690°

Blizzard Says Overwatch Skins Accidentally Made Mei Look Thinner

Like most of Overwatch’s Lunar New Year skins, Mei’s outfits for the Year of the Rooster are great. They caused a slight stir earlier today, though, when people who had previously believed (and loved) Mei for being a little thicker than your average video game woman thought she was now looking a bit slimmer.

UCForce2668d ago

She isn't that fat in her original outfit. The Snow Suit is large and bulky. Even in real life, jacket do make us look large and bulky . People been overacting way too much.

2668d ago
GottaBjimmyb2667d ago

I accidentally forgot to care.

2pacalypsenow2668d ago

Well overweight doest mean healthier either

2668d ago
Kabaneri2668d ago

As long as you're not emaciated, yes being thinner is objectively healthier.

ravinash2668d ago

If you ran round all day shooting people, you'd loss weight too.

2668d ago
ameliabaz2668d ago (Edited 2668d ago )

Dunno why people are disagreeing with you. I know plenty of skinny people who can't even run up a flight of stairs without puffing like an old steamboat. Fit is healthy, but thin doesn't always mean fit.

DaNxtLT2668d ago (Edited 2668d ago )

Someone that is thinner, 99% of the time is healthier than someone that is overweight. The only 1% I'm aware of is anorexia.

bluefox7552668d ago

99% of the time, yes it does.

Shubhendu_Singh2668d ago

I don't know why you have so many downvotes.
I am thin, and I am certainly not healthy - just ask me to run and you will see.

Ofcourse still better than extremely fat people obviously.

jwillj2k42667d ago (Edited 2667d ago )

agree, thinner could mean diabetes. could mean aids, could mean anything.

however thinner could mean more or less attractive, depending on what your tastes are ;p

NotoriousWhiz2667d ago (Edited 2667d ago )

Someone who is 10 pounds overweight is likely healthier than someone who is 10 pounds underweight. Weight is not a solid indicator of fitness. It is a known fact that muscles weigh more than fat and also that muscles can make someone appear bulkier.

It is for this reason that thinner does not always mean healthier. Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't.

People that are very muscular are likely overweight based on BMI.

For those saying that 99% of the time, thinner is healthier. That is a gross overstatement. It's probably a LOT closer to 50% of the time.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 2667d ago
rainslacker2668d ago

Yeah, heard they were trying to incite another SJW outrage, only to come back and do something more rediculous later.

JayPi32668d ago (Edited 2668d ago )

Skinny doesn't always mean healthier, you can be thicker based on genetics and still be healthy, just like you can be skinny as hell and still be out of shape.

2667d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2667d ago
PapaBop2668d ago

I dread to imagine what these special snowflakes are going to do to gaming in five/ten years time.. most of them will probably get older though, enter the real world and have a nervous breakdown at the reality of real life but seriously, time to crawl back into your safe space already.

kg73102668d ago ShowReplies(1)
JayPi32668d ago

The reality of life? It's a video game where you fight against a talking monkey, a cyborg ninja, a Dwarf, a Korean girl in a robot, and then some. No one's gonna break down from it. Just because someone takes issue with something you don't doesn't mean suddenly they can't handle "life".

Ogygian2668d ago (Edited 2668d ago )

Some measure of tolerance is required to get through life. Most of us have no problem with "SJWs" having their own games made by them for them, but we object to them telling other devs what they should and shouldn't do. Games someone doesn't agree with are not "toxic" or "evil"; they're just "not for me".

They're fundamentally intolerant, and in a diverse society, that's going to be their downfall. Most people don't react kindly to those they don't know well dictating morality to them. That approach doesn't make you friends, and it forbids the level of amicability necessary to be likeable.

Concertoine2667d ago

Look how some snowflakes reacted to the world shifting away from them politically and tell me they're ready.

Noctis2668d ago

idk man, it seems more like you're the one that's special here having only negative things to say with no reason. I personally know these "snowflakes" you happen to talk about and they work at Blizzard Entertainment and are deeply involved in these matters. they specially hate people like you who aren't as aware as the people who actually work in the media.

2668d ago Replies(3)
xDealtwithIt2668d ago

Lord forbid we have a chick that lost weight be portrayed in our game. We already catered to the LGBT crowd now lets go for the feminists.

Show all comments (84)
120°

Square Enix Is Going Multiplatform; The Layoffs & Its Past Don't Inspire Confidence

After its latest games didn't meet sales targets, Square Enix is going multiplatform but the company's track record isn't convincing.

Scissorman5h ago

Square Enix been multiplatform for decades, a few exclusively-deals doesn't make them any less multiplatform.

fr0sty5h ago

Nor is selling their games on a console with only 25 million install base going to bring their sales to where they hope they will be... Unless they somehow manage to dumb down FF7 trilogy to work on switch, they aren't going to have much luck. They already released it on PC, after all.

SegaSaturn6695h ago

It kind of does, giving preference to a certain platform by timed exclusivity. Console ports generally feel superior. Legend of mana PC port extremely broken

neutralgamer19924h ago

Sega

It doesn’t when square themselves didn’t want to fund the development of remake. It’s only after the success of the 1st they realized their mistake but now contract is signed. If it wasn’t for Sony there would be no FF7 remakes. Same goes for silent hill 2 with Konami. They don’t want to fund AAA budget. Companies like PlayStation and Nintendo get blamed when in reality they are saving some of these franchises

Remember sega didn’t want to fund bayonetta and epic games didn’t want to fund another gears of war. It’s easy to blame console makers but they are the ones taking the risk and paying huge upfront costs without seeing the final product. FF7 remake trilogy won’t be coming to Xbox now or in the future. PlayStation and PC is what square signed up for. Sony paid them more than they would make from Xbox sales.

ravens524h ago

I just wonder when everyone is going to demand that the Square Enix exclusives with Nintendo come to PS and Xbox. Or it's just the PS exclusives that matter lol

phoenixwing4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I'd love for the nintendo exclusives to come to pc or ps5. They'd actually be playable then.

neutralgamer19924h ago

Raven

Exactly and that’s where square enix does more exclusive than any other platform. Gaming is square has always been very unrealistic with their sales expectations. Remember when tomb raider reboot sold 7.5 million and square said it wasn’t enough. They need to spend less on development and have more realistic expectations from sales.

And those thinking games being not on Xbox makes a difference don’t understand we have a decade plus of data showing square enix games having less than 20% of their multiplatform sales on Xbox (final fantasy series) and Nintendo consoles aren’t strong enough to run any current games. Nintendo switch should be as strong as Xbox one x atleast but we all know that’s most likely won’t happen

RoadRacer3h ago

@raven

thing is, as neutral said in their comm, the switch isn't strong enough to run flagship SE games
i think what SE does is, it makes unique games for switch only so that it has something for that console too. Thats where all the "underlined sans" rpgs go to mostly

maybe things will change when Swtich 2 drops cuz that's gonna be as strong as ps4 afaik from the rumors flying around

TheGamingHounds4h ago

@Scissorman

Your point is valid enough but when the icon of this company is limited to one console in timed-exclusivity, it means the company has crossed the line. By some degree at least

All things aside, Square itself stated "aggressive multiplatform strategies" so we all know what it's talking about

Scissorman1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

Then the headline should read "Square To Drop Exclusively Deals in Pursuit of A Sweeping Multiplatform Strategy". I don't recall this argument when Square Enix released Bravely Default, Octopath Traveler, and Triangle Strategy on one platform. And even if FF is the icon, not all of its titles have gone to one platform. We're talking about three games, one of which is already on PC. Did Square suddenly go 'multiplatform' after it released subsequent Tomb Raider sequels on more than just the Xbox? It's just a silly way of putting it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1h ago
TheGamingHounds4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

SE needs to go all in optimization. Broken PC ports won't help its case, especially with big releases like mainline Final Fantasy

Asterphoenix3h ago

It's actually simple. What doesn't inspire confidence is Square allocating their budgets on the wrong projects such as Forspoken, Avengers, Babylons Fall and Foamstars.

Square has always been multiplatform since PS3/360 days which 80 % of their games are. People kick up a fuss over PS exclusivity but not Nintendo which has more exclusive projects console exclusive from Square.

FF16 has done ok but not enough to fix the blunders that the past mistakes Square has made with some of their projects. FF7 Rebirth is unclear we'll see a PC release for sure so it's hard to say so far not as good as they would of liked.

Then again unrealistic expectations. If it weren't for Sony these games would at least had another 2 years development time. So some people need to be realistic in that regard.

Scissorman1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

It's the blunders that set those expectations so high. If you remove those from the equation, I bet the sales numbers would be more than stellar. Square believes it's okay to release a pile of risky, middling, garbage because the big boys will ultimately subsidize the cost. Don't worry if Forspoken sells poorly, FF16 will surely sell 10 million copies to balance that right out. Oh wait, it only sold like 4 million. Well that's a disaster. Meanwhile games that sell 2 million units with comparable budgets are deemed successful.

RoadRacer3h ago

Square Enix just really need to revise its expectations. Maybe consider a change in strategy on dev end as well. Multiplat will help for sure but only good games that are marketed well will sell

70°

How the names Arrowhead Game Studios and Helldivers 2 came to be

Arrowhead Game Studios CEO Johan Pilestedt explains how the studio name comes from a name translation, plus the background on the game title “Helldivers.”

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
70°

Activision team is opening a new game studio in Poland 'Elsewhere Entertainment' to build new AAA IP

Microsoft's Activision subsidiary announced today that it is opening a new game development studio to take advantage of the huge talent pool growing in Poland. It'll be the second Activision studio based in the region, joining Infinity Ward Krakow, although this studio is, in fact, not working on Call of Duty.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com