270°

Sources: Overwatch 2 to feature PvE, new map and hero

Blizzard Entertainment will unveil the next iteration of their popular Overwatch franchise featuring a new logo, new game modes, maps, heroes and PvE features at BlizzCon this week, according to a BlizzCon source and a BlizzCon training document.

Rangerman12081668d ago

Highly doubtful imo. If it comes as a big update, then maybe.

gamer78041667d ago (Edited 1667d ago )

its for the second overwatch game, it would make it more interesting, right now I honestly prefer paladins and its free.

PeaSFor1667d ago (Edited 1667d ago )

A new map AND even a new hero? WHOOOAAA, that's impressive for a game which they are going to sell for $60.

nope,.

CrimsonPheonix1667d ago

Paladins is just a shittier version of overwatch.

gamer78041667d ago

@crimson i just prefer the character abilities and design better in Paladins

PeaSFor1667d ago

@gamer7804, i stopped playing Paladins after 30 mins asking myself: "Why the f am i even playing this crap, i already own Overwatch anyway."

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1667d ago
TechnoGoat1667d ago

All but officially announced at this point, sadly it's a thing, and it's happening.

Epicor1667d ago

What is highly doubtful? Overwatch chapter 2 (supposedly not "Overwatch 2") is now rumoured by multiple sources. Looks very likely tbh. Most likely it will be a big update to core game (current OW) and alongside that there will be a new PVE mode that will be behind a pay wall (expansion pack). I'm hyped!

Rangerman12081667d ago

Yeah I just saw those leaks actually. It's just that my post was hours before those popped up and I was kinda doubtful before. Now, I gotta say It's somewhat believable. If it does come as an expansion then I wouldn't mind just as long they don't sell it for $50-$60.

BeginsNightime1667d ago

Don't know about that...some of the recent leaks has been pretty credible. If they release it as an expansion then I actually wouldn't mind.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1667d ago
KeenBean3451667d ago

This couldn't have come at a worse time for blizzard. I'm sure this was planned way before the Hong Kong controversy but this won't be received well regardless of how good it looks

TechnoGoat1667d ago

Hate to burst your bubble, but people love to complain on the internet, but at the end of the day they are still playing all the games they say they are boycotting.

Kabaneri1667d ago (Edited 1667d ago )

Most people dont follow gaming news period.

KeenBean3451667d ago

You aren't bursting my bubble at all, fully aware of that. It's no secret though that OWs launch on switch was damaged due to this controversy so it can cause harm and obviously has to some extent for Blizzard to backtrack.

TechnoGoat1666d ago

@KeenBean345 you have factual evidence to back that up?

PCgamer981667d ago

Pve should have been done a long time ago.

ActualWhiteMan1667d ago

Overwatch 2 Chinese Overlord Edition.

Sorry Blizzard, you done f***ed up.

1667d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (28)
200°

Let's Be Real, There Is Nothing "Micro" About Microtransactions Anymore

Microtransactions have gotten ridiculously overpriced in recent years, with titles now offering cosmetic skins worth more than some games.

Terry_B16d ago

Yup..this is 100% the sad truth

z2g15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

The elephant in the room tho is personal accountability. It’s easy (albeit basic) to blame the big, bad corpo, but microtransactions wouldn’t be where they are if gamers didn’t spend money on them. As it stands the MTs usually make more than the game. Publishers know raising game prices will cause backlash, so they do MTs to compensate. But the adult conversation is consumers determine the success of products with their wallets. So if MTs are a huge thing, it’s because we as consumers told them we like them by giving them a lot of money for them. So if you don’t want them to be a thing, convince your fellow gamers to stop buying them and expect that games will be decently more expensive. You all can disagree all you want, but reality is a bitch, and eventually you have to live in it.

anast15d ago

Trying to convince people is the least realistic thing. If we are trying to be adults, actual action is what changes things not "convincing campaigns" on platforms owned by the people 'you' are going against. It's madness and idealistic.

ApocalypseShadow14d ago

Easier said than done. I've told gamers for years to not buy micro transactions, expensive dlc, etc. Gamers bought it anyway. Didn't fit on a DVD that would have fit on a Blu-ray disc.

I also told some gamers to not pay for online like Xbox Live because it would force the rest of the industry to only offer playing online if you pay for it. Told them not to support a broken console that Red Ringed. To not support Xbox One because Microsoft tried to take away game ownership and how you play your games. To not pay for a console by one manufacturer where a, now 3 trillion worth, didn't make enough games at the level of Nintendo or Sony who are worth less money.

How much of that did you support anyway with your money then go back and read your comment again.

notachance14d ago

yeah that was like telling people not to do drugs or alcohol, these game companies invested a lot of money in researching about how to make people buy MTs, from creating mechanics like loot boxes, purposely make the game grindy, all the way to menu designs and what color and sound effects played when gamers bought MTs.

It was specifically engineered to take advantage of vulnerable and prone to addiction people.

bradfh14d ago

@z2g
People always struggle with issues like drinking, drugs, and gambling. But in games, especially those played by kids, microtransactions are another way companies take advantage of them. It's a problem that needs addressing.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 14d ago
S2Killinit14d ago

I recommend everyone read this article.

My suggestion is to name these transactions, what they ARE: Hidden-fees.

isarai15d ago

I mean except for the amount of content you're paying for.

Hugodastrevas15d ago

There never was, the only time I paid for a microtransaction was on Blacklight Retribution (PS4) and it was because I enjoyed the game a lot so I felt the devs should get something for all that entertainment (€5 "membership")

-Foxtrot15d ago

The devs wouldn’t get that though, that shit goes straight to the higher ups who do f*** all let’s be honest.

Hugodastrevas15d ago

Probably, but I wasn't as cynical back then and €5 wasn't a big ask to get the guns with grinding instead of renting them, and the game was good (still is on the PS5/4)

CrimsonWing6915d ago (Edited 15d ago )

I couldn’t believe what Blizzard charged for horse armor and cosmetics in Diablo 4…

I remember back in the day when a season pass was $15 and you got everything included in it. Now, I see them at $60 and you still don’t get everything.

CantThinkOfAUsername14d ago

That's just Blizzard. Unlike Bethesda's $0.99 horse armour, Blizzard's first microtransaction, Sparkle Pony, cost $15.

Phoenix7614d ago

Bethesda out did themselves a few years back with 76. They released a Xmas bundle for half price on day of release! So, was meant to sell for only $12 from day 1, but tried to convince everyone it was half price, by marking it at $24!

Shane Kim15d ago

As soon as gaming wasn't deemed nerdy anymore, and reached the casuals this happened. We're smart, but casuals play mobile games and other stuff, and don't really have anything to compare. They think gaming is supposed to be like this and pay for in game purchases.

Show all comments (29)
60°

Overwatch 2 Season 10 midseason patch brings big updates for Tanks

Tanks are getting some hefty buffs for the Overwatch 2 Season 10 midseason patch. After a lot of community discussion about the role feeling the worst to play for a while, the development team is changing some numbers to make these brutes harder for the enemy team to take advantage of.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com
70°

Blizzard Pulled Off One Of Gaming's Biggest Scams, And We Let It Get Away With It

Danish from eXputer: "Blizzard overpromised the PVE elements of Overwatch 2, and then failed to deliver on just about all of them, despite charging money."

franwex30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

No, no, no. Only the people that paid money let them get away with it. There’s no we.

Support Blizzard at your own risk.

Michiel198930d ago

Everyone that I know that used to play overwatch has quit at this point, I don't feel like they got away with it.

PRIMORDUS30d ago

For me the original OW was amazing just for the first 2 yrs after that I had enough. Now I play Paladins from time to time.

Michiel198930d ago

Same for me, it was my favorite game for a good while after it launched and that's coming from someone who doesn't enjoy competitive shooters. I've considered playing Paladins but never bit the bullet, so many good games coming out that it's hard to spare some hours for a competitive game

PRIMORDUS30d ago

So if you just play this POS game without spending a cent Blizzard will not see a profit at all.