210°

Microsoft and FTC Are Fighting Over Ubisoft Deal Investigation in Activision Acquisition Case

While the $68.7 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard by Microsoft has been closed, the legal battle between the house of Xbox and the FTC continues.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
XiNatsuDragnel161d ago

Yeah xbox just buy smaller studios from now on

itsmebryan160d ago

They would have to. Not many bigger than what they already bought.

just_looken160d ago (Edited 160d ago )

They could buy sony easily.

Sony net worth a tiny 112 billion were as microsoft this year has tipped over a net worth of 2.5 trillion.

Toss sony 120 billion make that up in a years profit easily bam no competition.

They made 51 billion every quarter on average this year that is pocket profit
https://www.microsoft.com/e...

jznrpg160d ago (Edited 160d ago )

Or try to manage the ton of studios MS already has without ruining them.

itsmebryan159d ago

@jznrpg

Have seen what Sony has done to insomniac. They made it into a Marvel only sweatshop till at least 2031+ while wanting them to layoff people. Talk about how to ruin a developer.

shinoff2183159d ago

Itsmebryan

Just curious how do you know insomniac didn't wanna take that on? those marvel games while not what I personally want they sell , they sell a sh ton.

This isn't like how ms ruined rare

Darkegg160d ago

Or invest in studios like cuphead who could have gone .. supply them with the investment and grow them.

GamerRN160d ago

The FTC needs to stop wasting tax payer money! This is a fight that's already been decided. They are literally doing nothing good for the US, for video gamers, or for business as a whole.

Str8Chaos74160d ago

Totally agree. Not to mention it is a very corrupt organization.

esherwood160d ago

For real. And it’s not like they’re protecting small businesses or anything. Xbox only competition is Sony a Japanese company so wtf are they so hell bent on crippling an American company

shinoff2183159d ago

You made the point yourself. Sony is a smaller business and right now the thing stopping ms from being a monopoly.

Also figure I'd add Sony is headquartered in america so that's gotta count for something , just cause it didn't originate in america.

If Sony leaves gaming ms is the only player in town. Most people with ps wouldn't go to Nintendo they'd have to buy a xbox unless they go pc.

RAFTECH26160d ago

A bunch of disagrees but no real comments.

FTC is wasting/burning money!

1Victor160d ago

@raft:” A bunch of disagrees but no real comments.”
What’s the point to reply to unhinged comments that sound politically motivated and get a soft ban.
All I have to say about this is that what the FTC is asking for is normal and Microsoft shouldn’t have anything to hide if they acted in good faith.
Bellow is what the FTC is asking for.

Corporate testimony about terms that were proposed but not included in the final Ubisoft Agreement.
Corporate testimony about the alternatives to the Ubisoft Agreement that Respondents considered.
Corporate testimony from Activision on all but three noticed topics.
Any documents or corporate testimony about Respondents’ own agreement to extend their merger’s timing, which was a necessary precondition to reaching the Ubisoft Agreement.

All of those are interesting points except for the last one to a lesser extent.

S2Killinit160d ago (Edited 160d ago )

Yeah they should let large corporations buy up everything.

GamerRN160d ago

Victor, why would any of this be relevant? They already had their argument shot down, and Microsoft's new streaming deal only makes it a lesser issue, not a greater one.

The deal will not be blocked. It's a waste of tax payer money.

MrDead160d ago

When you have MS money you buy success and influence, f**k everyone else.

190°

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie. This is something of a homecoming, as Microsoft owns Activision.

Read Full Story >>
engadget.com
Obscure_Observer9h ago

Very very early in development. Still, fantastic news!

Let´s GO!!!

Lightning778h ago

I guess.

How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )

At least it wouldn't be MS of all ppl destroying them.

MS really should let go Tango go like they did TFB here.

darthv727h ago(Edited 7h ago)

one was under Bethesda (Tango) the other under Activision (TFB). Clearly each one handled the separations of their subordinates differently.

Obscure_Observer7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

"How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )"

Perhaps because Zenimax and ABK handles such matters differently based on their own internal policies as "independent" publishers.

Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future. Which could also be the reason why they ensured an exclusive partnership with TFB and its new game, before anyone else.

Sad and disgusting. But it is what it is.

Lightning773h ago(Edited 3h ago)

"Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future."

MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB.

It's inexcusable, they have options on how to handle studios they don't want anymore with killing jobs. Not just MS but the rest of the industry also.

Sad and disgusting sure how many will get shut down next year or this year even?

I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another.

-Foxtrot9h ago

Manages to buy their freedom especially after all the shit Microsoft has been doing with its studios lately

...

Goes right back to them as partners.

Okaaaaaay...

darthv727h ago

Id venture a guess that TFB working directly with MS was a better outcome than working through Activision to get to MS.

VersusDMC5h ago

From the article...

"Toys for Bob spun out as an indie back in February after Microsoft instituted sweeping layoffs that impacted 86 employees, which was more than half of the staff"

I doubt those 86 employees enjoyed the Microsoft experience over Activisions.

Inverno5h ago

MS shuts down studios because of lack of resources and then helps these guys by giving em resources. Also MS is what forced them to buy their freedom in the first place? What kind of logic 😂

Chevalier2h ago

The best thing is that the company that is worth $3 trillion and owns the company instead of Xbox lacks resources. How the hell does a company worth $3 trillion making a measly $70 billion purchase they 'can't' support. Lol

Sciurus_vulgaris7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Xbox’s gaming division seems to still function as 3 semi-autonomous sub-divisions, Xbox Studios, Bethesda and ABK. The three main sub-divisions can seemingly shut down or build studios and set up partnerships independently. This would explain why Bethesda can recently shutdown studios, while ABK spins off one studio, while building a new one. Plus, Toys for Bob could be spun off by ABK, only to immediately re-partner with Microsoft.

Chevalier2h ago

That's absolutely 💯 BS. Any sane 'autonomous' company would NOT put their games on Gamepass day 1 like COD will lose probably billions.

Also they're all under Xbox game studios so any autonomy is an illusion.

Elda2h ago

Either a kiddie game or something uninteresting.

Show all comments (15)
180°

Sony shares big new PS Plus stat, but not the one we want to see

PlayStation Plus has improved the split of PS4 and PS5 players on its priciest tiers, but Sony continues to hide total subscriber numbers.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
mandf13h ago

lol acting like it’s equivalent to ms numbers

Mr Logic13h ago

Uh...They're definitely not equivalent.

"Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass service now has 34 million subscribers."

"the total number of PS Plus subscribers across all tiers was 47.4 million"

darthv7212h ago(Edited 12h ago)

That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN.

bloop9h ago

That's not the "gotcha" you think it is Darth.

darthv728h ago

^^it's not supposed to be bloop.... it's just an interesting observation.

Einhander19726h ago

darthv72

"That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN."

Have you ever heard of a PC before? I hear they are pretty popular.

fr0sty54m ago

MS started lumping gold subscribers in with those GP numbers... keep in mind.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 54m ago
shinoff218311h ago(Edited 11h ago)

What. Definitely more os plus subscribers but that makes sense due to actual console sales

Darth the difference between the bases are huge your right but you gotta think. Ps players buy more games, where as the Xbox base relies on gamepass for their gaming. So it makes perfect sense

darthv7211h ago(Edited 11h ago)

What makes perfect sense though? You say PS players buy more games... so then logically there should be more PS+ subscribers given the increased number of online multiplayer games in the PS4 generation alone. The PS4 was the first time that + was required for online play much like Gold was for 360 users.

Keep in mind we are talking subscribers, not simply XB/PS users. I assume you meant to say offline single player games, which is most likely true as well. That gen also saw a significant increase in games with an online component comparted to the previous gen.

victorMaje11h ago

I for one will be going back to essential at the next renewal. When I feel a game is good & right up my alley, I’ll check trusted reviews & just buy it.

jznrpg9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

I have the top tier until 2028 as they gave me a massive discount for all the years I had left but I’ll most likely go to essential as well. I buy my games but my kids do use the service occasionally. They do prefer to own their games as well since any game can leave the rental service at some point and they don’t like that idea. They mostly use it to demo games then ask me to buy games if they really like it.

RedDevils5h ago

For me, I will cancel it all together but unfortunately I still have it till 2030 lol

meganick9h ago

I would like to see Sony add a fourth tier of PS Plus for people who just want to be able to play games online without any of the perks like monthly games, store discounts, or anything like that, and it should cost $20 annually, $30 maximum. There’s no way I’m paying $80 just to play games online. Even the original $60 fee was too much, and I would often wait for sales to re-up my subscription.

P_Bomb5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Essential is too expensive, I agree. We’ve got one Essential and one Premium sub. Dropping the Premium when it expires.

gamerz2h ago

Just let my subscription lapse for the first time since 2010. Will sub again every now and then for a month or so to access my old ps+ games but for me it's the end of an era.

DivineHand1251h ago

Let those numbers continue to drop because it is now too expensive. $80 per year just to play online. I noticed they didn't offer any discounts on the subscription or controllers during this year's days of play for the first time in many years and they will feel it when people choose not to renew.

My subscription will lapse next month and it will stay that way until further notice.

130°

What Happens to Your Steam Account When You Die?

The Outerhaven writes: While Steam has come out recently, stating that Steam accounts can't be transferred, we need to think about it since we all will eventually kick the bucket. But if Valve is denying transferring accounts, what can be done? Plenty, actually.

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
thorstein1d 10h ago

It goes to my kids because I gave them the passwords.

To Steam: Missio has a song that conveys my feelings about you stealing my purchase after I die. It's called "Middle Fingers"

shinoff218315h ago

Pretty much. My son knows my info.

Abear2116h ago

Yeah worrying about digital ownership when you’re on the other side of the grass seems a little strange, but also on brand for these millennial journalists to worry about.

qalpha1h ago

I'm sure Keith will be happy to hear he's a millennial journalist.

Goodguy0119h ago

I suppose if I have kids, I'd just give em my account details by retirement age. If I die young then...idk lol.

CrimsonWing6917h ago

Yea, I mean just give someone the password to your account. Is that difficult to do or something? Like, I’m legit asking because I don’t know.

anast15h ago(Edited 15h ago)

It's not difficult but It's against the policy. If they find out, they will lock the account permanently.

CrimsonWing6914h ago

Ah ok, I had a feeling there was something like that. It seems kind of weird that you can’t just hand your account over to a family member or friend and let them take over the account.

Show all comments (15)