750°

If You're an A****le, I Don't Want You As A Customer - Publisher Says

TGG says: "A Statement From Stefan Marcinek, Founder and CEO of Assemble Entertainment. I am only concerned with serving customers who have their hearts in the right place."

Read Full Story >>
thisgengaming.com
monkey6021045d ago

While I ultimately agree with this stance and wish more people weren't afraid to say something similar, there's a middle ground. Anyone abusive or nasty should absolutely be told to go F themselves. But bare in mind not everyone with an opposing view is evil or unreasonable. To take that severe a reaction to them could be seen as hypocritical.

I'll admit I have no clue what the political reference to Germany is there, so maybe the statement is more fitting than it seems strange to me right now ha

TheOptimist1045d ago

I think there is a massive difference between a critic and an asshole tbh

EvertonFC1045d ago

Critics and ass holes are both

XiNatsuDragnel1045d ago

@EvertonFC
I disagree with people like you. Critics and assholes are very different tbh.

Rimeskeem1045d ago

Critics are those who want something to be better. Assholes are those who just mean with no actual longing for something to be better.

dragonyght1045d ago

Unfortunately Critic and asshole get get lump together in order to deflect any sort of criticism, and it have become the default tactic Nowadays by Dev/Studio/Publisher

strifeblade1045d ago

Ahh I see the latter is what I normally see if PlayStation fanboys on this site.

NeoGamer2321044d ago (Edited 1044d ago )

The article the speakers make no mention of ass****s. The author of the article titled it this way to get clicks.

"If you are one of those people who can’t accept others because they don’t fit your worldview, because they are gay, lesbian, bi, trans or queer, who considers people with a different skin color, religion or ancestry than your own to be foreign or abnormal, who can’t stand them or even insults them, in what way ever, or who is incapable of respecting women and is violent; who votes for “parties” that are disgusting and inhuman, supports them, sympathizes with them or is active as a politician for them (yes, I’m referring especially to the AfD in Germany), then I want to make this perfectly clear:

I don’t want you as a customer!"

is the exact words in the article. The title of this article should be changed because the author is interpreting the remarks, the co-founder did not state that explicitly. I have no clue why this article was approved as is.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1044d ago
MoonConquistador1045d ago

His main point wasn't about being abusive or nasty. The majority of people have had odd moments of being abusive or can reflect in times in their life where they have been nasty and wish they had acted differently.

But underneath are your core values and beliefs. Do you believe that women can't do certain jobs that men can. Do you believe that people with a different skin colour are inferior or lessen the greatness of your once great "white supremacist empire". Do you look down on people who are different to your ideal whether that be their gender, identity, sexual preferences, race creed or colour.

I think it was a well written statement and I for one applaud him for making it.

Well done sir

1045d ago
John_McClane1045d ago

It's just more woke, cancel culture crap, go woke go broke.

InUrFoxHole1045d ago

Women can do the same jobs as men... Just not as well.

frostypants1045d ago (Edited 1045d ago )

I mean...the average woman CAN'T do certain jobs that the average man can, because like it or not there ARE physical differences...on average. Doesn't mean than some women can't buck the norm, and they absolutely should be allowed to. But if, for example, military physical requirements have to be dumbed down so more women can pass muster, that's where a line is being crossed (in that particular example, lives and unit effectiveness are being put at risk for a feel-good quota). And if we're to believe that they CAN do anything a man can do on average, then such handicapping wouldn't be necessary.

Point being there's nuance to this stuff. I'd also point out that the things women can do that men can't do are even more biologically stark.

1045d ago
dbcoops1045d ago

The problem is literally none of that has anything to do with selling a person a video game, he has no idea what anyone who buys one of his games thinks or feels or believes and it has no barring on him personally, as such this is little more than an angry rant from what he sees as the moral high ground. I think when we start dictating to people to not buy products because their personal views differ from our own we are heading down a very slippery slope. More importantly who made him the authority on core values and beliefs?

_Decadent_Descent1045d ago (Edited 1045d ago )

Women can't do all the same jobs as men, or even some of the same jobs to the same effectiveness as men. That's not discrimination, that's just an understanding and acceptance of empirical and anatomical facts.

Sayai jin1045d ago

@OrganicGamer, you and maby others still trying to push white-washed history. Yes, there have been slaves throughout time. Europeans, Africans, Asians, etc across the globe and time. Yet, the largest amount on scale, systematically slave trade was the Transatlantic Slave trade. Mutliple European countries had it down to percerted science. Yes, there were African tribes who sold Africans to Europeans for weapons and other goods, but most slaves were just taken and once most European countries figured out how to not trade Africans for slaves. They cut out the middle man. From the Brithish, Dutch, Swedes, Italian, French, Portuguese, and so on moved hundreds of millions of slaves for centuries from Africa. They had drops in throughout South America and the Carribean and onto the US. Where thede invaders pillaged, pkudered, looted, enslaved, killed, etc unchecked. The brutality of the Transatlantic Slave Trade was published and taught by Europeans. They had courses on how to breed, subjugate, etc their captors.

So you speak of history, speak truth, not nonsense. History perfectly reports the barbaric acts of the Barbary Slave Trade, slavery in Asia, Ancient Egypt slave trade, etc. Yetx when you speak of conquest and slavery Europeans whitewash and sugarcoat the savaragey, terrorism, invasion, genocide, etc globally as exploration, colonialism, etc. Times up though, just look at the migration around the globe.

Sayai jin1045d ago

@John Mclane, Cancel culture is in reality people finally being held accountable. Strap up, becuase there's no stopping.

Sayai jin1045d ago

Justadelision. Only a fool would believe that. Evil people are evil. I have seen my fair share of it as I deployed globally in the military.

Imalwaysright1045d ago (Edited 1045d ago )

Sayai jin

White washing? When slavery is the topic, everyone and their mother will invariable and always talk about the atlantic slave trade with some even claiming that slavery was invented by the big bad white men.

Pretty much no one talks about Egypt that enslaved the entire population of Israel, Mali's Mansa Musa who became the richest man to have ever lived on the backs of every single person that he enslaved and he alone "owned" 60 000 slaves. No one talks about the 1 million white people that were enslaved during the atlantic slave trade. No one talks about native american tribes enslaving rival tribes, no one talks about slavery happening today in Africa and how it's not illegal to "own" slaves in some african countries while in my country, Portugal, slavery was abolished in 1863, in the UK was abolished in1807 and in the USA a civil war was started in 1861 due to disagreements about slavery.

Today slavery is seen as a white men evil despite the fact that many countries in every single continent had slave economies centuries ago so don't give me your crapola about white washing of history when the opposite is what's happening today.

13sentinel1045d ago (Edited 1045d ago )

"Do you believe that people with a different skin colour are inferior or lessen the greatness of your once great "white supremacist empire".

Translation: "Only white people are racist" - The racist.

1045d ago
1045d ago
Ristul1045d ago

If there is a fire in your building and you need firefighter to carry you out of the building, would you want a woman or a man to do the job. Men and woman are not the same, we are very different in a lot of ways. Musclemass and strenght is one of those factors.

Stefan Marcinek is a leftist elit, looks down on anyone with a conservative nature it seems. Oh well, l have never bought any of his games so no worries.

gamer78041044d ago

Some of what he said I agree with but other parts were basically If you disagree or vote differently politically you are not welcome as a customer. IMO the message was passionate but inconsistent.

Sayai jin1043d ago

@Imalwaysright, reading/comprehension is fundamental. You can be upset and/or disillusioned about slavery being white washed, but you are not disagreeing with me. You are disagreeing with the majority
of history scholars across the planet. They acknowledge Anglos from Europe have whitewashed history across the globe. This isn't an opinion, it's a well known fact. It was even done on maps. Where most American and European maps and globes would depict Africa as the same size or as smaller continents...i.e. show the continental US and scale it to the size of Africa. Pathetic. The white washing of history won't be tolerated. It has and is still trying to be done. For instance, my homes state of Texas is attempting to take portions of US slavery, civil rights, Women's suffrage out as a requirement. It was in MCMillian Book Co. who produces school books in the US, had a few state's (Texas being one) middle school history books mention US slavery as more of a indentured servitude and that slaves were happy because their masters fed them and they sang. The curriculum mentioned that the slaves would work very hard and sing, then after, their over-seerer (that's another term they try to whitewash), more like their slave owner, would have a barbeque for them and let them dance and sing. This is on just a microscale, but the attempted white wahsing is on the macroscale. More white washing...calling invasion and terrorism colonialism...

"When slavery is the topic, everyone and their mother will invariable and always talk about the Atlantic slave trade with some even claiming that slavery was invented by the big bad white men."

Who's everyone? When people say things like everyone and nobody at all they are usually speaking of a narrow or anecdotal viewpoint. I have lived all over the globe and have a good bit of higher education and I have heard about the different slave practices throughout history and I have seen lectures, documentaries, etc about those practices. People talk about other forms of slavery. The main reason why people speak of the transatlantic slave trade is due to the amount of slaves, duration, amount countries, etc again this is where reading and comprehension is crucial. Again, these are undeniable facts. You disagree? These are presented in all literature.

Cont...

Sayai jin1043d ago

@Imalwaysright, Answer me this. Do you still see the effects of the Barbary slave trade or Egyptian slave trade? If so, to what extent? Another reason why people refer to the transatlantic slave trade is because you can see still the impact from it today. Take a look and start in South America and go north to Canada. You will still see the effects of slavery. It is multifaceted. Do I need to explain why? Another reason is that Europeans who enslaved, invaded, etc did so on a global scale. Look all over the globe, from India, North America, South America, Caribbean, etc. They stole land, committed genocide, etc for centuries.

Media, Countries, Organizations (i.e. NATO) people talk about the slavery occurring today in Africa, China, et...even down to human smuggling. You know this.

Yes, Africans, Native Americans, British, etc owned slaves and had slave like practices. It was all over the globe and throughout history. Most of those practices were more of an indentured servitude or when one tribe defeated another tribe, they would enslave the women and children instead of slaughtering them...unlike Europeans did to the Native Americans.

Some whites in America mention, but there was slavery everywhere to attempted to deflect that we are talking about the happenings in our country. You speak of the ending of slavery in different parts of the world as if I am unaware, but conveniently don't mention that those slave practices still continued well after that. Another reason why people refer to the transatlantic slave trade is the fact that Europeans and white Americans continued to cruelly treat and subjugate the descendants of those slave for 50 to 80 years past. Black Code, Jim Crow, Apartheid, etc. Some will even say that after slavery was ended in the US, that it was even worse for black Americans, because, slaves were no longer property or an asset and slave owners and their loyalists would perpetuate evil acts for decades.

The white washing of history is a "No Go" and is being called out just like all the other injustices that were for so long white washed. The chickens are coming home to roost, just look at the migration, immigration, demographic changes, etc around the globe. Certain folks don't like truth being spoke, but it will be spoke

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 1043d ago
helghastfan1045d ago

The AfD is Germany's far right anti-immigrant, extremist political party. They won support for their views on blocking immigrants entry into Germany. They also have ties to extremist groups so I think the studio founder is talking about more than a difference of opinion.

MoonConquistador1045d ago (Edited 1045d ago )

Oh he is very much. Supporters and voters of the AfD have some of the core beliefs I was referring to in my above posts.

He doesn't try to hide that he's referring to their supporters in his message. But that reference at least also includes every far right political party around the globe, being German he only really highlighted the point from his own country.

Every country seems to have their own version of the AfD. Some just disguise it better than others too

B68W1045d ago

Extremist by your partisan view. The Afd is Germany's third largest seat holding political party. A political party wanting restrictions on immigration, especially during the massive migration crisis over the last decade, does not make them extremist, nor does holding traditionalist views. Advocating for violence to achieve their political goals would make them extremists.

dbcoops1045d ago

I find that its often those who demand acceptance, inclusion and equality like this gentleman who are the least accepting, inclusive and willing to see others as equal out of everyone.

gamer78041044d ago (Edited 1044d ago )

This is the problem with taking this stance. What are “truly right values” and what is the difference between intolerant and just a worldview I don’t like. Tolerance is disagreeing but still being civil with one another, it’s not agreeing regardless…. A better idea, both realistically and financially, is just don’t engage in conversation with someone who is behaving in a manner that you view to be rude. The mean and rude part I understand the rest is basically if you disagree with them then they don’t want you as a customer, even if they have no control over that.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1043d ago
DnBSkillZ1045d ago

But most publishers are assholes

1045d ago Replies(3)
Snakeeater251045d ago

Publisher : delay because of covid … assholes

Riftrider1045d ago

Publisher release game to early ... Assholes.

bloodyspasm1045d ago

I also want to pitch in how funny it is to see Mike Rose (from No More Robots) reply to people on Steam, eg when they added a rainbow flag for pride month to Descenders and someone went on a rampage because of it. Don't give assholes the platform they want and just block them/ignore them ^^

Show all comments (100)
230°

Take-Two CEO Doesn’t Think AI Will Reduce Employment or Dev Costs; “Stupidest Thing” He’s Heard

Take-Two CEO Strauss Zelnick doesn't think AI will reduce employment or lower development costs, and calls it "stupidest thing" he's ever heard.

lodossrage19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

They already have AI trained to do coding.......

How he thinks it's stupid is beyond me, Especially since we see it happening in real time.

CS717h ago

Company A has 300 employees and lays of 200 to replace them with AI to release the same quality game.

Company B has 300 employees and keeps all 300 but instead uses AI to release a game with dramatically larger scale, scope, complexity, short dev cycle etc.

Company B would release a dramatically better product by using humans + AI and consumers would buy the better game.

I actually agree with this concept.

Huey_My_D_Long17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

This is key facet. Its how the AI is used. It's actually is impressive as is and really would make an amazing addition to alot of people in their jobs, not just tech. It also has the potential for businesses to use to lay off large amounts of people, as much as they could to save money on labor. I hope too many companies don't go with the latter. But since usually companies are worried about bottom line over people...we will see some try and hopefully fail. But yeah, if its to help workers like in your company B scenario I'm totally down...Just scared Company A may be too enticing to some ceos and businesses.

Darkegg16h ago

Value of AI and value of humans will both be increased with human-AI complex. Each, by themselves, will not be independently better than the other. Whether AI will ever be independent from humans is the fear question of humans, ironically because of our doing. At this stage, most of the doing is because of humans, not because of AI. AI is doing exactly that by our design, until we have failed ourselves with an AI development that went awry. The biggest take is that humans have only ourselves to blame when things become wrong, and we have to decide what is the ultimate goal with AI we want to accomplish. It would take a person with high morals and high ethics to make right of AI. I would not want businessman to decide what AI should do or what capabilities it can have. AI should be in the hands of people with high moral fiber, or those operating on love, kindness, and compassion.

BlackOni16h ago

AI is SUPPOSED to be used as a tool, not a replacement. It's designed to do two important things artists can take advantage of immediately.

- Make the ideation/reference imaging process much quicker and easier (basically using it as a google search)
- Make mundane and time consuming tasks faster and easier so more time is spent on creation.

Unfortunately, what many have done is used it as a way to replace rather than supplement.

Einhander197213h ago(Edited 13h ago)

CS7

In the ideal world yes.

In the real world where companies have shown little desire to innovate and spent every effort to maximize profits the end result will be the same quality games (if were lucky) made by less people and more AI.

Company Real World: Fires 200 people and makes the same game cheaper using AI and the executives get record bonuses.

Edit:

Lets look at history, specifically auto manufacturing.

In the 70's and 80's the auto unions tried to oppose automation of jobs (robots) stating that they would take peoples jobs. And the people in charge who wanted to make more money said the exact same types of things that are being said about AI. But we can look at history and see that countless types of jobs were in fact replaced by automation, that was of course even compounded upon by computers.

The net effect was that the rich got richer less jobs were needed so wages were forced down by competition for the jobs that were left.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 12h ago
Number1TailzFan17h ago

You can already make your own SFX with text prompts now as well, of course it will lower development cost and time

1Victor17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

WARNING WARNING ‼️ SARCASM AHEAD
Sure Strauss and robots didn’t take jobs from car factories.
Edit:Sad thing is he believes it and unfortunately he won’t be replaced for a long time by AI

senorfartcushion15h ago(Edited 15h ago)

He doesn't, he's just lying. These people lay people off so they can get bonuses. If AI takes jobs, their bonus goes bigger and the workforce goes smaller.

porkChop13h ago

Because he sees AI as a tool to aid development. He wants to use AI to help make bigger and better games in the same timeframe. Other CEOs want to replace devs with AI to cut costs and make lifeless games faster for a quick buck. Strauss has the right idea, this is how AI should be used. To extend and expand the capabilities of devs.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 12h ago
jambola19h ago

Ceo says stupid thing
Part 5837384

Zeref17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

I think maybe sometimes we give people in these positions too much credit when it comes to intelligence.

romulus2317h ago

As long as it doesn't effect his inflated executive salary or his ridiculous bonuses I'm sure he's fine with it.

RNTody17h ago

Hahaha yeah trust the CEO suit over the actual developers making the games. Good one.

Show all comments (26)
100°

Every PlayStation Studios game available now on Windows PC

Windows Central writes: "Many PlayStation Studios games that are ported to PC get dedicated PS5 DualSense support, which allows users to experience haptic feedback and adaptive trigger support without actually having to own a PS5.

According to Hermen Hulst, head of PlayStation Studios, it's still the company's intent to launch the bigger single-player games on PS5 first, before later bringing the games to PC. This might not be the case for multiplayer games however, which are considered okay to launch simultaneously on console and PC."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
ocelot072d ago

My guess is after god of war. Probably last of us 2 that's a almost 4 year old game now and by the time it's released on pc it will be more than 4 years old or close to 5.

Elda1d 20h ago

Every old Playstation game that is now on PC.

shinoff21831d 10h ago

Right. I definitely see what a headlined from a website named windows central was trying to do though. It's cute little wordplay to help out the green box

Flewid6381d 9h ago

Are PlayStation games no longer good or worth playing once they are old?

Elda1d 8h ago

I'm guessing my comment went over your head.

XiNatsuDragnel1d 18h ago

Good at least they can sell hardware

510°

Days Gone Director Says Bend's Project Costs Over $250M; Says PS Co-CEO Doesn't Want 2 Zombies Games

Days Gone director claims Sony has already poured in at least a $250M in Bend's project; says Days Gone sold more than Death Stranding.

shinoff21832d ago

Well that sucks. Seems they want more online trash. I'd rather of had the sequel if it was single player

MrNinosan1d 23h ago

What online trash games did PS Studios release last 10 years?

Notellin1d 21h ago

The past has nothing to do with the future. This is such a terrible argument. Everyone knows about their current live service push.

_SilverHawk_1d 20h ago

It's so tragic what happened to days gone. It is such an amazing game but bandwagoners trashed it and it underperformed in it's launch year. Days gone is the best open world zombie game released in the past five years. I was recently playing it on pc and I'm still amazed by it.

Games are very expensive to make and it seems like it's normal for a AAA game to cost over a quarter billion to make so if a quality game like days gone greatly underperforms then people shouldn't be upset when they see a lot of GAAS. I still remember a lot of bandwagoners calling days gone trash but years later it's now amazing when it's considered a failure by sony.

If a game isn't the best thing seen since hats with pockets then a lot of gamers who haven't played it automatically calls it rubbish and whoever made it should be incarcerated

Cacabunga1d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

Co CEO prefers gamers to boycott.. so be it. I’ll never buy a gaas.
Just imagine buying a game you cannot replay in some years.. this shit must stop.

Days Gone did zombies in a very original way. The story was also so engaging. You actually only meet Zombie hordes later in the game. There are many more enemy groups to deal with.

MrNinosan1d 17h ago

@Notelin
I am one of the few who bought Days Gone on release day and loved it completely.
However, "more online trash" is phrased like Sony has put out alot of trash online games.
We got what, 2 games? Helldivers 2 and GT7, 2 of the most sold Playstation games where both is loved by millions.

You, me and especially shinoff has no idea if Fairgames, Marathon and Concord will be trash.

Just because we (as in you and me) don't love or support online games, doesn't mean millions of other do.

And we don't know what Bend Studio is working with? We don't know if they're forced to make a online game or another amazing single player experience.

The only thing we do know is that it's not Days Gone, sadly due to poor sales the first 6 months.

shinoff21831d 15h ago (Edited 1d 15h ago )

More online trash wasmt meant how insee it comes across. I should've worded it different I was meaning the focus they currently have on it.

Anything online is online trash to me. How long did naughty dog spend on that dumba last of us multiplayer, how about Concord, or even the other couple we hear about. I fk with Sony because rpgs and their 1st party single player games. Been like that for years. I hate seeing them waste time, money, and talent on trash. I understand bot every game is gonna be for me but this focus they've seem to had on multiplayer is extremely disheartening. Even at the state of play the only things I was really feeling were Astrobot and silent hill 2 and I'm content with that, not everything is for me. It's just the online focus I hate. Ms bought up 3 to 4 wrpgs developers, Sony just ignores rpgs 1st party wise.

And a days gone 2 would've been much better then whatever online sht bend is working on. I do know sometimes I get very idk emotional. I do need to work on toning that down a bit lol

SimpleDad1d 5h ago

Ammm let's see... That All-stars, Foamstars, Babilon 5 wass gaas...
Concord... can wait to play that...Marathon uuuu... Last of them gaas... U
Horizon Zero dawn has a project that leaked as a Fortnite lookalike.

They bought Destiny that is a dead gaas...people love ti.

Helldivers 2 was luck.

Jimbo was all in and pushed Sony single player games 5 years behind.

Spiderman gaas was cancelled... I mean every 1st party studio was doing gaas.

Bend had to pitch a gaas game... Open world coop something

I can't remember more... Of that crap.

tay87011d 4h ago

@simpledad. Destiny 2 isn't a dead game. Its the number 5 most played game on steam. I dont play it, but alot of people do.

MrNinosan1d ago

@SimpleDad
You failed to mention a single PS Studios game that has been released last 10 years.
Either your reading skills are crap or you think Sony own every studio in the world.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1d ago
just_looken1d ago

I rolled my eyes at concord not only was it just yet another cookie cutter hero shooter but that qucik look for the hero select.

Already has a free section then paid section along with a they/them she/her dei crap top right.

Nothing like a day off of work to fire up concord to read about the new characters sexual identity and or preference then a paywall do you want o buy this character shit like no i just want to shoot my gun have fun.

-Foxtrot2d ago

It would be a shame if it was true that Hermen never gave the franchise a chance simply because he didn't like it and they already had a "Zombie" game with TLOU.

NaughtyDog are most likely moving onto a new IP next so it would have been the perfect time to do it.

ThinkThink2d ago

Here's where xbox steps in and releases state of decay 3 day and date on ps5.

shinoff21831d 15h ago

I mean it's not out of the realm of possibility at this point.

Grilla1d 23h ago

Days gone 2 was canceled before Herman was in charge. That happened like 4 years ago.

vfl5231d 22h ago

4 years ago he was head of Playstation Studios. He would've probably had a hand in the cancelation.

Notellin1d 21h ago

Man two seconds of research could have saved you from this comment. Amazing work Grilla you fit in with the uniformed N4G community who speaks before verifying anything that they say.

Redemption-641d 20h ago

Maybe encourage people to buy the game at full price and not when it's heavily discounted or go on plus. If this game had sold well when it was full priced a sequel would have been in the works. They made a single-player game that most people didn't support until they dropped the price.

Cacabunga1d 19h ago

The guy’s just a moron.. he should have stayed within game development. His choices will have a terrible impact on the brand in the long run.

tay87011d 9h ago (Edited 1d 9h ago )

Dude is pretty pathetic. Sounds like a guy who's girl left him for someone better. Always talking about days gone sequel that never was, even though he is no longer at bend and hasnt been for a while. I for one am not upset about the lack of a sequel. It is one of the worst 1st party games in recent memory. Completely jank, played like an xbox game. The only redeeming quality was the hordes.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 9h ago
excaliburps2d ago

Yep. Kind of weird since it wasn't a sales flop, no?

I know we have to take what Ross says with a grain of salt since we're hearing just one side of the story, but even so, the game wasn't bad at all. Heck, it's my brother's favorite last-gen game from what I recall.

The amount of zombies on screen, imagine that with the PS5 and SSD? That would be insanely fun!

Grilla1d 23h ago

Most copies were sold on sale. Not enough ppl bought it at full price. I paid 20$ for it 6 -7 months after release.

Notellin1d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

Yeah we should never believe the creators side until we hear the corporate/big business side as history has shown we should always believe billion dollar corporations.

What a bootlicker statement.

derek1d 17h ago

@Notellin, of course you'll believe an embittered ex-employee with an axe to grind because it's evil Sony he's complaining about. You guys act like days gone was this huge success and somehow Sony hates easy money a sequel would have generated. The game was mid and so was the response to it. They're still supporting the developer who is making a new ip that could be great.

shinoff21831d 15h ago

Days gone was fantastic. I bought day one but didn't get around to it for months. When I finally did I was pissed at myself for waiting so long lol

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1d 15h ago
P_Bomb2d ago

Well I don’t want 10 live service games, but they have no problem doing that lol. Ugh.

CrimsonWing691d 23h ago (Edited 1d 23h ago )

Oh great so we only get what the big wigs want… y’know, the people that really have their fingers on the pulse of what their consumers want. Faaaaantastic!

rippermcrip1d 20h ago

Well consider they know the sales... they do know what the consumer wants.

It sold shit.

-Foxtrot1d 15h ago (Edited 1d 15h ago )

But if it’s true what this guy says it sold better than Death Stranding

Yet that got a sequel and Kojima aside out of them both DS didn’t really NEED a sequel compared to Days Gone which ended on such a cliff hanger twist.

Show all comments (75)