310°
8.0

Microsoft Xbox 360 Wireless N Networking Adapter review (GamePro)

GamePro: "Xbox 360 owners who are yet to own a compatible wireless adapter or are having troubles with their existing one will find the Wireless N networking adapter a useful purchase. The dongle provides wire-free gaming and media streaming on the Xbox 360, albeit at an expensive outlay."

Read Full Story >>
gamepro.com.au
Willio5290d ago

Ethernet cable next to the modem = save $80

NecrumSlavery5290d ago

$100 adapter is an automatic 1/10review.

That's BS. When PS3 or Wii for Heaven's sake, gives it to you for free.

Serial_EDX5290d ago

You could always buy the madcatz wifi for the 360.

Its getting rather good reviews.
http://www.shop.com/madcatz...

BTW don't bother trying to google or yahoo shop search this, its restricted and won't pull up. Found that out trying to find a link for you guys.

Guido5290d ago

Come on, you get WiFi built into the Wii for god sakes and MS charges 100 bucks for this and they give it a 4 out of 5? Looks lo me like somebody has cranial-rectal-inversion!

dalibor5290d ago (Edited 5290d ago )

"That's BS. When PS3 or Wii for Heaven's sake, gives it to you for free"

While I agree it is always a good thing to have options. Some people may like to game wirelessly while others prefer not to nor even plan on playing online. I got a system that has it inside b/c I was planning to game wirelessly. I knew my options & I picked the best one for me, for my situation. That was my preference.

Guido5290d ago

Preference is not the issue at hand here. The real underlying issue at hand is that of MS screwing people over for the "option" to go wireless. While Sony and Nintendo put WiFi into their console, MS decided to give us the option to buy an overpriced peripheral to go wireless. Come on now, be honest with yourself and ask just how much should a WiFi adapter really cost? I can even see (yet still say is too hight) a 39.99 dollar price tag but 100 bucks? Come on, be real.

PirateThom5290d ago

You know, the wireless cards in the Wii, DS, PSP and PS3 probably only cost a few dollars to impliment, $10, I think was the estimate for the PS3s at LAUNCH, but in terms of convenience for the end user, they're priceless.

If everyone else can do, why not Microsoft? Why is simple convenience so taboo?

dalibor5290d ago

@ Guido
I see where you're coming from & I agree, nobody should pay this much for an adapter, it's to steep(at least for me & you). My question is out of all the 360 owners, would they have preferred the wireless adapter to be enclosed inside the console? And had MS not released the 360 so soon could there in fact, have been an wifi adapter inside the 360?

Guido5290d ago

I bought the 360 on release day and about a year earlier I bought a WiFi card for an old laptop on eBay for about 35 bucks new. Even at release they should have included it but rather than making it convenient to the consumer, MS stuck with their pricing scam and released it for a hundred bucks. I am a 360 owner and I feel they are ripping people off. It's a shame really. Thanks for the mature replies. Bubbles to you.

Rampant5290d ago

I suggest you read an economics course. Nothing is ever free. The difference is that the cost is included in the price when you buy a ps3 or Wii, while 360 fans can choose if they need it or not. This makes it more expensive for those that need it, but cheaper for those that don't (Like myself).

dalibor5290d ago

Right back at you. Keep on gaming.

Lifendz5290d ago

Nice to see Gamers having a discussion without one resorting to calling the other a fanboy.

Why o why5290d ago

and is the old one no good in terms of quality compared to this one??

Blaze9295290d ago

Before people start comparing this to the PS3 (too late), note this is a Wireless-N adapter...some of the nice routers like D-Link's are still $100. Also note...it's Wireless-N, something the PS3 does not offer.

tatotiburon5290d ago

you are correct Blaze....jesus i can believe the number of retards in this site comparing the new wireless adapter with the PS3 or Wii

Noob5289d ago (Edited 5289d ago )

I brought a wireless n adapter for $10. Even if it was $50, it's still too much money when it should integrated into the console. I don't know know why anyone would try to spin this, it's consumer rape to charge someone that much when it should of been included.

PirateThom5289d ago

Well, guys, what was the excuse for the other wireless adaptor being the same price before this one came out?

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 5289d ago
Dirk Benedict5290d ago

Who here can challenge the word "free"?

user39158005290d ago

Dude its obvious that you dont know what you have, nor the competition and let me tell you that I prefer to pay for accurate technology, then the garbage station 3, so call wifi and you get what you paid for here. My conection if any with the PS3 its terrible, but I always have problem with it, if is not the dead remote its the sorry network connection, not to mention 2 dead blu ray drives gone to sh@t. Yeah, I f@k hate my PS3, not that im happy with the 360 either but at least I had free repairs.

bumnut5290d ago

Can't believe 360 does not have wireless built in, even wii has that.

Im getting sick of 360 now (paid for online, expensive wireless, expensive hard drives, the list goes on). The only reason i still own a 360 is because thats what most of my friends have.

LesterCorncrake5290d ago

WOW HOLY SH1T deal of the year !!! where can i get one, this is cutting edge !!! BORE, buy a PS3 and get it for free its becomming really really tiring this xbox 360 nonsense

Tesselation 3605290d ago

Is terrible at best. You get what u pay for and no matter how you spin it the wifi will remain terrible in the ps3.

PirateThom5290d ago

Only if you can't set up a wireless network correctly.

In which case, you'll probably have just as many problems connecting with ethernet and opening ports.

TukkerIntensity5290d ago

Does anyone else see the irony in a 360 fanboy telling PS3 owners "You get what you pay for".

Ship this boy another coffin for his RROD, Disc Wrecking, E74, loud as a lawnmower POS.

dalibor5290d ago

Well I use an N router & it helps compared to when I was using a G. It's not only the adapter you have to address, it's also your configuration, any interferences that might be obstructing the signal, your wireless router & the internet server provider that you use(some are better than others) all account for how you experience playing online. And how great your connection is for that matter.

Guido5290d ago

More than likely, if you are having issues with your WiFi then the problem lies between your keyboard and the chair.

Lifendz5290d ago

Going to give you a chance to show that you're not a troll by asking for a link or something reputable that states the PS3 wifi is "terrible."

And I couldn't agree with you more on the consumer getting what he or she pays for. Black Friday numbers are proof that most people are aware of this ;)

Why o why5290d ago

i use a netgear router and i game hard...in fact ive never used wires for my wii or ps3....too far. Lifendz...ull be waiting for a long time...ur troldar was on point and your manners impeccable;)

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5290d ago
Show all comments (37)
70°

Spartan: Total Warrior - Before Dark Souls, There was Sparta

Spartan: Total Warrior launched back in 2005, with an aggressive-but-fair agenda for its combat not dissimilar to the Souls series.

john4164d ago

I still whip out my OG Xbox to play this once in a while it’s one of my all time favorites

vTuro244d ago

This game was so fucking good. It's legit one of my all time favorite games. I wish they'd make another (Vikings was mid) or remake this one. Probably won't happen, but one can dream.

150°

10 Biggest Xbox Mistakes of All Time (So Far)

The Xbox brand has done a lot of good over the years, but their various blunders are pretty wild to look back on in their magnitude.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
piroh9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

Ironically number 9 can save them at this point (releasing games on multiple platforms)

ChasterMies8d ago

By “save them” you mean make more profit for Microsoft. Xbox will still be a dying hardware platform.

OtterX9d ago

You could add the naming scheme for the consoles, it just confuses customers. I know they wanted to avoid traditional numbering bc it would always be lower than their competitor, but this whole 360 then One then Series thing is confusing af. Imagine a Soccer Mom trying to figure this stuff out. I still mistakenly call the Series X the One from time to time on accident.

RNTody9d ago

Don't forget about the Xbox One, Xbox One X and Xbox Series X! Good luck to Soccer moms around the world.

S2Killinit8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

They did that on purpose to confuse and direct attention away from the generational numbering.

MS doesn’t like reminding people that they joined the industry after others had already been involved in gaming.

For instance, they called the xbox “360” to combat PlayStation “3” because they wanted to seem like “more” than “3”, so instead of xbox 2, they opted for xbox 360. Also this had the additional benefit of selling consoles to uninformed parents who might purchase a “360” instead of a “3” by mistake, or because they thought 360 was more than 3. Kind of a disingenuous move.

They have been continuing with their confusing naming patterns for pretty much the same reasons. Frankly, it fits with who and what they are as a brand.

FinalFantasyFanatic8d ago

I can understand their reasoning, but whoever came up with that naming scheme should be fired, bad naming schemes have killed consoles (I'm pretty sure it was the major reason for the downfall of the WiiU). They should have had unqiue names like Nintendo and Sega have had for their consoles, far less confusing for the consumer.

rob-GP4d ago

@FinalFantasyFanatic "They should have had unqiue names like Nintendo..."

lol, you mean:

NES, SNES
GameBoy, GameBoy Advanced, GameBoy Colour, GameBoy SP
DS, DSi, DSXL
3DS, 3DS XL, New 3DS, New 3DS XL
Wii, Wii U
Switch, Switch OLED

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4d ago
Cacabunga9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

Phil Spencer is the worst that has happened to Xbox.
They built a respectable brand up to Xbox one. Then this guy took over and things became a joke

Reaper22_8d ago

He still has his job. Something you can't say about Jim Ryan.

Cacabunga8d ago

Both bad execs. One is on job and one thankfully retired.

FinalFantasyFanatic8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

I didn't like either person, both people damaged their respective brands and produced worse outcomes, but Phil did save the Xbox brand from being retired by Microsoft. Although in hindsight, he should have just let it die, rather than languish in limbo like it is now.

Rainbowcookie7d ago

Yeah but the one that was "bad" didn't even affect sales.

bunt-custardly8d ago

Phil Spencer was also on the team back when 360 was around, alongside Shane Kim, Peter Moore etc. I think the damage that did the most harm was the Don Mattrick "Always Online" console (ahead of its time basically). They handed Sony and Nintendo a free-pass when that was revealed. It went downhill from there. Then the corporate machine went into full swing to try and recover. They have to a degree as a games company for the masses, and less so for the core gamer. Outside USA, the Xbox brand does not sell as well as Japanese based consoles (citation needed).

Cacabunga8d ago

Want a decision maker. The always online and TV plans was a disaster yes, but they caught up by announcing 1st party games that gamers actually kept the hype going.. until this moron took over and introduced the PC day one release.. e all know where that ended..

S2Killinit8d ago

I dont think they were ever a respectable brand, not since the beginning, when their goal was never to be involved and share in the gaming space. I think the OG xbox was an exception because MS as a brand was still getting its foot in and so the people behind that were people of the gaming industry.

FinalFantasyFanatic8d ago

The 360 was the brand in its prime though, everything went downhill towards the end of that generation. Its staple games like Halo, Forza and Gears are what kept the console relevant and afloat for so long.

MaximusPrime_9d ago

Really good video.

I remember the days with RRoD was big news on here, N4G.

Microsoft had it turbulence number of years.

Looking at the success of Sea of Thieves despite being 6 years old, time to release Halo, Forza horizon 4 & 5 on PS5. It'll help their revenue

shinoff21838d ago (Edited 8d ago )

2 of the 4 games they did already sold really well. So it's definitely going down. Idk about halo or forza but I feel those studios they've bought in the last 5 years, their coming

ChasterMies8d ago

I found this video painful to watch. Can someone list them out?

Top 10 for me from are:
1. 2013 reveal presentation
2. Bundling Kinect 2 with Xbox One
3. RRoD or why rushing to market with hardware is always a bad idea.
4. Buying studios only to close them.
5. Ads on the Home Screen
6. Letting Halo die.
7. Letting Geard of War die.
8. Every console name
9. Charging for Xbox Live on Xbox 360 when Sony let PS3 players play online for free.
10. Cancelling release of OG Xbox games after the Xbox 360 launched.

Show all comments (31)