230°

Cyberpunk 2077 Has Sold 13.7 Million Copies in 2020; CD Projekt Announces Financial Results

Today CD Projekt released its financial results for the year 2020, alongside data about the sales of Cyberpunk 2077 and The Witcher series.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
thorstein1137d ago (Edited 1137d ago )

Biggest scam: Cyberpunk 2077 selling an early access alpha version for full price OR CIG never releasing a final build of Star Citizen?

cell9891137d ago

Damn tough question but I’d say Star Citizen takes the cake for the sheer fact that it has yet to be released lol

arkard1137d ago (Edited 1137d ago )

Star citizen because they took the money before (and still not) delivering a product. And CDPR offered refunds

UltraNova1137d ago (Edited 1137d ago )

To be fair to consumers, most of those sales happened before the news broke out about how broken the game was at launch.

I really hope CDPR doesn't plan on asking for full price for the next-gen edition of the game later this year. If they do that I'll happily wait another year to pick it up from the bargain/used bin.

-T9X-69-1137d ago (Edited 1137d ago )

The news broke out the same day and week the game launched. These are year end sales numbers. Not really sure what you mean.

The next-gen version of both this and Witcher 3 are free title updates. They're not being sold. I believe Cyberpunk physical copies for consoles even had a "free-next gen update" sticker on them.

UltraNova1137d ago (Edited 1137d ago )

I seem to remember it had insane pre-order numbers, more than half of the reported year-end figure so I was referring mostly to those who pre-ordered. Remember though, PC did not suffer the same technical issues so I guess many thought to try it.

As for the next-gen version, what's stopping them releasing a new edition at full price, a year later? My comment did not apply to those who already own the game (e.g., my self and everyone I know who is interested in playing this when it's fixed). To make my self even more clear - new editions should not carry a full price sticker.

I hope that clears things up for you.

-T9X-69-1136d ago

I think you should check out this article as it was updated this morning with more information.

https://arstechnica.com/gam...

The amount of refunds issued is comical given the total sales in general followed by nothing but negative press and angry customers. The internet will make you believe something is way worse than it is, regardless of how bad it is initially.

I do remember the PC version because that's the version I got. Fortunately for me, I have a good enough PC and also didn't encounter very many issues until my 2nd playthrough.

I know it's easy to think or say "well what's stopping them from doing this or that". But the real answer is investors. They're a publicly traded company and because of that, a lot of factors come into play. Transparency and honesty being most important. I'm sure you're well aware of the lawsuits from investors directed at CDPR after Cyberpunk launched.

Not only have they confirmed multiple times it will be free, it's also on the packing, mentioned during investor meetings etc. More lawsuits with a tacked on false advertising lawsuit isn't something anyone wants to happen to their business. Let's also not discredit their history of free dlc and updates because some big wig CEOs wanted to capitalize off hype during the biggest spending time of the year. Christmas.

Stanjara1137d ago (Edited 1137d ago )

Ben Affleck and I played this game... What a scam of the generation!

CrimsonWing691137d ago

Here's the thing, glad they're successful, but this was at the cost of their reputation.

I didn't think Cyberpunk was a complete dumpster fire, hell I 1000'd it within the launch month so it wasn't as busted for me as others. However, they lost the good graces of their consumers and that's something that will forever bite them in the ass when they release a new game. So, don't gloat about this CDPR because I have a feeling your next game won't sell as much as this one at launch.

solideagle1137d ago

wait for Witcher IV trailer and everyone will forget :)

Dee_911137d ago

And thats the sad part,
also thats the reason they believed they could do this with cyberpunk. Gamers have short memories. I for one put cdpr in the ea category. all future games will be bought out the bargain bin.

Sciurus_vulgaris1137d ago (Edited 1137d ago )

A friend of mine and myself both played Cyberpunk 2077 around the same time. He was played on high end PC. Conversely I played through the game on Xbox Series X. We both observed persistent minor bugs while playing.

You are right, CDPR had probably damaged their reputation for a long time. They were on the verge of possibly revivalist Rockstar as an open-world developer. However, they don’t have the graphics engine or experience to do so.

I however, encountered a bug that prevented progression . The previously mentioned bug was fixed by reverting to a earlier save at the start of the mission. The worst bugs I encountered involved the game crashing and performing worse -and-worse during extended play sessions.

Yui_Suzumiya1137d ago

I'd rather play Cyberpunk than any tripe Rockstar ever produced, lol

annoyedgamer1137d ago

EA/Ubisoft has no good graces and yet they rake in the dough.

Aussiesummer1137d ago

Please, gamers will eat up whatever shit they serve next.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1137d ago
Napoca71137d ago

The gameplay in this game, is really boring ./ The story is cool!

Show all comments (32)
100°

Every PlayStation Studios game available now on Windows PC

Windows Central writes: "Many PlayStation Studios games that are ported to PC get dedicated PS5 DualSense support, which allows users to experience haptic feedback and adaptive trigger support without actually having to own a PS5.

According to Hermen Hulst, head of PlayStation Studios, it's still the company's intent to launch the bigger single-player games on PS5 first, before later bringing the games to PC. This might not be the case for multiplayer games however, which are considered okay to launch simultaneously on console and PC."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
ocelot072d ago

My guess is after god of war. Probably last of us 2 that's a almost 4 year old game now and by the time it's released on pc it will be more than 4 years old or close to 5.

Elda2d ago

Every old Playstation game that is now on PC.

shinoff21831d 17h ago

Right. I definitely see what a headlined from a website named windows central was trying to do though. It's cute little wordplay to help out the green box

Flewid6381d 15h ago

Are PlayStation games no longer good or worth playing once they are old?

Elda1d 15h ago

I'm guessing my comment went over your head.

XiNatsuDragnel2d ago

Good at least they can sell hardware

220°

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie. This is something of a homecoming, as Microsoft owns Activision.

Read Full Story >>
engadget.com
Obscure_Observer2d ago

Very very early in development. Still, fantastic news!

Let´s GO!!!

Lightning772d ago

I guess.

How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )

At least it wouldn't be MS of all ppl destroying them.

MS really should let go Tango go like they did TFB here.

darthv722d ago (Edited 2d ago )

one was under Bethesda (Tango) the other under Activision (TFB). Clearly each one handled the separations of their subordinates differently.

Obscure_Observer2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

"How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )"

Perhaps because Zenimax and ABK handles such matters differently based on their own internal policies as "independent" publishers.

Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future. Which could also be the reason why they ensured an exclusive partnership with TFB and its new game, before anyone else.

Sad and disgusting. But it is what it is.

Lightning772d ago (Edited 2d ago )

"Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future."

MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB.

It's inexcusable, they have options on how to handle studios they don't want anymore with killing jobs. Not just MS but the rest of the industry also.

Sad and disgusting sure how many will get shut down next year or this year even?

I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another.

Obscure_Observer2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

"MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB."

Imo, MS separated from TFB because they didn´t had a game associated with Xbox yet, unlike Tango.

"I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another."

Fair enough. It was indeed an epic dumb move from them to close Tango.

Still, all to be forgotten, like always have. This is not the first time a big publisher shuts down a beloved and/or successful studio out of nowhere and certainly won´t be the last. Do you remember Lionhead? Do you remember Evolution Studios? Yeah... both were beloved studios and yet, those companies kill those studios in q blink of an eye and got away with it.

anast2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

The studio boss made some money from this transaction. Once the game releases, the studio will get chopped up.

-Foxtrot2d ago

Manages to buy their freedom especially after all the shit Microsoft has been doing with its studios lately

...

Goes right back to them as partners.

Okaaaaaay...

darthv722d ago

Id venture a guess that TFB working directly with MS was a better outcome than working through Activision to get to MS.

VersusDMC2d ago

From the article...

"Toys for Bob spun out as an indie back in February after Microsoft instituted sweeping layoffs that impacted 86 employees, which was more than half of the staff"

I doubt those 86 employees enjoyed the Microsoft experience over Activisions.

Inverno2d ago

MS shuts down studios because of lack of resources and then helps these guys by giving em resources. Also MS is what forced them to buy their freedom in the first place? What kind of logic 😂

Chevalier2d ago

The best thing is that the company that is worth $3 trillion and owns the company instead of Xbox lacks resources. How the hell does a company worth $3 trillion making a measly $70 billion purchase they 'can't' support. Lol

romulus231d 22h ago

Stockholm syndrome, maybe?

BlindMango1d 17h ago

The reason they would need to "partner with Microsoft" is simply to make a game that's part of a franchise that Microsoft owns. Meaning they're probably going to make a new Spyro game - they're still an independent studio, but are making a game in a franchise that Microsoft owns. It's kind of like Remedy partnering with Rockstar to be able to make the Max Payne remakes.

shinoff21831d 17h ago

It was probably the deal to get released from Ms

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1d 17h ago
Sciurus_vulgaris2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Xbox’s gaming division seems to still function as 3 semi-autonomous sub-divisions, Xbox Studios, Bethesda and ABK. The three main sub-divisions can seemingly shut down or build studios and set up partnerships independently. This would explain why Bethesda can recently shutdown studios, while ABK spins off one studio, while building a new one. Plus, Toys for Bob could be spun off by ABK, only to immediately re-partner with Microsoft.

Chevalier2d ago

That's absolutely 💯 BS. Any sane 'autonomous' company would NOT put their games on Gamepass day 1 like COD will lose probably billions.

Also they're all under Xbox game studios so any autonomy is an illusion.

PhillyDonJawn1d 22h ago

No, I'm sure MS can and does step in when they want something done specifically but I'm also sure they let them also work independently

shinoff21831d 17h ago

I highly highly doubt this. Ms controls all. The guys aren't gonna be allowed to just shut something down like that without approval. No way

Elda2d ago

Either a kiddie game or something uninteresting.

Obscure_Observer2d ago

Don´t worry. You won´t be playing it anyway since their next game will possible be a next gen Xbox console game.

Elda2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Don't worry about my comments.

PhillyDonJawn1d 22h ago

Right probably something like astrobot

romulus231d 22h ago

Nah he said "uninteresting", lots of people are interested in Astro Bot.

Elda1d 20h ago

Never Astro Bot. Astro Bot looks better than any exclusive released on XB this entire generation & believe there hasn't been much.

Asplundh1d 19h ago

Crash 4 was good, so I'm hopeful.

PhillyDonJawn1d 18h ago

Hey you said that about SOT and looks like many ppl on PS is playing it. You also found bugsnax interesting ffs your opinion hold no weight lol.

Elda1d 18h ago (Edited 1d 18h ago )

Bugsnax is BS, tried it & quickly deleted it. It's a game that fits right on Gamepass. PS5 owners that are probably playing the boring SOT you could count on one hand. LMAO!!...don't try to come for me.

PhillyDonJawn1d 15h ago

So you admit bugsnax interested you enough to try? 😂 someone gotta call you out on the foolishness.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 15h ago
Show all comments (35)
130°

What Happens to Your Steam Account When You Die?

The Outerhaven writes: While Steam has come out recently, stating that Steam accounts can't be transferred, we need to think about it since we all will eventually kick the bucket. But if Valve is denying transferring accounts, what can be done? Plenty, actually.

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
thorstein3d ago

It goes to my kids because I gave them the passwords.

To Steam: Missio has a song that conveys my feelings about you stealing my purchase after I die. It's called "Middle Fingers"

shinoff21833d ago

Pretty much. My son knows my info.

Abear213d ago

Yeah worrying about digital ownership when you’re on the other side of the grass seems a little strange, but also on brand for these millennial journalists to worry about.

qalpha2d ago

I'm sure Keith will be happy to hear he's a millennial journalist.

Goodguy013d ago

I suppose if I have kids, I'd just give em my account details by retirement age. If I die young then...idk lol.

CrimsonWing693d ago

Yea, I mean just give someone the password to your account. Is that difficult to do or something? Like, I’m legit asking because I don’t know.

anast3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

It's not difficult but It's against the policy. If they find out, they will lock the account permanently.

CrimsonWing692d ago

Ah ok, I had a feeling there was something like that. It seems kind of weird that you can’t just hand your account over to a family member or friend and let them take over the account.

Show all comments (16)