600°

Blizzard Asks Warcraft Player To Buy New PC To Play The Frozen Throne

A Warcraft Frozen Throne player found himself unable to play the game after the Reforged update he was asked to buy a new PC by Blizzard.

Read Full Story >>
respawnfirst.com
2pacalypsenow1562d ago (Edited 1562d ago )

Wait so if you have the original Warcraft 3 it automatically makes you purchase the remaster or you cant play any version of 3?

If that's the case then WTF.

SamPao1562d ago

I think that if you buy warcraft reforged it automatically updates the old game and you cant go back

Neonridr1562d ago

I don't even think this guy had a choice, he said he didn't pay for the new game, he only ever had the old version. But the reforged update automatically updated his game.

1562d ago
Smellsforfree1561d ago

No, when reforged was released everyone who had Warcraft III got the shit update regardless of if they purchased Reforged or not.

roadkillers1561d ago

How are you forced? I have the disk version of 3... don’t allow it to connect to the network. Is kind of an annoyance, which I am sure they will patch

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1561d ago
xX-oldboy-Xx1561d ago

...and certain graphic settings that were once part of WC3 are turned off and only accessible if you buy WC3: Reforged.

Such a scumbag company.

1561d ago
xTonyMontana1560d ago

What's the matter, do you guys not have decent PCs? How the mighty have fallen.

jjb19811561d ago

I posted this before on a previous article and got a couple of disagrees. This was my personal experience with it. 2 months prior to this I had played Warcraft 3 legacy to see if I feel that the hype is worth the purchase. The Warcraft 3 folder wasn't missing, the contents were missing. The desktop shortcut I had pointed to an executable file that didn't exist. When I opened the folder, everything was gone.

"Here are some real Blizzard Shenanigans. With all this Reforged hype/hate, I decide that I'm going to go play Warcraft 3 Legacy again. It is nowhere to be found on any drive on my PC. I only found shortcuts that pointed to nothing. Blizzard silently uninstalled it. So that I found my purchase on Battle.net from my browser, I go and download it, so I thought. It makes me download the Reforged client. So now I have to run the game from the buggy mess that is the new client. Also, Blizzard changed their ToS regarding the world editor so that they now completely own anything anybody makes with their editor. "

blacktiger1561d ago

no point of saying WTF when you have Blizzard disrespecting Honk Kong and have Activision in their pocket,

1560d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1560d ago
1nsomniac1562d ago

Blizzard have literally gone in full steam ahead after EA’s crown for scum of the decade!

Rimeskeem1562d ago

I didn't know Don Mattrick worked for Blizzard now /s

PurpHerbison1561d ago

This might be the first time that a remaster ruined the original version.

Smokehouse1561d ago (Edited 1561d ago )

Buy a new PC, this isn’t news. Headline: apple won’t update my iPhone 6, tells me to buy a new phone. The outrage!

TeamIcoFan1561d ago

Hey kids!
It's time to play :
SPOT.
THE.
BLIZZARD SHILLLLLLL!!!!

Smokehouse1561d ago (Edited 1561d ago )

I don’t support blizzard at all. I won’t buy another blizzard game because of Hong Kong. I also don’t support crybabies who play on Windows 98 PCs. A 200 dollar PC would probably look like something from NASA comparatively.

DivoJones1561d ago

You sound horribly, horribly uninformed on this particular situation. Nice troll job though.

A more accurate metaphor using your scenario: Apple updates your version of iOS, and your iPhone 6 no longer functions online, no cell data or wifi but local/offline apps still work. They tell you the solution is to buy a new phone.

Smokehouse1561d ago

Uninformed on what lol? Some guy getting told to buy a new PC? I’m not trolling at all, he should buy a new PC.

I would buy a new phone...

MadLad1561d ago

That's a s**t comparison.
It's closer to your service provider disabling your phone via an update, then telling you you need to buy a new one.

Smokehouse1561d ago (Edited 1561d ago )

That’s also a shit comparison lol.

We’re talking about a 20 year old game. If it won’t work because your PC is to old to run Warcraft 3 update then it’s time. That means the shittiest PC today is better than whatever turd you run. It’s time to cough it up instead of publishing woe is me articles. That’s a personal problem. There are far better reasons to dislike blizzard.

MadLad1561d ago

@smoke

Nah. You're still off. This old PC was able to run the game. Forcing in an update simply because you're shoehorning it into a remaster is dumb.
That computer played the game yesterday. That computer played that game years ago. Said person didn't buy the remaster, they bought the previous game. The remaster should have no effect on the original release.

Smokehouse1561d ago

Nah dude lol. I’m not trying to argue or get on yalls nerves, it’s just the truth. If you can’t run the update due to hardware then it’s time for a new PC. Not to fix this game but just in general lol. I get that people who have only played Warcraft 3 for 20 years on the same PC get kinda screwed and that sucks. I agree. I can also understand why blizzard wouldn’t account for 20 year old PCs in their plan moving forward. That’s basic shit.

Did they put the old game on their new servers or whatever? How dare they right? Is that the problem? What about Jeff and his 20 year old PC though? It worked yesterday. I get what you are saying and I don’t disagree, remasters shouldn’t be tied to the originals but that’s PC. PC always gets the free updates that consoles pay for. Hardware for an update is just a dumb thing to complain about. That’s actually a bold move from the cowards at blizzard. They will drag you into a brand new 200 dollar dell kicking and screaming.

Show all comments (43)
110°

Square Enix Is Going Multiplatform; The Layoffs & Its Past Don't Inspire Confidence

After its latest games didn't meet sales targets, Square Enix is going multiplatform but the company's track record isn't convincing.

Scissorman4h ago

Square Enix been multiplatform for decades, a few exclusively-deals doesn't make them any less multiplatform.

fr0sty4h ago

Nor is selling their games on a console with only 25 million install base going to bring their sales to where they hope they will be... Unless they somehow manage to dumb down FF7 trilogy to work on switch, they aren't going to have much luck. They already released it on PC, after all.

SegaSaturn6694h ago

It kind of does, giving preference to a certain platform by timed exclusivity. Console ports generally feel superior. Legend of mana PC port extremely broken

neutralgamer19923h ago

Sega

It doesn’t when square themselves didn’t want to fund the development of remake. It’s only after the success of the 1st they realized their mistake but now contract is signed. If it wasn’t for Sony there would be no FF7 remakes. Same goes for silent hill 2 with Konami. They don’t want to fund AAA budget. Companies like PlayStation and Nintendo get blamed when in reality they are saving some of these franchises

Remember sega didn’t want to fund bayonetta and epic games didn’t want to fund another gears of war. It’s easy to blame console makers but they are the ones taking the risk and paying huge upfront costs without seeing the final product. FF7 remake trilogy won’t be coming to Xbox now or in the future. PlayStation and PC is what square signed up for. Sony paid them more than they would make from Xbox sales.

ravens523h ago

I just wonder when everyone is going to demand that the Square Enix exclusives with Nintendo come to PS and Xbox. Or it's just the PS exclusives that matter lol

phoenixwing3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

I'd love for the nintendo exclusives to come to pc or ps5. They'd actually be playable then.

neutralgamer19923h ago

Raven

Exactly and that’s where square enix does more exclusive than any other platform. Gaming is square has always been very unrealistic with their sales expectations. Remember when tomb raider reboot sold 7.5 million and square said it wasn’t enough. They need to spend less on development and have more realistic expectations from sales.

And those thinking games being not on Xbox makes a difference don’t understand we have a decade plus of data showing square enix games having less than 20% of their multiplatform sales on Xbox (final fantasy series) and Nintendo consoles aren’t strong enough to run any current games. Nintendo switch should be as strong as Xbox one x atleast but we all know that’s most likely won’t happen

RoadRacer2h ago

@raven

thing is, as neutral said in their comm, the switch isn't strong enough to run flagship SE games
i think what SE does is, it makes unique games for switch only so that it has something for that console too. Thats where all the "underlined sans" rpgs go to mostly

maybe things will change when Swtich 2 drops cuz that's gonna be as strong as ps4 afaik from the rumors flying around

TheGamingHounds3h ago

@Scissorman

Your point is valid enough but when the icon of this company is limited to one console in timed-exclusivity, it means the company has crossed the line. By some degree at least

All things aside, Square itself stated "aggressive multiplatform strategies" so we all know what it's talking about

Scissorman57m ago(Edited 57m ago)

Then the headline should read "Square To Drop Exclusively Deals in Pursuit of A Sweeping Multiplatform Strategy". I don't recall this argument when Square Enix released Bravely Default, Octopath Traveler, and Triangle Strategy on one platform. And even if FF is the icon, not all of its titles have gone to one platform. We're talking about three games, one of which is already on PC. Did Square suddenly go 'multiplatform' after it released subsequent Tomb Raider sequels on more than just the Xbox? It's just a silly way of putting it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 57m ago
TheGamingHounds3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

SE needs to go all in optimization. Broken PC ports won't help its case, especially with big releases like mainline Final Fantasy

Asterphoenix3h ago

It's actually simple. What doesn't inspire confidence is Square allocating their budgets on the wrong projects such as Forspoken, Avengers, Babylons Fall and Foamstars.

Square has always been multiplatform since PS3/360 days which 80 % of their games are. People kick up a fuss over PS exclusivity but not Nintendo which has more exclusive projects console exclusive from Square.

FF16 has done ok but not enough to fix the blunders that the past mistakes Square has made with some of their projects. FF7 Rebirth is unclear we'll see a PC release for sure so it's hard to say so far not as good as they would of liked.

Then again unrealistic expectations. If it weren't for Sony these games would at least had another 2 years development time. So some people need to be realistic in that regard.

Scissorman50m ago(Edited 48m ago)

It's the blunders that set those expectations so high. If you remove those from the equation, I bet the sales numbers would be more than stellar. Square believes it's okay to release a pile of risky, middling, garbage because the big boys will ultimately subsidize the cost. Don't worry if Forspoken sells poorly, FF16 will surely sell 10 million copies to balance that right out. Oh wait, it only sold like 4 million. Well that's a disaster. Meanwhile games that sell 2 million units with comparable budgets are deemed successful.

RoadRacer2h ago

Square Enix just really need to revise its expectations. Maybe consider a change in strategy on dev end as well. Multiplat will help for sure but only good games that are marketed well will sell

70°

How the names Arrowhead Game Studios and Helldivers 2 came to be

Arrowhead Game Studios CEO Johan Pilestedt explains how the studio name comes from a name translation, plus the background on the game title “Helldivers.”

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
70°

Activision team is opening a new game studio in Poland 'Elsewhere Entertainment' to build new AAA IP

Microsoft's Activision subsidiary announced today that it is opening a new game development studio to take advantage of the huge talent pool growing in Poland. It'll be the second Activision studio based in the region, joining Infinity Ward Krakow, although this studio is, in fact, not working on Call of Duty.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com