160°

Overwatch 2 Has Generated Over $225 Million In Revenue, Exceeding Forecast By 130%

Overwatch 2 has reportedly performed more than $225 million in revenue, exceeding the forecasts and KPIs by 130%.

solideagle117d ago

when I saw youtube videos around it, everyone claimed it was a flop/bad game. I am assuming it's a good game that's why people are playing it :)

Kiryu1992117d ago

It was sold on the promise of single player content that was cancelled and you know gamers don’t speak with their wallets

Otherwise we wouldn’t see micro transactions generating billions on yearly basis from games which cost full price

blackblades117d ago

Most players play for what it is not some single player mode. Which wouldve been fine but I dont care for that for this game. Its all about PvP for the ones that play it. Also its free to play so.....

Epicor116d ago

It was "sold" on the promise of single player content? No, it didn't sell any on that promise. No one buys skins and PVP battle passes because of upcoming PVE content in the future. The sequel was announced with PVE excuse, yes. OW2 generates shit ton of money because it's genuinely a good game and people buy cosmetics.

blackblades117d ago

Its a fun game and yes people here and Twitter always bad talk the game as well as saying the game is dying. I play it but its been awhile but when I do its fun and I alway get disagreed to hell for enjoying a game and having a good time. People just hate live service games and gatcha and think 100million+ other people think the same way as they do.

il-JumperMT116d ago

It is a trash game but just like Sport Games, COD and Apple fans, they can be fed turd and rejoice still.
Blizzard has such a fanbase that they can make millions with barely any effort

ChasterMies116d ago

Overwatch 2 is still a flop/bad game but that never stopped the gaming audience from dropping dollars.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 116d ago
Tacoboto117d ago

Ah so that's why Blizzard employees got fired, *only* beating expectations by 130%.

🖕🏻

babadivad116d ago

This happens in every merger.

slate91117d ago

Impossible, internet told me this was dead

LastAvenger117d ago

That much money yet nobody can keep their job?

-Foxtrot117d ago

Amazes me that people will call out Activision Blizzards awful practices and treatment of staff but will play the game still, especially after they cancelled the story mission stuff you know tricking us into buying the sequel to justify putting number 2 at the end of it.

Epicor116d ago

I guess people want to play good games regardless of companies behind them.

-Foxtrot116d ago

It’s not good though so…

Epicor90d ago

It is objectively good game though. I guess some people just want to echo the sheep sentiment. I encourage you to actually try the games you have so many opinions on instead of spending all of your time on N4G.

Show all comments (27)
200°

Let's Be Real, There Is Nothing "Micro" About Microtransactions Anymore

Microtransactions have gotten ridiculously overpriced in recent years, with titles now offering cosmetic skins worth more than some games.

Terry_B16d ago

Yup..this is 100% the sad truth

z2g15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

The elephant in the room tho is personal accountability. It’s easy (albeit basic) to blame the big, bad corpo, but microtransactions wouldn’t be where they are if gamers didn’t spend money on them. As it stands the MTs usually make more than the game. Publishers know raising game prices will cause backlash, so they do MTs to compensate. But the adult conversation is consumers determine the success of products with their wallets. So if MTs are a huge thing, it’s because we as consumers told them we like them by giving them a lot of money for them. So if you don’t want them to be a thing, convince your fellow gamers to stop buying them and expect that games will be decently more expensive. You all can disagree all you want, but reality is a bitch, and eventually you have to live in it.

anast15d ago

Trying to convince people is the least realistic thing. If we are trying to be adults, actual action is what changes things not "convincing campaigns" on platforms owned by the people 'you' are going against. It's madness and idealistic.

ApocalypseShadow15d ago

Easier said than done. I've told gamers for years to not buy micro transactions, expensive dlc, etc. Gamers bought it anyway. Didn't fit on a DVD that would have fit on a Blu-ray disc.

I also told some gamers to not pay for online like Xbox Live because it would force the rest of the industry to only offer playing online if you pay for it. Told them not to support a broken console that Red Ringed. To not support Xbox One because Microsoft tried to take away game ownership and how you play your games. To not pay for a console by one manufacturer where a, now 3 trillion worth, didn't make enough games at the level of Nintendo or Sony who are worth less money.

How much of that did you support anyway with your money then go back and read your comment again.

notachance14d ago

yeah that was like telling people not to do drugs or alcohol, these game companies invested a lot of money in researching about how to make people buy MTs, from creating mechanics like loot boxes, purposely make the game grindy, all the way to menu designs and what color and sound effects played when gamers bought MTs.

It was specifically engineered to take advantage of vulnerable and prone to addiction people.

bradfh14d ago

@z2g
People always struggle with issues like drinking, drugs, and gambling. But in games, especially those played by kids, microtransactions are another way companies take advantage of them. It's a problem that needs addressing.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 14d ago
S2Killinit14d ago

I recommend everyone read this article.

My suggestion is to name these transactions, what they ARE: Hidden-fees.

isarai15d ago

I mean except for the amount of content you're paying for.

Hugodastrevas15d ago

There never was, the only time I paid for a microtransaction was on Blacklight Retribution (PS4) and it was because I enjoyed the game a lot so I felt the devs should get something for all that entertainment (€5 "membership")

-Foxtrot15d ago

The devs wouldn’t get that though, that shit goes straight to the higher ups who do f*** all let’s be honest.

Hugodastrevas15d ago

Probably, but I wasn't as cynical back then and €5 wasn't a big ask to get the guns with grinding instead of renting them, and the game was good (still is on the PS5/4)

CrimsonWing6915d ago (Edited 15d ago )

I couldn’t believe what Blizzard charged for horse armor and cosmetics in Diablo 4…

I remember back in the day when a season pass was $15 and you got everything included in it. Now, I see them at $60 and you still don’t get everything.

CantThinkOfAUsername15d ago

That's just Blizzard. Unlike Bethesda's $0.99 horse armour, Blizzard's first microtransaction, Sparkle Pony, cost $15.

Phoenix7614d ago

Bethesda out did themselves a few years back with 76. They released a Xmas bundle for half price on day of release! So, was meant to sell for only $12 from day 1, but tried to convince everyone it was half price, by marking it at $24!

Shane Kim15d ago

As soon as gaming wasn't deemed nerdy anymore, and reached the casuals this happened. We're smart, but casuals play mobile games and other stuff, and don't really have anything to compare. They think gaming is supposed to be like this and pay for in game purchases.

Show all comments (29)
60°

Overwatch 2 Season 10 midseason patch brings big updates for Tanks

Tanks are getting some hefty buffs for the Overwatch 2 Season 10 midseason patch. After a lot of community discussion about the role feeling the worst to play for a while, the development team is changing some numbers to make these brutes harder for the enemy team to take advantage of.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com
70°

Blizzard Pulled Off One Of Gaming's Biggest Scams, And We Let It Get Away With It

Danish from eXputer: "Blizzard overpromised the PVE elements of Overwatch 2, and then failed to deliver on just about all of them, despite charging money."

franwex31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

No, no, no. Only the people that paid money let them get away with it. There’s no we.

Support Blizzard at your own risk.

Michiel198931d ago

Everyone that I know that used to play overwatch has quit at this point, I don't feel like they got away with it.

PRIMORDUS31d ago

For me the original OW was amazing just for the first 2 yrs after that I had enough. Now I play Paladins from time to time.

Michiel198931d ago

Same for me, it was my favorite game for a good while after it launched and that's coming from someone who doesn't enjoy competitive shooters. I've considered playing Paladins but never bit the bullet, so many good games coming out that it's hard to spare some hours for a competitive game

PRIMORDUS31d ago

So if you just play this POS game without spending a cent Blizzard will not see a profit at all.