750°
9.2

IGN's Call of Duty: World at War Review

November 11, 2008 - War, as Fallout 3 so famously puts it, never changes. While the weapons and tactics may differ, it's still about chaos and fear and the overwhelming of the senses as adrenaline surges through your veins. That's a hard experience to capture on a screen, but the Call of Duty series comes close thanks to its constant redefinition of what "11" is in terms of intensity for first-person shooters. Last year's Call of Duty: Modern Warfare delivered an awesome and varied single-player experience that was matched with an even better multiplayer suite, and it made for some really big shoes for Call of Duty: World at War to fill.

Read Full Story >>
xbox360.ign.com
Apocwhen5667d ago

Great review, hopefully this will shutup all the nay sayers now.

Lifendz5667d ago

what essentially was a IW's engine with WWII skins on it. I might've picked it up but R2 online is so much fun and I just got LBP that I won't have the time. AAA score is impressive though. And the dogs being sent rather than the helicopter is crazy fun.

CEO OF N4G5667d ago

Personaly i dont like this game.I just dont like the hole idea of a WW2 setting again.Dont get me wrong im not saying the game will not be as good as cod4 all im saying is im tired of WW2 games.And with other great shooters like gears2 and resistance2 its hard for me to buy this game.

airheadluffy5667d ago

its not that i think the game sucks its just that its basically cod4 in WW2 with a couple of new features. i think thats great, but i dont have the money to buy all the games right now so im not about to buy the same game i already have. maybe if the price comes down ill buy this game.

Mozilla895667d ago

Is it just me or the guy who was doing the voice over sounded like he lost a bet and was forced to do the video review? lol Anyways wasn't expecting it to get such a high score but when IW did most of the work for them already...well its hard to mess up.

Kleptic5667d ago

wait...people weren't kidding about the zombies where they?...I thought that was a joke...

I simply can't go back to WWII again...i'll possibly rent it...as the single player looks good as far as WWII games go (a hell of a lot better than BIA:HH)...but this is simply a tease until CoD 5 from IW comes out next year, as back to modern warfare is where i'll be staying for a while...or in the future even sooner, as Killzone 2 is the best fps I have possibly ever played on a console...

kornbeaner5667d ago

All IW did was make a great engine. Everything else from coding, animation, story, sound, design, production and everything else that was done for the game was done by Treyarch.

Thats like saying that EPIC did most of the work on Last Remnant because SquareEnix used the unreal engine for that game.

hard work still had to be put into the game. And while having a great engine like the CoD4 engine is a great for a developer, having that engine is far from "...most of the work...."

Mozilla895667d ago

I'm not saying they didn't put any work into it. I know they did but its like they looked at COD4 and said we want to make this but just place it in WW2. Hence all the references to it juts being a WW2 mod of COD4. Now the Last Remnant looks or feels like no other Unreal game, its a new game by itself World at War doesn't. It's more like they added some new skins, textures and effects. I'm not saying its a bad game just that it's more of the same.

psnDevistator3565667d ago (Edited 5667d ago )

I just don't want to be playing the same game for the 402nd time(exaggerated of course). Oh and Zombies(lol) aren't going to do it. That's why we have left 4 dead.

badz1495667d ago

and I'll shut up now but I'm still not going to buy it! bad reviews never stopped me from buying a game and so does good reviews will never do any good for a game I'll never buy in the 1st place.

(~paste lips with glue~)

wil4hire5667d ago (Edited 5667d ago )

COD4 was moving forward, and it was a beautiful thing.

Upgrading a thompson isn't anything I want to do anytime soon. Im sure it will be good, but no better that DOD Source.

YEAH i said it.

COD going backwards = no sale. I'd buy a cod5 current day+ in a heartbeat.

A FRIGGEN HEARTBEAT

thebudgetgamer5667d ago

tomorrow will inevitably come cod waw ps3 vs 360

:)

ape0075667d ago

treyarch follow the safe way,the same route as IW's masterpiece cod 4

everyone has to admit that cod 4 engine is a beast

everything in cod 5 is just like cod 4,controls,feeling,framerate,s cope

even it has the same menus,killcam and that traditional IW precise control not seen in the awkwardly done cod 3

am gonna buy it,am die hard cod fan,I liked the new dark,gory,beach feeling

1-up for treyarch

IW,next year,I want to be completely blown away

Sarcasm5667d ago

You guys need to stop with the "oh it's just COD4 with WWII skins" because it's not.

coolfool5667d ago

to say that this game is just COD4 with new skins is doing treyarch a massive injustice. Just because they used the same engine doesn't mean there is nothing they can mess up. Does it mean that anyone who uses this engine is guaranteed to make a AAA scoring game? Of course not.

There was plenty for Treyarch to mess up, the plot, the settings, the voice acting, the music. It would have been so easy for them to do what has already been done before but somehow, they have taken the saturated genre of WWII and still created something new and exciting.

Don't discredit their work, they are good set of devs and the more of them we have the better!

Snyph3r5667d ago

Is it worth $65? WTF with the price increase? This is more expensive than all of the better games? GEOW2, R2, LBP, Farcry2 and so on are way better games but cheaper than this?

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 5667d ago
Rice5667d ago

Nice good job treyarch..

kosha5667d ago

Yep I think theyve shown that their not crap devs with this game.

LarVanian5667d ago

Bravo Treyarch. You've just earned back lots of respect (including mine)

Danja5667d ago

Yeah i weas quite surprised at the score , but seriously I was they would just quit witht he whole WW2 theme already....and keep the Franchise moving forward like COD4..i'll give it a rent to see if I like it then maybe i'll buyu it,.,

Final_Rpg5667d ago

Cod4 engine? Check.
Little to no improvement graphically? Check.
Lack of significant changes to gameplay? Check.
Set in overdone WW2 setting? Check

Who buys a game that has no evolution between it and its predecessor? Face the facts, the game is just COD4 in new environments. They haven't changed up anything. I'd rather this just be an expansion released for COD4. If you're into the online experience I'm pretty sure you're better off stick with 4. To be fair, at least it brings a new decent campaign alongside it. Shame it's not doing anything that hasn't been matched by COD4.

Best thing about this game is the Co-op. That's one thing I wished was part of 4, especially since it was such a short campaign. In my opinion, if you're looking for a decent jump in quality from 4 to WAW don't be surprised if you come out of the experience feeling disappointed. On the plus side, you're getting a solid title. I just get annoyed because they haven't moved forwards... Makes me feel like they are just in it for the money, like the guitar hero franchise, most of EA sports titles and the Tony Hawks series.

Maybe I'm just greedy because this game doesn't deliver when put next to the big blockbusters of the year. Even the reviewer stated this game as an acting filler until the next infinity ward game. It must be insulting for Treyarch. But look at the content. What have Treyarch done to push ahead of Infinity Ward? This game is just riding on the success of 4. Be your own developer Treyarch.

Sarcasm5667d ago

"Little to no improvement graphically? Check."

Actually the graphics are much much improved over COD4. It has an actual water physics engine, more destructibility in the environments, much more detailed character models, animations is improved, AI is improved, and it looks like it's already running in a higher resolution than COD4's 600p.

So please, stop spreading misinformation.

mugoldeneagle035667d ago

And I was waiting for this review before I purchased it.

Same gameplay, same fun, & trophies = The buy. It's just a shame they couldnt put as much effort into Bond.

Either way, ill see you guys on this weekend :)

Bubble Buddy5667d ago

Great score. But I got no money left after a whole attack of games so maybe I'll give it a rent. :).

Show all comments (96)
130°

Looking Back At 2008, An Unbelievably Incredible Year Of Video Game Releases

Huzaifa from eXputer: "2008 was home to the likes of Call of Duty: World at War, Dead Space, GTA 4, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead, and many other hits, which is outright remarkable."

ChasterMies23d ago

Some of these low paid video game “news” writers weren’t born before 2007.

just_looken23d ago

Here here

Those that were around before 2000's i am sure are like me that think we entered a world of non readers or those that follow without question.

I can not wait to see fallout 3 a goty game even though it was about water with non content until you add the dlc/updates then you got the performance/crashing

CrimsonWing6924d ago

I don’t think anything can compare to 2023

lucasnooker24d ago

1998 - the best year in gaming! Metal gear solid, crash bandicoot 3, medievil, half life, ocarina of time, thief, tenchu, resident evil 2, Spyro, tomb raider 3, oddworld abes exodus, banjo kazooie.

It was a different breed of a gaming era. You’ll never understand what it was like back then. The aura of gaming, it was different!

KyRo24d ago (Edited 24d ago )

I second this. Gaming was a lot more varied and fun than it is today. I'm 35 so getting on compared to some here but I got to see all the changes from NES up to now but I've never felt so disappointed in any generation than I have this current gen. I was expecting more from this generation rather than prettier versions of games that came before it. Game mechanics have become so refined that alot of games feel the same and has done for a while now.

Maybe it's time to have a break for a while. I love gaming but I don't feel I get much fun in the traditional sense out of it anymore.

CrimsonWing6924d ago (Edited 24d ago )

Metal Gear Solid, Resident Evil 2, Abe’s Exodus, and Ocarina of Time are the only things from that list that I liked.

Here’s the 2023 game releases that I personally liked… and big releases that I didn’t care for:

- Dead Space Remake
- Wo Long Dynatsy
- Resident Evil 4 Remake
- Diablo 4
- Fire Emblem Engage
- Hogwarts Legcay
- Street Fighter 6
- Hi-Fi Rush
- Like a Dragon: Ishin
- Octopath Traveler 2
- Final Fantasy Pixel Remasters
- Final Fanatsy XVI (actually ended up not liking this, but it was still a big deal release)
- Baldur’s Gate 3
- Armored Core VI: Fires of Rubicon
- Lies of P
- Mortal Kombat 1
- Marvel’s Spider-Man 2
- Starfield (Ended up hating this one, but big release)
- Super Mario Bros. Wonder
- Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom (I’m an old-school Zelda fan, but didn’t really enjoy this game)
- Alan Wake 2

I mean, honestly I’ve never seen a year of major IP releases like that, ever.

Profchaos24d ago (Edited 24d ago )

Isn't it just a generational thing realistically.

I've been gaming since way back and I some of my favourite games go as far back as the late 80s for me each generation has a year or two of game changing releases one after another before an inevitable dry spell.

I kind of agree gaming had a different feel games hit different because we didn't have the internet nothing got spoiled and you really had to put in the effort to beat a puzzle which could set entire groups of people looking for a solution. But most importantly games were experimental and not as cookie cutter as today even basics like controls were not universal today r2 is shoot l2 is ads garunteed you can't deviate from that in a shooter back then it could of been square, R1 or R1 and circle nothing was standard.

But as time moves on a new generation picks up their controller they are going to be interested in different things that PS1 demo disc with the t Rex blew our primitive 16 bit brains back on launch but to kids today it's laughable.
The new gen of kids coming into to hobby seem to value different things to us there seems to be a huge focus on online play, streamers, gaming personalities, and social experiences, convience of digital downloads. To me I value none of that but that's ok like my parents not liking the band's I would listen to its just the natural cycle.

Gameseeker_Frampt23d ago

Just about every year in the 7th generation was great and something we most likely won't experience again.

2009 for example had Assassin's Creed 2, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Dragon Age: Origins, Uncharted 2, Halo 3: ODST, Killzone 2, Borderlands, Bayonetta, and Demon's Souls to name a few.

just_looken23d ago

It still amazes me we got over 7 rockstar games ps2/ps3 but 3 for the ps3/ps4/ps5

Dragon age 1-3 and mass effect 1-3 in 7ish years what a generation.

380°

65 Year Old Gamer Racks Up Ridiculous Stats After Playing 1 Game for 15 Years

A very devoted fan of Call of Duty: World at War racks up incredible in-game stats while playing regularly for the past 15 years.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
franwex318d ago

Well, he definitely got his money’s worth.

Abnor_Mal318d ago

Same as Shirley Curry playing Skyrim for years. In the next Elders Scrolls game they should have her in the game as some form of npc.

andy85318d ago

She is, I read she will be a character. Not a dig in any form but I hope she's alive when it releases

Relientk77318d ago

That's over 7,000 hours geez. What crazy stats

nitus10318d ago

Actually it is very easy to up the number of hours you have been playing a game. Basically all you need to do (assuming you have a PS4 or 5) is to place the console into stand-by without exiting the game, so if you do this a one hour gameplay actually becomes a 24 gameplay or longer.

boing1318d ago

What? So the game is still runinng when you put it to sleep? What?

EvertonFC318d ago

It's actually sad not an achievement but hey we need the full story details.

Knushwood Butt318d ago

There's someone on my friend list that has more than 6200 hours on Uncharted 4.

vTuro24317d ago

7k hours over 15 years isn't that crazy. The fact that he's been playing the same game for 15 years is more impressive.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 317d ago
anast318d ago

And then you got people that want to finish a game every week.

Rhythmattic318d ago

Nailed what is the Spectrum... For good and bad, Quality or Quantity..Or the unreasonable to reason for. ;)

jznrpg318d ago

Of course you will hit a ridiculous stat after 15 of anything.
My main character for Everquest had over 500 days played in the first 6 years of the game. I was young then and had a lot of time on my hands. I don’t think I could duplicate that again until I retire and not sure I could match it if I tried.

EvertonFC318d ago

500 days in 6 years is nothing lol, you do realise how many days in a year right ?

poppatron318d ago

I might be getting the maths wrong here, I think 500 days in 6 years works out at an average of just over 6 hours every single day. For 6 years. That’s pretty serious

EvertonFC318d ago

Edit: wrote this early this morning, I understand it's lots of hours now lol at myself 😂🤣😜

RedDevils318d ago

The only way to achieve this, is by having no life outside of video game lol.

Outlawzz318d ago

Strange choice of game but hey that's some devotion. Congrats to them!

Show all comments (18)
90°

Call of Duty: Vanguard VS World at War Map Comparison

Gamespot : Call of Duty: Vanguard launches with 20 multiplayer maps, three of which are actually remakes from 2008's Call of Duty: World at War. Let's take a look at how the maps have changed with this side-by-side comparison.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
921d ago
RebDomine2921d ago

waw is the best with no feminism or black. it's a real ww2 game