80°

Metacritic's 10th Annual Game Publisher Rankings

We reveal the past year's best and worst videogame publishers (based on their 2019 releases) in our 10th annual Game Publisher Rankings.

Read Full Story >>
metacritic.com
FallenAngel19841543d ago

Yeesh Sony Interactive Entertainment came so low at #22, far below Nintendo’s #3 and Xbox Game Studios’ #7.

Never thought I’d see the day.

Even more baffling is seeing Activision Blizzard come in second.

Gemmol1540d ago

Nintendo make quality games I can’t see any year where Sony will place higher

FallenAngel19841540d ago

Lolwut? There’s already been various years where Nintendo has been beaten by its direct competition in Metacritic’s rankings

2012 - Microsoft #1, Nintendo #2, Sony #3
2013 - Microsoft #2, Sony #3, Nintendo #4
2016 - Sony #3, Nintendo #6, Microsoft #14

Plus you also have to account for all the years Nintendo didn’t come in first yet a third party publisher like EA or Ubisoft did.

I’m not trying to flame a fanboy war, I’m just saying that the gap between Sony and its rivals was unbelievably large within these rankings.

Obviously these rankings shouldn’t be taken as gospel since there’s a lot of factors to consider, but still #22. The lowest any of the big 3 have gotten prior was Microsoft at #14

PhoenixUp1543d ago

There’s a disturbance in the force when Konami is ranked higher on this list than Sony.

Jin_Sakai1542d ago

That should tell you something right there. These rankings are a joke.

Gemmol1540d ago

Do you understand how the website work?

Just because Sony is very low do not mean anything wrong with the website. All the website do is get the game scores from different websites and make an average for the game. This is much better than getting a review from one website because now you get to see what a collection of people think about the game. This is more of a fair way to get a better understanding why a game got that score it received and leave out bias websites who always give a good rating because they love that particular system.

Gemmol1540d ago (Edited 1540d ago )

Sony need to just make better games to get a higher rating so it can rank higher. This the problem with the internet people rather bias score because the game is made for their preferred platform. I rather get the avg number from taking the review scores from many websites to get a better idea on how well the game is vs getting score from one website who may be bias.

Christopher1542d ago (Edited 1542d ago )

Not sure I agree with these stats including releases of old games on new platforms. That's double-dipping, IMHO. It's not unlikely that those releases of games won't be high scoring ones, to begin with, now they get to be counted twice?

Overall, 2019 based on the GotY events was not the best one overall for "stellar" games and had a ton of mediocrity and delays to 2020 in it.

TheOptimist1542d ago

Idk why people even follow Metacritic.

Gemmol1540d ago

You do know all the website do is collect videogame scores from different websites and make an average so we get a better idea about the game.

Picking one website because they give bias score to your favorite system is not helping the gaming community and this why many people think a game is good then buy it and have regrets.

A website that shows everyone opinion is way better than a website that show only one opinion.

Just face it your company games wasn’t well received if anything they should use this as motivation instead of favoring websites with bias reviews that do not help developer improve on his game making him think everything is okay.

200°

Sony shares big new PS Plus stat, but not the one we want to see

PlayStation Plus has improved the split of PS4 and PS5 players on its priciest tiers, but Sony continues to hide total subscriber numbers.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
mandf1d 15h ago

lol acting like it’s equivalent to ms numbers

Mr Logic1d 15h ago

Uh...They're definitely not equivalent.

"Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass service now has 34 million subscribers."

"the total number of PS Plus subscribers across all tiers was 47.4 million"

darthv721d 15h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN.

bloop1d 11h ago

That's not the "gotcha" you think it is Darth.

darthv721d 10h ago

^^it's not supposed to be bloop.... it's just an interesting observation.

Einhander19721d 9h ago

darthv72

"That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN."

Have you ever heard of a PC before? I hear they are pretty popular.

fr0sty1d 3h ago

MS started lumping gold subscribers in with those GP numbers... keep in mind.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1d 3h ago
shinoff21831d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

What. Definitely more os plus subscribers but that makes sense due to actual console sales

Darth the difference between the bases are huge your right but you gotta think. Ps players buy more games, where as the Xbox base relies on gamepass for their gaming. So it makes perfect sense

darthv721d 13h ago (Edited 1d 13h ago )

What makes perfect sense though? You say PS players buy more games... so then logically there should be more PS+ subscribers given the increased number of online multiplayer games in the PS4 generation alone. The PS4 was the first time that + was required for online play much like Gold was for 360 users.

Keep in mind we are talking subscribers, not simply XB/PS users. I assume you meant to say offline single player games, which is most likely true as well. That gen also saw a significant increase in games with an online component comparted to the previous gen.

victorMaje1d 13h ago

I for one will be going back to essential at the next renewal. When I feel a game is good & right up my alley, I’ll check trusted reviews & just buy it.

jznrpg1d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

I have the top tier until 2028 as they gave me a massive discount for all the years I had left but I’ll most likely go to essential as well. I buy my games but my kids do use the service occasionally. They do prefer to own their games as well since any game can leave the rental service at some point and they don’t like that idea. They mostly use it to demo games then ask me to buy games if they really like it.

RedDevils1d 7h ago

For me, I will cancel it all together but unfortunately I still have it till 2030 lol

meganick1d 11h ago

I would like to see Sony add a fourth tier of PS Plus for people who just want to be able to play games online without any of the perks like monthly games, store discounts, or anything like that, and it should cost $20 annually, $30 maximum. There’s no way I’m paying $80 just to play games online. Even the original $60 fee was too much, and I would often wait for sales to re-up my subscription.

P_Bomb1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

Essential is too expensive, I agree. We’ve got one Essential and one Premium sub. Dropping the Premium when it expires.

gamerz1d 4h ago

Just let my subscription lapse for the first time since 2010. Will sub again every now and then for a month or so to access my old ps+ games but for me it's the end of an era.

DivineHand1251d 4h ago

Let those numbers continue to drop because it is now too expensive. $80 per year just to play online. I noticed they didn't offer any discounts on the subscription or controllers during this year's days of play for the first time in many years and they will feel it when people choose not to renew.

My subscription will lapse next month and it will stay that way until further notice.

KevtheDuff1d ago

There were savings on subs and controllers here in the UK? I bought a controller yesterday in the sale..
It would be weird if those deals were not in other territories too?

160°

Silent Hill Transmission Livestream

Konami has announced that a Silent Hill Transmission will take place on Thursday, May 30, at 4pm PT/7pm ET that will reveal game updates, a "deeper look at the film," and new merch. Join us at IGN to find out what's next for this beloved franchise.

RaidenBlack2d ago

Hope SH2 gets more polish before release.

P_Bomb2d ago

I’m not paying $94 CAD for what they’ve shown me. Looks rough as sin.

Fishy Fingers2d ago

Ive seen better lip syncing during a Punch and Judy show

Sonic18812d ago (Edited 2d ago )

This looks terrible. Capcom should have done the remake 😂 The animations and gameplay looks stiff.

-Foxtrot2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Okay. I was saying before in another article how SH2 looked better than the last trailer, which is true but damn this looks rough as hell.

I wanted RE4 / Dead Space remake quality

Sonic18812d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I wouldn't buy it for $70 dollars. Maybe when it's on sale.

-Foxtrot2d ago

Yeah full price, deluxe editions, Konami are f***** tripping here.

CrimsonWing692d ago

The characters look terrible to me… like it’s distracting.

repsahj2d ago

I will give this game a chance!!! let's go!

80°

Cheat Provider To Pay Call Of Duty Creator Activision Nearly $15M In Damages

Cheat software provider EngineOwning will pay Call of Duty creator Activision nearly $15 million in damages and legal fees.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Jin_Sakai2d ago

Cheat providers for competitive games should be illegal.

Rynxie2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

This is what developers and manufacturers should do. I know going after cheat devices/makers is a cat and mouse game, and cost money. However, they can get that money back by sueing these manufacturers of cheat devices. Take a page from Nintendo's playbook.