80°

Halo Wars Fights On While Civilization Revolution Fades Away

The Goozex Report breaks down two of the top real time simulation games for the Xbox 360 and provides excellent arguments for both Civ Rev and Halo Wars. Quotes from the article include, "But then I kind of mastered the game and it became repetitive. And a little boring. And the cool moments of creating certain wonders or blasting into space lost its shine after building them for the umpteenth time. I moved on fairly quickly..." And this one about Halo Wars, "I like to take my time, strategize, and then unleash unholy hell upon my enemies. The campaign really doesn't reward you for planning, instead, it rewards you for fast action."
JimmyJames70 - contributor
Published: 126 days ago | Article | Xbox 360
 
 

Showing: 1 - 15 of 15 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
bgrundman - 126 days ago
1 -
I was a huge fan of Civ Rev. It was a shame it took so long to complete a match.
Shut this user up Let user speak
JimmyJames70 - 125 days 19 hours ago
1.1 -
That's true. Civ Rev can take 3 to 4 hours to play while Halo Wars could be 45 min to a couple hours.
Shut this user up Let user speak
daleculp - 126 days ago
2 -
Well, it's pretty obvious to people who know me that I'm no fan of Civ, but I wonder if I'd even enjoy Halo Wars. Unfortunately, I don't have the points to pick this game up on Goozex.com, but I bet I could find it used for pretty cheap. If it annoys as much as other RTS games, I could just trade it on Goozex and get something else. I mean, it's worth 1000 points.
Shut this user up Let user speak
JimmyJames70 - 126 days ago
2.1 -
Halo Wars really doesn't have a learning curve or a Tech tree that you have to follow. It does have some specialty units depending on your leader, but that's easy to pick up on. The only thing you really have to master is issuing quick commands to get your troops moving. After that, it's all about pummeling, or getting pummeled.
Shut this user up Let user speak
peeps - 125 days 19 hours ago
2.2 -
i'm a pretty big rts fan and thats what put me off really, it's a good game for ppl who wanna get into rts (and chances are if they are getting an rts for a console then most will be new to the genre) but for me i want more depth to rts
Shut this user up Let user speak
green - 125 days 23 hours ago
3 -
playing Halo Wars at the moment and it's so much fun to play.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Sleebs - 125 days 22 hours ago
4 -
I'll be honest and say that I grew up never enjoying RTS games, strictly for their length and to end up losing the battle was aggravating after so much time. But that was when I played Age of Empires and before I actually grew up . . I think perhaps that I could give it a try, because I thoroughly enjoy RPG and strategic action games now (I actually like the Brothers in Arms strategy style over one-many-army Call of Duty shmups). Halo Wars could be something to look into.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Xi - 125 days 19 hours ago
5 - I like halo wars.
but I don't really like the fast-pace side of the game. Personally I like lengthy rts games focused on strategy. Halo wars seemed to be mainly about building the largest army as fast as possible and pushing in quickly to the enemy base.

However that being said, halo wars had the most mission variety out of any rts campaign I've ever played.

I hope they make a sequel that finds itself on both console and PC.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Jijoro - 125 days 19 hours ago
6 -
Halo Wars was fun its just that it needed more features like Halo 3.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Rowsdower - 125 days 19 hours ago
7 - there was plenty of dlc for civ rev
i love that game

here is the link for dlc

http://marketplace.xbox.com...
Shut this user up Let user speak
JimmyJames70 - 125 days 17 hours ago
7.1 -
Thanks for the link and the info on the Civ Rev DLC. I guess I just never cared enough to look. By the time the DLC came out, I had already moved on.
Shut this user up Let user speak
cheapness1 - 125 days 18 hours ago
8 - RTS comparison?!?
I was under the impression that Civ Rev was turn-based???
Shut this user up Let user speak
JimmyJames70 - 125 days 17 hours ago
8.1 -
Civ Rev is turned based. But they are similar games. Build an army and crush the opposition. Nuts to bolts.
Shut this user up Let user speak
wondroushippo - 125 days 16 hours ago
8.2 -
Still, I've always found that TBS and RTS games have vastly different mindsets unless Civ Rev gives you time limits for your moves - I generally think TBS acts more like chess in that you have to plan out and think your moves, whereas RTS games' more frenetic pace makes it more of a reactionary thing. I may be way offbase with this, though.
Shut this user up Let user speak
BadKarmaSutra96 - 125 days 8 hours ago
9 -
I found Civ Rev to be pretty limited after playing it a ton. I still play it occasionally but would have preferred options for larger maps and more opponents. Also, it got old when all of the opponents would simultaneously declare war on you instead of fighting each other once in awhile.

As for RTS style games, the Total War series dominates, but I guess we're only talking 360 games right now.
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News