650°

Activision welcomes its new CFO with $15 million after telling Blizzard to cut costs

The major publisher clearly has money to spend on staff

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
Sciurus_vulgaris1949d ago

Why on Earth do executives get paid so much and get such ridiculous bonuses? Executives even get severance pay when they are fired.

blacktiger1949d ago

that's because that's what the contract says.
It starts like this example for Satya Nadella, Microsoft CEO
He gets this much total, but half of it will be stocks, the stocks will be paid consecutively as guaranttee Microsoft to go higher, meaning he gets like 50 million plus another 20 million worth of stocks if he makes microsoft more revenue which he is, plus and this and that. In the long run they focus is to get Satya Nadella part of Microsoft, even when he gets fired no problem, be a advisor.

That's the kind of position they gave him. It's not a job, it's a position

Sciurus_vulgaris1949d ago

Its still strange that executives (like Dice's former CFO) get paid bonuses after they cause loses in revenue and sales, brand damage and negative PR.

UltraNova1949d ago

@Sciurus

"Part of the game"

blacktiger1948d ago

It's like a chicken and egg game, everyone is doing it. You know how hard is to get people in board. Before Satya Nadella, Sundar Pichai was the hottest ceo and still is, Google had to pay so much to stay away Microsoft and Apple. This is the game they play but yeah, developers gets peanuts.

Scar-1949d ago

Meanwhile the developers and testers make peanuts. Even the high level devs don't make anywhere close to this much its just stupid how this industry is structured.

DarXyde1949d ago

It's far from just this industry, my friend.

There's really no reason for these executives to make so much while employees who are creating the products are far more worried about their finances. Sure, most of their pay is in stocks, but (a) they still usually clear about $1M in base salary and (b) there's no reason why they can't split executive stock offers and share with employees. Americans could live good lives where they're not struggling so much, but I guess it's more important to give executives more than they need in 2 lifetimes.

Honestly, I'm not even saying that you can't pay executives more, but that's a pretty serious gap.

GameStallion1949d ago

Yeah. It’s better when companies are structured as a profit share.

PoSTedUP1949d ago (Edited 1949d ago )

no reason for someone who has worked harder and qualifies to generate millions and billions of dollars to get paid accordingly? the reason programmers and testers dont make what a ceo or cfo makes, as talented as they are, is because 1) they dont qualify to generate that much money, and they dont 2) have not chosen that career path 3) are easily replaceable in more cases than not. they are the laborers of the tech industry and that is their role. why dont the people who put the parts together make as much as programmers or ceos? sports players make millions because they generate that money accordingly and not everyone can play on that level and do what they do. they worked harder than others to get there and are qualified, so they get a contract. sometimes they mess up or get injured etc bc shit happens. but they are issued that contract bc the owners have trust and faith in them as they are qualified. if they dont improve they are done at the end of their contract and will be signed to a new one etc. or in some cases get sent back to the minors. this is capitalism not socialism. i dont make 10 million a year because i didnt chose that career path or work hard enough to. i dont get paid what my boss gets paid because i did not work hard, put in the time and dedication to build a business etc. i didnt sign up for my job knowing what im going to make to b**** to my boss that i want a him to make less of what he earned or to get a bigger piece of the pie of something i didnt build. the real bs is in other countries where doctors and higher professions work harder than everyone else and dont make significantly more than the average citizen.

spwittbold1949d ago

Because everything that happens in the company is ultimately their responsibility.

opc1949d ago

except for when they get fired and then get a bonus...

LightofDarkness1949d ago

This is often the reasoning/excuse, but the reality speaks to a very different reason. These people are handed golden parachutes when a company dives or goes in to free-fall, and they still get another gig steering some other company astray for the same money or more. It's very much a case of being in the big boys club: once you're in, you're in. You need not be held accountable for your screw ups. The employees and shareholders will bear the impact instead, while you receive a bonus, severance and another cushy gig elsewhere.

The thing is, these people are the new lords. The new aristocracy. They only get away with this because no one has the balls to tell them "no".

Godmars2901949d ago

Suppose to be their responsibility. In reality, they can look out for themselves and only themselves.

TiredandRetired1949d ago

According to Bloomberg: "Dennis Durkin joined Microsoft in 1999 and spent his first seven years in Microsoft corporate development. He managed a team that was responsible for helping shape acquisition and investment strategy for Microsoft's Information Worker, Business Solutions, Windows and Home and Entertainment business units. From 2001 to 2003, he was headquartered in London focusing on European opportunities at Microsoft. He worked on a variety of acquisitions and partnerships in areas including games, Microsoft Office, unified communications, security, digital media, Windows Client, Microsoft TV and cable and services.

He served as Corporate Vice President of Microsoft Corporation and also as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of its Interactive Entertainment Business. He was responsible for all financial planning and analysis relating to the Xbox 360 console, Kinect, Xbox LIVE, accessories, first- and third-party games software, Mediaroom and Zune."

He does have experience, love or hate Microsoft. (That Zune though, lol!)

Even with all of his success though, it still is hard to fathom one guy making more money than most of all of his employees combined. The ones who will be doing the hard labor and love of game making. Game directors make huge decisions and risks too, but they don't get compensated anything like the corporate board. Damn shame.

Smokehouse1949d ago (Edited 1949d ago )

It’s because the labor liberals are dead in America. The modern progressive left are for the rich elites now. They care more about superficial platitudes than the working class. Identity politics and other useless garbage smokescreens.

It’s everywhere, do the left bitch about the Amazon work conditions? About how employees are pissing in bottles while Bezos becomes the richest man in the world? No, he donated to the Democratic Party so it’s ok. Zuckerberg and Facebook? Uber? Google? The modern left is an absolute joke and the balance has been ruined. They don’t care when the power is theres.

Ceaser98573611949d ago

Damn! Tim Cook recently got a pay check hike and its 15 million.

2pacalypsenow1949d ago (Edited 1949d ago )

Because the job requires a lot of knowledge and are in high demand.

Cant just pickup some random guy of the streets and ask him to be the CFO of a multi billion dollar company.

mav8051949d ago (Edited 1949d ago )

It's incredible (and sad) how little people know about business.

Number 1- who cares how much this guy its paid? What is it to you? If the other employees are worth so much, then certainly they can go elsewhere and make more money right? Even if Activision decided to pay their CFO a fraction of this salary, say 500,000, Activision has 4,000 employees and that would result in less than $3,500 more per employee... in addition to likely being more than they're worth (according to the market), it's hardly enough to make any change in one's lifestyle.

Second- the reason 'executives get paid so much' is simple, it's because the owners of the company (read shareholders) and those entrusted to make these decisions by the owners have decided that the executive is worth the money. Sometimes they're wrong. If you don't agree with the board and you're an owner, sell your shares. See how simple things are?

Edit- also, those in executive positions like a CFO have much higher degrees of responsibility and liability than a typical employee. They also work constantly, so the argument that they aren't doing 'the real work' is an empty argument. There's much more to making a product than what you see as a consumer.

Godmars2901949d ago

Because they're in charge.

*drops mike*

Godmars2901949d ago

Edit:
Suppose to be "Fox running the hen house" kind of statement.

Profchaos1948d ago

The rationale that they give is it costs money to attract the best in the business the reality is that isn't always the case and far to often it's just exorbadent and attracts execs that have no interest in the company or the product or even the customers.

Case in point this type of move

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 1948d ago
beulahland1949d ago (Edited 1949d ago )

If that means more (good) games, what's the problem? It's a private company, they pay what they want for whoever they want. Anything Activision related now is a reason to scream "WITCH! WITCH!"
Chances are he won't do any miracles, though.

ravinash1949d ago

The thing we see over and over is these companies paying loads of money for these people who come in, and regardless of how well they do... or badly... still get paid these stupid amounts.
I've seen companies driven into the ground by these people, and then they walk away with their pockets filled with cash when everyone else is now out looking for new jobs trying to pay their mortgage.

Often it's the same people going round in a small circuit from company to company collecting their pay and then moving onto the next one.

Bear in mind my wife used to work in a head hunters company which role is to basically use their contacts to keep finding these roles for these people.
It's very hard for anyone new to get in because it really is a case of who you know rather than what you know.

Kabaneri1949d ago

The AAA industry is crashing right before our eyes.

Xb1ps41949d ago

RIGHT... instead of putting in that kind of money towards games and the ppl that actually make them they rather pay a suit and tie millions just to sit in front of a computer and figure how they can fuck over the little guys that make it happen.

Godmars2901948d ago

Not just that little guy, but the one who buys it as well.

AnnaDea1949d ago

no cash from me anymore activision....

sander97021949d ago

"Corporate, corporate never changes..."

Profchaos1948d ago

It's not always the case just ea and Activision take two are going alright they have the sense to give developers free reign with time and budgets rockstar took 8 years for rdr2 for example

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1948d ago
-volt-1949d ago

Unless you started and own your own company there is no job on earth that justifies paying executives excessive salaries.

Xb1ps41949d ago

I would love to see his job description and compare it to the workers that imo actually work! I’m out of here shit pisses me off.

2pacalypsenow1949d ago

You think CFO's don't work? My dad is a CFO and trust me, they work...

BigTrain1949d ago

@2pac

It's not so much a question of whether they work but more so if what they do warrants 15 million. Especially when average Joe makes 48000 annually. The gap is disturbing.

PoSTedUP1949d ago

ever meet an actuary or someone going to school for actuary science? they are on a whole other level dude. just the work they do to get their degree is insane. makes my physics/chemical engineer friend look like a middle-schooler. CFO can be responsible for a company making extraordinary gains. think every company that has done well and is making hundreds of millions, or billions, the CFO has played a huge role in that. thats what warrants his pay. not only do they work their ass off getting their degree, they work their ass of up the corporate ladder they dont just become a CFO overnight.

Godmars2901948d ago

@PoSTedUP:
But then there's the example of companies tanking, likely from things done by the CFO, and when that company goes under the same CFO takes what's left to the detriment of those under them. Have in fact engineered things to turn out that way.

This specific case is about Activision being in trouble, repeatedly cutting corners with their products and now losing a major asset, and handing over money that could have been used to fix issues to someone who has yet to do anything.

PoSTedUP1948d ago (Edited 1948d ago )

the CFO doesnt take whats left he gets paid a salary and has a contract. if he takes anything that would be fraudulent. and yes CFOs make mistakes and dont always succeed in their projections.

the 15 mill (11.5 only if he hits performance targets) is to get him to stay, since he was activision-blizzards CFO for 5 years. he was thinking about jumping ship supposedly. they apparently have confidence in this guy and know what he can do. so its not like he hasn't done anything yet. they need him to turn things around. and i dont blame them they are desperate. 15 mill else where isnt going to do squat in the light of turning a big company around, but they can give it to someone who they know has the ability to. and what better incentive than in stocks tied to a performance target! he doesnt get 11.5 mill unless he does a good job.

if my business selling bread took a hit, i cant sell it and people arent buying it; should i spend 80k and buy more bread, split 80k between my cashiers, or spend it on someone who knows how to sell the bread and save my business and making me more money...?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1948d ago
Godmars2901948d ago

How does even that excuse "excessive" salaries?

Xb1ps41949d ago

This is disgusting.. it’s always the people that don’t do shit that get paid so damn well, while the ones that actually work get the crumbs..

Just like my damn job.. got a gm that gets paid six figures with another six figure bonus... that’s not all he gets the ass hole came in knowing nothing about our field of work, nothing at all and gets a company vehicle company gas and to top it all off they pay his fvcking rent cause he moved from another state..

Just disgusting

2pacalypsenow1949d ago

"This is disgusting.. it’s always the people that don’t do shit that get paid so damn well"

Do you know what a CFO is, and what they do?

Xb1ps41949d ago

Yea a chief financial officer..

In other words a glorified finance guy.. I’m sure they work very hard... so hard that this guy deserves millions over the workers that perform the jobs that actually bring in the money to afford a cfo salary like this one.

2pacalypsenow1949d ago

Not saying he deserves 13 million, but handling a billion dollar companies fiances and answering to shareholders is no easy task.

Otherwise everyone would do it.

PoSTedUP1949d ago

go look into becoming an actuary scientist then get back to me. not only that but the fact that they can, and a lot of the times do, make the companies filthy rich from what they know and what they do. 15million is an investment in this guy to get him to potentially make billions of dollars grow. the laborers are easily replaceable, this guy not so much.

Xb1ps41946d ago (Edited 1946d ago )

I’m sure it’s not easy to answere questions... but who’s really making the company billions of dollars? In this case, is it not the guys making the games that ppl are buying?! How did the company make its revenue to afford that ridiculous salary? All I’m saying is share the wealth, distribute that money better than that.

What’s a cfo with that kind of salary to a company with out the workers that make the product?

Look at postedup response... “laborers are easily replaceable” yea... let those laborers go on strike for 2 months good luck replacing them soon enough before the stocks crash and if the cfo protect the investors through that then maybe he or she is worth all that money.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1946d ago
Show all comments (66)
100°

Square Enix Is Going Multiplatform; The Layoffs & Its Past Don't Inspire Confidence

After its latest games didn't meet sales targets, Square Enix is going multiplatform but the company's track record isn't convincing.

Scissorman2h ago

Square Enix been multiplatform for decades, a few exclusively-deals doesn't make them any less multiplatform.

fr0sty2h ago

Nor is selling their games on a console with only 25 million install base going to bring their sales to where they hope they will be... Unless they somehow manage to dumb down FF7 trilogy to work on switch, they aren't going to have much luck. They already released it on PC, after all.

SegaSaturn6692h ago

It kind of does, giving preference to a certain platform by timed exclusivity. Console ports generally feel superior. Legend of mana PC port extremely broken

neutralgamer19921h ago

Sega

It doesn’t when square themselves didn’t want to fund the development of remake. It’s only after the success of the 1st they realized their mistake but now contract is signed. If it wasn’t for Sony there would be no FF7 remakes. Same goes for silent hill 2 with Konami. They don’t want to fund AAA budget. Companies like PlayStation and Nintendo get blamed when in reality they are saving some of these franchises

Remember sega didn’t want to fund bayonetta and epic games didn’t want to fund another gears of war. It’s easy to blame console makers but they are the ones taking the risk and paying huge upfront costs without seeing the final product. FF7 remake trilogy won’t be coming to Xbox now or in the future. PlayStation and PC is what square signed up for. Sony paid them more than they would make from Xbox sales.

ravens522h ago

I just wonder when everyone is going to demand that the Square Enix exclusives with Nintendo come to PS and Xbox. Or it's just the PS exclusives that matter lol

phoenixwing2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

I'd love for the nintendo exclusives to come to pc or ps5. They'd actually be playable then.

neutralgamer19921h ago

Raven

Exactly and that’s where square enix does more exclusive than any other platform. Gaming is square has always been very unrealistic with their sales expectations. Remember when tomb raider reboot sold 7.5 million and square said it wasn’t enough. They need to spend less on development and have more realistic expectations from sales.

And those thinking games being not on Xbox makes a difference don’t understand we have a decade plus of data showing square enix games having less than 20% of their multiplatform sales on Xbox (final fantasy series) and Nintendo consoles aren’t strong enough to run any current games. Nintendo switch should be as strong as Xbox one x atleast but we all know that’s most likely won’t happen

RoadRacer49m ago

@raven

thing is, as neutral said in their comm, the switch isn't strong enough to run flagship SE games
i think what SE does is, it makes unique games for switch only so that it has something for that console too. Thats where all the "underlined sans" rpgs go to mostly

maybe things will change when Swtich 2 drops cuz that's gonna be as strong as ps4 afaik from the rumors flying around

TheGamingHounds1h ago

@Scissorman

Your point is valid enough but when the icon of this company is limited to one console in timed-exclusivity, it means the company has crossed the line. By some degree at least

All things aside, Square itself stated "aggressive multiplatform strategies" so we all know what it's talking about

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 49m ago
TheGamingHounds1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

SE needs to go all in optimization. Broken PC ports won't help its case, especially with big releases like mainline Final Fantasy

Asterphoenix1h ago

It's actually simple. What doesn't inspire confidence is Square allocating their budgets on the wrong projects such as Forspoken, Avengers, Babylons Fall and Foamstars.

Square has always been multiplatform since PS3/360 days which 80 % of their games are. People kick up a fuss over PS exclusivity but not Nintendo which has more exclusive projects console exclusive from Square.

FF16 has done ok but not enough to fix the blunders that the past mistakes Square has made with some of their projects. FF7 Rebirth is unclear we'll see a PC release for sure so it's hard to say so far not as good as they would of liked.

Then again unrealistic expectations. If it weren't for Sony these games would at least had another 2 years development time. So some people need to be realistic in that regard.

RoadRacer47m ago

Square Enix just really need to revise its expectations. Maybe consider a change in strategy on dev end as well. Multiplat will help for sure but only good games that are marketed well will sell

70°

How the names Arrowhead Game Studios and Helldivers 2 came to be

Arrowhead Game Studios CEO Johan Pilestedt explains how the studio name comes from a name translation, plus the background on the game title “Helldivers.”

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
70°

Activision team is opening a new game studio in Poland 'Elsewhere Entertainment' to build new AAA IP

Microsoft's Activision subsidiary announced today that it is opening a new game development studio to take advantage of the huge talent pool growing in Poland. It'll be the second Activision studio based in the region, joining Infinity Ward Krakow, although this studio is, in fact, not working on Call of Duty.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com