600°

Blizzard's new user agreement: You no longer own your games

Blizzard only lets you license its products digitally now, not own copies.

Read Full Story >>
gamereactor.eu
gold_drake51d ago

and so it begins. one company starts, other will unfortunately follow suit.

god i hate this

just_looken51d ago

Well do not read the sony tos so many forgot PT era then you got nintendio many they like shutting down stores.

Every company even your phones has this in some form already

ModsDoBetter50d ago

Getting downvotes because it doesn't fit the narrative that boo! Microsoft bad! 😂

True, they're all at it!

Ubisoft recently wanting consumers to be comfortable with not owning their games.

ravens5250d ago

Not for nothing but Sony just opened a production line in Brazil. They plan to make physical media for Latin America. Doesn't look like Sony is going the all digital route like MS. I'll continue to purchase my games physically to avoid this 😁. Tried to tell y'all.

just_looken50d ago

@raven

Yes the made that but there is alot of games that need server check that become coaster after that server is gone like the avengers game.

dumahim50d ago

Isn't store shutdowns really a different issue though? As I understand it, shutting down the store isn't removing your ability to play the games. The Xbox 360 storefront is shutting down in July, but they've confirmed you can not only still play your games, but download stuff you already purchased. Same with the Wii. Store shut down years ago but you can still download your purchases.

DOMination-50d ago

^ For the most part, you can download games you've purchased before.

However, there have been exceptions in the past and there certainly won't be any guarantees in future. Games that have licensed music or characters seem to have the biggest issues here.

Cacabunga50d ago

I’ll never buy any software from them ever again.. i don’t remember last ABZ game i got i can easily keep the trend..
I hope most will boycott, so others think before deciding something this dumb

TallDarknWavy50d ago

The best way to combat this is simply buy more physical media and send a message that this is a demand that will not disappear

Z50149d ago

Wasn't that Konami's doing?
(I still own and can play PT. Just can't re-download)

VariantAEC47d ago

Definitely true
PSN Store: 8.4: "No Resale or Commercial Use. You must be an end user to purchase from PlayStation Store. Resellers, as determined by us in our sole discretion, are prohibited. When you order Content from PlayStation Store, you buy a personal license to use that Content for private, non-commercial use. That license is not transferable unless your local applicable laws say it must be. This means you can use a Product in the ways described in the license, but do not own the Product."
This verbiage is not applicable to physical media on PS directly, but there are software terms for physical media as well. The thing is PS (and all companies) have no clue what you do with physical media and they can't do much about it not even PS as they admit even banning your console doesn't prevent access to disc-based games.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 47d ago
Zeref50d ago (Edited 50d ago )

This isn't new. Most big videogame companies already do this. Including Sony.

gold_drake50d ago

yes.

but not quite like this. or they dont spell it out like that

Redgrave50d ago

It doesn't matter who is enforcing it. Some do not have the brain capacity to navigate this without making it a fanboy issue, and you aren't parting water by specifically naming Sony.

This is a universal bad, plain and simple. We are losing rights to our hobby across the entirety of it, and still people can only go "lol sony bad / ms bad". These same brainlets will ultimately be responsible for ushering in this era instead of pushing back because brand loyalty is more important than gaming as a whole.

CrimsonWing6950d ago

I mean I thought this has been the case. You’re only buying a license to play the games… am I wrong about that?

Crows9050d ago

It's called legal theft

When someone pays for a product but have no rights to it. Said company can take away what you paid for on a whim.

There's no real legitimate moral reason for companies to act upon it but they do and it shouldn't be taken lightly.

At least we can still borrow games from others...that's still legal.

Christopher50d ago

You're buying a key to unlock the digital files, which typically are stored and validated on the storefront from which the game was purchased. This says you don't even own that key, meaning it can be removed for any reason and you can't contest it and neither can the storefront stop it, even if it's a mistake or they just decide to remove access entirely based on their whim. It's the opposite of game preservation, essentially, even for SP games w/o any online requirements.

On top of this, they, where applicable because of severability with regard to regions that don't allow it, you aren't allowed to take them to court over their decision to remove access, but you must enter arbitration with them, which means you get nothing because they just tell you no and that's it.

This is why the FTC is supposed to exist, to prevent these obviously corporate control methods. But, hey, no, let's call them incompetent, defund them, and let companies dictate what is right. It's always in the best interest of the consumer.

Christopher50d ago

Not going to feel any compunction about pirating their games, then. Why pay money to own nothing when I can get the same from downloading it elsewhere? If you want my money, give me ownership and not just a subscription to a digital key you can revoke at any time.

PRIMORDUS50d ago

Exactly, if buying isn't owning, pirating isn't stealing. 😁🏴‍☠️

Hofstaderman50d ago

Thank you for saying what we all thinking.

50d ago
S2Killinit49d ago (Edited 49d ago )

@Lomugi
Which PS studio has this policy in their agreement that you no longer own the games you buy from them?

Im actually asking.

Dont defend MS to world’s end.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 49d ago
PRIMORDUS50d ago (Edited 50d ago )

Torrent all you can now, and if more show up and can be torrented take them to. I already posted some torrent links of their games on their Twitter account and told them to fuck off. Probably will not matter, but other people will see that and maybe I helped influence them to torrent to LOL.

Michiel198950d ago

so it begins? you been living under a rock? It's been like that since forever now. You never owned any of the games you bought digitally, just a license to use the software.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 47d ago
purple10151d ago

They just ended themselves
Bravo

XiNatsuDragnel51d ago

Congratulations you've proven my and many other digital doubters right. Physical >>> Digital for life. Also Blizzard Congratulations shooting yourself in the foot too.

just_looken51d ago

at this point there is no foot they are bones at best im not surprised by this but physical has drm/server check ins aswell as all the live service crap so alot of $70 coaster's out there.

Kaozz197950d ago

Thats the thing. Yes you have a physical copy but if systems are in place for you to verify online then whats the point.

S2Killinit50d ago (Edited 50d ago )

@Kaozz1979 @just_lookin

The one thing we still get with physical, is that the market controls the price you buy it at. So, If its old, you buy it for what the market says its worth, not what the digital store says its worth.

shinoff218350d ago

Most physical disc don't have check ins though. I personally don't play online so that's nothing to me.

just_looken50d ago

@s2

So true there are digital games still full price years later but get a disc fraction of the cost.

ravens5250d ago

Physical live service and multiplayer games*. All of the single player games I have are playable out of the box, thanks.

dumahim50d ago

Yeah, but at least with physical I still get the coaster. Digital you get nothing!

Christopher50d ago

Let's not conflate one issue (Live Service games eventually being retired) with another (we decide how and what you own, not you). They're both issues, but this one is more severe as it applies to all games they produce, not just ones reliant on servers.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 50d ago
Hofstaderman50d ago

Well they belong to MS now so shooting themselves in the foot is essentially company policy....

Ps5conehead50d ago

You do realize with disk, it validates the license they can stop that as easy.

-Foxtrot51d ago

How’s that digital future going people keep bigging up?

just_looken51d ago

Well its been around on pc for 10+years

Oh right that is a dream we never talk about

Lets us be shocked when all the pc issues show up on consoles years later as pc players be dealing with this aswell as new store front's like the horrific ea app removing digital purchases.

Crows9050d ago (Edited 50d ago )

...c'mon...don't pretend PC gamers are actually concerned about the digital only situation....how else do you think people share games on PC?

Digitally...

CS750d ago

Sad reality is the physicals are going to start requiring online check in too if we don't push back.

ModsDoBetter50d ago (Edited 50d ago )

They tried it before and they'll try it again!

We see evidence everywhere from games with single player modes forcing an online collection: Helldivers being a recent example.

ravens5250d ago (Edited 50d ago )

Helldivers is a Live Service game. It requires you to be online. All if not most online games require you to "check in".

SimpleDad50d ago

Everyone clicked ''Yes'' so digital future is just fine.

ChasterMies50d ago (Edited 50d ago )

Back when digital was not an option, I still didn’t keep games. I usually sold games on Craigslist. I would also trade games with friends and family. For the entire OG Xbox and Xbox 360 generation, I only bought 5 games new, all Halo games, and none at full price. You might recall that publishers started including content via download code to penalized players for buying used. If digital wasn’t taking over, we’d be back there. So if I’m renting versus buying, I don’t care so long as the price is attractive.

just_looken50d ago

Your talking about the ea online pass to "curve cheating" bs

I too sold some stuff in the past i wish i did not but now i go more digital unless the game is truly offline like bulders gate 3 that physical copy is yours always.

But the future is gamepass/ps subs for sure renting is far cheaper like the blockbuster days were you rent a game before buying it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 50d ago
GoodGuy0951d ago

Why I grab AAA games on sales most of the time now.

jznrpg50d ago

I buy some games day 1 but I do buy less games day 1 than I ever have before. Still need to get Infinite Wealth, DD2, P3 remake and a few others but I’m still playing other games so I wait until I have time.

Show all comments (103)
100°

Square Enix Is Going Multiplatform; The Layoffs & Its Past Don't Inspire Confidence

After its latest games didn't meet sales targets, Square Enix is going multiplatform but the company's track record isn't convincing.

Scissorman3h ago

Square Enix been multiplatform for decades, a few exclusively-deals doesn't make them any less multiplatform.

fr0sty3h ago

Nor is selling their games on a console with only 25 million install base going to bring their sales to where they hope they will be... Unless they somehow manage to dumb down FF7 trilogy to work on switch, they aren't going to have much luck. They already released it on PC, after all.

SegaSaturn6693h ago

It kind of does, giving preference to a certain platform by timed exclusivity. Console ports generally feel superior. Legend of mana PC port extremely broken

neutralgamer19922h ago

Sega

It doesn’t when square themselves didn’t want to fund the development of remake. It’s only after the success of the 1st they realized their mistake but now contract is signed. If it wasn’t for Sony there would be no FF7 remakes. Same goes for silent hill 2 with Konami. They don’t want to fund AAA budget. Companies like PlayStation and Nintendo get blamed when in reality they are saving some of these franchises

Remember sega didn’t want to fund bayonetta and epic games didn’t want to fund another gears of war. It’s easy to blame console makers but they are the ones taking the risk and paying huge upfront costs without seeing the final product. FF7 remake trilogy won’t be coming to Xbox now or in the future. PlayStation and PC is what square signed up for. Sony paid them more than they would make from Xbox sales.

ravens522h ago

I just wonder when everyone is going to demand that the Square Enix exclusives with Nintendo come to PS and Xbox. Or it's just the PS exclusives that matter lol

phoenixwing2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

I'd love for the nintendo exclusives to come to pc or ps5. They'd actually be playable then.

neutralgamer19922h ago

Raven

Exactly and that’s where square enix does more exclusive than any other platform. Gaming is square has always been very unrealistic with their sales expectations. Remember when tomb raider reboot sold 7.5 million and square said it wasn’t enough. They need to spend less on development and have more realistic expectations from sales.

And those thinking games being not on Xbox makes a difference don’t understand we have a decade plus of data showing square enix games having less than 20% of their multiplatform sales on Xbox (final fantasy series) and Nintendo consoles aren’t strong enough to run any current games. Nintendo switch should be as strong as Xbox one x atleast but we all know that’s most likely won’t happen

RoadRacer1h ago

@raven

thing is, as neutral said in their comm, the switch isn't strong enough to run flagship SE games
i think what SE does is, it makes unique games for switch only so that it has something for that console too. Thats where all the "underlined sans" rpgs go to mostly

maybe things will change when Swtich 2 drops cuz that's gonna be as strong as ps4 afaik from the rumors flying around

TheGamingHounds2h ago

@Scissorman

Your point is valid enough but when the icon of this company is limited to one console in timed-exclusivity, it means the company has crossed the line. By some degree at least

All things aside, Square itself stated "aggressive multiplatform strategies" so we all know what it's talking about

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1h ago
TheGamingHounds2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

SE needs to go all in optimization. Broken PC ports won't help its case, especially with big releases like mainline Final Fantasy

Asterphoenix2h ago

It's actually simple. What doesn't inspire confidence is Square allocating their budgets on the wrong projects such as Forspoken, Avengers, Babylons Fall and Foamstars.

Square has always been multiplatform since PS3/360 days which 80 % of their games are. People kick up a fuss over PS exclusivity but not Nintendo which has more exclusive projects console exclusive from Square.

FF16 has done ok but not enough to fix the blunders that the past mistakes Square has made with some of their projects. FF7 Rebirth is unclear we'll see a PC release for sure so it's hard to say so far not as good as they would of liked.

Then again unrealistic expectations. If it weren't for Sony these games would at least had another 2 years development time. So some people need to be realistic in that regard.

RoadRacer1h ago

Square Enix just really need to revise its expectations. Maybe consider a change in strategy on dev end as well. Multiplat will help for sure but only good games that are marketed well will sell

70°

Activision team is opening a new game studio in Poland 'Elsewhere Entertainment' to build new AAA IP

Microsoft's Activision subsidiary announced today that it is opening a new game development studio to take advantage of the huge talent pool growing in Poland. It'll be the second Activision studio based in the region, joining Infinity Ward Krakow, although this studio is, in fact, not working on Call of Duty.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
70°

Manor Lords has sold over 2 million copies since launch

Developer Slavic Magic and publisher Hooded Horse announce that their city building sim Manor Lords has sold over two million copies since launch.

1nsomniac11h ago

Still waiting for its first patch which is worrying. I know it’s been a single man developer but there’s really no excuse for no updates being released since launch. I’ve been part of many single developer releases that are updated daily, sometimes hourly. This’s hasn’t had a single one yet….

shadowknight2033h ago

There's a rumor going around that this developer once went by the name of another alias, and released a game without any further updates afterwards. Tis an eye worth looking at.