BlackCountryBob

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 65620

GTA4 DLC - A disaster waiting to happen?

Remember back to those heady days of April 29th 2008; seems like a very very recent memory I am sure, but in video games it is a millennia ago. Back in those heady days, thousands of gamers worldwide waited outside games retailers at midnight to get their clammy hands on Grand Theft Auto 4. The GTA4 publicity machine had been in full working order for several months and gamers were positively foaming at the mouth in anticipation to get their hands on the latest and greatest instalment of the most controversial and profitable franchise in this millennia’s gaming landscape.

However, predictably gamers were not united in their anticipation. Much of the pre release chatter was idiotic console zealots arguing over the merits of the promised Xbox exclusive downloadable content. The content was (and still is) a very unique arrangement in gaming and showed the importance that post release internet delivered content had taken; something which is even more remarkable considering that this market had been non-existent on consoles at the time of the time when GTA3 was released (ignoring the Dreamcast's joke of a delivery service with no memory, no content and a 56k modem; I loved my DC BTW so no hating people but the truth hurts). Microsoft dropped a big $50m to secure this exclusive loveliness and the Microsoft advertising machine did a pretty good job of publicising the existence of the 2 content packs and telling the boys and girls who would be getting a new console for GTA (turns out there were not many) that a 360 and not the PS3 was the plastic box of joy which they should invest in to get the best GTA4 experience.

However, fast forward nearly 4 months and I think that the gamble is starting to look a little foolish. In the past 17 weeks we have seen the release of MGS4, Soul Calibur 4, Lego Indy and a whole host of great games and movies which have pushed GTA4 from the hearts, minds and disk drives of most gamers. Think it over; I doubt that many gamers will have seen more than the odd person on their friends lists playing GTA4 in the past 2 months. Looking at the wider picture, my local Gamestation (a small one) has literally 20 pre-owned copies of GTA4 for each platform up for sale; strolling past my local Cash Converters (a national pawn brokers chain in the UK) they are selling GTA4 on Xbox 360 for just £9.99 ($19 or 20% of RRP), a truly astonishing figure this close to release and considering the overwhelmingly positive reception it received.

This is kind of a problem for Microsoft, while trumping the merits of the exclusive DLC for over 2 years, there has still been no information about what it is, how much it will cost and no concrete info on when it will be released. Without this information, hoards of gamers are simply looking at that game on their shelf as being not worth keeping and are instead taking the discount on a new game it offers. Therefore whenever the mystical content is announced and released there will be a significantly reduced audience for the content than there was a few months ago, reducing further the chances of Microsoft recouping their substantial investment. Even if the content is truly magnificent in scope, how many gamers will be willing to buy back a copy of the game to buy it? If half of the gamers who sold the game buy a pre-owned copy back, the market for the DLC is still significantly reduced.

Of course, the number of trade ins on PS3 is less than ideal too but without the promise of DLC on the horizon, Sony and Rockstar/Take2/EA (future proofing is a good idea) are losing little by comparison except for a devaluing of the title with very cheap 2nd hand copies saturating the market competing with new Platinum range copies.

So what is Microsoft to do you might ask? More importantly, how did such a situation arise? Well first I have to point the finger at Microsoft who have displayed an almost Sony Europe like lack of communication and foresight with its customers. While everyone knows how outrageously well funded Microsoft is, you would hope that when they signed the cheque for $50m they had some idea about what content they were buying and what form it would take. Microsoft should have been jumping from the rooftops screaming about any info they had, even if limited, to anyone who would listen since pre-orders started properly after Xmas. If they want anyone to wait as much as 12 months for new content then they need to keep them informed about what it is they are waiting for or else they will move onto something else which is what seems to have happened.

In the end it comes down to inexperience. Net delivered content is still a new industry and everyone is learning. However, one thing is abundantly clear; communication and advertising are key to the success of DLC, not only up to and around launch of the disk game but also well after this time or else your market will shrink fast. I am sure more gamers are excited about getting their hands on Gears of War 2 or Dead Space than the GTA4 expansions.

I hope it is not the case, but at this moment with no information and a shrinking market to sell to; Microsoft’s $50m gamble could be one of the biggest commercial failures in gaming history.

rbbrdman5760d ago

My 360 is metal. My ps3 is plastic.
Honestly I had forgot completely about the DLC.

Your right it's not as interesting anymore. When it does drop I'm sure it will be around the same time Fable 2, Gears 2 and the holiday line-up is in full swing. I doubt Microsoft recoups their money on this one. But I guess they can always shift over the XBL fees to cover it.

Defectiv3_Detectiv35760d ago

Ah yes, the highly hyped DLC that we still have no clue what it will be. Most people I know have already stopped playing GTA, I really think this will be a disaster in the making. I read somewhere how almost every person who purchased this game will have to buy the DLC b4 MS sees profit.

socomnick5759d ago

Well its not really all about profit. Its about bringing more content to its console. I just hope it comes out soon and that its well worth it.

Jellzy5759d ago

A good read BlackCountryBob.

1 thing you missed though was the fact that although it may be competing with highly anticipated games such as Gears of War 2 or Dead Space, theres also the the fear that the light that is GTA is starting to deminish with their new direction in realistic gameplay.

Lets face it, GTA III to San Andreas and also the "Story's" series on the PSP are much more addicitve and adhearing to play and with the soon to be Saints Row 2 in the fray promising the sort of Over the Top gameplay that GTA once was (especially those reminiscing of the San Andreas era), then SR2 is starting to look like there cup of tea. And with almost everyone who buys GTA looking for the spark that once was, who exactly is going to be interested in paying for additional content that so far are still in the dark about.

Like you said $50mil is starting to look like a ridiculous amount for exclusive content, that with time, and for various reasons, may be a disaster wating to happen.

BlackCountryBob5759d ago

Thanks for the feedback everyone. I had planned on covering the negative reactions that GTA4 has received in a follow up blog later in the week if this one was well received; I considered including this in this blog but I worried my already lengthy post would end up as a novel without focus on a topic. However I am planning on a post about Burnout which will come first.

Its good to know that I am thinking much the same as others.

What the hell, I feel pleasantly positive about good feedback, bubbles for everyone!

Molock4205759d ago (Edited 5759d ago )

gamefly has sent me emails advertising *to buy* gta4 for dirt cheap on both ps3 and 360. but on another note it was a shocker when I told my friends w/ 360s about the dlc coming and not surprisingly have forgotten about it. I think M$ did that to make up for the fact that they couldnt get rockstar to make it xbox exclusive and win over some post next gen customers.

majorsuave5759d ago (Edited 5759d ago )

As I am for COD 5, Far cry 2, Portal still alive and fallout 3 among others.

It might prove worthy for MS, it's the only console game I have completed that has potential replay value because of this very DLC. (Ok, it has replay value DLC or not).

And I believe that, if that really is 50M that MS spent on the game, they made a profit so far. Why? Because, 10$ off every sold XBOX360 game goes to MS (same goes with PS3 games and Sony), and according to numbers they sold between 7 and 8 million copies of GTAIV on 360. Simple math puts the bill at 70Million $ or more.

Add to this the dollar or 2 they will make with all the DLC... excellent move I say.

Show all comments (17)
50°

The case for Pokemon Black and White remakes in 2024

A number of leaks have popped up that reference Pokemon Black and White remakes in some way. Are they all coincidences or real in 2024?

Read Full Story >>
nintendoeverything.com
160°

Final Fantasy VII Rebirth Combat Director Wants Final Part To Offer Players "Even More Freedom"

The Final Fantasy VII Rebirth combat director has expressed that he wants the final part in the trilogy to offer players "even more freedom".

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
gold_drake19h ago

i wonder if where gonna be able to jump

EternalTitan9m ago

Well its not an action game.
Even Elden Ring added jumping as an evolution of the combat system since Dark Souls did not feature jumping.
I want jumping as much as the next action game fan but this isnt that type of game.

-Foxtrot13h ago

I love the game so far but please don’t make the final part a mini game fest

Everytime I get to a new part in Rebirth it’s “mini game time”

Inverno6h ago

Hope ya don't mind me asking since it seems like you've played it, did it feel like a decent step up from the last game or was it more like the best from the last but more polished?

CS76h ago

It makes Remake feel like a demo.

9.5/10 imo. And I think the “mini games” did a great job of adding variety to the gameplay. Purely optional as well.

-Foxtrot5h ago

Here's my thoughts

I think it's a big step up from the first instalment, I'm enjoying it way more.

I thought keeping it just in Midgar was silly, it felt dragged out and it didn't have much variation in terms of the scenery.

However with Rebirth, as soon as you get out of Kalm you have a big world to explore and it's great to just wander round and explore.

Now that I'm half way in though, despite still liking what I'm playing, the gameplay loop is now starting to slow down on me. I've got to a new region and I'm like "Yaaay...need to go and find those towers again, oh look another special beast marker, is that a bird I see in the distance? Better follow it to another Mako Crystal"

It's like....you know how Peter Jackson was only supposed to have two Hobbit films then Warner Bros wanted a third film so he stretched the second film out as much as he could so he could keep stuff for the third film making a trilogy? Yeah it feels like that, so these mini games are a part of that overall gameplay loop to keep us going and stretch the game out overall so they have something for the third and final game.

I personally think you could have had the first instalment get you out of Midgar and through to Grasslands / Junon and the second game finishes things off.

Becuzisaid6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

I had a weird cycle of love/hate for all the mini games as I played through. At first I really hated the seeming need to check all these boxes while exploring the grasslands. I didn't enjoy the Gilgamesh quest initially, and thought Queen's blood was fine but didn't want to commit to it. The side quests didn't really grab me either.

Then for some reason everything in Junon region changed my mind and I did pretty much everything. I liked most of the side quests, I actually liked playing fort condor (didn't care for it in the intergrade dlc). And my interest for completing these quests stayed pretty much through to Cosmo Canyon.

Then they added that horrible Lifestream memory/battle mini game and I started getting so burnt out of it all. I just wanted to do the story. I didn't do any side quests in neibleheim and beyond except for the summon. I abandoned Gilgamesh.

So what I'm saying is I would like the third part to go back to the focused progression from remake. Keep the mini games to the gold saucer. Start the game snowboarding if you want, but from there keep the story rolling.

-Foxtrot5h ago

That's funny you say that because I did everything in the Grasslands but once in Junon I started to slow down a little until Corel where by the end I was burnt out. I'm still currently going but I'm just doing what I can while things keep getting thrown at me.

I would have preferred half of these mini game side fillers / collectibles for some really beefy side quests that really adds onto the world of FFVII.

Inverno4h ago

Sounds like they hadn't really figured out what they wanted to do with Remake and this one is more of what they thought of doing which is probably why they're dragging it out to make a trilogy. Disappointed to hear it has towers cause man do i hate towers lol. It's been a while since I've played the first and it'll be a while longer to play the sequel, but it sounds like I'll enjoy it. 7 really impressed me especially after being disappointed with 15, felt like Square finally realized that FF was THEIR big franchise again.

Tacoboto3h ago

How many hours are you into it at this point?

My friend got like 20-30 in and pretty much quit because of its mini game era. He loved and basically binged through Gran Blue compared to Rebirth

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3h ago
MetroidFREAK216h ago

As long as it comes out on PS5 to have the entire series on one platform, do whatever you want

franwex5h ago

The combat is my favorite thing about Rebirth. Would be really cool if they can improve it even more.

Knightofelemia4h ago

I hope after FF7 Square will either give a new FF game the remake treatment. Or give some of their older titles a remake treatment like Chrono Trigger, Chrono Cross, even Xenogears.

Show all comments (15)
210°

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2's Scope Was Impacted by Xbox Series S Limitations

Wccf tech writes: "Kingdom Come Deliverance 2's scope was impacted by the Xbox Series S hardware limitations, as developers could only make a game that was 25% bigger than its predecessor."

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
-Foxtrot12h ago

This is the issue with things like this

Xbox Series X is apparently to MS the worlds most powerful console

However the Series S is obviously a limitation because it’s underpowered and developers have to go for parity.

So what’s the point of the world’s most powerful console if you are holding third party developers back? They aren’t going to push themselves if they have to think about the weakest console.

The issue wouldn’t be as bad if it was just Xbox but you are also affecting the PS version aswell

I think developers need to start just taking advantage of a console and if one of them can’t do X Y and Z then f*** them…why should the others suffer. What’s MS going to do? The bigger the franchise the least chance MS are going to tell them to f*** off. Baulders Gate 3 seemed to have stood their ground and suddenly their “strict” parity rule didn’t really matter. We suddenly got super optimisation efforts for the Series S that got things sorted.

anast9h ago

I agree, and the sad part is use normal folk saw it the second they announced their plans.

Abear215h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Agree 100% this is why I didn’t want the M$ Monopoly, now PS5 version will be held back too.

If PS5 Pro comes out and Series S is still a thing it’ll be interesting what differences and what devs choose to do. Really hoping Rockstar pushes the PS5 pro with GTA6 and we get the best version possible.

outsider16243h ago

Good ole S indeed. Everyone knew this all along. S was holding games back...Now where the hell is Orchard i want a word with him.

LucasRuinedChildhood13h ago

More info from the author of the article, I think: https://www.reddit.com/r/ki...

Quote:
"1) I was told this info from the producer of the game Martin Klíma.
2) He specifically said the game will have only one mode.
3) And this mode is 4K 30 on PS5/XSX and 1440p 30 on XSS.
4) He said that the game is already running north of the 30 FPS cap so the performance should be stable on launch, much better than KCD1.
5) The limitation was XSS because of the 10GB memory. He said that's why they wanted to make the game 25% larger.
6) Speculation on my part: the output resolution is probably upscaled and the reason why there won't be a 60 FPS mode is because it'll most likely be very CPU heavy, like Dragon's Dogma 2 for example."

Doesn't seem like they're adding a 40fps mode on PS5/Series X for launch even if they can handle it.

Sgt_Slaughter9h ago

I'd much rather have 1440p/60fps or even 45fps. Having just one, even with the Series S in mind, is disappointing.

franwex7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Remember when xbots were adamant that the series s won’t hold back the gen?

Microsoft just needs to let go of the mandatory parity. Who cares if your grandma doesn’t understand that a game cannot be played on the S. It’s not like it she can buy you a physical game for it anyway. Before buying the game put up a notice that it only works on series X. If you’re buying for a friend-allow for a refund.

Bam. Everyone is happy. Most series s owners are for casuals that want Game Pass anyway and most likely don’t purchase most games.

If the developers want it to run on S, let them figure it out.

Chocoburger1h ago

If it were Series X only then they'd only be selling to 25% of the Xbox Series userbase, and that's certainly not worth the time and effort into doing a port. Could just do PS5 & PC instead. No compromises needed.

Jin_Sakai7h ago

“During the event, the Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 producer also revealed that on PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X, the game will run at 4K resolution and 30 frames per second“

Another “creative decision” right? 🤦‍♂️

IHateNate7h ago

Amateur hour. Very incapable developer.

Outside_ofthe_Box6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Since you're not an amateur and clearly know more than them, can you over there and help get the game running on the S without having to sacrifice their true vision. Us gamers would really appreciate you using your wisdom for good 🙏

IHateNate6h ago

Thousands of games run just fine on S.

But Kingdom Come is the game that can’t. Must be one hell of a game!

franwex5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Thousands of games run on PS4 and on Switch. If developers want them to run on those systems. Fine. Those two platforms still get new games. Sony isn’t making studios also make a ps4 pro version, or Nintendo a wiiu version. Microsoft technically is.

IHateNate4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

If games like Alan Wake 2, GTA6, COD, hellblade all run on S, no excuse for this 100x smaller and 100x worse looking game to be held back.

outsider16243h ago(Edited 3h ago)

"Thousands of games run just fine on S.

But Kingdom Come is the game that can’t. Must be one hell of a game!"

Kingdom come 2 runs just fine alright. Its the SCOPE that they want. They had to cut it because of the stupid S series. Hellblade2 ran just fine too..but im pretty confident if it was just the X in mind, the scope of the game would have been much bigger.

IHateNate2h ago

So their scope is greater than that of GTA6 and warzone? Wow. Crazy

Show all comments (21)