Approvals 12/3 ▼
JCOLE13195 (2) - 1415d ago Cancel
FallenAngel1984 (4) - 1415d ago Cancel
SlyDante (3) - 1415d ago Cancel
Sophisticated_Chap (3) - 1415d ago Cancel
300°

Interview with Xbox boss - Phil Spencer talks about the most important thing about the Xbox Series X

What does Xbox boss Phil Spencer actually think about the next gen? How does it compare to alternative price models, as presented by the competition? How important does he think cloud gaming is? He answered all these questions and many more in an exclusive interview for the Webedia Group's outlets (which also include GameStar and GamePro).

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Wrong source
https://www.gamestar.de/videos/xbox-chef-im-interview-phil-spencer-spricht-ueber-das-wichtigste-an-der-xbox-series-x-cloud-gaming-die-zukunft-der-konso,100920.html
Alexious1415d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1415d ago
Changed: title, content, url, credit url
ElementX1415d ago
Thundercat771415d ago

Not quite set in stone and yet Xbox officially stated that there is not going to be Xbox series x exclusives for at least a year.

If you are not yet sure, wait til you are clear about it because this reminds me the beginning of this Gen when Xbox was on total 180 u turns.

Z23ash1415d ago

No they didn’t. There are already multiple series x exclusives announced.

What Phil actually said is their 1st party studios have the option to make cross gen games

chiefJohn1171415d ago (Edited 1415d ago )

No they didn't, you heard from someone that work for them but it wasn't an official statement. For some reason you guys ran with that narrative

TranceHop 1415d ago (Edited 1415d ago )

Hellblade 2 will be Xbox Series X/ PC exclusive

ocelot071415d ago

Question and this is genuine. How how can it be exclusive if it's on two platforms? Like would it not he silly if I said well hitman 3 is going to be exclusive to ps5/xsx/pc?

Dissidia1415d ago

Same way death stranding and hzd are exclusive. Not on one platform, but also not on Xbox.

_dangerclose_1415d ago

@Dissidia

Death Stranding and HZD are no longer exclusive and neither is anything on xbox.

Imalwaysright1415d ago

The way TranceHop phrased it is correct. If he said that Hellblade was just a PC exclusive or just a Series X exclusive it would be incorrect.

Imortus_san1415d ago

Hellblade 2 is a MS exclusive game.

rainslacker1415d ago (Edited 1415d ago )

Then Horizon: Zero Dawn is a Sony exclusive game. Madden is a EA exclusive game. COD is an activision exclusive game. So on and so forth.

I love how we make up new categories for MS for things which have never needed them in the past. MS is basically a third party publisher, with their own console, and now a content delivery service(soon to be two officially launched).

Nothing wrong with that, but the spinning to try and make it a win for Xbox itself for this silly console war is rather ridiculous.

Just to note, I was never against MS putting their games on PC, and I don't care if Sony does it. My only interest in the debate is purely philosophical on the meaning for how it may or may not effect a consoles sales because I find such things interesting.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1415d ago
sprinterboy1415d ago

Only sold 1m on xbox, so gonna be another hard sell getting more fans onboard if they didn't play the 1st? It's one of them games which probably doesn't really sell well to the casual crowd? Hope it sells well though, great studio and great 1st game.

chiefJohn1171415d ago

Sequels tend to sell better plus it now has a trillion dollars company backing it with a bigger budget for marketing. I wouldn't be concerned bout sells

darthv721415d ago

So what about those who played the 1st on gamepass? They suddenly no longer count because they arent "sales"?

rainslacker1415d ago

1st is available on multiple platforms, and they could probably put it on Game Pass to help promote it for the sequel. It wouldn't be unheard of to promote a game in that way.

Plus, depending on the story, it may not require knowing the first game, which was more a journey inside Sansua's own mind. Personally, I'm not even sure how a sequel could be made of the same character, since the story wasn't really set up for that kind of thing. But, it'll be interesting to see how they approach it.

ElementX1415d ago (Edited 1415d ago )

In the interview, Phil talks about "creators", not first party devs. I submitted this article, but I think Gamespot might be misinterpreting what Phil meant. They haven't updated the article to reflect any errors, though

yarbie10001415d ago

first party devs aren't creators now?

If you watch the video he says our studios in his answer.

Either he's limiting all his devs or he's giving freedom to all devs. Either way, Xbox's PR is a mess

ElementX1415d ago

He said "if a creator comes to us"... that could mean 3rd party devs. He didn't say "our" creators.

darthv721415d ago (Edited 1415d ago )

3rd party partners and creators are free to make what they want. It could be xbo exclusive, sx exclusive, cross generational... it's their choice. All MGS games that are near release as well as those currently in development to be released within the next 1-2 years will be cross generational. those that are outside that 2 year mark are also under no obligation to be SX titles and could also be cross generational. It is their choice if they want to continue to support the xbo or if they want to be fully exclusive to the SX.

neutralgamer19921415d ago

We will see after launch which approach gamers prefer because both companies are taking on next gen consoles in different ways. Sony is ready to move on knowing 3rd parties will support PS4 for a while due to its market share so they can focus on must have ps5 games while Ms wants to support all it's platforms for at least the initial 1-2 years

Once both consoles are out and at least 6 months have passed only than can we get accurate stats on what gamers preferred (btw I am not saying which approach is right or wrong it's just that lets stop hating one or the other until we have some numbers)

chiefJohn1171415d ago

6 months? Uhhh you won't be seeing many must have exclusives in the 1st 6 months ijs. Add an additional year to that 6 month estimate

rainslacker1415d ago (Edited 1415d ago )

I think it would take longer than 6 months to see the long term effects. Plus, MS is still coming into the gen handicapped because of the market share discrepency this gen. At best, we might see how it effects the start of the generation, but generally speaking, if a company doesn't have a strong start, then they tend to struggle the rest of the gen. Or at least not gain market share compared to the competition.

Unfortunately, it's all those finer details and less obvious things which rarely get considered for actual discussion on these topics, which is a shame, because I find them more interesting...albeit require lots of explanation to really explain sometimes.

I do think that chief has a point though. The effect of exclusives on a consoles sales may have more obvious measures when they finally start releasing exclusives on the new hardware(actual vs console exclusive debate notwithstanding). But, some of this can be measured already with what we commonly refer to as system sellers. There are quite a few games that when they release, we see a surge in consoles sales. If MS has these, then two comparable games....lets say Halo and then Gears, or a second Halo, we can measure the sales of a system when one is cross-gen, and then again when one is exclusive, and see the relative bump to sales to make a more accurate, or at least more informed argument on the subject.

In my opinion, the launch window of a console only shows how eager people are to move onto a next gen, and how well that company did on selling people on their new console. It is not a metric of how well the console will do for it's lifetime....although a strong start does tend to mean a strong generation. It's hard to go backwards when you have momentum, and while it's hard, it's not impossible to move forward if you stall out of the gate.

Show all comments (41)
120°

Take-Two CEO Doesn’t Think AI Will Reduce Employment or Dev Costs; “Stupidest Thing” He’s Heard

Take-Two CEO Strauss Zelnick doesn't think AI will reduce employment or lower development costs, and calls it "stupidest thing" he's ever heard.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2h ago
lodossrage3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

They already have AI trained to do coding.......

How he thinks it's stupid is beyond me, Especially since we see it happening in real time.

CS71h ago

Company A has 300 employees and lays of 200 to replace them with AI to release the same quality game.

Company B has 300 employees and keeps all 300 but instead uses AI to release a game with dramatically larger scale, scope, complexity, short dev cycle etc.

Company B would release a dramatically better product by using humans + AI and consumers would buy the better game.

I actually agree with this concept.

Huey_My_D_Long55m ago(Edited 54m ago)

This is key facet. Its how the AI is used. It's actually is impressive as is and really would make an amazing addition to alot of people in their jobs, not just tech. It also has the potential for businesses to use to lay off large amounts of people, as much as they could to save money on labor. I hope too many companies don't go with the latter. But since usually companies are worried about bottom line over people...we will see some try and hopefully fail. But yeah, if its to help workers like in your company B scenario I'm totally down...Just scared Company A may be too enticing to some ceos and businesses.

Darkegg33m ago

Value of AI and value of humans will both be increased with human-AI complex. Each, by themselves, will not be independently better than the other. Whether AI will ever be independent from humans is the fear question of humans, ironically because of our doing. At this stage, most of the doing is because of humans, not because of AI. AI is doing exactly that by our design, until we have failed ourselves with an AI development that went awry. The biggest take is that humans have only ourselves to blame when things become wrong, and we have to decide what is the ultimate goal with AI we want to accomplish. It would take a person with high morals and high ethics to make right of AI. I would not want businessman to decide what AI should do or what capabilities it can have. AI should be in the hands of people with high moral fiber, or those operating on love, kindness, and compassion.

Number1TailzFan56m ago

You can already make your own SFX with text prompts now as well, of course it will lower development cost and time

1Victor47m ago(Edited 45m ago)

WARNING WARNING ‼️ SARCASM AHEAD
Sure Strauss and robots didn’t take jobs from car factories.
Edit:Sad thing is he believes it and unfortunately he won’t be replaced for a long time by AI

jambola3h ago

Ceo says stupid thing
Part 5837384

Zeref1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

I think maybe sometimes we give people in these positions too much credit when it comes to intelligence.

romulus231h ago

As long as it doesn't effect his inflated executive salary or his ridiculous bonuses I'm sure he's fine with it.

RNTody59m ago

Hahaha yeah trust the CEO suit over the actual developers making the games. Good one.

Show all comments (11)
340°

Trying to push players over from PC to console is a terrible idea, PlayStation

As PlayStation announces its new strategy to encourage PC users to choose PS5 it is a bitter-sweet moment for PC gamers.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1d 8h ago
Christopher1d 23h ago

I mean, it's a business based on hardware market. Do we expect them to not even try? It's not like Nintendo doesn't do the same by not putting any games on PC and Microsoft until recently did the same. I don't care what they attempt, as long as they don't abuse the community or lie about their goals/requirements.

Will it work? Not likely. Should we care? No. Let them waste their time, it doesn't affect anything.

RaidenBlack1d 23h ago

let them try ... at the end of the day, we get few extra PC games ... yay ... and also promotes game preservation via PC ... so double yay.

LordoftheCritics1d 6h ago

If only Playstation games provided the ease of pc gaming features.

Primary being very few PS games support m/kb.

Christopher22h ago

If only PC games supported controllers more. Main reason I play primarily on console. So many games have shit support on PC. Playing Dark Envoy now, and it's quite frustrating since I have to switch to keyboard during cut scenes just to make sure advancing conversation doesn't also auto-select a decision. Let alone it's quite rough to select between characters and inventory screens are bad bad bad.

Anywho, similar complaints for both I find. But, I 100% agree that both PC and consoles should support both as best as possible.

crazyCoconuts18h ago

PS may push more kb support in the future to get more PC converts, we'll see.

Flewid63817h ago

As someone with a high end PC, I feel like the ease is on PS5. Too many PC games are a troubleshooting nightmare, which few people have the time for when all you want to do is pop in a game & play it.

Yui_Suzumiya9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

I just use an Xbox controller on my laptop for everything 😆 .. I haven't used a keyboard / mouse combo for PC gaming since 1996

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 9h ago
LordoftheCritics21h ago(Edited 21h ago)

I don't think you understand what I mean by the lack of m/kb support on PS.

Over a thousand titles have PS controller support on PC.

Not even 30 titles have m/kb support on PS5.

Once you are done with the single player title, you'll go back to playing your daily shooter/looter/mmo etc which the pc gamer has mastered with their mouse and keyboard.
Why would any pc gamer make the switch?

jznrpg13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

PC is secondary to PlayStation for them. Mouse and keyboard would affect development. Live service will have it but most single player games aren’t going to have it as PC is not the focus

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 9h ago
Fishy Fingers1d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

I wish them the best of luck.

But PC players are often a patient bunch, many will even wait for Epic launcher exclusivity to end until a game comes to Steam.

If they didnt buy the console when its games were exclusive, why would they do it now theyre not?

MrNinosan1d 8h ago

Way more do than you probably think.

ravens521d 8h ago

All you need is that one game that'll make a few switch at a time. Like a game a PC player REALLY wants.

porkChop19h ago

It just doesn't work that way though. Plenty of the best games ever made were never available on PC. That didn't make PC gamers buy consoles to play them. This kind of strategy has never worked in the past and it won't work now. It's fine for PS to hold their games back and release on PC later, but to think that will boost console sales is wishful thinking. All this will accomplish is some double dipping, which is obviously good for business.

JackBNimble18h ago(Edited 18h ago)

People aren't going to switch from pc to ps5, why would anyone do that for a game?
Most sony exclusives aren't all that to begin with, and pc has the option to upgrade what they want when they want it. Having access to some ps5 games, gamepass and steam.

Thinking this would happen is naive

outsider16241d 4h ago

I mean if there's 10 million pc gamers out there...getting atleast just 1 million from there is probably a good thing..right?

romulus231d 1h ago

PC players are not a monolith, I don't know why people keep thinking they speak for the entirety of all PC gamers like they all know each other personally. You think out of the millions of PC gamers not one single person will be impatient?Well Sony is willing to bet there will be. Why would they do it now? People's feelings change and new PC gamers come along all the time that may also feel different about waiting, that's why.

Yui_Suzumiya9h ago

Just like how I'm waiting for Alan Wake II to hit Steam 😆

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 9h ago
-Foxtrot1d 22h ago

PC gamers are just too patient and loyal to their gaming set ups, something they've spent a lot of money on to perfect. They have backlogs of games which many never get round to finishing or get round to at all and will always have other multiplatform releases to keep them going.

Over the many years Sony has published so many awesome titles such as The Last of Us, Uncharted, Heavenly Sword, Infamous, Killzone, LittleBigPlanet, Dreams, Puppeteer, Resistance, Heavy Rain, Gran Turismo, Motor Storm, God of War, Horizon, Ratchet and Clank, Spiderman, Ghost of Tsushima, Bloodborne

If none of those games BEFORE all these PC ports convinced a hardcore PC gamer to get a PS5 console then why on Earth would porting them them to PC now make any difference? All PC gamers now know 100% is that they just have to be patient, which they are good at anyway to get a PS5 game 2 years later.

I get GaaS games or multiplayer focused titles but if people really want to play these games they'd have gotten a PS console years ago.

Crows901d 4h ago

Not sure they're aiming to convince the hardcore PC gamer.

Not sure why people are obsessing over his comment...it seems pretty simple to me.

He will do all he can to entice gamers to move to his ecosystem. As you say....exclusives existing hasn't moved many gamers over. But if they get to try them and love the games then they might change their mind about waiting 2 years.

We're in an echo chamber on this site...I've Personally seen people with Xbox and PC setups but no PlayStation. I've also seen people with small PC setups but no console. Not every pc gamer invests thousands and many may decide to put one in the living room.

They're not looking to convince all of players to buy a PlayStation...just a few...and really it is just a PR statement after all...they have to give a reason why single player won't release day 1....not to mention they also have to ensure current PlayStation gamers don't jump ship to PC. It goes both ways and they're ignoring the big L by putting any of their games off their platform.

anast1d 3h ago

"Not sure they're aiming to convince the hardcore PC gamer."

Right here

Kakashi Hatake1d 4h ago

PC gamers think tomorrow is promised. Sorry, don't have time for that.

Michiel19891d 3h ago

it's not just about loyalty or sunk cost, pc is an open platform while consoles are closed platforms. If you for example want to mod, you will play on pc, no question about it. Also if you like indie games, steam is a fucking goldmine for that. I've been playing a lot of indie games over the last years and there just seems to be an endless amount of them on steam. Also not having games locked to a certain fps is a prettty big deal for me and I assume a lot of other pc players.

Walalon1d 1h ago

And don't forget steam sales, you can get a ton of games on an awesome price.

badz14917h ago

@Walalon

Sony has been doing sales constantly on the PS Store nowadays.

jznrpg13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

@Walalon Steam sales are basically the same as PS sales. I was going to buy a Steam Deck and I heard about these Steam sales but the games I was interested in were not any cheaper. Indie games were cheap and older AAA were cheap but the same can be said for PS store sales. I didn’t end up getting the Steam Deck as there weren’t any games that I wanted to play that wasn’t already on PS and prices aren’t much different

romulus231d 1h ago

And how do you know out of the millions of PC gamers that not one single person ever went ahead and bought a PlayStation console for one or more of those games? People keep speaking for the entirety of millions of PC gamers like they know them all personally. Here's one example for you, I'm currently typing on a recently purchased PC that cost me over twenty five hundred dollars and is more than capable of running any game including Sony exclusives that come to PC and yet I still bought a PS5 so apparently I'm not patient or loyal enough to my set up, hope it's not mad at me for not being loyal.

jznrpg13h ago

Some of those people will consider getting a PS5 some wont. I was a PC gamer for a long time and I’m a console only gamer now. Everyone’s different.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 13h ago
helicoptergirl1d 21h ago

Who cares? Then just stay on PC and play the waiting game. No big deal. Sony wins in the end anyway.

Number1TailzFan1d 21h ago

I mean if there's any single player Sony games that I actually want that aren't on PC then I would buy said console to play them on. But the ones that I like that aren't on PC are few and far between anyway so no loss for me.

If I game, it's usually multiplayer titles, otherwise I like playing around with some other software.

Amplitude23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

Astro Bot is the game that just did it for me. I'm gonna have to grab a PS5 again for that.

I did this for Ratchet Rift Apart too but ended up selling the PS5 after getting my plat. Rebought it on PC and other than GoW Ragnarok and Horizon FW (which eventually I could get anyway), I haven't had a reason to downgrade my graphics, controller features, ease of recording, and increase my game costs and monthly subscriptions throughout this entire generation.

I play on a TV with a controller but this has been the absolute worst console gen for both consoles. Never in my life thought I'd be a PC gamer but I've been spoiled by the cheap costs, cross-platform controllers and mostly the unbelievably useful Steam controller config.

Show all comments (71)
50°

ARK: Survival Ascended Premium Mods on Consoles Q&A - By 2030, Time Spent on UGC Will Be Way Bigger

ARK: Survival Ascended has introduced Premium Mods on consoles. Wccftech talked to Studio Wildcard and their partner Overwolf about the rising importance of user-generated content, especially for live service games.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4d ago