180°

Grand Theft Auto Movie? Take-Two Films Are in the Works, Will Have Creative Control

Is a Grand Theft Auto movie incoming soon? Get ready to see your favorite Rockstar and 2K games on the big screen as Take-Two films are in the works. The company wants creative control.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
-Foxtrot2667d ago

Well Ubisoft had creative control over Assassins Creed with a great actor and director behind it yet they still screwed up

Creative control means nothing if you are going to follow the same mistakes Hollywood would make without you.

Derekvinyard132667d ago

I've said it once and I'll say it a million times, Hollywood will never make a good video game movie after the screwup that was max Payne. With that game you are literally handed a movie and they still managed to botch it

-Foxtrot2667d ago

All they have to do is to have a writer who is a gamer, loves the games and who will follow them as closely as they possibly can.

Not hard to do

Gamble202667d ago

Just my personal theory but I think the interactive element of a video game is still the part that makes it difficult to translate to film. There are a lot of games with great stories, but the fact that you can immerse yourself in playing the characters is what makes it better. In a movie you lose that immersion and you have to rely solely on the emotional attachments to the character. There hasn't been a film yet that has been able to truly create that emotional bond. With books or comics coming to film, they are already designed to create that in a narrative process. Video games, even if they do use heavy narrative process, still need that interaction. There are some stories that I love playing but when I take a step back and ask myself "If I couldn't play this and just had to watch it start to finish, would I enjoy it just as much?" And the answer is generally no.

-Foxtrot2667d ago

If you take the gameplay out and focus on the main cutscenes you could easilly bridge the gap between the scenes.

Take Drakes Fortune for example. Most of the gameplay sections within the game could easily be removed and replaced with quick cuts to the next scene. If we take the first section of the game where Sully and Nate look around the jungles of Central America for El Dorado you could easily by pass most of the traps and puzzles in that level, all you would have to pick is one or two key scenes then move it along to the next scene when they realise that the statue has been moved.

Personally I would choose the scene where everything starts to collapse and you need to run for your life only for Sully to take the easy way in the end by just walking across what's almost crushed you to death. This scene would be 1) A great set piece. 2) Shows Nates struggles and so called luck. 3) Shows the comedy with Sully taking the easy route in the end which would lead to 4) The interaction of the two characters. This scene in that first level would literally sum everything up nicely of that chapter.

You go in the entrance, walk around, pull a chain for the door, get through, the massive set piece happens, they get through ok and BAM they end up in the room where they discover El Dorado was a statue and was dragged out by a back entrance. This shaves a shit load of time off the story.

2667d ago Replies(1)
cfc832667d ago

They would basically be using the i.p to milk it. How on earth can you make a movie that accurately portrays gta ?

2666d ago
Limbrick2667d ago

I think GTA works as a movie if it is a parody type. A parody featuring multiple GTA games, or GTA and other games. Something like " Not Another Teen Movie" or " Scary Movie". GTA games are basically parodies and would not be a fun movie if done all dramatic and serious.

Gamble202667d ago (Edited 2667d ago )

But beyond the first few Scary Movies when the genre was brand new, live action parody films have flopped so hard.

smolinsk2667d ago

I would say that in some way what makes the resident evil films work is that it do not follow the games and have more freedom to make something creative on top of the residents evil formel. That works much better then the films tries to much to follow the games to strictly.

2667d ago
Show all comments (17)
100°

Take-Two CEO Doesn’t Think AI Will Reduce Employment or Dev Costs; “Stupidest Thing” He’s Heard

Take-Two CEO Strauss Zelnick doesn't think AI will reduce employment or lower development costs, and calls it "stupidest thing" he's ever heard.

lodossrage3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

They already have AI trained to do coding.......

How he thinks it's stupid is beyond me, Especially since we see it happening in real time.

CS738m ago

Company A has 300 employees and lays of 200 to replace them with AI to release the same quality game.

Company B has 300 employees and keeps all 300 but instead uses AI to release a game with dramatically larger scale, scope, complexity, short dev cycle etc.

Company B would release a dramatically better product by using humans + AI and consumers would buy the better game.

I actually agree with this concept.

Huey_My_D_Long31m ago(Edited 31m ago)

This is key facet. Its how the AI is used. It's actually is impressive as is and really would make an amazing addition to alot of people in their jobs, not just tech. It also has the potential for businesses to use to lay off large amounts of people, as much as they could to save money on labor. I hope too many companies don't go with the latter. But since usually companies are worried about bottom line over people...we will see some try and hopefully fail. But yeah, if its to help workers like in your company B scenario I'm totally down...Just scared Company A may be too enticing to some ceos and businesses.

Darkegg10m ago

Value of AI and value of humans will both be increased with human-AI complex. Each, by themselves, will not be independently better than the other. Whether AI will ever be independent from humans is the fear question of humans, ironically because of our doing. At this stage, most of the doing is because of humans, not because of AI. AI is doing exactly that by our design, until we have failed ourselves with an AI development that went awry. The biggest take is that humans have only ourselves to blame when things become wrong, and we have to decide what is the ultimate goal with AI we want to accomplish. It would take a person with high morals and high ethics to make right of AI. I would not want businessman to decide what AI should do or what capabilities it can have. AI should be in the hands of people with high moral fiber, or those operating on love, kindness, and compassion.

Number1TailzFan32m ago

You can already make your own SFX with text prompts now as well, of course it will lower development cost and time

1Victor24m ago(Edited 21m ago)

WARNING WARNING ‼️ SARCASM AHEAD
Sure Strauss and robots didn’t take jobs from car factories.
Edit:Sad thing is he believes it and unfortunately he won’t be replaced for a long time by AI

jambola2h ago

Ceo says stupid thing
Part 5837384

Zeref1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

I think maybe sometimes we give people in these positions too much credit when it comes to intelligence.

romulus2359m ago

As long as it doesn't effect his inflated executive salary or his ridiculous bonuses I'm sure he's fine with it.

RNTody35m ago

Hahaha yeah trust the CEO suit over the actual developers making the games. Good one.

200°

Sony shares big new PS Plus stat, but not the one we want to see

PlayStation Plus has improved the split of PS4 and PS5 players on its priciest tiers, but Sony continues to hide total subscriber numbers.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
mandf1d 23h ago

lol acting like it’s equivalent to ms numbers

Mr Logic1d 22h ago

Uh...They're definitely not equivalent.

"Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass service now has 34 million subscribers."

"the total number of PS Plus subscribers across all tiers was 47.4 million"

darthv721d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN.

bloop1d 18h ago

That's not the "gotcha" you think it is Darth.

darthv721d 18h ago

^^it's not supposed to be bloop.... it's just an interesting observation.

Einhander19721d 16h ago

darthv72

"That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN."

Have you ever heard of a PC before? I hear they are pretty popular.

fr0sty1d 10h ago

MS started lumping gold subscribers in with those GP numbers... keep in mind.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1d 10h ago
shinoff21831d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

What. Definitely more os plus subscribers but that makes sense due to actual console sales

Darth the difference between the bases are huge your right but you gotta think. Ps players buy more games, where as the Xbox base relies on gamepass for their gaming. So it makes perfect sense

darthv721d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

What makes perfect sense though? You say PS players buy more games... so then logically there should be more PS+ subscribers given the increased number of online multiplayer games in the PS4 generation alone. The PS4 was the first time that + was required for online play much like Gold was for 360 users.

Keep in mind we are talking subscribers, not simply XB/PS users. I assume you meant to say offline single player games, which is most likely true as well. That gen also saw a significant increase in games with an online component comparted to the previous gen.

victorMaje1d 20h ago

I for one will be going back to essential at the next renewal. When I feel a game is good & right up my alley, I’ll check trusted reviews & just buy it.

jznrpg1d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

I have the top tier until 2028 as they gave me a massive discount for all the years I had left but I’ll most likely go to essential as well. I buy my games but my kids do use the service occasionally. They do prefer to own their games as well since any game can leave the rental service at some point and they don’t like that idea. They mostly use it to demo games then ask me to buy games if they really like it.

RedDevils1d 15h ago

For me, I will cancel it all together but unfortunately I still have it till 2030 lol

meganick1d 19h ago

I would like to see Sony add a fourth tier of PS Plus for people who just want to be able to play games online without any of the perks like monthly games, store discounts, or anything like that, and it should cost $20 annually, $30 maximum. There’s no way I’m paying $80 just to play games online. Even the original $60 fee was too much, and I would often wait for sales to re-up my subscription.

P_Bomb1d 15h ago (Edited 1d 15h ago )

Essential is too expensive, I agree. We’ve got one Essential and one Premium sub. Dropping the Premium when it expires.

gamerz1d 12h ago

Just let my subscription lapse for the first time since 2010. Will sub again every now and then for a month or so to access my old ps+ games but for me it's the end of an era.

DivineHand1251d 11h ago

Let those numbers continue to drop because it is now too expensive. $80 per year just to play online. I noticed they didn't offer any discounts on the subscription or controllers during this year's days of play for the first time in many years and they will feel it when people choose not to renew.

My subscription will lapse next month and it will stay that way until further notice.

KevtheDuff1d 8h ago

There were savings on subs and controllers here in the UK? I bought a controller yesterday in the sale..
It would be weird if those deals were not in other territories too?

160°

Silent Hill Transmission Livestream

Konami has announced that a Silent Hill Transmission will take place on Thursday, May 30, at 4pm PT/7pm ET that will reveal game updates, a "deeper look at the film," and new merch. Join us at IGN to find out what's next for this beloved franchise.

RaidenBlack2d ago

Hope SH2 gets more polish before release.

P_Bomb2d ago

I’m not paying $94 CAD for what they’ve shown me. Looks rough as sin.

Fishy Fingers2d ago

Ive seen better lip syncing during a Punch and Judy show

Sonic18812d ago (Edited 2d ago )

This looks terrible. Capcom should have done the remake 😂 The animations and gameplay looks stiff.

-Foxtrot2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Okay. I was saying before in another article how SH2 looked better than the last trailer, which is true but damn this looks rough as hell.

I wanted RE4 / Dead Space remake quality

Sonic18812d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I wouldn't buy it for $70 dollars. Maybe when it's on sale.

-Foxtrot2d ago

Yeah full price, deluxe editions, Konami are f***** tripping here.

CrimsonWing692d ago

The characters look terrible to me… like it’s distracting.

repsahj2d ago

I will give this game a chance!!! let's go!