1150°

The Chinese Room Accuses The Witcher Developer CD Projekt RED Of Sexism

Everything happened after GameSpot tweeted an image from the making of the first teaser trailer of CD Projekt RED’s Cyberpunk 2077. Developer The Chinese Room replied with its official twitter account commenting on the image and implying that the game appears to be “just as sexist” as The Witcher.

Hoffmann2956d ago

...and?

Someone posts his opinion on twitter. I see it as the bigger thing that various gaming sites including big ones like dualshockers and destructoid are using it for clickbait articles.

fallacious2956d ago

that's sjws for you. it's like their life's mission to try and be or get people offended.

Hoffmann2956d ago

Nah..the sjw here MAYBE was whoever tweeted that comment, but the many sites there that write their short stories about it, knowing that the average gamer will of course write how dumb that comment is just does it knowing that it means a good amount of clicks.

N4G000012956d ago

while people distracted by "sjws", anti-sexy religious nuts in congress are on offensive trying to ban everything sexy.

BrandanT2956d ago

@N4G

And the atheistic SJWs are also trying to ban sexy things. Go figure.

TheOneWhoIsTornApart2956d ago (Edited 2956d ago )

@BrandanT: The people that you are talking about aren't doing it in the name of atheism. Religious people that call for censorship mostly do it because it doesn't conform to their holy books teachings. Atheism is just a lack in belief in a deity and that's it.

annoyedgamer2956d ago (Edited 2956d ago )

@N400001

New account created : 28 Apr 2016 ( 1d 5h ago )

Already spamming regressive leftist defection comments. Go figure.

BrandanT2956d ago

@theone

I said they were doing the same thing regardless of intent.

Eonjay2956d ago (Edited 2956d ago )

I can understand a woman having issues with this image. They have a right to express it, but I would prefer them to not do so under the company's name. Thats all. Unless of course she owns the company in which case fire away.

Eventually some of you may have daughters one day, and if she tells you that an image like that makes here feel uncomfortable, you will be able to explain how the freedom of speech works without attacking here or calling her names.

Morgue2956d ago

Aside from meaning ' Social Justice Warrior ' I'm beginning too think it actually stands for ' Single Jaded Women '

TheCommentator2956d ago

Women all over the world exploit "sexism" to get ahead in life and I don't see SJW's doing much to stop that. Look at that gamer girl dressed up like an anime character with the "wardrobe malfunction", Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian screwing their way to fame, or the majority of all women that use their bodies as currency to get what they want out of their sugar daddies.

God forbid that a game company (full of sexist men no doubt, lol) would try to paint a woman in that light though. Apparently, most SJW's only think it's appropriate for sex to sell when a woman benefits from it. Think about it. Who did Paris Hilton make her sex tape with? What about Kim Kardashian? I don't know because those men didn't get famous from it. For that matter it's just as sexist for a man to have to pay for everything when he's out on a date with his girl, who only has to look good, when they're both just trying to get laid. Why doesn't she pay for it sometimes? Seriously though, if a man generally has to pay for sex by taking his date out and paying for everything, why is it illegal for a man to cut out the dating part and just pay for the sex? Isn't it the same thing in the long run, just without the middle man?

The problems with sexism are way too big for SJW's to keep bitching about the little stuff. What they're doing seems like the equivalent of telling someone at a garbage dump not to litter. The real problem is the way society trains our children how to behave and there's nothing we can do to stop it. My 11 year old daughter, for example, is already showing signs of the influence social media and pop culture is having on her style of dress and attitude in terms of sexuality. It's just the way people are brainwashed to behave.

jer11222956d ago (Edited 2956d ago )

It must be stressful to be sjw to go through life offended by everything. I mean if everything bother you must be miserable lol

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 2956d ago
DarXyde2956d ago

I don't know if I'd call those two big ones though. I've only heard of Destructoid prior to joining N4G, to be honest. Even then, didn't really hear from them much about anything. Dualshockers, not until I joined. It's just the sensationalist headlines I take issue with (which in a way makes it clickbait).

I don't know if I can agree with The Chinese Room though; The Witcher III reminds me of Game of Thrones a little where, sure, there's certainly some sexist elements given the elven/olden times vibe they were going for. But there are female characters who are incredibly respectable in both universes (Arya Starrk and Ciri, for example).

The image used from Cyberpunk 2077 for TCR's argument could, for all we know, be taken out of context. I think it's pretty pre-judgmental of them to say that.

OoglyBoogly2956d ago

So because you haven't heard of Destructoid or Dualshockers they're not that big? Are you serious?

DarXyde2956d ago

And that was your takeaway from my comment? Are you serious?

I specifically began with, "I don't know if[...]"

And at what point did I say I never heard of Destructoid? I said I hadn't heard much from them. It was DualShockers I hadn't.

Before making brash assumptions, be sure to understand what others mean. There was nothing cryptic about my statement. Very black and white.

2956d ago
Palitera2956d ago

Well... Every single comment and click here is making sure their clickbaity job is successful.

What would these sites be without our neverending support?

Congrats to us all.

MRMagoo1232956d ago

well half the people or more problems don't even click the article so not that successful. if an article has a stupid opinion I don't ever click it.

Zeref2956d ago

OMG, Can somebody tell these sjw to f**k off?

Christopher2956d ago (Edited 2956d ago )

***I see it as the bigger thing that various gaming sites including big ones like dualshockers and destructoid are using it for clickbait articles.***

Says the first person to respond to the submission itself, let alone help to propel it to the top spot on the site right now.

Not sure how you're helping if that's your argument.

Hoffmann2956d ago

Well, when over 60 N4G members clicked on that agree button I think I made a pretty good point.

If I would be one of the site admins who posted a whole article about this tweet I would be as guilty - in my opinion - as the websites that did it. But as someone who simply comments about the content of the article instead of being the first who yells insults at the Chinese Room - as seen in many comments on mentioned websites - or writes how terrible their opinion I don't think I was hurting my point.

I get what you mean though and when I wrote the comment this morning I was not 100% sure if I should do it as well.

jer11222956d ago (Edited 2956d ago )

Whats funny if its to gay characters having sex or anything its considered Progressive and its applauded. Men and women its sexist. I have no problem with whatever its up to the game creators to make what they want. Sjw are so hypocritical

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2956d ago
Skate-AK2956d ago

Absolutely ridiculous. Guess they have never heard of Cyberpunk 2020. They are getting slammed for this sad SJW attempt.

N4G000012956d ago

pfff, "SJW" decoy buzzword again, while the anti-porn religious nuts in government, congress trying to ban everything Sexy.

Skate-AK2956d ago

That would make sense if The Chinese Room wasn't a British developer.

BrandanT2956d ago

There's a bunch of atheist leftist groups that are trying to do the same thing. SJWs and feminist extremists are doing the same thing on the grounds of..."it's degrading to women " or whatever buzzwords may appear.
It's the same goal, so at least get along.

And by the way, this isn't the first SJW stuff ended up censoring "sexy" things in games.

annoyedgamer2956d ago (Edited 2956d ago )

@N400001

New account created : 28 Apr 2016 ( 1d 5h ago )

Don't feed the SJW troll.

opinionated2956d ago (Edited 2956d ago )

Name one bill. You can't because that's blatantly false. The religious zealots were destroyed in the Supreme Court when it came to video games. Sjws do not go through courts they protest like the gutless wonders they are.

N4G000012956d ago

"Sjws do not go through courts they protest like the gutless wonders they are." and that's why they're not the government, they are "trolls", a distraction from the real centuries old effort of anti-sexy religious nuts, their oppression can still be seen in Afghanistan. Freedom of Speech! Freedom to make sexy games!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2956d ago
senorfartcushion2956d ago (Edited 2956d ago )

But it is sexist. There is no imagery like this but with men in the chair unless it IS porn.

Games get sold with shiny graphics and blood. This is how they sold Lara Croft.

divinealpha2956d ago

You need to proof read. Also what are you saying that there are no men dressed like this only women that's sexist, are you ok in the head

senorfartcushion2956d ago

Hot women in games are for us men.

Hot men in games are also for us men. To help us feel masculine.

rocketpanda2956d ago

You must be very insecure to think that every gender in a games are for men. The last few years have shown the market is split almost down the middle between men and women gamers. Hot women can be for women too, muscular men can be for muscular men because believe it or not some people are attracted to the same gender.

Tomb Raider was never sold because of shiny graphics and violence. The violence was made into an issue with SJW for the reboot because it portrayed a female lead in violent situations.

Tomb Raider was always sold on having a strong female lead since the ps1 era and she became a gaming female sex symbol because of that. Not just because she is a pretty face.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2956d ago
cfc832956d ago

This is one of these times where everybody clamours to say how wrong chinese room are. People hunt for these articles in packs.

Ogygian2956d ago

It's important we know which studios to boycott. When the Chinese Room apologise for being intolerant, perhaps they'll win back the customers they upset.

kraenk122956d ago

Who is they?! It was one f'in guy on Twitter!

annoyedgamer2956d ago

@kraenk12

One comment is all it takes for SJWs to demand an apology for being offended. Well....now the SJWs have offended us and WE demand an apology.

Rachel_Alucard2956d ago

But that would imply people actually bought their games.

_-EDMIX-_2956d ago

? Do you actually buy games to actually have fun? Sounds pretty stupid and childish to me.

Smh. Idiots. ...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2956d ago
rainslacker2956d ago (Edited 2956d ago )

Didn't really have to hunt. It was right there at the top of the page this morning.

Are they wrong?

Well...yes. Sexism is not showing sexy women, or using them to express a narrative. Sexism is the act of discriminating against women....which a game isn't capable of doing, unless CDPR didn't allow women to play their game, or the game lobbed insults at the women while they were playing, or something along those lines.

A game can convey sexist messages, but that doesn't make the developer, the game, or anyone else sexist unless it's done from the point of trying to influence common consensus on the issue to believe what the message conveys....something that is really hard to do...and is still very much more an expression of ideas, rather than a form of sexism.

The proper thing to say would be that it objectifies women, but objectifying women in media is not in itself sexism or sexist.

The word sexist, and sexism, are way too misused nowadays, and many people who try to say something is sexist, have obviously learned the meaning of the term from the media's misuse of the word, as well as the misuse of the word from uneducated people who want to jump on a trend which they typically only have a one semester sociology or political science course knowledge in. In other words, they are idealistic without having all the facts, or understanding how everything fits into a bigger picture, and base their opinions on reactionary stimulus which is either false, or blown out of proportion, along with the inability to realize that the world is not as black and white as they want it to be.

Truthfully, if more articles, and SJW types could use their own terminology in it's proper way, it'd be a lot easier to take them seriously.

Ristul2956d ago

The Chinese Room, come back when you have made a game as great as Witcher 3, now run off with your sad sjw bullshit.

garrettbobbyferguson2956d ago

This. Instead of ruining sequels to decent games. I don't understand how you can ruin such an easy formula as corridor horror. A Machine for Pigs was terrible.

Rachel_Alucard2956d ago

They make walking simulators and political statements not tense and exciting games.

ChrisW2956d ago

When "Chinese" and "accuses" are used in the same sentence, it's most often about censorship and politics... Not sexism.

**This political statement was brought to you by ChrisW**

aquaticDonut2956d ago

...The Chinese Room is a British game developer. They made Dear Esther and Amnesia: A Machine for Pigs. I think you slightly misunderstood this article.

Mikefizzled2956d ago (Edited 2956d ago )

It's not that he didn't understand the article. He just didn't read it.

ChrisW2956d ago

I'm not surprised that went over heads. Oh well... We can't always expect people to understand lowbrow, off-topic humor.

As for reading the article... What article?!? It's a Twatter feed!!!

Show all comments (219)
100°

Every PlayStation Studios game available now on Windows PC

Windows Central writes: "Many PlayStation Studios games that are ported to PC get dedicated PS5 DualSense support, which allows users to experience haptic feedback and adaptive trigger support without actually having to own a PS5.

According to Hermen Hulst, head of PlayStation Studios, it's still the company's intent to launch the bigger single-player games on PS5 first, before later bringing the games to PC. This might not be the case for multiplayer games however, which are considered okay to launch simultaneously on console and PC."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
ocelot072d ago

My guess is after god of war. Probably last of us 2 that's a almost 4 year old game now and by the time it's released on pc it will be more than 4 years old or close to 5.

Elda1d 20h ago

Every old Playstation game that is now on PC.

shinoff21831d 10h ago

Right. I definitely see what a headlined from a website named windows central was trying to do though. It's cute little wordplay to help out the green box

Flewid6381d 9h ago

Are PlayStation games no longer good or worth playing once they are old?

Elda1d 8h ago

I'm guessing my comment went over your head.

XiNatsuDragnel1d 18h ago

Good at least they can sell hardware

220°

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie. This is something of a homecoming, as Microsoft owns Activision.

Read Full Story >>
engadget.com
Obscure_Observer2d ago

Very very early in development. Still, fantastic news!

Let´s GO!!!

Lightning772d ago

I guess.

How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )

At least it wouldn't be MS of all ppl destroying them.

MS really should let go Tango go like they did TFB here.

darthv722d ago (Edited 2d ago )

one was under Bethesda (Tango) the other under Activision (TFB). Clearly each one handled the separations of their subordinates differently.

Obscure_Observer2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

"How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )"

Perhaps because Zenimax and ABK handles such matters differently based on their own internal policies as "independent" publishers.

Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future. Which could also be the reason why they ensured an exclusive partnership with TFB and its new game, before anyone else.

Sad and disgusting. But it is what it is.

Lightning772d ago (Edited 2d ago )

"Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future."

MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB.

It's inexcusable, they have options on how to handle studios they don't want anymore with killing jobs. Not just MS but the rest of the industry also.

Sad and disgusting sure how many will get shut down next year or this year even?

I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another.

Obscure_Observer1d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

"MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB."

Imo, MS separated from TFB because they didn´t had a game associated with Xbox yet, unlike Tango.

"I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another."

Fair enough. It was indeed an epic dumb move from them to close Tango.

Still, all to be forgotten, like always have. This is not the first time a big publisher shuts down a beloved and/or successful studio out of nowhere and certainly won´t be the last. Do you remember Lionhead? Do you remember Evolution Studios? Yeah... both were beloved studios and yet, those companies kill those studios in q blink of an eye and got away with it.

anast1d 20h ago (Edited 1d 20h ago )

The studio boss made some money from this transaction. Once the game releases, the studio will get chopped up.

-Foxtrot2d ago

Manages to buy their freedom especially after all the shit Microsoft has been doing with its studios lately

...

Goes right back to them as partners.

Okaaaaaay...

darthv722d ago

Id venture a guess that TFB working directly with MS was a better outcome than working through Activision to get to MS.

VersusDMC2d ago

From the article...

"Toys for Bob spun out as an indie back in February after Microsoft instituted sweeping layoffs that impacted 86 employees, which was more than half of the staff"

I doubt those 86 employees enjoyed the Microsoft experience over Activisions.

Inverno2d ago

MS shuts down studios because of lack of resources and then helps these guys by giving em resources. Also MS is what forced them to buy their freedom in the first place? What kind of logic 😂

Chevalier2d ago

The best thing is that the company that is worth $3 trillion and owns the company instead of Xbox lacks resources. How the hell does a company worth $3 trillion making a measly $70 billion purchase they 'can't' support. Lol

romulus231d 16h ago

Stockholm syndrome, maybe?

BlindMango1d 10h ago

The reason they would need to "partner with Microsoft" is simply to make a game that's part of a franchise that Microsoft owns. Meaning they're probably going to make a new Spyro game - they're still an independent studio, but are making a game in a franchise that Microsoft owns. It's kind of like Remedy partnering with Rockstar to be able to make the Max Payne remakes.

shinoff21831d 10h ago

It was probably the deal to get released from Ms

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1d 10h ago
Sciurus_vulgaris2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Xbox’s gaming division seems to still function as 3 semi-autonomous sub-divisions, Xbox Studios, Bethesda and ABK. The three main sub-divisions can seemingly shut down or build studios and set up partnerships independently. This would explain why Bethesda can recently shutdown studios, while ABK spins off one studio, while building a new one. Plus, Toys for Bob could be spun off by ABK, only to immediately re-partner with Microsoft.

Chevalier2d ago

That's absolutely 💯 BS. Any sane 'autonomous' company would NOT put their games on Gamepass day 1 like COD will lose probably billions.

Also they're all under Xbox game studios so any autonomy is an illusion.

PhillyDonJawn1d 16h ago

No, I'm sure MS can and does step in when they want something done specifically but I'm also sure they let them also work independently

shinoff21831d 10h ago

I highly highly doubt this. Ms controls all. The guys aren't gonna be allowed to just shut something down like that without approval. No way

Elda2d ago

Either a kiddie game or something uninteresting.

Obscure_Observer1d 22h ago

Don´t worry. You won´t be playing it anyway since their next game will possible be a next gen Xbox console game.

Elda1d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

Don't worry about my comments.

PhillyDonJawn1d 16h ago

Right probably something like astrobot

romulus231d 16h ago

Nah he said "uninteresting", lots of people are interested in Astro Bot.

Elda1d 14h ago

Never Astro Bot. Astro Bot looks better than any exclusive released on XB this entire generation & believe there hasn't been much.

Asplundh1d 13h ago

Crash 4 was good, so I'm hopeful.

PhillyDonJawn1d 12h ago

Hey you said that about SOT and looks like many ppl on PS is playing it. You also found bugsnax interesting ffs your opinion hold no weight lol.

Elda1d 11h ago (Edited 1d 11h ago )

Bugsnax is BS, tried it & quickly deleted it. It's a game that fits right on Gamepass. PS5 owners that are probably playing the boring SOT you could count on one hand. LMAO!!...don't try to come for me.

PhillyDonJawn1d 9h ago

So you admit bugsnax interested you enough to try? 😂 someone gotta call you out on the foolishness.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 9h ago
Show all comments (35)
130°

What Happens to Your Steam Account When You Die?

The Outerhaven writes: While Steam has come out recently, stating that Steam accounts can't be transferred, we need to think about it since we all will eventually kick the bucket. But if Valve is denying transferring accounts, what can be done? Plenty, actually.

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
thorstein3d ago

It goes to my kids because I gave them the passwords.

To Steam: Missio has a song that conveys my feelings about you stealing my purchase after I die. It's called "Middle Fingers"

shinoff21832d ago

Pretty much. My son knows my info.

Abear212d ago

Yeah worrying about digital ownership when you’re on the other side of the grass seems a little strange, but also on brand for these millennial journalists to worry about.

qalpha2d ago

I'm sure Keith will be happy to hear he's a millennial journalist.

Goodguy012d ago

I suppose if I have kids, I'd just give em my account details by retirement age. If I die young then...idk lol.

CrimsonWing692d ago

Yea, I mean just give someone the password to your account. Is that difficult to do or something? Like, I’m legit asking because I don’t know.

anast2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

It's not difficult but It's against the policy. If they find out, they will lock the account permanently.

CrimsonWing692d ago

Ah ok, I had a feeling there was something like that. It seems kind of weird that you can’t just hand your account over to a family member or friend and let them take over the account.

Show all comments (16)