Lionhead Working on Fable 2 Glitches

kindi_boy - 419 days 10 hours ago

slipped thru the net?! lmao they were OBVIOUS! and all those stupid problems were on 1 version of the game they are working on 1 version the game is not multi! with all of this crap...really ruined my gameplay

Agree(3) | Disagree(3) | Report

rroded - 419 days 9 hours ago

Were talking several game stopping glitches just not acceptable imo.
Bad nough when its just annoying but game breaking glitches are like selling me a brand new car that goes boom after a 100 miles...

This is why i dont buy launch titles on any platform and its like 99% of the reviewers dont even play the games since they never mention em.

So glad I didnt buy SOCOM on launch either but not like they havng got me a few times already sigh is a working product so much 2 ask 4?

Agree(2) | Disagree(4) | Report

ASSASSYN 36o - 419 days 4 hours ago

I got to agree with you on that. Fable 2 had an update today and it seem to create problems that were never there.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

FreeMonk - 418 days 17 hours ago

I personally wouldn't mind if these glitches popped up for just 1 or 2 gamers only, but there are thousands of people out there who are experiencing these problems, so it's got to be obvious to the developers that they are there.

The problem is that everyone has been so accepting of updates to games that have had slight little problems, that developers think it is ok to just update later, and over time the glitches have gotten badder and badder that they are making the game unplayable.

Ohh.. and I hope they fix the sucky Co-op. It's definatly not what Peter M showed us at E3!

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Kyur4ThePain - 419 days 3 hours ago

Unfortunately it would be blamed on either Blu-Ray or the Cell.
But hey, let's not drag that into the discussion, shall we?

Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report

haruvister - 419 days 2 hours ago

From the sounds of it, SOCOM's problems are show-stoppers (i.e. major connection issues in an online game). However, as the dude from Lionhead says, a minority of people have suffered issues with Fable 2. I'm not part of that minority, and I'm on my second run through - so go figure.

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

Kyur4ThePain - 418 days 17 hours ago

Why should devs be given time to fix their product? There was NOTHING wrong with the money paid for it.

Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report

Jewbat - 405 days 16 hours ago

Not a net. I can understand some glitches and the really rare ones. But these are thousands of people encountering the same glitches, in the same spots. Over and over I might add.

Many of them are OBVIOUS and would only take 3-4 playthroughs to find out, and that's without intentionally trying to break it. Which testers are paid for by the way...

I'm really upset due to the fact that a really FANTASTIC game is ruined by poor testing.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Tmac - 419 days 9 hours ago

What the fudge are you talking about, they left OBVIOUS glitches in the game, if it's not ready (LIKE THE XBOX 360) then don't ship it till it is.

Agree(5) | Disagree(0) | Report

Jewbat - 405 days 16 hours ago

I am glad that they are stepping up to fix them. Problem is, they shouldn't be trying to cover themselves saying that they "missed a few that went through the net."

This isn't a net, this is a giant gaping hole.

These glitches and errors are pretty obvious. I found around 5 of them on just 2 playthroughs. And I was playing the game extremely slow, due to the fact that I like to encounter EVERYTHING an RPG has to offer. So I wasn't blowing through the game or anything. Both playthroughs are now unplayable due to the glitches in the game.

You should perform more testing before putting out a product that has this many glitches.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

GWAVE - 419 days 6 hours ago

@ Keele

If these massive glitches were simply "missed", I'm worried about the quality of the other aspects of the game.

However, in most cases developers know when a game is glitchy. They have to keep to deadlines, though, so they launch it anyway. Heck, the 360 hardware itself falls into this category.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

NaiNaiNai - 419 days 5 hours ago

actually call of duty 4 had a lot of glitchs at launch, ALOT. bioshock had a lot of collision glitchs in the game. as for burnout paradise may not have had glitchs but alot of reviewers didnt like the game. mainly for simple reasons as where to go after you lose a match or restart it.
-nai-
tired of fanboys trying to ruin stuff with BS "facts"

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Jewbat - 405 days 16 hours ago

I agree. And to Keele. Would you like it if someone sold you a car, and it crashed and you got injured?

"Well, I guess you can't catch all those errors. Some just slip through the net!"

Seriously, it's not high standards, it's called quality. And it's not hard to achieve by just pushing the distribution date back.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

FailStation3 - 419 days ago

yeah, the problems aren't major at all. the problems are small. like how stuff fades away near the camera, but only half of the stuff, like the dog's polygonal body, but then not his fur all over and sh1t like that. it's just f*cking DUMB. like they didn't test the game even once or something. just lazy.

tons of stuff like that. like also with how you float an inch or two off the ground in a lot of areas but not in others.

how you can't find anything without turning that GARBAGE bread crum trail back on for a second (leaving it on is just gay as hell, sorry, PETER)

tons of stuff... and I wish I could kill that f*cking dog. so annoying. I really hate dogs...

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report