330°

Original Dreamcast Controller Designs

Scans of a magazine article titled "Dreamcast Peripherals Story", from today's Japanese blog Hatimaki . Similarities to what is to be the future Wiimote shows that the Dreamcast was indeed ahead of it's time.

Read Full Story >>
hatimaki.blog110.fc2.com
Rikitatsu5495d ago

We all know the Dreamcast is far better than all Next gen consoles combined in terms of software quality.

It was the perfect console... Shame about the sales though... it was too hardcore for the mainstream to buy it.

RIP

Polluted5494d ago

It wasn't "too hardcore". It was poorly advertised. It also relied too heavily on a slew of arcade ports (great for quick gaming fixes), but failed to deliver a wide variety of games like Sony was offering at the time.

They also dropped the ball on securing third party support once the PS2 showed up. Nobody to blame for that but Sega.

Anyway, cool looking controller designs there, but I'm sort of a traditionalist. The old school DC controller was fine, imo.

Marceles5494d ago

Yeah it was pretty much the Playstation brand's power, Sega's first party not being enough, and Sega's practically non-existant third party support leading to the end of Dreamcast. Dreamcast certainly had some great games though, especially at launch. I remember getting Sonic Adventure and NFL2K at launch and thinking Dreamcast was the greatest thing ever. I certainly had some great memories with the console (and still do)

table5494d ago

The only dreamcast games I seem to remember playing were sonic and crazy taxi at a friends house. crazy taxi was awesome.

Winter47th5494d ago (Edited 5494d ago )

The DC was far ahead of its time. Online play, the brilliant memory card, Mouse & Keyboard support, Cross-Platform online play 'Quake III DC vs PC', Phantasy Star Online. What's really a shame was that SEGA was the one behind it, those guys can't plan ahead for sh!t. The day they announced they were going to ditch their console I felt like I got stabbed in the back, they sure ain't thriving now.

ZuperAmazingCooKie5494d ago

And I found a lot of things about the dreamcast obsolete, like its controller, its media and its complete lack of backwards compatibility (or at least provided by SEGA).

I think the Dreamcast is overrated. Not saying I wouldn't like to play the games I've missed, just saying it gets way more credit than it deserves.

Marceles5494d ago

I think it's the most underrated system ever. The only reason why Sega never received much credit for it was because they had a bad reputation with consoles after the Genesis. They did a really good job at digging themselves out the hole for awhile and brought some great games with really good graphics. It even gave PS2 a run for its money a little while after PS2 was released since PS2 was expensive and didnt launch with that many great games other than SSX, Madden, and Tekken Tag. Once GTA 3, FFX, GT3, and MGS2 came out, the price went down, and DVD became the new standard, there was pretty much nothing the Dreamcast could do. RE: Code Veronica, Crazy Taxi, Marvel vs Capcom 1 and 2, Skies of Arcadia, Shenmue, Sonic Adventure, Jet Set Radio, Soul Calibur, Power Stone, NFL and NBA2K series, Virtua Tennis, Street Fighter 3, Dead or Alive 2...man the list goes on at how many good exclusive games were on the system at the time, but like alot of people who were waiting on PS2, they just never took notice or didn't care.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5494d ago
ULTIMATE_REVENGE5495d ago

scroll down to the bottom of the page and there's a drawing of the PS3-Slim WHAT THE HECK!??

the new concerning the PS3-Slim has gone so crazy that it's pretty much confirmed now, even 'Sev' confirmed it so it's real

Sony! you can't hide it amy more, drop your weapons and put the PS3-Slim down!

Sony Rep5494d ago (Edited 5494d ago )

Is that a wii mote? Too bad the Dreamcast never took off. Then again, no one did that gen... no one else but the PS2.

G4drake5494d ago

damn you ps2 for killing the dreamcast

Krimmson5494d ago

It wasn't really the PS2 that killed the Dreamcast. Sure it helped, but I feel that it was mostly Sega's doing.

In an awkward way, I look at it like this:
The PS2 and the Dreamcast are in a boxing match. The PS2 is a faster and more powerful boxer than the Dreamcast (having better graphics and plays DVDs). At first the Dreamcast is having the upper hand in the first round or two (Dreamcast being launched early and having awesome launch titles). The PS2 started off sloppy in the fight (low productions). But then the PS2 begins to fight back and starts to overwhelm the Dreamcast (The PS2 gaining popularity from developers). The Dreamcast had a horrible cut-man and crappy coaches to help him through the fight (little third-party support). While the fans of the Dreamcast helped supported him to fight another round or 2, the Dreamcast forfeited the match after round 5 from being too gassed out.
The PS2 then went on to defeat the Gamecube and Xbox and win the Sixth-Generation Console Belt. While the PS2 is still fighting, he's near retirement and will hope his successor, the PS3, will be able to finally hold his own and become a respectable fighter (system) one day.

... Now how in the hell did I ever come up with that crazy analogy?

madnessof15494d ago

it was the 1st on the internet, and th last pure gaming machine.

ambientFLIER5494d ago

Dreamcast wasn't the first. Wasn't there a 16 or 8 bit system that allowed players to play against each other over the internet?

Show all comments (18)
90°

15 Great Games Where Every Minute of the Experience Feels Earned

GB: "We take a look at 15 amazing games that had the perfect length."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
5d ago
coolbeans5d ago

Pretty good list. Botany Manor would be the newest addition that encapsulates that title.

400°

Anyone else not blown away with graphics these days? Me neither

Talal writes: "I'm talking about having that rush of excitement - that feeling you get when you know you've just made a memory for a lifetime."

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
OptimusDK8d ago

There are different games. Some have gamplay at it highest priority, some have the story, some have the replay value and choices... There are a lot of different game experiences.

It is laughable that just now graphics does not have anything to do with that experiene. We have had many games of that type over time. This is just the one that have come closest to feel like playing an actual movie. Just look the the Digital foundry walkthrough it is a masterpiece in that perspective and hence wrth trying. But yes do not do it for the gameplay - but that was never the goal of this experience.

GamerRN7d ago

It's because it's on Xbox. When Xbox has amazing graphics, they don't matter. When PlayStation does, it's a game changer!

Lightning777d ago

Pretty much my thoughts. They were technical marvel's on PS and still are. The moment Xbox puts out a graphically intense game is doesn't matter suddenly.

4 years ago this month would the UE5 tech demo debut with the girl flying (tech demo said it was only possible on PS5 because of the SSD. Glad to finally see it in its glory.

fr0sty7d ago

FFS, gaming journalism has really gone downhill. At least hire people with a basic grasp of grammar... "Me neither" means the exact opposite of what the "author" is trying to say. That's like saying "I could care less"... lol.

S2Killinit7d ago

Maybe because the gameplay being dull allowed it to have the amazing graphics and people are not as impressed by graphics alone anymore? I mean there is a lot of sites saying the story and the gameplay are lackluster. So what are we supposed to enjoy then? Cgi graphics are beautiful but since they arent interactive, they dont impress me as much as they used to. Thats an extreme example, but you get my drift.

Terry_B7d ago

When Playstation (Sony) does it..its usually a great game and not a cinematic experience..or at least something new at the time..like Until Dawn back in 2015.

1Victor7d ago

@gamer:” It's because it's on Xbox. When Xbox has amazing graphics, they don't matter. When PlayStation does, it's a game changer!”

The game looks as good as any other PlayStation game in my eyes why can’t you and the other hardcore Xbox be happy about it and drag PlayStation into every conversation and force PlayStation hardcore to look into the game and find flaw that most games have in one way or another.
@light: “ 4 years ago this month would the UE5 tech demo debut with the girl flying (tech demo said it was only possible on PS5 because of the SSD. ”
Yes at that time it was only possible on PlayStation SSD how ignorant of you to think that after 4 years the technology wouldn’t evolved and move to a industry standard 🤦🏿I wish your mentality wasn’t so naive and narrow to post stuff like that 😩 in a year or 2 a new game will come out that might look better, it’s the nature of the industry.

Now that the distraction is gone I feel that is a good thing that the graphics in games are starting to hit the rooftop and hopefully the developers will put more thoughts into story and gameplay mechanics than just the next shiny oily skin of old.

Reaper22_7d ago

So true. Not surprised by all the negativity. It's a really good game and looks better than any game I've ever seen. GOTY nominee for sure. Like I said before, sony screwed up big time by not purchasing Ninja Theory.

Asplundh7d ago

Pretty much. It's like how the Switch and Steam controller using haptic feedback in their controllers wasn't a big deal but then Sony did it and it was then a "game changer".

fr0sty7d ago

The game runs at as low as 21fps... That isn't much to brag about no matter how good it looks.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 7d ago
MajorLazer7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

We've had graphical gamechangers before, such as Crysis but those games still had gameplay to compliment it. Hellblade pretty much has none, and only achieved such graphics through being incredibly linear and having very small, closed off environments where very little is happening.

Vx_7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

GFX does not mean anything if the game is boring. It is simple like that and these major companies need to understand this simple concept.

Games are like your lady, she may be beautiful to look at for a while but then it gets boring if her character isn't interesting and fun to be with.

8d ago Replies(7)
Kneetos8d ago

Mario kart 8 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Sonic18818d ago

Horizon forbidden West has great graphics and great gameplay

GamerRN7d ago

Yeah but graphics don't matter, remember?

anast7d ago

@RN

I've been pretty consistent in saying that we need both.

GamerRN6d ago

So until dawn, too human, or whatever those series of games were... Graphic masterpieces it garbage with no gameplay?

VincentVanBro8d ago

I agree and I actually think Forbidden West looks better than Hellblade 2. I easily prefer looking at it at least.

Sonic18817d ago

It does look better in my opinion as well. I don't know why it looks better but there's something about the Decima engine or that guerrilla games is using tricks that we don't know of

Abear217d ago

Can you fly a mount under water in Hellblade 2? I think not! One of the best moments this Gen

Show all comments (111)
90°

Two Decades Later, the Original Splinter Cell is Still a Masterpiece

They don't make games like this anymore.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
vgvill16d ago

Too dated in my book. The AI is way too unpredictable to be acceptable today. It's definitely a game of its time.

Jingsing16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

Agreed with those sentiments. The quality of the CPU controlled characters make or break a stealth game and they are pretty poor in all the Splinter Cell games by today's standard. This is what led me to playing Spies vs Mercs all the time in later games just to get a better stealth experience from a real person. Arguably Sony are making better stealth games albeit not Tom Clancy stuff.

TheProfessional16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

You should stick with fortnite or one of the countless bloodborne style games then. What a joke.

rlow116d ago

I had a good time with the game. It is a product of its time. But when it came out it was a must have game for a lot of people. I wish Ubisoft would make another game in the series or at least a reboot.

vgvill16d ago

They are making a remake, I think. I loved the original game when it was released, but I tried to play it again in recent years and just couldn't get on with it. The same with the older Hitman games.

PrecursorOrb16d ago

Yeah chaos theory still holds up though I gotta say. If you’re a fan of the series I highly suggest you go back to that one. Ubi has said they are remaking sc for “modern audiences”. I don’t have a lot of faith for the future of that company

Chocoburger16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

Due to the lack of modern stealth games, and me constantly playing the MGS series, I've been looking for alternative stealth games to play, and went back and re-played the SC series recently. I wouldn't call SC1 or SC:PT masterpieces, there are AI issues, they're very much trial-and-error games, and that can lead to a lot of frustration. I also found the stories in this series to be boring, uninteresting, and just sloppily told. Cinematics are also of poor quality for both in-game scenes and CG cut-scenes, the soundtrack didn't leave any impression on me either.

Chaos Theory is better, but there was still a lot of room for improvement, and Double Agent (old gen ver.) was a sloppy mess that ended up a regression from CT. But still, at least they tried back then, these days Ubi-junk doesn't even try to make good games!

HvNzSoul7d ago

Everyone needs to quit with all of the unnessacery Ubi-hate. SC Conviction and Blacklist are both still good games.

HvNzSoul7d ago

Everyone needs to quit with all of the unnecessary Ubi-hate. SC Conviction and Blacklist are both still good games, they just weren't 100% focused on stealth with Conviction and they remedied that in Blacklist. The only thing they have released recently that I was disappointed with was Watch Dogs Legion, and Skull & Bones. Everyone seems to be salty about the misleading trailer for the original Watch Dogs and The Division. Which are also, both good games, and actually Watch Dogs seems like it was ahead of its time even with all the trailer drama (having gone back and played recently, can say the game didnt deserve all the flak). Yeah the misleading E3 trailer that had better graphics than release is understandable to a very small degree, when most Teaser Trailers, or Game Demo's only have that portion of the game developed so they use the highest quality assets of w/e they have being showed, or what they are showing was made purely for the showing, allowing for extra polish . As to the gripes about minor game design changes, or cut features upon a games release just goes to show how unknowledgeable most gamers are in terms of how game development works or to even understand what what the hell a WIP, let alone titles still in early development.

Good games from Ubi since 2014 (Year that SC Blacklist Released) include:

Watch Dogs 1 & 2
The Division 1 & 2 (Although I had a hard time getting into The Division 2 at first)
R6 Siege
Ghost Recon Wildlands & Breakpoint
Immortals Fenyx Rising
AC Origins, Odyssey, MIrage (Haven't finished Valhalla games too damn long)
Far Cry Primal, and 5 (6 also has a length issue)
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora
Prince Of Persia The Lost Crown

Haven't played a couple of titles those being For Honor (played at launch but didn't honestly give it an actual go), The Crew, R6 Extraction and at the time of writing this xDefiant.

Even if you absolutely hated any of the above titles, they aren't inherently bad games, they're just good, but not always top quality either.

I say give Ubi credit where credit is due, they at least fix games post launch if they start out rough, Breakpoint is an excellent example this and is such an enjoyable experience now compared to it's launch.