370°
8.7

PSM3 Scans - Battlefield 1943 Review

Scans of the Battlefield:1943 review from the August issue of PSM3

Read Full Story >>
4thelulz.co.uk
Chuk55411d ago

This will be a great time consumer till mw2 and even then it'll be a nice alternative to mw2 when you don't want to play.

mrv3215411d ago

I agree, but this and Fat Princess will prove to be my downfall, they look great stunning in their replayability.

LinuxGuru5411d ago (Edited 5411d ago )

I agree. I honestly will never get tired of WWII titles, but unfortunately my view on that doesn't gel with the masses. Apparently the vast amount of crap WWII games has left a bad taste in everyone's mouths.

I'll definitely play MW2, but I have a feeling the multiplayer is gonna feel like more of the same. I'll most likely rent it and beat the campaign on a couple different difficulty settings.

I know one could say "Well this is just more Battlefield same-ol same-ol! Hypocrite!" Not really. Take BF1942, add tons of polish and great sound and physics, up the resolution, and you get a much more compelling multiplayer experience. Call of Duty, on the other hand, has zero physics, canned animation (no ragdoll), and the gameplay has had almost zero changes to it since the beginning of the franchise. At least Battlefield has the Frostbite engine, which brings a host of changes to the overall experience.

Battlefield 1943 on the other hand...15 bucks, some nice looking maps, good solid graphics engine for a multiplayer title, and plenty of replayability...I'll take it.

KwietStorm_BLM5411d ago (Edited 5411d ago )

It's not the vast amount of crap WWII games, it's the vast amount of WWII games, period. People are just tired of the overflow, and it boggled many minds when Call of Duty actually went BACK to that time period. It's just been done to death, and it's tired. But this game looks fun. Looks something like Warhawk.

Dude4205411d ago (Edited 5411d ago )

They can do as many WWII titles as they like. What has been done to death are WWII games that use the same FORMULA. Think about it, how many times have we played a COD/Medal of Honor game based on WWII, a ton. How many times have we played an RTS based on WWII, not many. What about sandbox WWII shooters, not many either.

This is why I'm getting sick of COD/Medal of Honor based on WWII, I've played that formula too many friggin' times to even care. Battlefield on the other hand, I certainly wouldn't mind playing that again. It's a shooter but it's so much more different and offers a lot of variety in gameplay.

SprSynJn5410d ago (Edited 5410d ago )

"People are just tired of the overflow, and it boggled many minds when Call of Duty actually went BACK to that time period. It's just been done to death, and it's tired."

Not to sound redundant, but can't the same be said for "Modern Warfare" style games? To be honest, I prefer games based on history than games based on one's cynical view of the present.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5410d ago
Tee7soo5411d ago

i really cant wait , i played all the battlefield games and loved them , i just hope this game wont disappoint .

Chuk55411d ago

Why did I get a disagree?

joshua19055411d ago

Because N4G is full of pathetic people who get a hard on over disagreeing

That's my opinion anyway.

a_squirrel5411d ago

Hey! It worked he got disagrees (somehow)

Now... how do you kill the disagrees before they come....

Mods, can you help us out here?

and some people who are fans of BF might not like it if you mention Modern Warfare 2 (i didn't like the first one... it got boring, no destruction)

vickers5005411d ago

Stop being so damn insecure. You got a disagree, so what? Are you gonna cry because people don't agree with your opinion? What is it with people and whining about people disagreeing with them on this site? It's not like someone stole something from you or called you a bad name.

This site is really insecure when it comes to disagrees. You see people saying something like "I personally think this is a good game, yada yada" then they see a disagree and come back with a comment like "you are disagreeing that I think this is a good game? wow you have problems". They're not disagreeing that you don't think its a good game, dumb@ss, they're applying the "I like this game" idea to them, and saying that they don't. It's the same way it happens in a real conversation.

Someone says "I like this game" in real life and the other person says "I don't". They are taking what they are hearing as a comment directed at them (and why shouldn't they, if you're posting to see your own comment and not discuss with anyone else, then you're a f*cking weirdo) and responding with the disagree option that they do not share the same opinion as you do.

That's why people disagree with you, now would you all please just shut up and stop whining about a little number count next to your comment?

evrfighter5411d ago

What's the record for disagrees here? I'd like to try and break it. I'll be waiting for Gt5 of GoW3 reviews from IGN to come out.

If I can grab the first post and bash both games or just ps3 gamers in general. I should be the record holder for quite awhile

Chuk55411d ago (Edited 5411d ago )

So did I touch a nerve by mentioning mw2? I'm sorry if none of you like it mentioned but it's biggest shooter of the year (After kz2).I wasn't whining I was legitimately questioning why I got disagrees. I don't see the problem created by stating that bf1943 could be played up to and after mw2. This site is ass-backwards sometimes.

sGIBMBR5410d ago

^ biggest shooter of the year after KZ2?

I think you'll find it the otherway around... !

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5410d ago
HQLocated1115411d ago

So is this game like Bad company but in WWII?

Or is it not as open world as Bad Company? Anyways I'm buying this game the gameplay vid looks great.

Mo0eY5411d ago

This game is a remake of the very first BF game, BF: 1942. It's set during the WWII era and it was the king of them all back in the day. It's replayability was ASTONISHING.

If you like BF: BC, then you'll LOVE this game. No BF game will ever top BF: 1942/Secret Weapons/Road to Rome (expansions). I just hope that it's as fun as it is on the PC as it is on my PS3.

Gambit075411d ago

Is this game like Warhawk?

Breakfast5411d ago

...Warhawk is like this game.

sak5005411d ago

Hahah Breakfast, you can see with the comments here that average person who comes on n4g. The people have no idea what BF franchise is. Comparing a copycat game with one of the greatest multiplayer franchises in video game history. The preteens have no clue about games before 2004.

a_squirrel5411d ago

I dont know why people disagreed with a simple question...

No, Warhawk reminds me of starfox game for gamecube... I dont like running around fast

BF 1943
DESTRUCTION

That is the BIG difference, OH and it's also a remake of 1942 (look it up) and it's WW2 (obviously)

evrfighter5411d ago

most people here when they hear they hear of the battlefield franchise, think bad company. But for you console teens who don't know what real FPS gaming is...

Battlefield is your chopper ridin grandaddy that brought land, sea, and air combat to the table. with 64 man servers I might add.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5411d ago
Show all comments (45)
390°

Battlefield Legacy - Sunsetting Announcement

EA: "As we close in on 15 years since the release of Battlefield 1943, and Bad Company™ 1 & 2, we are announcing that their journey is coming to an end."

darthv72403d ago

This reminds me... I have ME on my PS3 hdd. Never really played it, but it was free.

XiNatsuDragnel403d ago

Digital future ppl is good they say nope imo

Eidolon403d ago

And it still says nothing about being able to downloaded even when it's off the storefront, that's a huge ouchie for some who somehow still have it in their backlog...

Shane Kim403d ago

Dont make it an issue when it's not. If you haven't played it in 15 years, chances are you'll never play it.

isarai403d ago

That all digital future sure looks great!

/s

zidane1341403d ago (Edited 403d ago )

Online game servers shut off eventually all the time. Doesn’t matter if you have the disc or not. Even if you have the disc, it’ll be just paperweight unless the game lets you connect directly to a friend or LAN play.

isarai403d ago (Edited 403d ago )

Read the article bro. They are delisting the games, including mirrors edge which is an offline game. Online servers i can understand, not being able to buy/download the games anymore? Completely separate issue, especially seeing as how some these games had lengthy sp campaigns and not just mp.

zidane1341403d ago

@israrai, you can still buy the disc for less then 10$. Hardly a loss.

TheEnigma313403d ago

You shouldn't have to buy the disc, that's the issue.

OhReginald403d ago (Edited 403d ago )

Some brilliant minds created servers to keep these old online games alive. A lot of ps2 and ps3 games that had there servers shut down a long time ago have been restored by fans to keep it going. Warhawk, killzone 2, socom 2/ confrontation, resident evil outbreak series, etc.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 403d ago
DankSinatra402d ago

The disc still exist. I don’t understand the issue. You guys are upset about that “all digital future” yet these games are not “digital only”. Hell digital only is a minority in the gaming world and so far we haven’t moved into it, the only digital only games are games as a service or online only games, which end up failing in the end.

This is no different than a store that stops selling old games, just go and buy a copy somewhere else. So which is it, you hate all digital or you like it? Make up your mind.

isarai402d ago

Talk about missing the point entirely. I'm not going to sit here and explain it to you, figure it out.

DankSinatra402d ago

Talk about whining about something and not wanting to explain from an off handed sarcastic original comment.

I got the point just fine. You’re literally complaining about something that has an easy alternative to it.

ManMarmalade402d ago

I don't think you got the point

DankSinatra402d ago (Edited 402d ago )

@ManMarmalade

No I got it, it has to do with the push towards a future of all digital and reprocussions of losing games. Something I already stayed that hasn’t happened nor is it large enough right now to cause any issues as the games that are all digital are online only to begin with or make up the minority of games

So I’ll say it again, the disc still exists for these games that are over a decade old and can still be played easily. You guys are contradicting the whole “we don’t want a digital only future” crying when the dude I originally responded to stated:

“Read the article bro. They are delisting the games, including mirrors edge which is an offline game. Online servers i can understand, not being able to buy/download the games anymore? Completely separate issue, especially seeing as how some these games had lengthy sp campaigns and not just mp.“

So again, which is it? Do you hate all digital or do you want it?

Inverno403d ago

On PC I don't think it's much of a problem but I'm sad to see BF43 being shut down. I haven't played it in a while since it's stuck on PS3, but i preferred it way more over BF3. It was the lack of invisible barriers which made it better for me.

badz149403d ago

BFBC2 was still the best overall package offered by the franchise so far IMO

porkChop403d ago

Absolutely. BC2 was such a great game. It's a shame we never got BC3.

P_Bomb402d ago

I had a great run on Bad Company 2. Pound for pound, as solid a BF package as there’s been.

InUrFoxHole403d ago

Does anyone play the last BF anymore? I searched crossplay servers and it was 20 people the most on all the servers? Can never find a game

SonyStyled403d ago

The last BC you mean? I was still able to find 10v10 on ps3 2 years ago on NA servers during the evenings. I have all the free and paid dlc installed, but there want any matches in the Vietnam dlc.

Show all comments (35)
60°

Looking back to 2009 and the war over the Pacific with Battlefield 1943

Carlos writes: "In terms of Battlefield, the past 10 years has seen the series go from strength to strength, and whilst there will be many who would argue that the hit and miss adventures of Battlefield: Hardline didn’t quite live up to the excitement that the series is so well known for, each and every entry has at least provided plenty to shout about. Should you look back far enough and manage to take your mind away from Battlefield: Bad Company 2, what you may well remember is a small, online-only multiplayer adventure that lit up the Xbox Live Arcade – Battlefield 1943."

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
TargusX1755d ago

Great little game but yet again, no offline bots so once the servers went, so did all its players. What a waste.

70°

History, Hate, and Trusting the Player

Game developers should - and can - trust the player to consume their entertainment while maintaining perspective.

Read Full Story >>
cgmagonline.com