GTA 5 voice actor Ned Luke has called out an AI company for using his voice for their AI chatbot without his consent.
Grand Theft Auto V was released over 9 years ago, but the player base is largely intact due to regular updates to the Online Multiplayer. The game had some technical issues at launch, most notably a CPU utilization issue, but most recent chips shouldn’t have any issues running it.
Subscribers of the Extra and Premium tiers of PS Plus will lose access to a total of 12 games during the month of June, 2024.
I think everyone and their sister owns the game by now. They likely want to squeeze the rest of the holdouts before GTAVI releases.
That game comes and goes from subscriptions so frequently I think it's expected now. Like rdr2 on gamepass Rockstar Games only last a max of 3 months On a service
indivisible was pretty neat. Cute artstyle, fun throwback to older RPGs, shame its leaving but it is on sale often
Definitely. I e joyed what I played of it. Still gotta grab the physical at some point
I'm not surprised by GTA V removal, Rockstar never allows this game to stay long on a subscription service.
They usually allow 4 to 6 months.
Yeah, they do that routinely with both GTA and Red Dead.
But it's because they know they can still sell them so they take them off and on to these sub services in cycle.
The weird thing to me is why is anyone still buying those games at this point? You would think after 3 generations of being sold GTA 5 that everyone and their momma would have it by now
I fail to see how the loss of an almost 11 year old game that released across 3 generations is in any way a problem.
From school politics to ping-pong, pistols to police procedurals, let’s dive into the best that Rockstar has to offer.
i feel for people in this situation. mainly because i know ai will come for me next. I'm trying to write a fantasy novel as a hobby/side hustle. I can't help feeling in a couple years chatgpt will spit out millions of novels and flood the market making my already slim chance of a book, drown in a sea of computer made novels.
Edit: The other thing is they don't even repay anyone for copying their voice and using it as a baseline. Just like they don't pay copyrights to the images they use to create ai art as a baseline.
This shit is getting annoying. You can't just steal someone's voice, mannerisms, personality, etc., and turn them into some AI. If you don't see a problem with doing that then you clearly weren't raised right.
The thing about these llms is they require a metric shitton of data and the developers don't care where it comes from as long as it's modern information pulled from countless webpages videos images songs etc.
If we trained llms on what is in the public domain they would be pretty useless.
So here we are walking trending a new ground of what letal and just and who has been screwed over.
I don't have any answers outside of copying someone's likeness is obviously wrong but it's also not new we've had deep fakes for around 8 years or so now.
I'm not worried about ai taking jobs right now it's output is pretty bad and untrustworthy I've asked it to code for me at first glance it looks good but the reality is when you actually look at what it's doing it's essentially full of what the call hallucinations essentially made up garbage
This is going to turn into another "occupy wall street": do a few book deals, make some money off of the slacktivist market, brought to you by some Banksy rip-offs. Finally, at the twilight of one's career, do some paid appearance money talking about how AI is bad... Sounds like a plan.
On YouTube I saw an advertisement using Ai with snoop dog supposedly promoting a service