Approvals 12/3 ▼
freemmogamer (3) - 933d ago Cancel
-Foxtrot (3) - 933d ago Cancel
exputers (3) - 934d ago Cancel
Orchard (3) - 933d ago Cancel
190°

Take-Two requested to remove GTA mods and a fan-remake of GTA Advance

Once again Take-Two Interactive requested to remove some GTA modifications from LibertyCity. The publisher claimed these mods with DMCA strikes.

Read Full Story >>
libertycity.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community933d ago
-Foxtrot933d ago

Are they annoyed that fans seem to be able to do things better then them

Nebaku933d ago

If the fans are better than them, why do they need their engine to do these?

They're so good, they should be able to make their own superior game.

giveyerheadawobble933d ago

In some things, a modder can show a big studio up. But its usually them just doing something that the developer should have had to start with. Like the recent RE2 Remake mod in VR with full hand tracking. Capcom said it wasn't right for the game and the best way was 3rd person. Praydog, the modder, basically pulled Capcom's pants down. In regards to GTA, most mods are terrible "realism" graphics mods that destroy the art style and make it look like a mirror or a blown out mess. Model changing and other stuff is great, though. Take Two are going down the wrong path by pissing off the PC modding community here.

SimpleSlave933d ago

Spoken like a true ignorant goofball. Clearly reality means nothing to you. Why don't you go ahead and try again? Trust me, go on and read your own dumb ass comment and think it through just a little bit longer. You'll get there.

I believe in you.👍

anast933d ago

Devs and fans are using the same engine. The fans are sometimes better at using the same engine the devs use. Actually, some modders even get jobs doing this. A person does not have to create another space entirely to be better at something in shared spaces. I think there is an underestimation out there about how rare creating new spaces actually is.

Army_of_Darkness933d ago

Rockstar doesn't want to be exposed for putting very little effort to these remasters just to earn higher profits you know!? These modders are making them look bad.👌🤣

notachance933d ago

lmao

it's not even their proprietary engine, the remastered trilogy runs on unreal engine.

WillyC009932d ago

lol this guys is so clueless.

NotanotherReboot932d ago

because they don't have millions of dollars...?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 932d ago
persona4chie933d ago

It's not even that they're made that fans can do better than them. it's that since they know they aren't willing to put in the same amount of work or more to make it look as good or better, they don't want that other version to exist for people to even be able to compare it to

jeromeface933d ago

If your company spent millions developing an IP you'd prob be protective of it too.

luckytrouble933d ago

As they've spent years basically just cashing in on GTA Online and making the lives of fans that dare to make mods and fan projects hell. I feel zero pity for a company that is losing literally nothing to a modding community releasing mods for free.

7EVEN933d ago

Maybe but most of the mods are made to do what the companies should have done from the beginning, like I said most, not all.
And again most of the mods are free, that means the companies lose literally nothing.
They can do the same as Konami did with UnMetal or I think Snk with a fanmade Metal Slug, let the autors publish what they did and even let them gain some money.

anast933d ago

People get punish for making the games better. A better game means less MTs.

XxINFERNUSxX933d ago (Edited 933d ago )

Ok time to torrent GTA Trilogy out of spite not playing that turd but will take and seed. I would tell em to fuck off, then move your work and if you have a website on the dark web and post download links to your work there. This would be the logical thing to do. Go around them, this will be the only way. If all fan remakes were in this way we would all be having them finish to completion. Ain't no one going to bother you on the dark web with this, when there are much worse things up there, and never taken down. Now I'm going to post the torrent site and their game on that site right to Take-Two's email address and say to them what can you do now? Nothing that's what, you lose I always win 🤣 Keep messing with modders, casue in the end you won't get a dime from me.

annoyedgamer933d ago

I wish more people would torrent these things and stop supporting the companies.

got_dam933d ago

That's a double edged sentiment. I agree that we need to vote with our dollars and stop letting these shitty corps release broken shit and rake in the money. But if the sales weren't there then they would just abandon the IPs for not being profitable enough. Won't be anything to torrent if it's not being made. Again, I do agree with the sentiment. The ubi/ea/actibliz/Rockstar are all way too comfortable and they keep getting rewarded for their bullshit.

XxINFERNUSxX933d ago

Way ahead of you 😁 Been doing this about 2003, before that old school newsgroups, which are still around. You have to pay per month or year but it's well worth it sometimes.

Fntastic933d ago

Only 2003? Pretty sure I got Win XP using an auto redialer just before i moved to 128k broadband, ahh return to castle wolfenstein multiplayer was so smooth, first smooth online experience like 2001, unless playing a turn based game like Worms 2 or Armageddon then dial up was ok for that.

These days i mostly support software devs, steam and key sites are very cheap.

SDuck933d ago

I try but Denuvo's a b*tch. Crackers are having a hard time cracking the trilogy

240°

Take-Two CEO Doesn’t Think AI Will Reduce Employment or Dev Costs; “Stupidest Thing” He’s Heard

Take-Two CEO Strauss Zelnick doesn't think AI will reduce employment or lower development costs, and calls it "stupidest thing" he's ever heard.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community22h ago
lodossrage23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

They already have AI trained to do coding.......

How he thinks it's stupid is beyond me, Especially since we see it happening in real time.

CS721h ago

Company A has 300 employees and lays of 200 to replace them with AI to release the same quality game.

Company B has 300 employees and keeps all 300 but instead uses AI to release a game with dramatically larger scale, scope, complexity, short dev cycle etc.

Company B would release a dramatically better product by using humans + AI and consumers would buy the better game.

I actually agree with this concept.

Huey_My_D_Long21h ago(Edited 21h ago)

This is key facet. Its how the AI is used. It's actually is impressive as is and really would make an amazing addition to alot of people in their jobs, not just tech. It also has the potential for businesses to use to lay off large amounts of people, as much as they could to save money on labor. I hope too many companies don't go with the latter. But since usually companies are worried about bottom line over people...we will see some try and hopefully fail. But yeah, if its to help workers like in your company B scenario I'm totally down...Just scared Company A may be too enticing to some ceos and businesses.

Darkegg21h ago

Value of AI and value of humans will both be increased with human-AI complex. Each, by themselves, will not be independently better than the other. Whether AI will ever be independent from humans is the fear question of humans, ironically because of our doing. At this stage, most of the doing is because of humans, not because of AI. AI is doing exactly that by our design, until we have failed ourselves with an AI development that went awry. The biggest take is that humans have only ourselves to blame when things become wrong, and we have to decide what is the ultimate goal with AI we want to accomplish. It would take a person with high morals and high ethics to make right of AI. I would not want businessman to decide what AI should do or what capabilities it can have. AI should be in the hands of people with high moral fiber, or those operating on love, kindness, and compassion.

BlackOni20h ago

AI is SUPPOSED to be used as a tool, not a replacement. It's designed to do two important things artists can take advantage of immediately.

- Make the ideation/reference imaging process much quicker and easier (basically using it as a google search)
- Make mundane and time consuming tasks faster and easier so more time is spent on creation.

Unfortunately, what many have done is used it as a way to replace rather than supplement.

Einhander197217h ago(Edited 17h ago)

CS7

In the ideal world yes.

In the real world where companies have shown little desire to innovate and spent every effort to maximize profits the end result will be the same quality games (if were lucky) made by less people and more AI.

Company Real World: Fires 200 people and makes the same game cheaper using AI and the executives get record bonuses.

Edit:

Lets look at history, specifically auto manufacturing.

In the 70's and 80's the auto unions tried to oppose automation of jobs (robots) stating that they would take peoples jobs. And the people in charge who wanted to make more money said the exact same types of things that are being said about AI. But we can look at history and see that countless types of jobs were in fact replaced by automation, that was of course even compounded upon by computers.

The net effect was that the rich got richer less jobs were needed so wages were forced down by competition for the jobs that were left.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 16h ago
Number1TailzFan21h ago

You can already make your own SFX with text prompts now as well, of course it will lower development cost and time

1Victor21h ago(Edited 21h ago)

WARNING WARNING ‼️ SARCASM AHEAD
Sure Strauss and robots didn’t take jobs from car factories.
Edit:Sad thing is he believes it and unfortunately he won’t be replaced for a long time by AI

senorfartcushion19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

He doesn't, he's just lying. These people lay people off so they can get bonuses. If AI takes jobs, their bonus goes bigger and the workforce goes smaller.

porkChop17h ago

Because he sees AI as a tool to aid development. He wants to use AI to help make bigger and better games in the same timeframe. Other CEOs want to replace devs with AI to cut costs and make lifeless games faster for a quick buck. Strauss has the right idea, this is how AI should be used. To extend and expand the capabilities of devs.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 16h ago
jambola23h ago

Ceo says stupid thing
Part 5837384

Zeref22h ago(Edited 22h ago)

I think maybe sometimes we give people in these positions too much credit when it comes to intelligence.

DarXyde2h ago

I think you mean candor, not intelligence.

If you take him to mean what he's saying at face value, sure.

I don't. And I think he's clearly lying.

romulus2321h ago

As long as it doesn't effect his inflated executive salary or his ridiculous bonuses I'm sure he's fine with it.

RNTody21h ago

Hahaha yeah trust the CEO suit over the actual developers making the games. Good one.

Show all comments (29)
200°

Sony shares big new PS Plus stat, but not the one we want to see

PlayStation Plus has improved the split of PS4 and PS5 players on its priciest tiers, but Sony continues to hide total subscriber numbers.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2d ago
mandf2d ago

lol acting like it’s equivalent to ms numbers

Mr Logic2d ago

Uh...They're definitely not equivalent.

"Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass service now has 34 million subscribers."

"the total number of PS Plus subscribers across all tiers was 47.4 million"

darthv722d ago (Edited 2d ago )

That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN.

bloop2d ago

That's not the "gotcha" you think it is Darth.

darthv722d ago

^^it's not supposed to be bloop.... it's just an interesting observation.

Einhander19722d ago

darthv72

"That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN."

Have you ever heard of a PC before? I hear they are pretty popular.

fr0sty2d ago

MS started lumping gold subscribers in with those GP numbers... keep in mind.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2d ago
shinoff21832d ago (Edited 2d ago )

What. Definitely more os plus subscribers but that makes sense due to actual console sales

Darth the difference between the bases are huge your right but you gotta think. Ps players buy more games, where as the Xbox base relies on gamepass for their gaming. So it makes perfect sense

darthv722d ago (Edited 2d ago )

What makes perfect sense though? You say PS players buy more games... so then logically there should be more PS+ subscribers given the increased number of online multiplayer games in the PS4 generation alone. The PS4 was the first time that + was required for online play much like Gold was for 360 users.

Keep in mind we are talking subscribers, not simply XB/PS users. I assume you meant to say offline single player games, which is most likely true as well. That gen also saw a significant increase in games with an online component comparted to the previous gen.

victorMaje2d ago

I for one will be going back to essential at the next renewal. When I feel a game is good & right up my alley, I’ll check trusted reviews & just buy it.

jznrpg2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I have the top tier until 2028 as they gave me a massive discount for all the years I had left but I’ll most likely go to essential as well. I buy my games but my kids do use the service occasionally. They do prefer to own their games as well since any game can leave the rental service at some point and they don’t like that idea. They mostly use it to demo games then ask me to buy games if they really like it.

RedDevils2d ago

For me, I will cancel it all together but unfortunately I still have it till 2030 lol

meganick2d ago

I would like to see Sony add a fourth tier of PS Plus for people who just want to be able to play games online without any of the perks like monthly games, store discounts, or anything like that, and it should cost $20 annually, $30 maximum. There’s no way I’m paying $80 just to play games online. Even the original $60 fee was too much, and I would often wait for sales to re-up my subscription.

P_Bomb2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Essential is too expensive, I agree. We’ve got one Essential and one Premium sub. Dropping the Premium when it expires.

gamerz2d ago

Just let my subscription lapse for the first time since 2010. Will sub again every now and then for a month or so to access my old ps+ games but for me it's the end of an era.

DivineHand1252d ago

Let those numbers continue to drop because it is now too expensive. $80 per year just to play online. I noticed they didn't offer any discounts on the subscription or controllers during this year's days of play for the first time in many years and they will feel it when people choose not to renew.

My subscription will lapse next month and it will stay that way until further notice.

KevtheDuff2d ago

There were savings on subs and controllers here in the UK? I bought a controller yesterday in the sale..
It would be weird if those deals were not in other territories too?

160°

Silent Hill Transmission Livestream

Konami has announced that a Silent Hill Transmission will take place on Thursday, May 30, at 4pm PT/7pm ET that will reveal game updates, a "deeper look at the film," and new merch. Join us at IGN to find out what's next for this beloved franchise.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3d ago
RaidenBlack3d ago

Hope SH2 gets more polish before release.

P_Bomb3d ago

I’m not paying $94 CAD for what they’ve shown me. Looks rough as sin.

Fishy Fingers3d ago

Ive seen better lip syncing during a Punch and Judy show

Sonic18813d ago (Edited 3d ago )

This looks terrible. Capcom should have done the remake 😂 The animations and gameplay looks stiff.

-Foxtrot3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Okay. I was saying before in another article how SH2 looked better than the last trailer, which is true but damn this looks rough as hell.

I wanted RE4 / Dead Space remake quality

Sonic18813d ago (Edited 3d ago )

I wouldn't buy it for $70 dollars. Maybe when it's on sale.

-Foxtrot3d ago

Yeah full price, deluxe editions, Konami are f***** tripping here.

CrimsonWing693d ago

The characters look terrible to me… like it’s distracting.

repsahj3d ago

I will give this game a chance!!! let's go!

Show all comments (10)