsewhere ask me why we should care how you feel about BC...

_-EDMIX-_3229d ago

@G-Red "for YOU isn't necessary or practical for everyone else"

This just in, packing up game consoles and storing them isn't "practical", but not gaming on them at all and waiting for limited BC is.....

Gangsta Red everyone. You seem to be more fanboy then gamer, I'm not even sure why a gamer would state, limited functionality and support is better then more consoles...

Sad.

Sorry but, I got my consoles stored up and I have no plans to sell them. I wouldn't jump for joy if any company announced limited BC...

Why? Oh...your announcing that I can do what I've been doing on a system I already own? Oh but limited?

I see lol.

Should get your gamer card revoked.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3229d ago
BillytheBarbarian3230d ago

I keep my favorite games but don't care to keep everything. Mostly I like having the original cases and art for Sega Master System, Genesis, SNES, and NES. I keep some Xbox games that work on 360. Shenmue 2, kotor 1&2, Nfl2k5, etc...but I just don't have room for everything.

TheLoCoRaven3230d ago

I keep all my consoles and games mainly so one day I can hand them down to someone and seem like the coolest dude ever to someone that appreciates retro. Possibly a son one day.

ICANPLAYGAMES23230d ago

I don't have quite as big a backlog as that, but I do play on my older consoles from time to time, as for the accumulating ps+ games, I'll actually try out some (the ones that I can tell that just aren't for me, though I just delete). I do however feel for you. Like BillytheBarbarian said, I also just keep my favorite games for my older consoles, and just get to 'em when I get to 'em.

TXIDarkAvenger3230d ago

Personally, I just like collecting and I wouldn't plan on ever selling any of my consoles.

Show all comments (50)
180°

Sony shares big new PS Plus stat, but not the one we want to see

PlayStation Plus has improved the split of PS4 and PS5 players on its priciest tiers, but Sony continues to hide total subscriber numbers.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
mandf11h ago

lol acting like it’s equivalent to ms numbers

Mr Logic11h ago

Uh...They're definitely not equivalent.

"Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass service now has 34 million subscribers."

"the total number of PS Plus subscribers across all tiers was 47.4 million"

darthv7210h ago(Edited 10h ago)

That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN.

bloop7h ago

That's not the "gotcha" you think it is Darth.

darthv726h ago

^^it's not supposed to be bloop.... it's just an interesting observation.

Einhander19724h ago

darthv72

"That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN."

Have you ever heard of a PC before? I hear they are pretty popular.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4h ago
shinoff21839h ago(Edited 9h ago)

What. Definitely more os plus subscribers but that makes sense due to actual console sales

Darth the difference between the bases are huge your right but you gotta think. Ps players buy more games, where as the Xbox base relies on gamepass for their gaming. So it makes perfect sense

darthv729h ago(Edited 9h ago)

What makes perfect sense though? You say PS players buy more games... so then logically there should be more PS+ subscribers given the increased number of online multiplayer games in the PS4 generation alone. The PS4 was the first time that + was required for online play much like Gold was for 360 users.

Keep in mind we are talking subscribers, not simply XB/PS users. I assume you meant to say offline single player games, which is most likely true as well. That gen also saw a significant increase in games with an online component comparted to the previous gen.

victorMaje9h ago

I for one will be going back to essential at the next renewal. When I feel a game is good & right up my alley, I’ll check trusted reviews & just buy it.

jznrpg7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

I have the top tier until 2028 as they gave me a massive discount for all the years I had left but I’ll most likely go to essential as well. I buy my games but my kids do use the service occasionally. They do prefer to own their games as well since any game can leave the rental service at some point and they don’t like that idea. They mostly use it to demo games then ask me to buy games if they really like it.

RedDevils3h ago

For me, I will cancel it all together but unfortunately I still have it till 2030 lol

meganick7h ago

I would like to see Sony add a fourth tier of PS Plus for people who just want to be able to play games online without any of the perks like monthly games, store discounts, or anything like that, and it should cost $20 annually, $30 maximum. There’s no way I’m paying $80 just to play games online. Even the original $60 fee was too much, and I would often wait for sales to re-up my subscription.

P_Bomb3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Essential is too expensive, I agree. We’ve got one Essential and one Premium sub. Dropping the Premium when it expires.

gamerz21m ago

Just let my subscription lapse for the first time since 2010. Will sub again every now and then for a month or so to access my old ps+ games but for me it's the end of an era.

390°

PlayStation Aims to Entice PC Gamers to Play Single-Player Sequels on Consoles

Sony aims to release live service PlayStation games day & date on PC and PS5, but single-player games will have more "strategic approach."

-Foxtrot1d 21h ago

How? I’m sorry but how when they literally port their games to the PC now after not even 2 years, it’s rumored GoW Ragnarok is next.

The best thing they could have done is focus on the generation before with PS3 / PS4 titles and when it got to the PS6 then start porting PS5 games so people will want to get the sequel on the new console

Now PC gamers just wait it out because they know it’s coming

Redemption-641d 16h ago

Rock Star does the same thing. Release 1st on consoles, wait a year or two then release on PC. It's clearly a strategy that works for them.

They don't need a lot of PC gamers to move to Playstation, but they just need a few who would also buy into it and possibly double dip. There are some very unhappy gamers on Twitter, who wanted to hear day and date for all games.

Cacabunga1d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

Fox
Your analyse is not accurate..

If sony keeps things the way they are then they will grow the business. Some pc gamers who really liked God of War for example might buy PS4 or 5 to play Ragnarok. Same if they announce ghost of tsushima 2 or a new Ratchet game.

-Foxtrot1d 12h ago

Rockstar?

Yeah I loved playing Red Dead Redemption on PC…….

@Cacabunga

I highly doubt it, PC gamers have their setups, if they didn’t budge for years to get a console despite all the cool exclusives then they aren’t going to budge now knowing a new PS5 game will get a port 2 years later

Crows901d 11h ago (Edited 1d 11h ago )

@cacbunga

Basically you're functioning under the assumption that PC players are impatient, rich and stupid.

Most will not budge. But if the hype is real enough they'll get a few. But those few won't actually be invested in the platform.

shinoff21831d ago

Those unhappy gamers will just have to suck it up. I'm sure Sony sees how thats worked out for Xbox. Why tf would they follow in their footsteps

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d ago
thorstein1d 16h ago

How?

According to Sony, by co launching live service games like Helldivers2 day one, then enticing PC players to want to play sequels on the console for SP games.

That's how. If you play Ghost of Tsushima and Sony launches GoT 2 on PS later this year, you're more apt to want to grab the console and play the sequel instead of waiting.

1d 15h ago
ThinkThink1d 14h ago

Yeah, pc players are the most patient of players. They will just wait for the game to come to pc.

Tacoboto1d 14h ago

You're just spitting back out the Sony PR line.

PC-first and PC-centric gaming is a different beast. Helldivers 2's popularity and GoT's popularity are because they're good solid games, not because they're from PlayStation publishing.

It's the same PlayStation that put Helldivers 2 for sale internationally, then pulled their PSN-Steam removal card. The same PlayStation that released Returnal with UE4's dreaded shader stutter. The same PlayStation that released TLOU Part 1 in a broken state.

If Sony's PS4 slate of titles didn't convince PC gamers, if their current PS5 titles still don't, ports of games they've had *years* of knowing and reading and hearing about aren't going to convince them to finally buy a console.

Don't fall so easily for the same PR BS that fabricates quotes from their own studio heads.

VincentVanBro1d 14h ago

Nah I’ll wait for the best version on PC lol

JEECE1d 12h ago

I mean that's certainly the thinking, but for most PC gamers that just won't work. Like in a rare circumstance if someone was already on the fence about a console that might get them to take the plunge and buy a PlayStation, but it will be the exception rather than the rule.

-Foxtrot1d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

PC gamers are super patient

There's no f****** way, for example, they are going to get a PS5 the moment Ghost of Tsushima 2 is announced just because they played the PC port of the first game

The mindset?

"Ah cool GoT2 has been announced, really enjoyed the first game. Anyway I'll just play on the dozens of other games I have while I wait for the obvious PC port from Sony in like 2 years"

Not a chance they'll all wait now.

thorstein1d 9h ago (Edited 1d 9h ago )

@tacoboto

"You're just spitting back the Sony PR line."

I literally said: "According to Sony."

I was responding to someone who asked "How?"

I gave Fox an answer that reflects Sony's thinking. Maybe read the OP's comment and then reading a reply to that person as if it's an answer to their question instead of sounding off in such a bizarre way. See Jeece's reply to mine.

@Dom I do. Sony may not, but then again, they've made billions in the gaming industry and you've made $0.

INMATEofARKHAM1d 2h ago

@thorstein PC gamers have been condition to wait... Epic Games exclusives don't sell well and EA, Ubisoft, and MS have all come back/or arrived on Steam and that's all for preferred store front that doesn't cost money at all so to think people will rush out to spend 500 dollars on a console (whichvcould be used to help pay for PC upgrades) is a bit naive.

shinoff21831d ago (Edited 1d ago )

I think some of yall are giving pc gamers to much credit. Not every pc gamer is gonna be the same. I'm sure sony isnt expecting all pc gamers to switch, that would be foolish. Idk how many pc goers are there. 500 million 400 million idk really. Say son bgets 5 million of them to it was worth it. If you say none imma call bs

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 1d ago
romulus231d 12h ago

You're mistakenly speaking for all PC gamers, there are bound to be some people who are not willing to wait and for Sony those are potential console buyers.

RaidenBlack1d 9h ago (Edited 1d 9h ago )

eh, no ... if a PC gamer is playing on a PC, they'll continue to do so ... there are tons n tons of games on Steam alone and the steam gamers' backlog stories are one of the most discussed topic you'll find in PC forums ... indie is already huge there, plus early access, PC-exclusive titles, VR, big publishers' titles and now Sony's ports too.
Realistically speaking, usually there's not enough time to complete the backlog alone, than go buy a separate console altogether.
The only game that has the power somewhat to make a PC gamer to get a console is GTA VI.
PC gaming existed and proliferated well before this recent Sony's PC decision.

StormSnooper1d 9h ago

@romulus23
True, there will be new gamers who will be exposed to PlayStation IPs, and they will possibly obtain PSN accounts, both of which make people more inclined to purchase PlayStation.

VincentVanBro1d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

I don’t think you understand PC gaming. We have sooooo many games to play it’s kind of ludicrous. The insane Steam backlog is not a myth. So, we’ll happily wait for the best version of a game.

outsider16241d 1h ago (Edited 1d 1h ago )

How these guys think that they're only pc gamers that won't buy a console, I'll never know..lol. we're talking about the whole world here..not a few guys on this site or reddit.

Edit: in fact there's posts on reddit how they bought a ps5 after having played a few exclusives on PC.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 1h ago
romulus231d 9h ago

"Not a chance they'll all wait now."

You don't know what all of them will do. Some may wait some may not.

StormSnooper1d 9h ago

Well, if they want the games when they release, they will need a PlayStation. If they are ok with waiting, then they can do that. I think it’s a sound gameplan for PlayStation. The release of games on PC, will generate additional fans for the ips.

kaos891d 4h ago

So who cares how / when someone chooses to spend or not spend their money? Sony gets their money for their game sold either way whether its on PS5 or PC, so in the end what does it matter?

Resistance_lord1d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

PC gamers will wait a year to get a game $10 cheaper lol. they ain't gonna go out and spend $500 on a system to play 1 game. people underestimate them big time.

outsider16241d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

@Fox
It actually works, i know some of my friends and cousins who cannot wait and bought a Ps5 to play Horizon FW. In fact they cannot believe that "ps has amazing games" lol

Sure there's others who can wait a whole year or two but then there's others who have to play as soon as possible.

Christopher1d 1h ago

*** Now PC gamers just wait it out because they know it’s coming ***

I think a lot of people who would abandon consoles entirely don't because of the wait. Sure, they aren't drawing new users from PC like they want, but they are maintaining while getting more from PC-only gamers (possibly even double taps from those who own both).

Einhander19721d ago (Edited 1d ago )

The PS5 Pro is going to be WAY above the average PC of users on Steam.

The PS5 Pro will be able to play every single game they have released on PC at PC settings with a minimum of 60FPS and higher with unlocked framerates.

Jingsing17h ago

I agree, there is zero logic from Sony on this. Sony completely underestimate how stubborn a PC player is. They can wait, I'll now wait as I've stopped buying games for my PS5 and will now acquire them for free on PC.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 17h ago
helicoptergirl1d 20h ago (Edited 1d 20h ago )

"While Helldivers 2 was released day and date on both PS5 and PC, don’t expect single-player narrative-driven games to be released in the same boat by Sony anytime soon. - This was confirmed by PlayStation’s soon-to-be co-CEO Hermen Hulst in Sony’s business segment presentation"

There you have it. Won't be 'day and date' single player games on PC anytime soon or for the forseeable future. They understand single player games are Playstation's backbone.

CrashMania1d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

So much for the nonsense narrative that playstation is somehow failing so they are going to immediately start releasing every single game day and date on PC lol.

Elda1d 17h ago

That is what the competition has to deal with.

1d 15h ago
Elda1d 17h ago

Agreed. First & foremost Playstation not only wants to sell their AAA first party games but their gaming consoles to play them on that is why their AAA first party games come to PC later after it sells on PS consoles.

ocelot071d 17h ago

I was told that Playstation was doing so bad on here and on X that Helldivers 2 was going to release on Xbox and Sony was going to start releasing all games on pc day and date with playstation. Why do people constantly lie on the internet!!!!!

Hofstaderman1d 17h ago ShowReplies(1)
Fishy Fingers1d 16h ago (Edited 1d 16h ago )

We've gone from you'll never see PS games on PC, to you'll never see any PS games day one on PC, to you'll see some PS games day one but have to wait for others.

I mean, its kinda looks like it's heading one way no? That "wait" is going to get shorter and shorter.

Fishy Fingers1d 15h ago

It's happening.

God of War 2018 - 4 years
Horizon Zero dawn - 3 years
Horizon Forbidden West - 2 years

StormSnooper1d 9h ago

Well, with MS going full PC/multiplatform, PlayStation will need to adapt. Luckily, they are in a position to hold the fort for all lovers of console gaming. Otherwise, if MS’s business model was the norm, we can all kiss console gaming goodbye.

Thank god for Sony.

HankHill1d 6h ago

Exactly. As usual, the usual suspects on here are coping and moving goal posts.

darthv721d 5h ago

Ragnarok is now 1y and 10m between PS-PC release. Its only going to get shorter over time.

outsider16241d 1h ago

Well, change of leaderships on Sony did that, under Jim it looked like a lot has changed. Who would have thought eh?
Who would have thought under Big ole Phil xbox games would come to Playstation eh?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1d 1h ago
XiNatsuDragnel1d 16h ago

That's a smart move because at the end of the day playstation is a hardware business and need to sell hardware folks

Software_Lover1d 16h ago

Meh, I'm done with consoles altogether.

Bathyj1d 15h ago

Considering the amount of bangers PlayStation and Nintendo make, your name doesn't sound very apt.

darthv721d 14h ago

Well I think he means that on PC, all software eventually is playable on it. Which is true.

Consoles just are a convenient way of playing some sooner than later.

ApocalypseShadow1d 13h ago

Darth, all software eventually is playable on PC through emulation and theft of games. You forgot that part. It's not through legal means.

andy851d 11h ago

Most, not all. Unless you're talking emulation

Mad_Matt1d 11h ago

Apocalypse- You consider emulation theft of games? LMAO
Way to shill for corporations.

Software_Lover1d 9h ago

This gen has been trash. I was already on the fence but caved and bought the consoles, I have regretted that decision. Most of the games that I would play come to PC anyway. I'm done with consoles. I have had the best time with PC this gen and a good amount last gen that it just pulled me away.

XiNatsuDragnel1d 8h ago

@Shadow
Emulators and emulation are legal not rooms you're inaccurate

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1d 8h ago
Show all comments (88)
300°

Sony Says The PS5 Is Its “Most Profitable Generation To-Date"

During Sony’s recent business segment meeting and investor presentation regarding its game and network services, the PlayStation company revealed that PlayStation 5 is the company’s “most profitable generation to-date.”

It’s the top slide of the presentation, showing that in its first four years, the PS5 generation has already hit $106 billion in sales, having almost caught up to the PS4’s total $107 billion generated.

Operating income for the PS5 generation has also already surpassed that of the PS4, having now reached $10 billion.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I wouldn't doubt it. They released a high quality system. A lot of high quality games from themselves and their support of 3rd party developers and indies. They released many high quality remakes and remasters. They released a high quality GaaS game going against the naysayers thinking Sony would abandon single player games. And they most likely are profiting a lot more than PS1, PS2 PS4 and the loss leading PS3 that drained all their profits.

Now, I'll wait to see what's cooking tomorrow. But can you use some of those profits to better support your high quality VR headset? Because, by supporting it, you can sell more games and more systems and make more profits?

jznrpg2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I want RPGs for PSVR2! Good ones of course

shinoff21832d ago

If it had some rpgs I would buy right fking now. It looks dope and alot of fun, but it's biggest game resident evil 4(maybe) I've got no interest in. I'm not a fan of racing games, even with that metro game coming i was never much into that series. Rpgs would be fantastic.

MrNinosan1d 22h ago

Lemme know if ya wanna play some Zenith 🙌
Bought it at release, but haven't played it more than 1-2 hours but for sure on my "todo list".

Cacabunga1d 21h ago

Normal when they released mostly cross gen games so far. That’s a lot of money saved..
We haven’t seen what PS5 can do yet. 4years in and PS4 games still look great to me. The gen leap isn’t quite there yet.

--Onilink--1d 23h ago

The interesting metric for me is the $106billion in operating income/profit (not sales as mentioned in the article) reaching the same as the PS4 did with only half the consoles sold.

In particular because they all are supposed to be making the most per hardware sold after a few years when manufacturing costs are down.

So even putting inflation aside(and the higher console price), it is interesting that they could reach PS4 $ with just half the consoles sold.

Maybe there is more to the metric thats whats seen at face value, but they have clearly been making a lot more money than before on the software side (with also less games released I suppose, given its only been half the generation so far)

VersusDMC1d 23h ago

The bulk of the money has to be coming from the 30% cut on all games and microtransactions. Especially on all the free to play juggernauts like genshin, apex, fortnight, etc.

--Onilink--1d 20h ago (Edited 1d 20h ago )

@Versus

They are definitely making a lot on that for sure (which the $70 price increase factors into as well), but its not like many of those games werent around for the PS4 too.

They might be counting the gen as a whole and not just PS5 itself (so extra profit from PC sales, whatever that may be)

PS+ price increase and different tiers probably amount to part of that too.

But in general, its still quite a surprising metric. Half the time, half the consoles sold, less first party games released so far and still already making more of a profit than last gen is quite something, and as mentioned, there is probably more to it that we dont know, after all, since we are talking about operating income, all the expenses they have also factor into it, so it is also possible that they have found ways to significantly reduce that + all the means of increased revenue that appear to be factoring into the equation

All in all, just an interesting situation from a business perspective

porkChop1d 19h ago

It's for the whole generation, so it would likely be including PC. They also make much more profit on digital sales vs retail, and digital is far more prominent these days. The generation also started at the height of COVID when everyone was home, spending far more money on gaming/hobbies. It makes a lot of sense for this gen to be more profitable.

Abnor_Mal2d ago

This will surely shut up all the new trolling accounts trying to spread lies and non facts in other articles comment sections before this article is posted.

Hofstaderman1d 23h ago (Edited 1d 23h ago )

Obscurely, those trolls or troll will not show in these articles as the truth is contradictory to his or their orchard-sized daily dose of copium and hopium.

Tacoboto1d 23h ago

Or... They're intentionally trolling you guys specifically. Because they know it upsets you so easily.

Name-dropping Orchard, after this many months? How long has it been and he's still in your thoughts?

Elda1d 23h ago (Edited 1d 23h ago )

I'm quite sure the individual is reading these positive comments downvoting & seething at the same time. Edit: It just downvoted my comment...lol!!

Hofstaderman1d 22h ago

No I'm entertained by this individual. I love unhinged people, they are so interesting lol.

repsahj2d ago

Wow! I am super impressed that in just 4 years, ps5 already caught up to the PS4's. Congratulations.

JackBNimble1d 5h ago

That happens when half of your games are cross platform. I'm still waiting to see what the ps5 is capable of, because they sure haven't pushed any limits.

And where are all these ps5 exclusive games?

sagapo1d 23h ago

Not really surprised as Sony barely has any competition at the moment.

Show all comments (47)