MultiConsoleGamer3701d ago

Huge news!

I never thought this would happen. Best of luck to Square Enix. Sony has been their biggest supporter for many years.

UnwanteDreamz3701d ago

If this money goes to funding new fresh experiences im all for it.

pompombrum3701d ago

Someone needs to remake that video but change the music to the FF victory theme.

CrossingEden3701d ago

Thats actually the complete opposite of their financial situation. They are very much in the red compared to Nintendo and Microsoft, which is why they had to do this in the first place.

ZodTheRipper3701d ago

Good move, I would have done that right when Square announced that FF13 Versus is now a multiplatform release.

LexHazard793701d ago

@unwanted,

I dont think that money is going towards any games. Maybe the money is going towards R&D. Its not cheap1 developing VR and other experiences for the PS4, plus their 1st party games all have big budgets their so good.

AsimLeonheart3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

I do not think they are using that money to party... They probably sold the shares because they did not see any further reason for maintaining their stake in SE. SE is washed up now days and are no more the influential juggernaut they once was. The new gamers may find it hard to believe but during the second half of the 90s and early 2,000s Squaresoft's support determined the winning console of the generation. Now SE has ruined FF series, the company is going in red, share price is falling and is desperately in need of a hit to make them relevant once again.
Suppose Sony purchased each shares for $50 10 years ago when Square was on the boom and now the price has fallen to $30. They have already lost $20 on each share with no hope of recovering them. If the SE share price is expected to fall any further then Sony will sell the shares as soon as possible to mitigate any further loss.

mewhy323701d ago

Can't really blame Sony. Square isn't very profitable lately. I think this is just part of Sony's trimming the fat effort.

UltraNova3701d ago

I still remember the moment I inserted FF7's 1st out of 4 discs in my ps1 and started playing what turned out to be the reason for my life long addiction to video games...those were the days when Squaresoft was king.

Thehyph3701d ago

There's really only one proper explanation at this point:
Sony is selling off these shares because, at this point in time, it makes financial sense.

That's all there is to know. Lots of conjecture and anecdotal comments here.

GTgamer3701d ago

IMO Sony did the Right Thing they owned allot of share in Square Enix, a Company that has literally not been on its game lately especially with the latest Final Fantasy series But they did make some good games last generation like Sleeping Dogs/TR/DxRevolution but They are still struggling http://www.eurogamer.net/ar... then theirs FFVersus which was supposed to be PS exclusive but went multiplatform So is it really a Shock that Sony isn't supporting Square anymore :/.

Fluke_Skywalker3701d ago

4.8 billion Yen?
Is that not about £30 or something.

chrismichaels043701d ago

Sonys TV and PC divisions have been hurting them for years, but to say Sony "needs the money" and "isn't doing well" is ridiculous. Square Enix has been hurting as a game publisher for years. Plus their games are no longer exclusive to the Playstation brand. It made perfect sense for Sony to get rid of their investment with the company.

DragonKnight3701d ago

*sigh* There had to be someone start the doom comments on this hadn't there.

Mankey3701d ago

Nah.

Good Move.

No Point in hanging out the shares when Square is putting out Final Fantasy XV and Kingdom Hearts III on competitors platform.

Think of this from a business perspective.

chrismichaels043701d ago

It's hysterical how Sony-haters are trying to find a reason to bash Sony making a 4.8 Billion profit. Those are the same people that don't want to talk about "sales" when Sony reports higher PS4 sales over the competition....but they have no problem talking about behind the scenes sales reports when they can try and twist it against Sony.

stragomccloud3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

@UnwanteDreamz
Actually it's going to offset their losses to make their fiscal year look better.

@chrismichaels
Sony incurred a fiscal net loss for 2013 at about 1.5 billion. This is even after shutting down Sony's computer division and cutting loose 5000 jobs.

strifeblade3701d ago

But why would sony do this they are the saviour of gaming. Man they would do anything for money...

darthv723701d ago

Did they sell with the option to buy back at a later time? If not, then those shares are attainable by any company. Be it MS, Nintendo or even Square themselves...etc.

troylazlow3701d ago

4.8 million Yen = $46,939.15 USD

sooooooooo... my question is, why? whats the point?

this should be pocket change

SolidStoner3701d ago

@tbone567

Everyone needs cash. ASAP! ;)

XboxFun3700d ago (Edited 3700d ago )

Thats great that Sony can make some kind of profit for their struggling business. But at the same time it sux that they had to let go of what was the biggest company with the most popular frqnchise to do it.

oh well, I'm sure it was no big deal as Square knew Sony had to do it. Which is probably one of the main reasons sony couldnt keep FF exclusive to its platform contrary to what most on he said.

lol@ the spin the sony defenders are putting up. Remeber guys...sales dont matter!

scott1823700d ago (Edited 3700d ago )

@DragonKnight

Yes, it's kinda sad that the trolls come out of the wood works to spout doom and gloom on these articles. What else is there for them to grasp at anymore?

chrismichaels043700d ago

@xboxfun - With a name like "xboxfun" commenting on a Playstation article....i should have known you were a comedian. Too bad you only have one bubble....I would have liked to hear more of your crazy stories.

gameon19853700d ago

Only a Sony fan boy would try and twist this as good news. Sony is selling off assets to stay afloat end of story. so that link couldn't be any more inaccurate. Like I said, Sony fans like to live in this fantasy land where ever thing is all well at Sony, and your reaction is proof. Then again, maybe you just didn't know better. However judging by the amount of disagrees you got most of N4g knows better.

hay3700d ago

At least It'll produce a quality title which Square is unable of doing.

BlackTar1873700d ago (Edited 3700d ago )

@troylazlow

Did you even read the article? The math is in the article. Maybe next time you get this excited you should fact check

4800000000 Japanese Yen equals
46915200.0000 US Dollar

@XboxFun FF isn't the biggest franchise and Square isn't the biggest either.

MysticStrummer3700d ago

Gotta love how the "Sony is doomed" stuff keeps on rolling, despite PS4's domination. Straws come in many graspable forms I suppose.

Square Enix hasn't made a game I was interested in for years and years, so I'm all for this whether it's to fund new projects or help pay for old ones.

morganfell3700d ago

Sony was just being smart and some people are insisting on finding doom. Mainly those that are supporting a console other than the PS4.

http://sqex.info/square-eni...

SilentNegotiator3700d ago (Edited 3700d ago )

@CrossingEden

Except Sony was profitable last quarter, thanks in large part to their gaming department. So, actually, yes, they're probably doing that about now, being profitable for once. Selling worthless shares for almost $50M USD is going to be another little push for another profitable quarter.

+ Show (28) more repliesLast reply 3700d ago
Gamer19823701d ago

Not surprising since S-E has basically turned on them the past generation making Star Ocean originally as an exclusive for 360 and bringing FF and Tomb Raider games to Xbox too. The only reason FF14 never came to Xbox was because of Xbox live issues. Sony is in the business of making money and when S-E showed zero loyalty to a major shareholder a major shareholder basically jumped ship.

As for what this means for the future who knows?? It means S-E has Zero backing from Sony now and although they are a huge company they aren't the juggernaut they used to be.

jetlian3701d ago

TR wasnt even part of SE till 2010!!! If sony was in the business of making money even if the games were sold on xbo they still would make money for sony.

Sony did this cuz they going broke and needed cash now. SE still gonna make ps games anyway

Nitrowolf23701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

"SE still gonna make ps games anyway"

You just proved his point. Why bother holding any shares if it's not going to benefit them in any way? SE has show int he past decade that the shares Sony own mean squat.

It's just like any other devs that SOny doesn't own Share for. Activision is still gonna make games for them, same with EA.

There's no denying that SOny isn't in a finacial crisis, but this TBH wa sjust a smart decision.

Death3701d ago

You guys make it sound like Sony didn't approve of Square releasing these games on other platforms. By releasing on the Xbox, Sony received part of the profits since they were pretty significant share holders.

DragonKnight3701d ago

@Death: No they weren't. They used to be significant shareholders, but over the years the percentage dropped from 20% to the now 8% that they are selling off. The height of the partnership between Sony and Squaresoft was Final Fantasy 7, after the merger it dropped off but they still maintained a presence.

You are correct that they'd receive a cut of the profit, but they'd have received more if SE games were PS exclusives.

k3rn3ll3700d ago

Xbox live issues? Pray tell

kingdom183700d ago (Edited 3700d ago )

@k3rn3ll, meaning Microsoft most likely wouldn't have allowed the servers to be connected or what ever I can't think of the right term. PC and PS4, PS3 players are all connected on FF14, I'm sure Microsoft wouldn't have allowed that.

Deano73943700d ago

@ k3rn3ll MS don't wouldn't allow cross platform play, that is why they have no FF14.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3700d ago
SpadeX3700d ago

B-b-but I love her...

ArchangelMike3701d ago

I wonder, if the loss of FFXV exclusivity has anything to do with this. I know Sony are calculating the risk of investment in SE going forward, versus end-of-quarter profits; but I can help wonder if they would have still sold their shares if FFXV remained exclusive?

LightofDarkness3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

Doubtful. FF is simply not the money spinner it once was, and Sony decided to sell while share prices were still pretty high. Sony had a nice stake in SE, so SE doing well via multiplatform releases benefited Sony. Sony are not internet fanboys, they wouldn't take something like that as a perceived slight and would have been made aware of this decision long before the public were. I'm sure they even supported it at the time, Sony need money, which is the real reason why this is happening.

Sony have invested a HUGE amount of money into VR and their cloud services over the past 4 years, and will need a lot more before either project will come to fruition. That VR headset from last year was released as a reaction to pressure from investors to see SOME return on the investment in VR up to that point. Plus, Son'y partnership with SE has likely been unfruitful over the last few years, they have been struggling to maintain a profit and have eaten huge expenses over Final Fantasy XIV and their faltering mainline series sales. Eidos have basically been keeping them alive since 2010, it was a smart move for Sony to withdraw their stake and focus it on the direction they're really heading in. This is a good move by Sony, and really only highlights the industry's current opinion of Square Enix.

MightyNoX3701d ago

I approve of this. Square-Enix has been making nothing but stupid decisions for years. They've been losing money, wandering in the desert trying to 'regain their core'

Exclusivity is already did WITH or without the shares, so why should Sony keep those? Better cash out while there's value in 'em still.

LightofDarkness3701d ago

Funny, with one game, Bravely Default, they gave their core hope. Then they were surprised that it was successful, and people wonder why their Japanese division have been circling the drain in recent years.

hay3700d ago

Bravely Default is by Silicon Studio, dudes behind 3D Dot Game Heroes, a reason why it's good.

AsunaYuukiTheFlash3700d ago

@LightofDarkness Bravely Defauly was developed by Silicon Studios.

Dark113701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

Yean Not surprising , sony need every $$$ they can get.
they has been selling stuff right and left in the past few months.

HugoDrax3701d ago

To put things into perspective, I read this comment from a mod over on IGN:

"Separately, the co and Hydro-Quebec announced that they have agreed to establish a joint venture to research and develop a large-scale energy storage system for power grids. Sony and Hydro-Quebec plan to establish the new company in June, 2014

So Sony is, wisely, looking to break into more profitable sectors. Good for them."

Not sure how much of it is fact, but everything isn't always a doom and gloom situation. Our job as gamers are to enjoy games, not concern ourselves with every single financial matter of Sony, Microsoft, or Nintendo.

Anon19743701d ago

@HugDrax. It reminds me of when Sony was selling off real estate when the real estate market started to pick up again and posted huge profits due to that. Many where "OMG, look how bad off Sony is that they're making profitable real estate transactions" when at the same time Sony was making billions in acquisitions.

We all know that Sony's facing an uphill battle to turn the company around in a changing marketplace, but so many are quick to focus on every slightest, perceived weakness while ignoring the everything else to do with the company.

This is a perfect example, where Sony's making an investment decision which results in a profit for the company and people are acting like it's some move made out of desperation. You're supposed to sell investments when it'll profit you. I'd be more worried if Sony wasn't making moves like this.

Revolver_X_3700d ago

@Hugo

What else would Xbots have to talk about? In 5-10 years we'll hear this again during the reign of the PS5.

Magicite3701d ago

I wonder how this gonna influence Square Enix?

lelo3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

What the hell is going on with Sony ?

They are selling a lot assets, like properties, hardware divisions (PC Vaio) or other company shares (Square Enix). Several people leaving, or getting fired, from their gaming studios.
All this is not good news for Sony!

SoulSercher6203701d ago

Care to explain why they NEED to keep their shares of Square Enix?

Dark113701d ago

Yeah they're so desperate that they're trying to liquidate everything they can now.

it could help them in the long run.

ps360s3701d ago

LOL

why would they need shares in SE?

You don't know much about the market I'm guessing

THC CELL3701d ago

Pc and laptops are dying. More people buying tablets these days. I recommend a z2 tablet. Amazing

Anon19743701d ago

Actually, according to the experts, this streamlining of operations is exactly what Sony should be doing to turn things around. They've been saying for years that Sony had become too bloated and should be reorganizing in exactly the manner we've seen recently. Slimming down is just what the doctor ordered.

Now as for this move, it makes perfect sense. The stock had been kicked all to hell the last couple of years and no one needs that type of volatility in their equity portfolio. The stock was trading at it's highest point since last year Square warned of "extraordinary losses" and Sony jumped at it to the tune of 48 billion yen worth of profit. There's nothing but win here for Sony.

It'll be interesting to see if the spin off of Sony's TV division this summer will help TV's return to profitability. The entire Japanese Television industry still seems to be in free fall. Only time will tell.

ginsunuva3701d ago

You haven't heard they've been in financial trouble for the past 7 years?

MrSwankSinatra3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

The problem I have is that they are getting rid of gaming assets when that's gaming is their only profitable division. You people keep talking about how sony and squares relationship hasn't been the best over the past generation, but that could have changed this gen. Don't expect to see any exclusive square stuff on PlayStation anymore. Sony has literally gone full retard.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3701d ago
EXVirtual3701d ago

I suppose this has to do with FF15 and KH3 going multiplatform. Oh well.
To clarify, FF15 is still going to PS4. Last time I checked, MS doesn't have any SE shares and if that's the way all 3rd party publishers worked, Sony would have too many shares on their hands.

ginsunuva3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

Why would this have anything to do with those games going multiplatform?!?

If you own stock, might as well keep it until you can sell it at a high point.

They're trying to get money from their assets. They aren't 12-year old fanboys who care about multiplatform games.

3-4-53701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

* At most I can see this money going into paying off debts, but 4.8 million yen isn't a lot of money.

* 4.8 Million Yen is ONLY $46,934.40

prankster3701d ago

Typo. If you read the article it's actually 4.8 billion yen.

Darrius Cole3701d ago

There is a typo in the title.

The profit is 4.8 BILLION dollars (with a "B"). That's somewhere around 47 Million US dollars.

Blaze9293701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

I guess Sony finally got around to playing the FFXIII trilogy....

Meanwhile I find it funny everyone is pointing the blame and reason at Square Enix. Last time I checked, they were doing just fine and with Disney purchasing the Marvel license, Kingdom Hearts just became as big as ever. Then FF15 incoming too.

So how exactly is Square the "not stable" ones? Financially or just in your little minds? What "risk" does Square currently have for it's shareholders lol? Lettuce he reality - since we apparently have so many accounting majors on N4G. Gotta love the career variety of the members on this website. Me? I'm just a gamer ;)

BlackTar1873700d ago

Hey Blaze,

Square posted a loss last year of over 100 million USD and i also believe they posted a loss for the fiscal year in 2012.

neither company is doing just fine unless you consider multiple losses over a 2 yr period.

AceBlazer133701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

Good on Sony's part, I would've done this the moment KH3 and FFXV went multiplat. Putting Kingdom Hearts on the Xbox, what a load of bs. Why put KH3 on Wii U,on PS4, you know the brands that have been pushing it since birth, when you can put it on Xbox a platform that never had a thing to do with the series. Dammit Square Nintendo deserves KH3 almost as much as PlayStation.Then you have them weaseling FFV13 out of exclusivity by renaming it FFXV.Just sad.

Still love them for Kingdom Hearts though, but they screwin up lately. (Yes I know this most likely goes beyond 2 games going multiplat, this is just my view as a gamer).

AnotherProGamer3700d ago

Weird how Sony has been big share holder of Square Enix but they have been making multiplatform games and exclusive games for other platforms like 3DS

geddesmond3700d ago

Its about time they did as owning so much in SE did nothing for them exclusive wise. Now lets see if SE can afford to spend 10 years making a game when it has different investers it has to answer too.

randomass1713700d ago

The decision will most likely help both companies in the long run. Recovery is a long road but both Sony and Square can find their own way. :)

ITPython3700d ago

They sold over 9 and a half million shares and only got 4.8 million yen? (which is like $46,000 US dollars).

So each SE share is like a fraction of penny (something like 0.004 of a penny per share).

I dunno, Sony had $46,000 in SE, that's not that big of an investment. Even if they had 4.8 million dollars in SE, it wouldn't be that big of an investment for a company like Sony.

AsunaYuukiTheFlash3700d ago

TYPO.It is actually 4.8 BILLION yen.

ITPython3700d ago

Ah, that makes more sense. $46 million US dollars is incredibly significant!

Gotcha53700d ago (Edited 3700d ago )

@MultiConsoleGamer
Ha ha... I remember back in the days when Nintendo was a big supporter of Square.Until Sony stuck their noses up Square ass. Now they see that Square Enix is not what Square once was being a profitable developer.The same can be said about Tecmo Koei.

Geoff9003700d ago

Sony isn't doing that hence them selling a lot of their divisions and doing massive restructuring, no business does this unless they aren't making enough money.

Square Enix was an investment it by owning shares of company doesn't mean that games will only come out on your platform, SE have made games for Nintendo before. Companies ALL companies heavily invest in various products, companies etc for a number of reasons.

@chrismichaels04

"It's hysterical how Sony-haters are trying to find a reason to bash Sony making a 4.8 Billion profit. Those are the same people that don't want to talk about "sales" when Sony reports higher PS4 sales over the competition....but they have no problem talking about behind the scenes sales reports when they can try and twist it against Sony."

So because someone states the truth it must mean people hate Sony?

Sony is a business, which isn't doing that well, hence it's massive restructuring, selling of businesses, selling it's shares, this is what companies do.

Having the lead market share on a console isn't that important, when you consider how big Sony actuality is/was. Putting the emphasis on one brand to succeeded is a huge risk, more so when there are other companies in the market.

Sony used to be the leader in virtually everything from T.V's, audio, gadgets, etc now that has pretty much gone for them.

MS doesn't need the Xbox succeed, they could just carry on with Windows, and other services, some other company could take their place in the market.

Business is business, it's complicated just because someone says something about your beloved company, doesn't mean you should dismiss them.

fenome3700d ago (Edited 3700d ago )

I would've done it the day they went from Squaresoft to Square-Enix, but that's just me. I don't actually have stock in this market, I just play games :D

EDIT:
@Geoff900
I didn't see your post till I dropped mine already. I like Sonys first-party games better than anything Square-Enix comes out with nowadays anyways. I would've dropped 'em off too, sooner than later.

This isn't something said lightly either, I grew up on Final Fantasy, they are some of my favorite memories in gaming. Back in the day, when they were still Squaresoft, that might've been different, but things have changed hard.

I hope we get some of those old-school games again, I really do, but this industry is changing like crazy. Hard to say what's what right now, E3's right aroung the corner though, hopefully that's when we really start finding out about the good-good..

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 3700d ago
UnwanteDreamz3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

I cant help feeling this way just a little. I used to love Square but I haven't played a FF game in over a decade.

blackbeld3701d ago

Finally Sony.

Its about time.

Volkama3701d ago

On the other hand the Enix side have been churning out some pretty good games in recent years. Deus Ex, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider spring to mind and I am especially fond of the extra effort they put into their PC versions.

adorie3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

lol@Volkama

That's EIDOS. Cause I didn't know Enix developed those games otherwise.

randomass1713700d ago

Play Bravely Default on 3DS. That game is more like an older FF game.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3700d ago
morganfell3701d ago

Agreed GamersHeaven. Other than TombRaider Square has been on the slide for a while. Those using this news to attack Sony are the same ones that were also damning the FFXIII series and talking about how Square had lost their touch. Yet they think Sony is wrong for dropping their shares and walking.

How many times has Square went for the money instead of being loyal to Sony? Yet Sony is supposed to keep a poor investment? No, just no.

jetlian3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

loyal to sony?! lol only thing a company is loyal to is money. I for one cant wait for FF15, KH3 and TR2.

right on starchild didn't even think of those. 6 series i like i'd say they are my second favorite next to ubisoft

starchild3701d ago

I have no problem with Sony making a business decision they believe to be best for their company.

But aside from Tomb Raider Square Enix have also published games like Deus Ex Human Revolution, Batman Arkham Asylum and Sleeping Dogs, and those are some of my favorite games of the last generation. So unless all Square means to you is Final Fantasy I don't see how they are on the slide as a company. At least not from a gamer's perspective. I don't know what their financials look like.

RGB3701d ago

@starchild,

Those games were developed by the Eidos name which Square purchased. Only Tomb Raider came out long after Eidos acquisition.

Sleeping Dogs is the only noteworthy title they have published outside of former Eidos developers & Square franchises and that was in Activision hands before anyway.

Thief was botched, same with Hitman. They canned a Hitman project too. Square had a few good titles last gen, but most came from their Eidos teams, not them.

Sums up the Eastern market really.

maniacmayhem3700d ago

"Square went for the money instead of being loyal to Sony?"

Loyal??

Why would Square be loyal to Sony? Shouldn't they have been loyal to Nintendo since that s where they got their big start and success?

Why is it that some people on this site think that these companies owe others anything...especially when their IP's didn't even originate on the console of their choice.

morganfell3700d ago

If you grew up and lived in Japan like some of us you would understand. But since your didn't, you don't.

Geoff9003700d ago

Loyal to Sony? Sorry but if you are an investor, it doesn't make the company you are investing in 'loyal'.

SE has been making Nintendo games for many years for instance.

The fact that Sony has shares of a company makes no difference, the actual reasoning to them selling off their shares are simple, the first thing you do if you want to do if you are losing money is sell everything you can, get rid of people, and invest heavily into a new product (in the hope it sells).

I think you guys need to get out into the real world, the world doesn't run on loyalty, honor etc, it simply works on money.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3700d ago
Not-A-Cat3701d ago

If this means more money for first party studios then its all right

shadyiswin3701d ago

actually Volkama is dead on square enix did publish ,tomb raider,deus ex and sleeping dogs. Also did a good job with Just Cause and other random titles.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3700d ago
ArbitorChief3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

Sheesh, more assets being sold, Sony really want to post a profit for this quarter.

TomShoe3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

You don't even know what you're talking about.

Do you even know why they're doing this? As far as we know, Square Enix is struggling as a company, and Sony may be selling their shares because of their current volatility in the market. Risk is the last thing Sony needs right now. They need a steady source of profit in the wake of a large restructuring effort. Who knows how Square will fare in the long run, those shares may be worth nothing in a few years.

THINK/RESEARCH before you go typing your "Sony is dooooooomed!" nonsense, will you?

ArbitorChief3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

I didn't say Sony were doomed? All I said was Sony sold their assets (aka Shares) to most likely recover from their $1.1 billion loss, like they've been doing the past few months (e.g. Sony stores closed, 5000 employees fired, numerous Playstation developers fired, new IPs cancelled, etc) Just same old for Sony as of right now, it's a good move for Sony, they need to recover from their poor financial annual statement.

@Iamnsuperman
That could be true definitely, but considering the timing and the fact that Sony have been selling off assets like crazy as of recently and that their financial quarter is coming up soon, the most obvious answer is just Sony selling more assets to have more cash on hand to post a profit for the quarter.

Gamer19823701d ago

Indeed the money they get from them shares they could pump into a new studio or expand a 1st party studio.

LexHazard793701d ago

Thats a reach dude! You say as far as you know, but you dont know. Its all speculation on your part. Sony is also having financial issues. They are selling real estate, shares. Theres been layoffs. Yet you sit here and type as if Square is the only ones having problems. Sony is probably in a worse position than Square Enix.

randomass1713700d ago

He didn't really say anything about Sony being doomed though, just that they wanted to make a profit. Which isn't really untrue, ANY company wants to make a profit.

Geoff9003700d ago

SE, isn't in the same situation as Sony, SE is a software house, the risk isn't high as making hardware/software/etc.

Like every company on the planet, when they aren't doing well the first thing they do is sell off everything they can, shares, sectors, and lastly they get rid of staff something they HAVE been doing.

Geoff9003700d ago

He didn't say Sony is doomed, he stated that they want to post a profit this quarter.

Sony is doing what all companies do, it sells it's stocks/shares, companies, and gets rid of it's staff it need to post a good quarter for investors/stocks and shares to invest.

All companies do this around this time of year.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3700d ago
iamnsuperman3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

Or:

1. Square Enix isn't stable
2. Sony doesn't want to loose more potential money/value
3. Sony sells shares in a company whose value could drop further

I think a lot of companies would do the same regardless of financial stability. For Sony this is even more important

andibandit3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

how are all your outcomes focused on there must be something wrong with SE.... I find it more likely that it's just part of Sony's reorganization step.

LexHazard793701d ago

Im a Sony supporter, but at some point the Sony fanboys need to realize that Sony is not doing good(as a whole, and I dont mean that their DOOMED either). And from all the articles on N4G we should all know this. So im wondering why some many fanboys are out defending Sony as if all their financial woes have been cleared!

Also if Square is in such trouble, why they not selling off their IPs? They have some of the best IPs ever created in gaming history, Square is good baby!

GarrusVakarian3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

*Sony doesn't make any effort to make a profit, goes into "junk" status* -

"Lol, Sony are broke! PS4 is DOOOOMED!"

*Sony makes concious efforts to make a profit* -

"sheesh, more assets being sold"

Seems to me like it's 'damned if they don't, damned if they do'.

buttclown3701d ago

Both sides of the fence are the same, people just don't know it.

marlinfan103701d ago

what do you expect. thats how it is with these fanboys for both companies

randomass1713700d ago

Sony and Nintendo get a lot of that it seems. :(

MultiConsoleGamer3701d ago

Just when Square-Enix was starting to turn things around.

http://massively.joystiq.co...

iamnsuperman3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

Probably why they did it now. That game (even though it was risky) was a big boost for Square Enix but is that enough for long term stability (keeping an investment). A bit too risky.

Volkama3701d ago

I don't think Square-Enix are any worse off for this deal.

Charybdis3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

True its assets being sold with probably as goal to free up some capital for new or existing projects.

To be honest I would have preffered sony buying a majority share in square instead of selling their shares. I would have loved to see an exclusive ff7 on the ps4.

Anon19743701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

Sony Financial Holdings buys and sells securities on a daily basis and other business units regularly invest in the stock of other companies. At the end of the day with this sale, SCEI made a profits.

I can't believe there's people out there that are trying to spin a company making business decisions which profit their companies as a bad thing. And, by the way..they didn't sell the shares for 4.8 billion yen, that's what they expect to profit off the sale. The shares were valued at approx 16 billion yen.

"Sony just made a business move that saw them profit on a company who's stock is trading at the highest point since it warned of "extraordinary losses" a year ago? Dooom!"

Absolutely ridiculous...

LexHazard793701d ago

Best one ive read so far. Bubble up!

LoveOfTheGame3701d ago

Haven't really seen anyone trying to spin this in a bad way. Only people who think that and defend Sony with their lives lol.

It's simple, Sony as a whole have not been very profitable. In order to increase profits they are trimming fat all around the company. The shares in SE were deemed unnecessary and could be sold for profit.

Pretty simple business right there. Sony isn't doomed, but they do need to make decisions like these to move the company forward.

Anon19743701d ago

Are you kidding. There are numerous comments hear trying to spin this negatively. Just skim the page and you'll see a bunch.

But you're 100% correct. Sony's doing exactly what they should be doing, and exactly what the market wants them to do by streamlining the company, "trimming the fat" and generally slimming down their size and product offering. They started these restructuring efforts years ago. You can't really spin selling a stock for profit negatively, but plenty are trying to. As if making money through stocks is somehow some desperate indicator instead of the entire point of investing.

maniacmayhem3700d ago

@Darkride

And we also have numerous comments from people like you trying desperately to defend this action and turn into a positive. Funny you can't do the same for MS as you in the past as you constantly submitted "Xbox 360 is doomed" or "MS is selling Xbox" articles and blogs. Even though MS is in a better financial situation than Sony ever was.

Sony needs the profit but selling off Square to do it? I feel that is a bad decision since Square is still a huge company with one of the only RPG IP's that sells like gangbusters. Square might have had some missteps in recent years but a company like that always has ups and downs. No doubt with Vs. and KH coming they will see a surge in sales and popularity again.

I think it would have been best for Sony to hold on to its shares.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3700d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3700d ago
MeteorPanda3701d ago

Why though? Square is picking up and just before 15 releases?

TomShoe3701d ago

No reason to have stocks in a company if you're not getting anything out of it (FF exclusivity, etc.)

Shad0wRunner3701d ago

FFXIV is PS3/PS4 exclusive....aside from being on PC. But I mean....it's not on 360/XBox One or Nintendo. So, there's that.

Kayant3701d ago

@Shad0wRunner

It's only a console exclusive because of MS's policies with cross-platform play.

http://www.mcvuk.com/news/r...

Geoff9003700d ago

Exclusivity means nothing to an investor, MS owns the majority of stock of Bungie it doesn't mean Bungie games will be exclusive to MS's platforms.

Investing in a company is a way to off set taxes, to help stabilize a company among other things.

ChozenWoan3701d ago

I was thinking the same. With FFXV just around the corner.... 6-24 months from now (hopefully) why sell now. Then again, SE has shown almost hostility and disdain for the PS brand throughout most of Gen7, so it can be understandable that Sony would feel it's time to part ways with an unstable and unreliable "partner". I kinda wonder what took them so long now that I think about it.

Anyway, great news for Sony.

Mikefizzled3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

When you say 'just before' what do you mean? As I referred to the Oxford English Dictionary and that said you've stretched it their sir.

GuruMeditation3701d ago

Dude, you can't invoke the Oxford ED whilst substituting 'there' for 'their'. That's, like, 25 to life in grammar-prison.

Mikefizzled3701d ago (Edited 3701d ago )

I edited my comment by changing the subject to a place and forgot to change the 'their' in question.
Don't worry I'll show myself to the gallows...

KwietStorm_BLM3701d ago

Should have sold em sooner and bought exclusivity for FFXV. El oh el

Show all comments (265)
140°

Square Enix Is Going Multiplatform; The Layoffs & Its Past Don't Inspire Confidence

After its latest games didn't meet sales targets, Square Enix is going multiplatform but the company's track record isn't convincing.

Scissorman17d ago

Square Enix been multiplatform for decades, a few exclusively-deals doesn't make them any less multiplatform.

fr0sty17d ago

Nor is selling their games on a console with only 25 million install base going to bring their sales to where they hope they will be... Unless they somehow manage to dumb down FF7 trilogy to work on switch, they aren't going to have much luck. They already released it on PC, after all.

anast16d ago

Where are you getting that number?

SegaSaturn66917d ago

It kind of does, giving preference to a certain platform by timed exclusivity. Console ports generally feel superior. Legend of mana PC port extremely broken

neutralgamer199217d ago

Sega

It doesn’t when square themselves didn’t want to fund the development of remake. It’s only after the success of the 1st they realized their mistake but now contract is signed. If it wasn’t for Sony there would be no FF7 remakes. Same goes for silent hill 2 with Konami. They don’t want to fund AAA budget. Companies like PlayStation and Nintendo get blamed when in reality they are saving some of these franchises

Remember sega didn’t want to fund bayonetta and epic games didn’t want to fund another gears of war. It’s easy to blame console makers but they are the ones taking the risk and paying huge upfront costs without seeing the final product. FF7 remake trilogy won’t be coming to Xbox now or in the future. PlayStation and PC is what square signed up for. Sony paid them more than they would make from Xbox sales.

ravens5217d ago

I just wonder when everyone is going to demand that the Square Enix exclusives with Nintendo come to PS and Xbox. Or it's just the PS exclusives that matter lol

phoenixwing17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

I'd love for the nintendo exclusives to come to pc or ps5. They'd actually be playable then.

neutralgamer199217d ago

Raven

Exactly and that’s where square enix does more exclusive than any other platform. Gaming is square has always been very unrealistic with their sales expectations. Remember when tomb raider reboot sold 7.5 million and square said it wasn’t enough. They need to spend less on development and have more realistic expectations from sales.

And those thinking games being not on Xbox makes a difference don’t understand we have a decade plus of data showing square enix games having less than 20% of their multiplatform sales on Xbox (final fantasy series) and Nintendo consoles aren’t strong enough to run any current games. Nintendo switch should be as strong as Xbox one x atleast but we all know that’s most likely won’t happen

RoadRacer17d ago

@raven

thing is, as neutral said in their comm, the switch isn't strong enough to run flagship SE games
i think what SE does is, it makes unique games for switch only so that it has something for that console too. Thats where all the "underlined sans" rpgs go to mostly

maybe things will change when Swtich 2 drops cuz that's gonna be as strong as ps4 afaik from the rumors flying around

TheGamingHounds17d ago

@Scissorman

Your point is valid enough but when the icon of this company is limited to one console in timed-exclusivity, it means the company has crossed the line. By some degree at least

All things aside, Square itself stated "aggressive multiplatform strategies" so we all know what it's talking about

Scissorman17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

Then the headline should read "Square To Drop Exclusively Deals in Pursuit of A Sweeping Multiplatform Strategy". I don't recall this argument when Square Enix released Bravely Default, Octopath Traveler, and Triangle Strategy on one platform. And even if FF is the icon, not all of its titles have gone to one platform. We're talking about three games, one of which is already on PC. Did Square suddenly go 'multiplatform' after it released subsequent Tomb Raider sequels on more than just the Xbox? It's just a silly way of putting it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 16d ago
TheGamingHounds17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

SE needs to go all in optimization. Broken PC ports won't help its case, especially with big releases like mainline Final Fantasy

Asterphoenix17d ago

It's actually simple. What doesn't inspire confidence is Square allocating their budgets on the wrong projects such as Forspoken, Avengers, Babylons Fall and Foamstars.

Square has always been multiplatform since PS3/360 days which 80 % of their games are. People kick up a fuss over PS exclusivity but not Nintendo which has more exclusive projects console exclusive from Square.

FF16 has done ok but not enough to fix the blunders that the past mistakes Square has made with some of their projects. FF7 Rebirth is unclear we'll see a PC release for sure so it's hard to say so far not as good as they would of liked.

Then again unrealistic expectations. If it weren't for Sony these games would at least had another 2 years development time. So some people need to be realistic in that regard.

Scissorman17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

It's the blunders that set those expectations so high. If you remove those from the equation, I bet the sales numbers would be more than stellar. Square believes it's okay to release a pile of risky, middling, garbage because the big boys will ultimately subsidize the cost. Don't worry if Forspoken sells poorly, FF16 will surely sell 10 million copies to balance that right out. Oh wait, it only sold like 4 million. Well that's a disaster. Meanwhile games that sell 2 million units with comparable budgets are deemed successful.

thorstein17d ago

I would also add that FFXVI, which I loved has a hint to one of their biggest problems: the number 16.

It's a great franchise, but that's all they've become known for. Dragon Quest is my favorite all time series but it's like they don't know what to do outside of those two IPs.

Valve never makes trilogies. The idea is that they don't want to become stagnant. Gabe Newell hates the number 3.

I can't imagine their talent wouldn't want to try a new RPG.

RoadRacer17d ago

Square Enix just really need to revise its expectations. Maybe consider a change in strategy on dev end as well. Multiplat will help for sure but only good games that are marketed well will sell

Show all comments (18)
350°

Square Enix Preparing for Layoffs in U.S. and Europe Amid Heavy Restructuring

In a town hall that took place on Monday, Square Enix president Takashi Kiryu reportedly confirmed imminent layoffs in the U.S. and Europe.

20d ago
lelo2play20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Square should ask Sony for more money...

Outside_ofthe_Box20d ago

Square should ask Microsoft to buy them out...

FinalFantasyFanatic20d ago

@Outside_ofthe_Box,
So that Microsoft can close down the studio after doing nothing with them? Right...

Outside_ofthe_Box19d ago

@FinalFantasyFanatic

That's exactly my point...

gleepot20d ago

Sad but true. It's the consequence of a shift in player habits, massive overhead, and out of control budgets across the industry.

blackblades20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

What did NA and EU did anyways? Just translate or something? I would say it might help them get back to there roots but DK.

Hofstaderman20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Actually, you are correct they play a hand in localization especially in Europe with the many languages. That and marketing.

nommers19d ago

Marketing for SE has been poor lately so these layoffs make sense if true.

Profchaos20d ago

Yup videogame crash 2024 edition

_Decadent_Descent19d ago

Hope so. Industry needs a good crash to shake it up again.

Show all comments (64)
460°

Square Is Shifting Strategy To Aggressively Pursue Multiplat Releases,Focus On Quality Over Quantity

Square Enix is shifting its strategy to aggressively pursue multiplatform releases and focus on quality over quantity.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
CantThinkOfAUsername21d ago

Yup, it's official. FFXVI and FFVII Rebirth didn't sell as much as they expected.

gold_drake21d ago

read the report, where exactly does it say what u just said ? lol

TheEroica20d ago

Denial isn't just a river in Egypt for some gamers.... 🤣

Barlos20d ago

It's your interpretation. That doesn't make it 'official'.

CantThinkOfAUsername20d ago

- 1% increase in net sales compared to a year with Forspoken and Octopath Traveller II, which didn't sell more than 3 millions combined (and I'm being generous).

- A 38.3% decrease in operating income despite the release of 'High-Definition' titles namely FFXVI, FF Pixels Remaster, Dragon Quest Monsters, and FFVII Rebirth.

- Aggressive multiplatform strategy one year after saying that exclusivity with PlayStation was mutually desired.

Sure, it's all in my head.

Sonic188120d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Probably for PC and the upcoming Nintendo Switch 2. Square Enix games doesn't sell to well on Xbox

Extermin8or3_20d ago

Nothing sells well on Xbox that's precisely Microsoft's problem

The3faces20d ago

Apparently they don't sell well on PlayStation either.

Lightning7720d ago

Square named Drops Xbox as part of their multiplatform approach in their quarterly reports.

Like it matters MS will probably find away to close them down to.

FinalFantasyFanatic20d ago

I can see them going for PS5/Switch/PC for the most part, it'll mostly likely be the Switch 2 by the time their next game enters development, which is probably a good thing since the Switch is struggling with 3rd party games. If they're hurting for money/sales, I don't see them bothering with Xbox, that's just wasted time/money for them.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 20d ago
DarXyde20d ago

I mean, maybe? They'll want as much as possible and I figure they could have been hoping for greater impact on PlayStation, but that's good reason to reflect and realize the resources and development cycle of these games aren't very sustainable. The solution is to make more affordable games with shorter dev cycles, then once in a while bring out the big guns.

I think Final Fantasy VII Re make and Rebirth would do really well if it was multiplatform. Specifically, if Nintendo gets their hardware up to snuff, and the rumors are promising. I don't really have much faith in its performance on Xbox, but Nintendo gamers really commit to buying their games. At one point, Breath of the Wild for Switch outsold the Switch itself.

Granted, Zelda always solos everything except GTA, but Nintendo folk are avid Final Fantasy fans. I think it would do exceptionally. Nintendo just needs to make porting easy and inexpensive and they'll get more games.

FinalFantasyFanatic20d ago

I don't think the exclusivity hurts them as badly as they think, I think it's a range of factors, like the quality of the games, high sales expectations, ESG/DEI, censorship, development costs/time... I also suspect that Square-Enix is extremely inefficient with their resources, they struggled/avoided towns in the FF13 trilogy, and FF14 was mostly wilderness with little to do apart from derp about in the wild (they also avoid towns and making a lot of characters there too). But FF14 also went through development hell, I think Square-Enix just needs to overall how they do everything, because the way they manage that studio just isn't working.

Christopher20d ago

The two most profitable games for them didn't sell as much as expected. Yes. Make it make sense.

MrCrimson20d ago

I interpret it as - they want to be multiplatform, as they will sell more copies.

EternalTitan20d ago

16 isnt even a JRPG let alone a final fantasy game.
So glad that it bombed.

itsmebryan20d ago

Square finally realized what Sony figured out recently, their installed base is not enough. We are going to see a lot less exclusives from everyone moving forward.

MajorLazer20d ago

PS5 is nearly at 60 million only half-way through its life-cycle, but sure, the install base is not enough.

EternalTitan19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Good exclusives always sell despite install base. Look at Nintendo's recent Zelda.
Its just 16 was awful.

itsmebryan18d ago

@major
It is not enough if it was Sony's operating income wouldn't be down 26% and the company would not have lost $10 billion of value after they missed their sales target .

Christopher18d ago

Looks to me more like they need multiplatform because they've been failing completely everywhere else. Honestly, Square needs to rethink it's non-FF games. They've been failing hard over there in that regard.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 18d ago
CrashMania21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Hopefully the next Nintendo system isn't a potato and it can contribute to FF sales in future as well, in addition to PC releases. If this ensures the long term health for SE and franchises than like FF and KH then I'm all for it.

NotoriousWhiz21d ago

Adding Nintendo and PC customers is the best way to increase sales and long term success. Not going to get that from Xbox.

shinoff218320d ago

Hopefully square brings all the lose switch exclusives over to.

Hofstaderman21d ago

Will there be a XBOX for Square to release games on? Or a MS Games service?

thesoftware73020d ago

Hof,

You must not have heard they are launching new hardware and have already committed to a Next-Gen Xbox.

But, for some reason, I think you already knew that and wanted to spin a silly narrative; besides, why wouldn't they release games on the SX/SS? You do know these consoles will still be here, right?

Hofstaderman20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Optics. They have a STATED plan to do so. Thats not commitment. The shareholders and board are calling the shots now. Lets see if they have the appetite for hardware because they are owed 80 Billion Dollars already. Investment in hardware, R and D and marketing is how much again? That cost with the history of their hardware performance....at most maybe a handheld. What I am certain of XBOX is finished, the writing has been on the wall before the studio closures. Its MS Games and they are not hardware. They are software because MS is a software company. Expect them to be folded in the Surface team.

DarXyde20d ago

*hardware

I believe they committed to hardware.

I hate to nitpick, but that's kind of the company they are. You have to.

20d ago
Michiel198920d ago

@hofstaderman the board and shareholders have always called the shots or had a huge impact on decisions.

Xbox finished lmao, the writing has been on the wall? mate they just spend 70 BILLION dollars, and you see the writing is on the wall that they're done. 0 idea what you're talking about. They grafiti'd on the wall and you still can't see it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 20d ago
Aloymetal20d ago

No to both, not worth the effort, money and time on an already dying brand.

20d ago
thesoftware73020d ago

"They have a STATED plan to do so. That's not commitment."

Huh? What are you talking about? They announced they would be unveiling new Hardware this holiday season; how else are they supposed to commit to it?

" Lets see if they have the appetite for hardware because they are owed 80 Billion Dollars already"

What a silly statement, you think this deal was approved so they could make 80 billion in less than a year? This is a long-term commitment, a future-proofing of profit.

"What I am certain of XBOX is finished,"

No, you are not certain of this lol; as you stated, if they make even a Handheld in the form of a Steam-Deck that can dock to a TV/monitor, wouldn't that be just changing the form factor but still XBOX?

Closing these studios has really got you guys delusional; that is what happens in companies, in a changing market: you acquire, and you trim; like it or not, that is the way things are done. Lets look.

Where is the new Psygnosis with a new wipeout?
What happened to Japan Studio? Pixl Opus? London Studio?
Where is Zipper Interactive?

I can list more, but you see, closing devs doesn't mean your company is finished, especially when you have like 30+ dev teams.

Extermin8or3_20d ago

They won't be unveiling the hardware this holiday season it will be like the series x and s they got a tease at the game awards 2018. But no details until year of their release in 2020 lol

Relientk7721d ago

Please tell me the Dragon Quest III HD-2D Remake is still coming. I feel like I've been waiting forever for that game.

gold_drake20d ago

i think the juggernauts kingdom hearts (disney provides the money for that one) final fantasy and dragon quest are fine, the rest not as much

Michiel198920d ago

I'm kinda worried about the future of DQ though, Toriyama and the composer both passed away. Huge blow to the franchise.

FinalFantasyFanatic20d ago

@Michiel1989,
Akira Toriyama had an understudy though, he emulates his style, so maybe he'll do the art for Dragon Quest games, I would love to see Nobue Uematsu do music for the series though, that could be fun if they could convince him.

FinalFantasyFanatic20d ago

I'll be so p*ssed if that doesn't go ahead, also, where's DQ12 at? They've been silent on that for so long, and it was announced years ago.

@gold_Drake,
I'm pretty sure they can siphon some profit from A Realm Reborn to keep FF and Dragon Quest going too. I think the company would have gone bankrupt if it wasn't for that cash cow.

gold_drake20d ago

14 is definitely brings in the a consistant cashflow

Charal21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Another sign that dedicated consoles market is in trouble, while PC seems more and more attractive to big publishers.

Having a good gaming PC and a PS5 myself, given current trend form both Sony and MS I am less and less playing on PS5, waiting for exclusives to release on PC, so I understand the logic behind the new strategy.

anast20d ago

Post those numbers. Then your comment might make sense.

thesoftware73020d ago (Edited 20d ago )

Ants,

I get that we don't know exactly without numbers, but come on, man, we can clearly see what's happening.

The console market has not grown much, the highest-selling console in history is still the PS2. You can play the " prove it" game all you want, but Sony's more aggressive PC push, SE completely rebooting their company/business, after being mainly exclusive to one console and showing a sizeable profit loss is telling.

PC is a high seller, and your doubtful PS5 dominant stance does not change the clear writing on the wall, straight from Sony's mouth, that they need to be, and will be more aggressive in the very lucrative PC market.

So, in other words, PC market is indeed looking more and more attractive to Pubs.

anast20d ago

@730

Numbers?

I'm willing to bet the farm that ¨PC gamers are not the dominate number compared to console, but I don't know because I don't have numbers. However, the price point of entry can allow us to infer what I had just stated.

anast20d ago

I don't click on links on forums. Tell me why that .com source is legit.

Tacoboto20d ago

What an ironic thing to say on a link-agreggate site like N4G. Explains your comment history perfectly.

Michiel198920d ago

asks for numbers. receives numbers and then continues to say I don't wanna click a website (because it might shatter my illusion)

anast20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

@All the people with that good 'ol folk wisdom

It's ironic how I clearly asked for the site and people still can't even answer this simple question.

Tell me how many people click on random links on forums?

Tell me the site and I will look. I don't mind being wrong and I'm barely intelligent enough to change my mind with something substantial.

All the numbers I have seen is that PC doesn't even come close console gaming in revenue, and nothing touches mobile gaming. More people touching something doesn't mean anything. It just means more people own PC for work and touch Steam every now and again, those numbers mean even less.

Charal20d ago

Anast I wasn’t expecting more from you and I haven’t be disappointed.

Don’t believe any number if you want, but things cannot be more evident that most of games companies are pushing to get the most they can from PC market.

Hell, we have both MS and Sony that are releasing their biggest franchise on PC with no or less and less delay vs console release, that is never seen before in the industry.

What is surprising me is that PC is not cheap in term of hardware cost, a rig close to PS5/XBX perfs may be close to double the price I guess, and close to 4x for a good gaming PC.
Plus, PC gaming does not have physical release anymore.

So a lot of supposed advantages from console market are not there but PC market is successful anyway, it would be very interesting to understand it.
Maybe one big argument is that we are more likely to need a PC at home, were we can work with, browse, and game, than a dedicated gaming machine. That why handled console market have been crushed by smartphones, we could see a repeating pattern here.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 20d ago
Babadook720d ago

From what I can ascertain PC is a smaller market than PS. There are occasionally times when PC looks to be stronger but overall it's still behind.

FinalFantasyFanatic20d ago

PC also has a lot more competition, especially when people can easily buy and play older games from 20 or so years ago on it.

anast17d ago

PC has the potential to be a bigger player, but the market is smaller in terms of revenue nonetheless. People conflate sign up numbers with money spent on a product.

anast20d ago

You probably need to worry about yourself and your own expectations.

You still haven't even complete the simplest task in telling me the name of the website. Let that sink in. I asked for the name of the website so I can look at it and you couldn't even complete that task.

Show all comments (113)