440°

Firefox 3 vs IE 7 vs Safari 3.1.2 vs Opera 9.5

gadgetzone.com.au has posted a complete comparison test between all the current full versions of the most popular internet browsers. IE 7 takes on Firefox 3, Safari 3.1.2 and Opera 9.5. IE 8 has been left out because it's still in beta. There was a previous smaller comparison between IE7, Safari 3 and Firefox 3 when the latter was still in RC phase, but this is a much more detailed comparison, including four graphs, that includes only final release browsers and has this time included Opera as well, due to numerous requests after the last group test.

Read Full Story >>
loader.gadgetzone.com.au
crazy250005820d ago

apple is heading towards being the next microsoft now....why develop safari?

thewhoopimen5820d ago

because Apple likes to develop good software...

funkeystu5821d ago

The article tested speed only.
Overall results were (approximately)
Safari-2.6 (but longer start up time)
Opera-2.75 (failed a java-heavy test page)
Firefox-3.4 (authors said there was no visible diff. and convenience of awesome bar would likely outweigh extra loading time)
IE7-4.1

It all sounded a tad firefox biased to me - "Firefox got fairly beaten in our tests but is clearly better because...." type of thing.
Not that I disagree (I use firefox myself), but a more objective article would have held more weight imho.

dnf275821d ago

Of course, it goes into a lot more detail than just that so it's probably worth a read rather than just taking funkeystu's comments and being done with it. But thanks for telling everyone that darth Vader is Luke's father!

verb3k5821d ago (Edited 5820d ago )

@dnf27: Your article is clearly biased, all test and benchmarks from all respected websites and journals show that Firefox is the king of the browser speed jungle, especially in JavaScript interpretation.

dnf275820d ago

That's your call to make as a reader. You can take what you want from it. However, I can assure you that the writer, which wasn't me by the way (I may be biased, I use a mix of Firefox and Opera), has no strong browser preference. In fact, he uses IE7 because it came with the machine he uses and he couldn't be bothered downloading another.

gunnerforlife5820d ago

whether his article is biased and all, his still right Firefox>>>>>the rest

thewhoopimen5820d ago

I dunno what reviews you've read, but all reviews have put safari at least = to firefox in terms of speed ... and that was 3.00 . This one just shows that 3.1.2 safari is even faster than safari 3.00, only proving that apple is continuously tweaking and improving the browser. A great thing, b/c it gives everyone a choice.

Bonsai12145820d ago

i've read on a tech forum somewhere that people don't like the awesome bar and reverted it to act like its old self.

plus the numbers speak for themselves. safari > others in terms of speed. i'm running the safari 4 dev build, and let me tell you, it puts firefox 3 to shame.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5820d ago
LFC1EE5820d ago

Firefox is no1 browser it's better than anything out there at the moment it's just fantastic.

user8586215820d ago

just another microsoft paid website trying to make their crappy browser look good

firefox ftw!!!!!

SaiyanFury5820d ago

No doubt Safari is a bit faster after the first load. But it has a ton of incompatibility problems when operating on a Windows platform. That alone makes it an inferior browser when compared to Firefox 3.0's general usability.

shine13965820d ago (Edited 5820d ago )

yeh that's been my experiance with safari...I don't know why opera was pulled there...and opera also has that info tab you can put on the bottom that tells you exactly whats happening, and at what speed...funny I seem to be prefer opera yet I'm using firefox more these days...its all the adverts I tell you...as well as so many websites telling us to use firefox...I didn't even know that opera had gone 9.5, I thought it was still in beta..

edit: just downloaded it..hands down, I think the smart bookmarks (firefox) are better then opera but opera has the best download service in my opinion by far.

SaiyanFury5820d ago

I've never used Opera, myself so I just went with Firefox 3. Glad to see it's working for you though. If you're concerned about web ads and all that rot, look for a program called Ad Muncher. It's a small program that runs in the background and gets rid of most types of advertisements like those annoying popups and lead-in ad pages that often load when you go to sites like ign.com and whatnot. Truly a useful little program.

coolfool5820d ago (Edited 5820d ago )

It seemed like opera was the best all rounder to me. It was almost consistently faster than firefox, almost as feature rich and if you don't have the compatibility issues on the machine you use it then that would be a mute point for you.

I user firefox but overall it doesn't really *kill* the competition......well apart from IE7

Show all comments (22)
70°

Hunter x Hunter Author Dips Into Horror With One of PlayStation's Best-Selling Titles

The creator behind Hunter x Hunter is dipping his toes into the world of video game horror with artwork of one of the best-selling PlayStation titles.

phoenixwing1h ago

I thought the guy behind hunter x hunter died

Chevalier57m ago(Edited 55m ago)

He didn't die. He suffers from chronic back issues which has caused him to have lots of hiatuses

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/...

"For years, he has been suffering from chronic back issues, leading to several hiatuses spanning multiple years. Due to these issues, he is only able to draw sporadically and only while laying down."

180°

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie. This is something of a homecoming, as Microsoft owns Activision.

Read Full Story >>
engadget.com
Obscure_Observer8h ago

Very very early in development. Still, fantastic news!

Let´s GO!!!

Lightning776h ago

I guess.

How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )

At least it wouldn't be MS of all ppl destroying them.

MS really should let go Tango go like they did TFB here.

darthv726h ago(Edited 6h ago)

one was under Bethesda (Tango) the other under Activision (TFB). Clearly each one handled the separations of their subordinates differently.

Obscure_Observer5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

"How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )"

Perhaps because Zenimax and ABK handles such matters differently based on their own internal policies as "independent" publishers.

Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future. Which could also be the reason why they ensured an exclusive partnership with TFB and its new game, before anyone else.

Sad and disgusting. But it is what it is.

Lightning772h ago(Edited 2h ago)

"Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future."

MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB.

It's inexcusable, they have options on how to handle studios they don't want anymore with killing jobs. Not just MS but the rest of the industry also.

Sad and disgusting sure how many will get shut down next year or this year even?

I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another.

-Foxtrot8h ago

Manages to buy their freedom especially after all the shit Microsoft has been doing with its studios lately

...

Goes right back to them as partners.

Okaaaaaay...

darthv726h ago

Id venture a guess that TFB working directly with MS was a better outcome than working through Activision to get to MS.

VersusDMC4h ago

From the article...

"Toys for Bob spun out as an indie back in February after Microsoft instituted sweeping layoffs that impacted 86 employees, which was more than half of the staff"

I doubt those 86 employees enjoyed the Microsoft experience over Activisions.

Inverno4h ago

MS shuts down studios because of lack of resources and then helps these guys by giving em resources. Also MS is what forced them to buy their freedom in the first place? What kind of logic 😂

Chevalier50m ago

The best thing is that the company that is worth $3 trillion and owns the company instead of Xbox lacks resources. How the hell does a company worth $3 trillion making a measly $70 billion purchase they 'can't' support. Lol

Sciurus_vulgaris6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Xbox’s gaming division seems to still function as 3 semi-autonomous sub-divisions, Xbox Studios, Bethesda and ABK. The three main sub-divisions can seemingly shut down or build studios and set up partnerships independently. This would explain why Bethesda can recently shutdown studios, while ABK spins off one studio, while building a new one. Plus, Toys for Bob could be spun off by ABK, only to immediately re-partner with Microsoft.

Chevalier48m ago

That's absolutely 💯 BS. Any sane 'autonomous' company would NOT put their games on Gamepass day 1 like COD will lose probably billions.

Also they're all under Xbox game studios so any autonomy is an illusion.

Elda54m ago

Either a kiddie game or something uninteresting.

Show all comments (15)
80°

All Call of Duty Black Ops Games Ranked

The Nerd Stash: "Developed by Treyarch Studios, Call of Duty: Black Ops games are some of the best in the series in terms of gameplay, story, and -- of course -- Zombies."

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com