GRAW 2 Screen Comparison : PS3 vs Xbox360

TnS - 845 days 10 hours ago

But where are the pictures?
Edit: Ok, you attached it.

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

eXplotion - 845 days 9 hours ago

looks better

Agree(13) | Disagree(3) | Report

eLiNeS - 845 days 6 hours ago

These are the worst pictures I have ever seen to compare with. There not even taken at the same time of day or same exact spot of the game. They don't even look like there from the same source. If you're going to compare something, you have to compare from the same setup not from 6 or 8 different setups. Next!!!

Agree(14) | Disagree(8) | Report

Omegasyde - 845 days ago

no offense but the only thing to really go off that is the same......... is comparing the grass. Big whup. Flame bait article number ___40002193

Agree(4) | Disagree(1) | Report

MrSwede - 844 days 22 hours ago

Bad pics to do a comparison with. I mean you can´t even get a good close look at the grass....(remember Dirt comparison?)

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

spasticjustice - 844 days 13 hours ago

Are you even speaking english? I can't understand a single word that you write, your english skills are just about as bad as your comparison photo's.

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

darx - 844 days 12 hours ago

Still doesn't justify me spending an extra $200.00.

Agree(0) | Disagree(3) | Report

DG - 844 days 10 hours ago

Bad comparison...but if you do go by the pics PS3 looks better, as it should since it had more dev time. Compare games that came out the same time like Stranglehold or The Darkness, Madden etc. (actually dont use any EA games). Flamebait, moving on.

Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report

Blabbermouth - 844 days 8 hours ago

I've played the 360 version. And I've played the PS3 demo, I can say hands down that the PS3 version looks better. The shadow effects are a lot better, and it makes a big difference.

I know theres a difference in the pictures but thats actually what the 360 version and PS3 one looks like. 360 ones you notice the lack of shadows in the plants. And when you walk up to vehicles, your shadow dosn't cast on them like they should etc. But shadows in general are better in ever object in the PS3 one, ranging from people, landscape etc. And I'm not sure if there's more jaggies in the 360, but you notice it quite a bit the in the 360 version. Although I think that has to do with the better shadows on the PS3 version, and because of that the jaggies are not so noticeable. Over all 360 one looks more washed out than PS3 version.

Oh yeah, and if you turn on the Full RGB setting on the PS3 it makes a little difference too the looks in GRAW2 also. The RGB settings are Supported on most Hi-Def TV's, most TV have it set low. Makes a huge difference in most games, Resistance exceptionally. And you need HDMI. Go to your PS3/settings/display settings/RGB full(HDMI) and set to full.

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

gta_cb - 844 days 13 hours ago

just wanted to know why you have put the channels in the PC and PSP section? ..... oh and also the comparison you have done is one of the worste i have seen.

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

Fisher339 - 845 days 8 hours ago

Yup Bout time Ubisoft started doing a good job.

looks good, may pick it up

Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report

Fx35 - 845 days 9 hours ago

No,it's absolutely not a port.

Agree(2) | Disagree(2) | Report

Cartesian3D - 845 days 9 hours ago

the design part was same as 360 and they didnt change anythin except add some features to 360 version ( some new exclusive New MP maps and sixaxis and blah blah ... )

and the difference is in Lighting and AA and framerates....etc..

all of them are changed becuz PS3 team can make it in their way..may be completly different compare to 360

in my opinion they make it so much better in term of lighting.. I know that 360 proved itself with Gears of war..I DONT WANT TO SAY PS3 is BETTER guys..

with this post I want to say EA is just a CRAP dev with no brain and no expert engineer .. they just want to make games with LOWEST possible money and make for 1234454 platform at the same time..

Agree(5) | Disagree(0) | Report

Ju - 845 days 3 hours ago

Said above. Graw2 PS3 was written by Ubi's Shanghai studio, the 360 version in the US. Different teams, not a port. PS3 version was re-written from scratch. (But, sure, same art department, AFAIK)

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Ignorant Fanboy - 845 days 9 hours ago

2 screens look better on the 360, and 2 screens look better on the PS3, doesnt really show much, show the in-game cutscenes for the best comparison.

I played it a while back on 360, so I wont be getting this again. It was fun, but nothing new really, except a drone view.

Agree(3) | Disagree(8) | Report

Daishi - 845 days 7 hours ago

Out of nowhere I see your post and start dieing laughing. Good thing to because Ubisoft is EA's #1 competitor, and my favorite thing out of France! I loved this game on 360 but the grass looks 100x better on the PS3. The best part is the 16 player co-op, I don't no why more games try something like that.

Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report

skinzfan - 845 days 7 hours ago

I feel you on that MaddenRaiders. EA has made me very dissapointed.

Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report

socomnick - 845 days 4 hours ago

so you are willing to get madden 5 months after the xbox 360 version and have it be completely identical to the xbox 360 version 5 months later.

Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report

Maddens Raiders - 845 days 2 hours ago

I am not. I don't know why it would take 5 extra months anyway, if what I outlined above was applied to this situation. And really socom, what about the 360 version besides the 60 frames per second is so compelling about this game? What?

The 60fps should be an afterthought and other features in the game should rise far far above it. 4 players in usnison doing the same thing at once on the sidelines is not cool. 8 black guys earing white Polo's and kakhi's on the sideline should not be doing the same things all at once, and taking the same stances over and over and over again. Where is the endzone contingent of busy cameramen, stadium and NFL personnel? Something as simple as a full compliment of refs on field (that's in the game)? Let's just leave the crowd out of the comment for now - pathetic.

Are all things about this year's Madden bad socom? No, but even you can admit that there is a little left to be desired for a game that's been around since 1989, now -- on next-gen technology -- not to mention N.A.'s biggest sports game by a longshot. This sports game should actually seperate itself from all others (as Madden did back in the PS2 day and even XBox 1 days) on this generation of consoles letting us know for sure that we're playing something special. Do you feel that way?

Would 5 months be annoying enough for me while waiting? Yes, of course, but if it meant that we were playing a superb rendition of photorealistic football with the full gambit of nuances (at least an attempt) in the game and a HUGE REDUCTION IN UNACCEPTABLE GLITCHES -- then hell yes I would wait 5 months and know that, that template was in place for the years going forward. You would hear a resounding YESSS!!! from the masses and EA would be heralded as one of the best of all time. Period. But money rules the day unfortunately and that will never happen. Vacations will be taken, status quo accepted, and the line of programmed drones will fork out their hard earned cash each year for more EA vomit and THEIR vision of NFL football.

~Not Me~

Ok, now I'm in a dream state.....dreaming what a Polyphony Digital rendition of NFL football would look like with the NFL license. Don't wake me up........don't do it........ W O W it looks amazing...just W O W

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

Ps3Fanboy777 - 845 days 7 hours ago

I agree, I dont see how people can make an accurate comparison when those screenshots are so not even in the same area for most.

Game was cool had some of the best explosions ive seen thus far.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Dr Pepper - 845 days 7 hours ago

Perhaps I misunderstood your comment, but Ubisoft didn't have anything to do with Oblivion...

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

San anto - 845 days 7 hours ago

And it does XD

Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report

Foliage - 845 days 6 hours ago

It is expected that the better hardware would produce a better looking game, so yes it does look better on the PS3.

Agree(9) | Disagree(3) | Report

achira - 844 days 19 hours ago

no chance r6 vegas looks better on ps3. did you even see it on the ps3 ?
edit: skinfan then you never played the xbox360 version. alone the better lightning on the ps3 makes the game far better on the ps3, this bloom on the xbox360 version is far too strong.

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

skinzfan - 844 days 16 hours ago

Hi Achira,

I play the PS3 Version all the time :)

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

Lakuspakus - 845 days 7 hours ago

True

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report