Polygon's "Non-Review" review of Star Fox Zero is some thing that might cause a bit of controversy. Poli Games host Joseph, talks about his feelings towards review sites and advertisers.
Broken Roads is an Australian-set CRPG set in a post-apocalyptic world. Is it ripper or does it belong in a dunny? JDR puts on sun cream for today's review.
Tales from Candleforth is a 2D folk horror point-and-click indie game from indie dev UnderTheBedGames. Will it keep you up at night? JDR finds the appropriate chapter for today's review.
Headquarters: World War II is a turn-based strategy covering both sides of the war. How does it compare to the likes of Company of Heroes? JDR heads to the front line for today's review.
How is every one enjoying Star Fox? Do you guys think Polygon is in the right, for not giving the game a review?
Most reviews I've seen are in the low 8 to high 8 mark- sure there are a few 7's in the mix and a couple of 9's- I'd hardly call that "negative" reviews..
This is no good. Yeah, money above integrity. Damn Polygon... these sites need to find another source of income before all integrity is lost. The real question is whether games get artificial good reviews for money as well.
I read Polygon's article on Star Fox. I suppose they could be walking that tight rope of sales vs journalism... but save for a numbered score they really did put out a review and it hit hard. Is it possible they had to agree to not put a review up lower than XYZ score? Yes...certainly possible. However, it seems they didn't do what likely could have been the easy thing to do and just put up a review that scored it an acceptable number and phone it in. Instead what they did write clearly reflects a game that misses the mark in their eyes. I for one will take a truthful "non-review" over a phone it in review every time.
Who in their right mind goes to Polygon for gaming reviews??