Doctor_Doom5394d ago (Edited 5394d ago )

"could absolutely execute on PS3", and that the game's Xbox 360 console exclusivity is entirely a question of "business".

We didn't know that /S

sonarus5394d ago (Edited 5394d ago )

lol before they said PS3 couldn't handle the AI for splinter cell but that was when they were still running the assa creed crap version

http://www.psxextreme.com/p...

Saigon5394d ago

I do remember that disscussion...I guess now with all of their experince with the PS3...they decided to take a different tone...

5394d ago
5394d ago
poopsack5394d ago (Edited 5394d ago )

cept when things are done correctly, example being Burnout Paradise

good thing ur not a fanboy amirite?

Applegate5394d ago (Edited 5394d ago )

It could be done on the PS3 but the 360 version would look better like the great majority of multiplats.

Hellsvacancy5394d ago (Edited 5394d ago )

*Puts fanboy hat on * but if it was exclusive 2 the Ps3 would Ubisoft say the same 4 the 360?

Tito Jackson5394d ago

But its not going to. So why does this matter?

Applegate5394d ago

Nope they would probably not say that, its part of the PS3 folklore to make people believe that PS3 exclusives cant be done on 360. Resistance 2 could easily be done on 360 for instance but of course they would never admit that.

PopEmUp5394d ago

will eat this game for breakfast, lunch and dinner lol

vhero5394d ago

Your idiots for saying if on multi it would look better on 360 we just dont know this as it wont be. It most likely would since it was made on 360 first and it would most likely be ported to ps3 but to come right out and say it would just shows how deluded you are and how much of a fanboy you really are. Fanboys goto the open zone we dont want you here. You are 360 man and applegate both goto openzone and stay there.

SevWolf5394d ago

@ 360 man and applegate: here's your lollipop, the doctor will be with you shortly.. take this,we hear at the mental institute try to believe our patient(you guys) can fill out these paper with no help :)..lol
I'm proud from Ubi, atleast they were honest about it
@ hellsvacancy: to answer your question..it depends on how they would have did it, for example Killzone isn't possible on 360 cause of the way it uses the SPUs or the processors etc.. while another game, sich as GTA IV which was a exclusive was able to be moved cause it didn't use the PS3's full potential

Boody-Bandit5394d ago (Edited 5394d ago )

One word. Hits
Don't you remember MGS4 and how many (hundreds) articles surrounded it? This is just where the gaming media has gone this generation, in the craper. I don't see Splinter Cell Conviction getting "that" out of hand, at least I hope not, but as you can see it is already starting.

BTW I would hold off just a little bit on "it's not going to".
If this generation has taught us anything it is that almost nothing is safe. We have already witnessed quite a few developers and publishers say game X wasn't coming to the other and then it did. With all of the MGS4 nonsense I myself almost started to believe it might end up on the 360 until I saw Kojima himself show up at E3 09 and talk about Rising and Peace Walker. :)

Applegate5394d ago (Edited 5394d ago )

Lol so whoever says that multiplats 90% of the time look better on 360 is a fanboy ? Oh well on N4G that must be an extremely fanboyish claim.

Nelson M5394d ago

I Got a PM of That Butt Sore BoT pp

3 hours ago | By: pp | Block
Shut the F*CK UP B*TCH.

Haaa Lack of Exclusives can do that to a BoT
And the Fact that Spinxter Cell is a Poor BoTs Metal Gear

The Wood5394d ago

at least they are'nt talking rubbish like some have done before even if its just to hype the game. I remember the 'ps3 cant handle our naruto' jab and then i saw Ultimate Ninja Storm and that smashed that statement to bits....tiny bits

Christopher5394d ago

But it's always great to hear a company come out and say it rather than hiding behind marketing and closed-door-deals that require them to choose one platform over the other.

Thanks for being completely honest, Ubisoft.

Boody-Bandit5394d ago

Good point.
It is definitely better than we are going multiplatform to reach a wider range of players. That is it, end of story.

^^^ Yeah because we all know that no money was involved. /s

At least Ubisoft has the balls to come out and admit it was purely a business decision. Oh and it was a really big check! ;)

ugly15394d ago (Edited 5394d ago )

By how many pixels... 1 or 2 because it really matters? 360 fans have an insecurity problem and latch onto multiplatform games as a means of justification. The same multiplatform devs still being held back by DVD ( see Carmack article. )

Only exclusives matter and Sony dominates that space in terms of technology and graphics.

thenickel5394d ago (Edited 5394d ago )

Why should they go to the open zone? There only speaking the truth which all PS3 fanboys try and deny. If anybody should be in the open zone it should be everyone of you insulting them because you don't like the truth.

Back on topic: I'm sure this game could work on PS3 just like I'm sure UC2 and even KZ2 could work on 360. Of course they might not look exactly the same but neither would conviction going to PS3.

edit above ugly1: If anything Ps3 fanboys have an insecurity because when a multi plat looks better on 360 they all scream exclusives. There is no excuse for a so called weaker console to have game that look better than a more powerful console or pc for that matter. 360 fans are not insecure at all and actually tell it like it is rather than sit there and listen to fud like yours. Rage isn't even out yet and if it looks better on 360 I'm sure you will still find a way to twist the truth. The only insecure people on n4g are PS3 fanboys that always voice there opinion like it's there way or nothing at all.

Raf1k15394d ago (Edited 5394d ago )

'it just wont be as good as the 360 version

EDIT:

but im telling the truth. judging on the past im pretty confident that it wont look as good, were it to come out for ps3 '

Since we all know it comes down to the devs to make a game look the same on two different platforms, your comment shows you don't think Ubi are good enough to make it look as good on the PS3.

SevWolf5394d ago

@ brutallyhonest: "At least Ubisoft has the balls to come out and admit it was purely a business decision. Oh and it was a really big check! ;)"
lol..I'm pretty sure that's exactly what they meant, when they say "business", since business is money, it's not like remedy, which chose the 360 cause they wanted to concentrate on one console, and get the marketing ;), or like Quantum Dream and David Cage(heavy rain), which they stated that it was planned as a multiplatform game, but then realized they would focus on the PS3 due to technological reasons, also that Sony was the only publisher which accepted to see their gamem while they were turned down by others

Christopher5394d ago

Bubble for getting it right. The onus is all on the developers. We have seen many games that are so alike that it's obvious that it's possible, developers just need to step up and make it so.

Consoldtobots5394d ago

learn to read between the lines kids

"business decision" = m$ money was thrown at them to keep it exclusive.

oh and all the stupid 360 fanboys on here just got owned with a ten foot sextoy.

marinelife95394d ago

Too me it doesn't even seem Splinter Cell should warrant that question. It doesn't have anything groundbreaking graphics or physics wise. It's like asking if the new Zelda game can run on the 360 or PS3.

darthv725394d ago

Was there any doubt?

Realistically any game could be made to run on any platform. Give and take...it can be done. Killzone 2 on the DS is possible but not probable.

To think otherwise is fanboyish.

Nineball21125394d ago

@ Applegate...

Quote: "Resistance 2 could easily be done on 360 for instance but of course they would never admit that."

Yeah, you keep posting this crap... so show me the 360 game that has 60 player online that doesn't lag.

Go on... I'm waiting.

TheReaper425394d ago

didn't Prototype look a lot better on the PS3 than it did on the 360, yet the 360 fanboys (not 360 gamers) fail to bring up the "but it's a multiplatform, it's the superior version." Anything good relating to the PS3, lets just sweep it under the rug eh?

IdleLeeSiuLung5394d ago

Sorry to break it to you, but both versions has its advantages on each platform. Albeit minor:

http://www.lensoftruth.com/...

"The Xbox 360 wins in terms of performance due to minimal screen tearing and consistent frame rate. Also the Xbox 360 had a further draw distance with its shadows."

"The PlayStation 3 takes the win by sporting higher resolution shadow maps and additional shadows underneath certain objects. Both versions had the same texture resolutions throughout."

MGSR THE HD VERSION5394d ago (Edited 5394d ago )

big difference between "handling" and actually making the conversion live up to those expectations.

sure ps2 and ps3 was able to handel all the splinter cell games....but were they any good?

http://images.eurogamer.net...

http://images.eurogamer.net...

http://images.eurogamer.net...

pixelsword5394d ago (Edited 5394d ago )

...and NOT to down any of the games I mention in a negative way, but...

When the 360 puts out a game like Resistance 2, Uncharted,or Lair, with all of it's graphic detail and technical spit-shining, A first-time multiplat from developers who don't know how to convert over from the 360 to PS3 will start to matter.

The fact is when exclusive games like Halo 3, crackdown, and America's Army: True Soldiers came out with underwhelming technical achievements within a comparable time frame and then Killzone 2 comes out putting everything else on the market to shame, it only goes to show what you put into the PS3 will directly correlate to what you get out of it.

Again, NOT downing Halo 3, as I love the game, or the other games: but I know Bungie and the others could have done MUCH better given the talented developers they have in each studio.

Syronicus5394d ago

If it never does I won't cry. I'll be too busy playing on the 360. Anybody that says this game could not be done on the PS3 is lying to themselves, PERIOD.

FamilyGuy5394d ago

I know there's an exclusivity deal with this game but that statement makes me think it might be a timed exclusive.
I'm not interested in the game either way and up until about a month ago I never knew the older games had released on anything but the xbox. I always thought; MGS-PS2 * SpC-Xbox

I do like the objectives being written on the walls/backgrounds, it's just like the episode titles for "Heroes" which is pretty cool.

pain777pas5394d ago

This does not matter but neither does the word exclusive for third party developers.

Greywulf5394d ago

http://image.com.com/gamesp...

That?

PS3 runs the 360's top graphical titles... Bioshock and Gears just fine. Shame they couldn't get the MGS4 engine working on the 360 though.

Jaces5394d ago

Well duh, seeing the quality that the PS3 can produce in games this would be a no brainer.

Still though I'm glad they went 360 only, exclusives always tend to be better in quality than most multiplats because of the sole concentration of developing on one platform.

A port would be nice but I'll still end up getting this for the 360.

darthv725394d ago (Edited 5393d ago )

"Shame they couldn't get the MGS4 engine working on the 360 though."

By "they" do you mean Konami or Hideo Kojima? Cause both of them said it could be done. Just because it can be doesnt mean it will. Business is business.

KZ2 could be done on the 360 but it doesnt mean it ever will.

Gamertags5393d ago

But you and I all know it would be a grade or two under the 360 version. Just like all multiplatform games.

Before you cry foul, think about this: Recognizing and acknowledging the problems of a console does not constitute bias. On the other hand, willfully ignoring those problems while exaggerating the flaws in another console... You know who you are!

Greywulf5393d ago (Edited 5393d ago )

The PS3 runs the unreal engine fine. Which is 80% of the technically demanding 360 titles right there, and it runs UT3 specifically fine.

The 360 can't run kz2, uncharted2, gt5p, lbp, it can't even run Alan Wake in a sandbox engine, or have more than 8 cars on the road in forza, or run native 1080 lines. Yet some how you have some blind hope that its possible? based on what? No 360 games even do per-object motion blur let alone the laundry list of other things specific to NaughtyDog/GG Sony engines.I mean based on just developers word vs titles, the 360 has nothing to show. and it hasn't since the launch of the console..

It could turn into a dinosaur, I mean all things are possible right?

Yes multiplat games look a tiny bit better on the 360, while more technically advanced games --than any multiplat-- live specifically on the PS3 specifically.I think its safe to say most would take a better looking entire game, over one that ultimately looks worse than the PC version either way.

The 360 has nothing to show for itself when it comes to titles I can pick up right now that compete with the likes of Uncharted/Killzone2/MLB09 etc.

GameGambits5393d ago

Also in a shocking twist it seems the sky is in fact the color BLUE when we gaze up at it!

REMARKABLE!

Gamertags5393d ago

Seriously? If you think there is a game on the PS3 that the 360 can't handle you are dumber than a box of rocks!

Gosh these fans boys get on my nerves.

Before you cry foul, think about this: Recognizing and acknowledging the problems of a console does not constitute bias. On the other hand, willfully ignoring those problems while exaggerating the flaws in another console... You know who you are!

mal_tez925393d ago

I read the title, looked over at my copies of Drake's Fortune, MGS4 and Killzone 2, then let out a big DURRRRRR!

It's debatable which console has better graphics (and I know fanboys love debating it), but I'm just sticking to the facts. At the moment, the three aforementioned games are graphically a level above the 360. But with the release of Splinter Cell and Alan Wake, this gap will bw bridged and they will be on the same level.

When I look at which console seems to be improving much more rapidly, I can tell the PS3 is having constant advancements that are more noticeable than the Xbox. This leads me to believe that in the near future, the PS3 will streak ahead graphically, this is however just speculation as nobody knows for sure.

The correct answer to the question of: Which console has better graphics?
Is: I don't know... yet. We'll see.

Jecht5393d ago

Your posts reek of fanboy, so kindly take that "by acknowledging a consoles' faults" crap off your posts. The quality of a game, yes even multiplats, is directly proportional to the work put into its development. If a game looks better on the 360 than on the PS3, it is NOT the PS3's fault, it is the DEVELOPERS fault. Period.

Traveler5393d ago

It really isn't even the developer's fault either. At least not the way some people think. When a multiplatform game runs or looks a bit better on the 360 it is generally due to two factors.

One, the 360 is often the lead platform and the games are then ported to the PS3. Anybody that knows anything about porting knows that a port will almost always be slightly inferior.

Two, the PS3 has a unique architecture that can be extremely rewarding for those that put in the effort to learn it, but for the very same reason it is also a little more challenging. For developers that are focused on the 360, they are going to have a harder time tapping into the PS3's potential.

Recent games like Wanted: Weapons of Fate and Bionic Comando looked better on the PS3. So, it really is a matter of which console developers put the most attention towards. In any case, the differences between most multiplatform games these days are so minor that it really isn't even worth worrying about.

Greywulf5393d ago (Edited 5393d ago )

Theres like:

MGS4, Killzone2 & 32 people online, Resistance2 & 60 players online, Gran Turismo 5 prologue 1080i lines @ 60fps & Reflecting track vehicles, Little Big Planet, Motorstorm2, MLB09, Warhawk -32 online, Heavenly Sword, Uncharted 1 & 2, Wipeout HD, Flower.. I think im forgetting some? Oh yeah White Knight Chronicles @ 1080p. The 360 has yet to run any advanced engine in any form of 1080 or high number of players online.

I think most of them. The 360 hasn't shown any title that is running the level of resolution/textures/animation/ framerate/amount of models on screen/scale/stream loading/shader trees/post processing.

So far in the 360's graphical trophy area, you have.. the Unreal engine, which runs on the PS3. Again, the 360 hasn't shown it can run any technology close to ps3 exclusives since the 360 had a head start, with easier hardware to develop for. No PS3 engines have made its way to planet 360, and no 360 developer has the talent of say.. Naughty Dog to pull off anything other than hitting "swap mech marine" in kizmet.

In other words, unless you're talking about zooming in 5x to see a soft edge in the Ps3 version of Call Of Juarez, don't bother talking about graphics. The 360 can't go head to head with any PS3 graphical title, at all. Again, you can pretend it does.. and go on words. But eh, ill go on playing games that are released. The 360 has over 500 games, and not one can touch Motorstorm2 let alone Killzone2.

Microsoft spends money on repairing consoles and buying exclusive timed third party games. Sony spends money on quality titles with second to none technology behind them.

Just stick to talking about what all "real" gamers care about.. sales and pretending multiplatform games show off hardware power :)

pixelsword said it best:

"The fact is when exclusive games like Halo 3, crackdown, and America's Army: True Soldiers came out with underwhelming technical achievements within a comparable time frame and then Killzone 2 comes out putting everything else on the market to shame, it only goes to show what you put into the PS3 will directly correlate to what you get out of it."

The timeframe argument goes out the door with Uncharted 1 & 2 as well. its as if you guys have no ground outside of hoping the future will bring better performing games.

darthv725393d ago

Why is it so hard to believe that something could be made to work on something other than the originating console? With the right creative programmers you could take something as complex as kz2 and make it run on the psp. Kind of like how insomniac did for resistance. It is a great game on the psp. So then if it can be adapted to work on lesser hardware then why cant it be cross coded on a system of almost equal performance?

Obviously there are differences to the architecture but creative minds find a way. Some of the best stuff I have seen on the genesis was done in the later years when programmers really learned the system. Things that were not possible (scaling/rotation) in hardware were accomplished in software.

All I am saying is that there is no real technical reason for ANY game to not be able to be created and adapted to a system regardless of limitations. It may be a worthless argument but it makes you wonder if some of these exclusive companies have ever tried their ground breaking game on something else. Even if it was just to see if they could.

Realistically it would never get released because of licensing and publishing rights but it would be neat to find code for a 360 version of mgs4 or heavenly sword. We already know LBP was at some point pitched to the 360 but turned down due to MS user generated content policies. I bet those guys still have demos of that game for 360 in their office somewhere.

Jecht5393d ago

here, this will put an end to it...

the 360 can run any game the ps3 can, but likely at a (sometimes large) loss somewhere. techincally, you are both correct.

darthv725393d ago

Thank you Jecht. Glad someone else can see that. Respect to you grey for sticking to your beliefs. Have a bubble.

Syronicus5393d ago

Can the 360 handle over 300 different light sources at one time? Just asking because I have not seen it done and wonder if some tech guy could explain if that would be possible.

Nineball21125393d ago

Gamertags: "Before you cry foul, think about this: Recognizing and acknowledging the problems of a console does not constitute bias. On the other hand, willfully ignoring those problems while exaggerating the flaws in another console... You know who you are!"

Didn't I just just read this in my latest Game Informer magazine as a reply in one of the letters to the Editors?!?

I swear I did... I don't have it with me at the moment, but I think that's word for word what is in there.

+ Show (48) more repliesLast reply 5393d ago
Mr Tretton5394d ago

lol, of course the PS3 could handle this game.

belal5394d ago

everybody knows that ps3 could handle splinter cell, its the most powerful console out on the market right now.

so how can a console who is great but less owerful than ps3, outperform the ps3? where is the logic?

raztad5394d ago

Some people here will argue with you about that.

On topic: Splinter Cell looks very good but is not a bar raiser, graphics-wise.

LONEWOLF2315394d ago

That is true the Cell is a beast too bad that cant be said about the GPU though.

pixelsword5394d ago

You can put some items directly to the RSX, and in some instances it's best to, but if you want to leverage the full effect of the PS3 performance wise, you process your data in a different way.

I'm going to write an article on it within two weeks, and hopefully I'll nail it, because I've read a few things and I think I figured out why multiplats translate so poorly from some people.

mrblacknut5393d ago

The same reason why the PS2 was great but the Xbox was more powerful.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5393d ago
PirateThom5394d ago

So, it'll be on PS3 in 6 months to a year?

SpoonyRedMage5394d ago

Well they've so far said that's it full exclusivity but it does seem odd. Ubi Montreal has only made Xbox Splinter Cells though, the ports were done by Ubi Shanghai.

Game looks awesome anyway.

Applegate5394d ago

Don't think so, not sure but one thing that's for sure is that I'll be playing it in October 2009, not end 2010.

PirateThom5394d ago

Actually, Ubisoft Montreal have made Choas Theory for PS2/GC and Double Agent for PS2/GC/Wii as far as I remember.

I don't see why a PS3 release would be beyond the realms of any possibility. I'm not partcularly interested in the game anyway, I just don't see why we should be facing another timed exclusive fiasco.

MegaMohsi5394d ago

Ubi isn't an exclusive developer, they've been developing multi-plat from last gen on, I definitely see a PS3 version coming out in 2010

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5394d ago
MegaMohsi5394d ago

hmmm timed exclusive? MS usually secures 3rd party games as timed exclusives so you never know, SC: Conviction PS3 could be out in Winter 2010

The Wood5394d ago

I dont think so. The 360 needs an identity. Most of its games are timed or titles that were born elsewhere. I actually want the 360 to have real exclusives because it lacks them in my opinion. I just hope MS start acquiring more studios. If the fact that the last big game was halo wars all those months ago doesnt highlight issues with a lack of 1st/2nd party what does??

Show all comments (258)
330°

Watch Ninja Gaiden II, Fable 2, Fable 3, and Splinter Cell Games Enhanced for Xbox One X in Action

Microsoft presented a new batch of Xbox 360 games that received Xbox One X enhancements via Xbox One backward compatibility, and here you can watch how they run.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
RizBiz1837d ago

Nothing wrong with more games. As someone who just fundamentally hates xbox, I am pretty jelly that xbox gamers get real BC.

1837d ago Replies(2)
1836d ago Replies(1)
Gaming4Life19811837d ago (Edited 1837d ago )

Finally ninja gaiden 2 is BC, I've been waiting on this since they announced BC.

Bane351837d ago (Edited 1837d ago )

Yeah i thought ninja gaiden was gonna get remaster because it wasnt announced for backwards compatible til just now tho i would've been up for joy if they announced max payne 3 for backwards compatible today instead

hiawa231837d ago

I am so wanting MP3 on BC and X1X enhanced

Bane351837d ago (Edited 1837d ago )

@hiawa23 i think R* has plans to remaster MP3 at this point

Z5011837d ago

You couldn't play your copy of NG2 before this announcement?

Bane351837d ago (Edited 1837d ago )

No it just became backwards compatible today

Movefasta19931837d ago

not everybody still has their 360, that's why

Z5011837d ago

Kept your game, but no console to play it on?
No one sells 360's anymore?

EddieNX 1837d ago ShowReplies(1)
bluebenjamin1837d ago

Ninja Gaiden 2 is the main game I wanted bcthen alone one x enchanced is this game is more fun than bloodborne

Gwiz1837d ago

No contest,souls games are overhyped for difficulty.

bluebenjamin1837d ago

Very overhyped just because of difficulty not because of fun

1837d ago
Movefasta19931837d ago

facts, once you beat a souls game and do ng plus, you have the game downloaded. Once you return to ng1 and 2 you still can get your ass handed to you lol, the regular enemies are a threat, still attacking even when they are on the ground dismembered.

Gaming4Life19811837d ago

Agreed dark souls, bloodborne, and sekiro are overhyped games and dont compare to ninja gaiden 1 & , ninja gaiden 3 sucks.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1837d ago
Z5011837d ago

What does BB have to do with NG2?
Why not insert Contra Shattered Soldier while you're at it.

bluebenjamin1837d ago

Ninja gaiden was once considered one of the hardest games ninja gaiden 2 has rpg elements so does bloodborn they have similar combat but ninja gaiden 2 just looks better doing it plus its fast pace and flashy combos removing limbs of foes remember 360 put more enemies on screen than ps3 on this game 360 had more dismemberment of limbs than the ps3 vs.360 had a better gpu but ps3 still to this day has an awesome cpu the ps3 had the prettiest ninja gaiden because of native 720 p while 360 pushed 640p now the one X has both higher rez and 360 style dismemberment But Ok for you contra ps2 version and nes

1837d ago
1837d ago
Movefasta19931837d ago

I do think ninja gaiden 1 and 2 are better than souls games, but they aren't even comparable

Z5011837d ago

Again. Why'd you pick BB?
Ninja Gaiden has ninja dog mode = easy
NG2 has a jump and block button
BB has none of those.

You could've picked a Devil May Cry or Bayonetta game. They're more similar to NG2 than BB.

What does PS3 have to do with this announcement? Your insecurities are showing.

Gaming4Life19811837d ago

I think they are being compared because of difficulty but I dont even think that is comparable imo. Ninja gaiden games are better though that's just facts.

Hungryalpaca1837d ago

And Forza is Better than MARIO Kart!!!!!

See how stupid that sounds?

bluebenjamin1837d ago

No Mario Kart is the best racer ever almost anyone can play

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1837d ago
timotim1837d ago (Edited 1837d ago )

Amazing news! NG2!?!? Three Splinter Cell games!!! Fable 2&3 (the first is already enhanced)!!! This is what separates Microsoft's version of BC from others...its that they enhance both the performance and visual quality of these titles to keep them current in a lot of cases, instead of playing them exactly how they played and performed back in the day. Whats even better...I don't need to do ANYTHING but download the new patch...amazing.👏

Keep it coming Xbox!

Show all comments (53)
220°

Are the free Xbox Games With Gold titles for July 2018 any good?

Neil writes: "Every single month we hear the same old thing about the Xbox Games With Gold titles. "We don't want that rubbish - we want decent games, we want AAA blockbusters, we want something different". Well, the free Xbox 360 and Xbox One titles being given away during the month of July pretty much tick those boxes. What's the chances there will still be complaints?"

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
AG1002127d ago

Tom clancy and virtua fighter are great death sqaured is pretty cool idk about assualt

lxeasy2127d ago

Splinter cell conviction is great, vf 5 is fun. Haven't played the other two so I'm excited to try them out.

ApexWolf222127d ago

Great month for 360 titles, X1 titles remind me of early days when all they gave away were indies, I hope they dont start doing that again.

AG1002127d ago

at least you can play the 360 games on xb1 too lol

Goldby2126d ago

Now that there's gamepass, expect bugger AAA to have priority in that, more money for both the dev and Ms more likely

yomfweeee2127d ago

I though Plus was lackluster this month. Gold is way worse.

BQ322127d ago

Vf5 fs is the best fighting game of all time abd backwards compatible, so it is a huge win in my book.

annoyedgamer2127d ago

No these are pretty awful. Virtua Fighter is great and so is Splinter Cell but those are 360 titles.

lxeasy2126d ago

so what if there 360 titles it's still awesome

Show all comments (11)
240°

A new Tom Clancy adventure can be enjoyed on Xbox One due to Back Compat – Is it worth the return?

Carlos writes: "Xbox Backwards Compatibility has shown a strong start to 2018 with a number of top titles being made available to play on Xbox One, but whilst this week doesn’t bring quite as many new arrivals as the past few weeks, there is still one addition for us to get stuck into once more... and it’s one that’s sure to prove a popular addition."

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
NotanotherReboot2267d ago

god bless backwards compatability

TheSplooge2267d ago

And thank god we dont have to pay for it.

2267d ago
Gman322266d ago

yeah Microsoft get points for that

TheOttomatic912267d ago

I’m still waiting for Blacklist

PlayStation_52267d ago

Don't confuse the Xbox gamers. They have enough problems to deal with... : P'

Mister_Wolf2266d ago

I AM an Xbox gamer aswell as other systems lol.

TheRealHeisenberg2266d ago

No confusion at all. Just another game added to the list if anyone gets nostalgic.

Vectrexer2266d ago

Are we confused? We get games that we've been enjoyed before at no cost to us!

C-H-E-F2267d ago

"new"? an "old" Tom Clancy Adventure can be enjoyed on xbox one due to back capat is worth the return"

*Fixed*

zerocarnage2267d ago

Yes, I loved conviction the co op was ace.

Show all comments (21)