190°

Bethesda's Big Takeaways For 'Fallout 4'

It's hard not to think about the next "Fallout" game, and while Bethesda is quiet about "Fallout 4," they've said they intend to make more "Fallout" games, so MTV Multiplayer asked the company to name their biggest lessons learned from making "Fallout 3."
Alternative Sources:
Columbo - moderator
Published: 331 days 4 hours ago | Article | PlayStation 3 | Xbox 360 | PC
 
 

Showing: 1 - 21 of 21 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
METtAL-GAMER - 331 days 5 hours ago
1 -
If they've learned from they're mistakes why don't they get rid of the damn level cap?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Tempist - 331 days 3 hours ago
1.1 -
Now, now this is their first Fallout game since they took over the Fallout IP. Yes you can't make a monalisa on the first try, but it's not like the game was broken, just not entirely as everyone was expecting.

I don't think it will take too long to make an Fallout game on the scale of Daggerfall, but it will be a challenge. So long as they take the proper time and no push it out in the next 2 years.
Shut this user up Let user speak
ThanatosDMC - 331 days 2 hours ago
1.2 -
Morrowind with updated graphics and gameplay please!

I like sword and shields better... but i hope they add all the gore from Fallout for the next iteration of Oblivion...
Shut this user up Let user speak
Tony P - 330 days 20 hours ago
1.3 -
"Don't let the game end, and don't have a level cap"

I don't see how they just now learned this. I enjoyed F3. Even the bugs were forgivable since it's an open world game. But this is what you learn? Bit of a waste, imo.
Shut this user up Let user speak
edhe - 330 days 20 hours ago
1.4 -
What i learned is that if you're going to have an ecosystem, vary it.
Level capping sucks, the more i play the more powerful i want to become, that's what levelling's for. Let me skip or fast forward VATS.
Add some mo-cap animation, or procedure phusics based animation on the people. Give us mas effect style conversations, i want to see my character i spent time designing say the words i want him to say. If you're going to be a shooter - apply some console shooting mechanics like the 'sticky' crosshair. there's no way i can shoot someone in fallout when they're close - movement's way too fast.

and more voices please... more voices...
Shut this user up Let user speak
KRUSSIDULL - 330 days 15 hours ago
1.5 -
I want Elder Scrolls with Fallout gore and 2-4 player coop and better graphics.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Canary - 331 days 4 hours ago
2 -
So, basically... Bethesda thinks Fallout 3 was PERFECT and thinks people want to play it FOREVER.

Because, you know, God-forbid they hire EVEN A SINGLE WRITER.
Shut this user up Let user speak
thereapersson - 331 days 4 hours ago
2.1 -
the writing was terrible, not to mention the fact that they didn't really use the Fallout canon AT ALL.
Shut this user up Let user speak
pain777pas - 331 days 3 hours ago
2.2 -
first improvement shooting without vats must improve. 2nd the animations for woman must improve and set the world before its blown and progress into it being blown would be the best thing. The game is great no doubt, however their are improvements like seing your character's face and body in another menu like oblivion. Plus the graphics could have been better they are better character models and it works for making a male character but I like making girls so for me they could have done better in this regard.
Shut this user up Let user speak
skip2mylou - 330 days 20 hours ago
2.3 -
im still playing..... 5th time around
Shut this user up Let user speak
rhood022 - 331 days 4 hours ago
3 -
My perfect Fallout game would be in two acts:

Act 1 would be fairly linear and take place before the nuclear war where you create a character who is working for the US government doing various missions aimed at reestablishing order in the wake of the successful Alaskan liberation movement. As the story for act 1 progresses, you learn that the U.S. has a plan of their own to invade China--which is preceded by a tactical nuclear strike on the country--to capture experimental technology aimed at alleviating energy needs (a major source of conflict in the pre-war Fallout universe). You learn that this plan had been in effect for a while, to the point that contingencies were in place to rebuild the country in the aftermath (which would tie together the other games' aspects--GECK, the AI President, the Enclave, etc). Eventually, you have to make the choice of sabotaging the plan, with limited success, or letting it happen. Either way, the war starts and your character dies in the ensuing attack.

Act 2 would take place some time later, maybe 70 years after the war where you awaken in one of the Vaults. Newly resurrected (and able to customize your character even more+ carry over stats from the previous act) you learn that you yourself were part of the Vault experimental program--sort of the successful clone attempt, unlike the "Gary" disaster. Eventually you make it out of the Vault and proceed to make your own path.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Tempist - 331 days 3 hours ago
3.1 -
That's actually not too bad of an idea. It would take a lot to get it all working nicely interms of story and mechanics, but it's very do-able.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Graphics Whore - 331 days 3 hours ago
4 -
They could improve Fallout A LOT. I'm not trying to make the wrong impression, I absolutely loved playing Fallout 3 but there were tons of things they could have improved on it especially the stability of the game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
NewYork214 - 330 days 23 hours ago
5 -
and how about not screw over the people who bought your game on the PS3. but money is everything so i dont blame ya
Shut this user up Let user speak
edhe - 330 days 20 hours ago
5.1 -
Exclusive DLC was a well known fact long before the launch.

Only got yourself to blame.
Shut this user up Let user speak
NewYork214 - 330 days 19 hours ago
5.2 -
well if they didnt bend over to microsofts check book it wouldnt be a problem so why should i blame my self now
Shut this user up Let user speak
mfwahwah - 330 days 14 hours ago
5.3 -
@5.1

I have to blame myself for Microsoft releasing a system I don't want? And then Bethesda giving that system the DLC I do want?

I'm willing to pay a few bucks for DLC - not hundreds of dollars.
Shut this user up Let user speak
zeph94 - 330 days 23 hours ago
6 -
In Fallout 4....if you shaft playstation again I'll kill you Bethesda I'll kill you until you are dead.
Shut this user up Let user speak
zaz12 - 330 days 16 hours ago
7 -
I want a new OBLIVION.
Shut this user up Let user speak
AnttiApina - 330 days 15 hours ago
7.1 - Dude...
It' called Elder Scroll...Not Oblivion... It's like calling a "Fallout 3" as a "Fallout". But wait a sec...People do like that!
Shut this user up Let user speak
mfwahwah - 330 days 14 hours ago
7.2 -
@7.1

Better example would be if someone "I want a new Guns of the Patriots!" when referring to MGS.
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News