700°

Eidos Expands on Extended Chapters

Tombraiderchronicles.com reports:
The announcement by Eidos to produce extended chapters exclusively for owners of Microsoft's Xbox 360 video-games console has been met with mixed reaction, especially from those planning to steer Lara Croft through her latest adventure on one of the additional five platforms being catered for. We checked in with Eidos who shed some light on the decision.
Internet Trolling Expert - contributor
Published: 448 days 9 hours ago | News | PlayStation 3 | Xbox 360
 
 

1234Next »
Showing: 1 - 50 of 170 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
LightningPS3 - 449 days ago
1 - whatever
Tomb Raider sux balls
Shut this user up Let user speak
Rick Astley - 449 days ago
1.1 -
Couldn't agree more. There hasn't been a DECENT Tomb Raider game since the very first one on PS1 LOL!
Shut this user up Let user speak
PirateThom - 449 days ago
1.2 -
I dunno, Rick, I quite liked II and III.

Then again, I was 12 when III came out. ;)
Shut this user up Let user speak
morganfell - 448 days 23 hours ago
1.3 -
I don't screw with these companies anymore. I can buy any number of titles I want. That isn't bragging, it's just a fact from having played my cards correctly. That's an old one but it is the one I have on file.

http://i39.photobucket.com/...

I have about 15-20 titles preordered or paid off at any one time. But when a company does something like this in the middle of a game heavy season I just scratch my order. There are too many titles coming this fall. I just canceled my TomRaider order today and kicked it over to Endwar.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Max Power - 448 days 23 hours ago
1.4 - you'll...
have to scratch Tiberium from that list as well.

EDIT: to below, well thats good, it is still a nice list.
Shut this user up Let user speak
morganfell - 448 days 23 hours ago
1.5 -
Yeah I know. As I said it is an older list. I have added a few reservations, picked up an item or two as well. They have also shifted dates on a few. I also reserved the new PSP that I will be picking up as well.

The idea I put forth stands as the fact remains there are just too many good games coming this fall to give away money to Eidos for TR. Let MS pay them.
Shut this user up Let user speak
DaTruth - 448 days 22 hours ago
1.6 -
Just give me Tomb Raider 2 downloadable from PSN that I can play on my PSP and forget Tomb Raider forever!
Shut this user up Let user speak
BattleAxe - 448 days 21 hours ago
1.7 -
Clearly Microsofts strategy is to dump most of its internel game studios and buy exclusive games and DLC content. After Banjo it will be interesting to see if they dump Rare.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Kigmal - 448 days 20 hours ago
1.8 -
Fake. Look at who submitted it, and click on link. He changed the title.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Robondacob - 448 days 20 hours ago
1.9 -
That could just be a coincidence...
Shut this user up Let user speak
Baba1906 - 448 days 19 hours ago
1.10 -
i enjoyed legends and anniversary very much. so im pretty excited about this one.
Shut this user up Let user speak
superaktieboy - 448 days 15 hours ago
1.11 - how is this news?
everybody knew this..

/sarcasm :P

seriously tho.. both sony and MS should stop with these exclusive DLC and these companies should stop accepting this deal.. coz first of al, they get more.. and its unfair to the gamers, not everybody gets the full experience
Shut this user up Let user speak
gaffyh - 448 days 12 hours ago
1.12 -
Tomb Raider is going to be crap anyway, why would you buy DLC for a game that will most likely suck? Also MS needs this game more than Sony, cos Uncharted is much better (you can tell just by looking at gameplay vids of Tomb Raider), so MS needs it's own Uncharted, Tomb Raider is the closest thing to that.

Though I would like to say, MS don't waste your money on crap games like this!!!
Shut this user up Let user speak
XboxOZ360 - 448 days 11 hours ago
1.13 - @ Max Power
Unfortunately mate, Tiberium has been canceled as a stand-alone game and will not be made or developed further. Sadly. It was shaping up to be a top looking game. http://planetcnc.gamespy.co...

On a second note, the article that this belongs to says nothing about how much MS paid for the Exclusive content and merely reiterates the fact that MS asked how they could extend the gameplay for XboxLIVE users, and the two chapters were the result.

"Microsoft asked us how we could extend the fantastic Tomb Raider: Underworld gameplay experience, exclusively, for their thriving Xbox Live community and these two new downloadable chapters were the result." says Eidos, who also confirm there are no plans for additional downloadable content for PS3. .... "Both extended chapters feature individual storylines, based in different environments and with very different mission objectives and gameplay. They are linked to Underworld, they take place following events that occur during Underworld. "

And naturally, any company asking another to produce content that would otherwise NOT be made, would have to pay for that content to be made. As you can see, if anyone read it, is that it is not simply the end of the game with something tacked on, but TWO separate chapters, the second one having a separate playable character, Lara's Shadow . . .

SO naturally, Edios are not going to spend a few more Mill on making additional content unless they get suitably rewarded for their efforts. Now if anyone says that it should be for free, and that all platforms should have it, they obviously have never been in, or are in any form of business, nor dealt with production business of this sort.

It's simply sour-grapes based on the fact that MS ask first for some exclusive content before Son=y did.

You can be sure that Sony will be looking at other MP games that they might well have additional content, they have done so already, so why the complaining. They have done with Mirror's Edge, they basically beat MS to the punch.

This time MS beat Sony to the line with Tomb Raiders, so stop the whinging and complaining, it reaks of immaturity big time.

Sure, be unhappy, even disgruntled, I am about Mirror's Edge, but I understand Sony did it for a reason, and applaud them for getting in before MS did. Serves MS" right for not acting quick enough. But this is how business works these days, get used to it, or get out of the kitchen . . .

Sony would have to do the same (pay for the content) if they asked Edios to do it before MS did, as would Nifty Nintendo. Don't go thinking that it's a conspiracy to hoodwink gamers. It's simple business matters that anyone in business know.

You want content, you pay for it, simple as that. Be that Sony, MS or Nintendo
Shut this user up Let user speak
CyberCam - 448 days 4 hours ago
1.14 - @XboxOZ360 (1.13)
You're right and I do agree with what you said, but I also agree with morganfell(1.3). Being a PS3 owner, I don't want partial experience, I want the complete gaming experience without having to buy another console. So I will opt to not buy this game because there are just too many other complete games being released around the time frame. No big deal, my measly single copy is not going make or break the game sales. Enjoy the game!
Shut this user up Let user speak
Breakfast - 449 days ago
2 - Confirmed: MS has no shame.
:)
Shut this user up Let user speak
thebudgetgamer - 449 days ago
2.1 - here you go check this
:)


Shut this user up Let user speak
sonarus - 449 days ago
2.2 -
Nice to know ensemble money was used to purchase tomb raider dlc and demo:D

I love microsoft let me run off and hug my new 360 while my ps3 is at the shop:D
Shut this user up Let user speak
NegativeCreep427 - 448 days 23 hours ago
2.3 - MS has no inherent talent along with having no shame.
Like I've said before, Microsoft is like a totally retarded rich boy that goes off to college and that can't get anything done on his own, so he instead has to pay off other smart students to do his homework for him so he'll still get good grades.
Shut this user up Let user speak
JasonXE - 448 days 22 hours ago
2.4 -
of course steve will say that..hello!! That's like ps fanboys posting on n4g saying how the 360 suxs...oh wait. Another thing is check the actual story title and story itself. The story title was changed from the orginal story and it mentions no where that ms paid for it.

FACEPALM to ps n4g trolls.
Shut this user up Let user speak
thebudgetgamer - 448 days 21 hours ago
2.5 - @jason whoa
your pretty quick to throw that word around you don't know me.
Anyways I put it up for laughs and i thought it was apt to the story. So don't be hyper defensive play the games you like and relax.

Happy Gaming :)
Shut this user up Let user speak
tigerstyle - 448 days 21 hours ago
2.6 - Jason.
LULLLLLLZ.

You Fail.
True that microsoft have no original stuff to offer. Same old garbage windows with different colors.
Shut this user up Let user speak
GiantEnemyCrab - 448 days 20 hours ago
2.7 -
Yes, how dare they give the owners of their platform exclusive content!

I guess $ony has no shame as well since they are doing it for Mirrors Edge eh?

Anyway, nowhere does it confirm MS paid for anything, the only thing confirmed is Internet Trolling Expert has now expanded his bullsh*t beyond just trolling every single 360 article and now is submitting news stories with his fake titles that fit his agenda.
Shut this user up Let user speak
duelingdragon - 448 days 16 hours ago
2.8 - @2.7
This article is in the PS3 and 360 sections, no one is trolling, it free for owners of both consoles to comment, or don’t you understand the concept of an internet forum?

Nothing wrong with exclusive content. Sony’s 1st party titles are exclusive to them, and M$ pay developers for exclusive content to Multi-platform games. You say nowhere does it confirm MS paid for anything.

Hmm, i imagine the talk between MS and Eidos went something like this.

Microsoft Rep to Eidos “hello, I’m from Microsoft and we have a proposal for you.”

Eidos “Yes, whats that.”

Microsoft, “we want exclusive add-ons for your new Tomb Raider game, exclusive to the 360 of course.”

Eidos, “Thats sounds like something we could do, ok let talk terms and cost.”

Microsoft, “Oh no, we’re not gonna pay for it, we want you to do it for nothing, just because you like us so much.”

Eidos, “of course we’ll do it for nothing, we’ll put all our resources, hours of work etc into it, just because your so nice. It’s not like we’re running a business or anything. Money, (slaps forehead), what a silly suggestion.”

Microsoft, “thank you very much.”

End Sarcasm.

Really, do you think they just bribed Eidos with a lolly pop?
2.9 lelo | 448 days 12 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
XboxOZ360 - 448 days 11 hours ago
2.10 -
Simply another disgruntled Sony fans, but I bet you weren't saying the same thing when Sony nabbed Exclusive DLC on Mirror's Edge etc. no, didn't think so.

So it's okay if Sony does it, but not if MS does it, after all, MS is the devil - isn't it . . come on, how old are you . . act mature if you want to be treated with maturity. Business is business, and both Sony and Ms will be looking at securing different levels of exclusive DLC in the future, it's just how they are doing it now-days.
Shut this user up Let user speak
duelingdragon - 448 days 10 hours ago
2.11 -
XboxOZ360 please make clear who your replying too, your comments seem to be directed at me.

I'll say again, "Nothing wrong with exclusive content. Sony’s 1st party titles are exclusive to them, and Microsoft pay developers for exclusive content".

Yes, Mirrors Edge has exclusive content paid for by Sony, nothing wrong, I'll repeat, NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT. Its OK if Sony does it and its OK if MS does to IMO, perhaps you should read someones comments and comprehend their point before you talk about maturity. The article didn't state money was paid by MS, even though MS approached Eidos. Its pretty certain money was involved, this is business after all, they wouldn't go to such lengths as to produce DLC content for the 360 unless the almighty dollar was waved in front of them.

Edit: Sorry XboxOZ360, just read your comment further down below, which states pretty much what i just said, guess your comment was aimed at someone else.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Deviant - 449 days ago
3 -
MS doesnt care about developing any new ips. Their only goal is to buy all the ps3 third party exclusives.
Sad...:(
3.1 Megatron08 | 448 days 23 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
NegativeCreep427 - 448 days 23 hours ago
3.2 - @ Megatron
"Microsoft asked us how we could extend the fantastic Tomb Raider: Underworld gameplay experience, EXCLUSIVELY, for their thriving Xbox Live community and these two new downloadable chapters were the result."

Yeah, and you yourself wouldn't let a little thing like opening you're eyes and actually reading every word in every sentence in the entire article get in the way of you're delusional B.S.
Shut this user up Let user speak
theEnemy - 448 days 22 hours ago
3.3 -
Confirmed: Megatron08 = Megaidiot.
Shut this user up Let user speak
iHEARTboobs - 448 days 22 hours ago
3.4 - @the Enemy
It's confirmed in each thread. haha
Shut this user up Let user speak
DaTruth - 448 days 22 hours ago
3.5 - @theEnemy and IHeart
lololololololololololololololo lolol!!!!!!!
3.6 Megatron08 | 448 days 22 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
Menchi - 448 days 21 hours ago
3.7 - @Megatron
You're not seriously that deluded, are you?

So, Microsoft went to Eidos, asked to do exclusive content, essentially, a bunch more work, for free, did they?

You actually believe Eidos decided to do -extra work- for Microsoft alone, out of the goodness of their hearts? O_o;

My God.
Shut this user up Let user speak
theEnemy - 448 days 19 hours ago
3.8 - @Megaidiot
So, Eidos is making Microsoft an exclusive DLC that is worth 6 hours of gameplay that will be made by 20-30 developers/designers that Eidos will obviously pay for their hours.

And not to mention a very high chance of many PS3-only gamers not to buy this game (Like what I'm gonna do) cause they feel like they will be buying an incomplete game for $60.

Very nice logic sir.
Shut this user up Let user speak
XboxOZ360 - 448 days 11 hours ago
3.9 - @ @ Megatron
Of course MS paid, but the article is in no way saying how much it paid, simply that it did ask Edios to make special content for the game that only XboxLIVE users could get, and that would extend the game rather than simply add some extra bits-n-pieces to it.

I'm a MS fan, hence the name and website, but MS do pay for things and so do other companies, Sony included. Don't be too blinded by support for a platform to think no one does. It's a business from all sides, and Edios would not make two extra chapters, and additional playable character all for nothing . .

The second DLC will add an additional 6 hours of game play, almost a complete small game, so it will require money to have that made, without question.

And while I do support MS through my choice, I do not like MS Corp per-se', never have, never will. But I do have some respect for the original guys who started up the Xbox Platform (1st Gen Xbox) and started the whole deal of XboxLIVE and the 360 way back as early as 2001/2.

However, their teams are splitting of late and their ethos is changing, but at least there are still gamers in the main teams that have some control of the platform - at the moment. When Ed Fries left, there was a whole to fill that not many could, and it was his enthusiasm, his development skills and game design skills that helped the platform succeed. Not MS Corp.
3.10 Megatron08 | 448 days 6 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
jay2 - 449 days ago
4 -
Well dur. This is MS.
Shut this user up Let user speak
trovon - 448 days 23 hours ago
5 -
I didn't see where in the article that Eidos stated that Microsoft paid for DLC. Maybe I missed it?
5.1 Megatron08 | 448 days 23 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
Halochampian - 448 days 23 hours ago
5.2 - yea.. you didnt miss it
apparently people don't know that (asked for) =/= (paid for).
Shut this user up Let user speak
maggotmx - 448 days 22 hours ago
5.3 -
do you guys really think that just by asking nicely a company would be willing to screw over their costumers and potentially hurt themselves in sales from said costumers? seriously... seriously.... you guys would make terrible company owners =)
Shut this user up Let user speak
Real Gambler - 448 days 22 hours ago
5.4 - Halochampian, are you kidding?
Let me see:

Microsoft: Can you give us exclusive dlc content for free?

Eidos: Sure, we will put 40 programmers on the job right away for totally nothing. They will work on your DLC instead of working on our future product so you can make more money and we don't.

Microsoft: Thank you. Now, let's call the next dev and see if they can make more DLC for us for free.

Wake up and smell the beans Halochampian. Those programmers, artists, etc, cost a lot of money. And quite often exclusive DLC means less sales from the other platform.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Halochampian - 448 days 22 hours ago
5.5 - @ real gambler
Edios will still make money off of it. Every time someone downloads the extra content, they will make money.

All I said was that people cant tell the difference. This is obviously not confirmed and shouldn't be news because people like you like to make assumptions.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Ju - 448 days 20 hours ago
5.6 -
Eidos must have known this will alienate (parts) of theirPS3 customers. Obviously they think they can recoup that thru DLC. Now, I am wondering, wouldn't they make even more money by selling that to their PS3 customers as well, well, except ... I leave the rest to your imagination. Take a guess.
Shut this user up Let user speak
XboxOZ360 - 448 days 11 hours ago
5.7 - @ Halochampian
Of course it is news, and it has been confirmed as happening, we ran an article on it yesterday when it became known that there would be two DLC chapters - remember!

SO it IS news, but the article its self says nothing new as such, simply that the website asked if it was true, and Edios confirmed that MS had asked for additional content.

And naturally, being a business, they (MS or Sony for that matter) would have to pay for it if they wanted it. Especially when one of those chapters ads and additional 6 hours of game play (Lara's Shadow).

Don't get me wrong, I'm not dissing you, I support MS Xbox-Div as well (not MS Corp), but I do know what is news, what is business and what should be openly discussed on any site, and this is basically news worthy in its own right.
Shut this user up Let user speak
AclayPS3 - 448 days 23 hours ago
6 -
Of course Microsoft paid for it because Microsoft is the king of 3rd party spending.

Of all games to buy DLC for, I think that Tomb Raider Underworld was really a waste it because I really think that Tomb Raider Underworld will fly under the radar this Fall for all systems including the Xbox 360.

The only reason why I think Microsoft went after Tomb Raider Underworld DLC is because Tomb Raider was a game franchise that started on the Playstation consoles. Uncharted Drakes Fortune is a better action/adventure game than Tomb Raider in my opinion anyways, and that game is only on the PS3.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Johnny Rotten - 448 days 23 hours ago
7 -
"Microsoft asked us how we could extend the fantastic Tomb Raider: Underworld gameplay experience for their thriving Xbox Live community and this exclusive content was the result."

Guess I wont be thriving, I'm looking forward to playing this game but it's still only a rental.
Shut this user up Let user speak
hunter21 - 448 days 23 hours ago
8 -
hahaha typical MS.
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News