1170°

Best Reasons to Play GTA IV on Xbox 360

No offense to PlayStation 3, but GameDaily don't want to play Grand Theft Auto IV on Sony's machine. Here's why they are rocking the Xbox 360 version.

Read Full Story >>
gamedaily.com
chaosatom3335845d ago (Edited 5845d ago )

basically it's live. The only real feature of live is in-game communication, which sony is going to deliver.

when he said "premium service that allows for user-friendly match making and features a robust online community" what the hell is that suppose to mean.
---doesn't premium mean that you have to pay, and it makes it sound like a good thing. He COPIED and pasted it from microsoft.com!

what the hell with "most of our buddies have xbox" suppose to mean. No DUH the xbox is the choice for him.

Second is the controller. He is whining about recharging the controllers? just wow. He never held a ps2 controller in his hand, so no duh the xbox controller is going to feel 'better' for him.

For dlc here is the deal.
---too big, means more time, and less people interested.
----too little, means missions and sort, and less people interested still.

hd cables- are you serious, whining about HD CABLES. How about microsoft forgot to add a hard-drive in arcade version? How about microsoft forgetting to add a blue-ray player in all their xbox?

Hard-drive. Wow, this guy thinks that 5-min intall is going to eat up 5-10-20 gbs hard-drive. 360 also has install.

The person who wrote the article is clearly delusional and NEVER owned a ps, ps2, or a ps3 in his life.

IF he was writing "worst reasons to play GTA on 360", he wouldn't even mention RROD. Now you see how blind he is in his bias.

This guy is mad because rockstar didn't screw the ps3 version, and is making excuses for himself and his audience.

Trust me when i this: this guy is going to call the ps3 version 'washed out' based on the videos he watches on UTUBE.

sonarus5845d ago (Edited 5845d ago )

This is just opinion. Here are my reasons to get GTA4 on PS3

Xbox Live: PSN is free. As long as i can do friend invites and voice chat that is really all i need. Most of my friends i have known for yrs either have ps3's or are getting ps3's not for GTA4 but for MGS4 though. Xbox live has a robust community but that in no way affects me because i am not trying to play with ALL of them.

Controller preference: Maybe its just me but i never found anything wrong with the PS1 controller or PS2 controller. The 360 controller feels weird in my hand. I don't suffer any strain when playing on the ps3 controller so i am really confused as to where this comfort comes from. Sure the 360 triggers are better placed but those aren't the only buttons on the controller. I find that ps3 button are better than 360 in ever area except triggers. I find the bumpers very stuff as well as most of the other buttons on the controller. I have an extra long wire for recharging my controller and i don't see why anyone should complain. If you have to buy a recharge kit/ AA batteries for your 360 controller why can't you buy a longer usb recharge cable

DLC: I never finished saints row, GTA vice city, san andreas or any other open world game i have managed to get my hands on. Sooner or later i give up following the missions that being said extra missions have absolutely no impact on me.

HD cables: Yes it sucks ps3 doesn't come with HD cables but i fail to see how this has anything to do with which version to choose from. If you already have a ps3 and still no hd cables it means you don't need them. If we are talking about buying a new console for the game, then simply put there are a lot of reasons to buy the ps3 over the 360, blu ray player, and reliable hardware are just some.

Hard drive space: Yea it sucks but 5min install doesn't sound like it will be much. I find it funny that someone looking to download DLC is going to be complaining about hard drive space.

Like i said its still all relative to opinion. If you are going to buy GTA4 on 360 then go ahead. A lot of people prefer the 360 to the ps3 but it is all based on personal preference and very little fact. Before we could say 360 games run better, or ps3 had no rumble, or some excuse but slowly those excuses are dwindling and soon there will be no reason to choose 360 version over ps3 version but for personal preference.

The Killer5845d ago

and thats happened to be with the ps3, so its a better reason to play it on ps3!

Real Gambler5845d ago

Hot summer days, and DVD spinning all the time and generating extra heat... Sandbox game calling for 6 hours game sessions. And house with no central air, getting way above your typical 72 degrees.

Now, do I want the game for a PS3 or a 360, knowing that "some" consoles don't like heat???

sephiroths_revenge5845d ago (Edited 5845d ago )

New headline

Stupid PS3 Owner sells $60 for $40 to buy cheap and nasty version of GTA4

yesah5845d ago

I know, this is one of the dumbest pieces of crap i ever read.
I dont know who GameDaily is but i sure as hell wont click a link to there again.

"We bought theese cables already but ummm, we had them on the other one so ummm, we keep other one ummmmmm and use."

and this instalation crap is starting to piss me off, a blu ray disc holds more, less need for instalation. Its common sense that if there is more space on the disc, and you install, the benifits will be much greater then less space on the disc, and you dont install.

Ghoul5845d ago (Edited 5845d ago )

what a shame, that so called article is pure fanboyism sorry

Xbox Live

- PSN for me it's free, open, and that last live feature (ingame communication) is coming soon (also for free)

Xbox 360 controller is pimp

- It's a ripoff i have to buy AA batteries or recharable packs from MS
sure its a choice of preference but claiming that using batteries is a feature is laughable couse i bought my ds3 play it charge it every 2-3 days on my usb and havent bought ONE batterie or recharge pack ever since. on my 360 i bought several packs AA's and later 3 packs of rechargeable packs + recharge station.

GTA IV is bigger on Xbox 360, and size matters

- ok the dlc is nice but calling the 360 version (ultimate, superior) whatever is a sore joke because otherwise i have something for you xbox fans, i play gears, mass effect, bioshock, as the "superior pc-version", wich is also the same bs as saying gta4 on 360 would be superior to the ps3 its the same game....

IF you want something different i can say you that the ps3 has motion controlls and the 360 not.

(below not yet 100% profen)
I would laugh real hard if home really comes with a gta4 space and dlc, come one a 3d socialising room for chatting and mp game arangements in a gta4 style social network at the cost of uhm ... free ? i take that over the 20$ dlc mission of the 360 anyday.

We already own HD cables

- Now THAT is the lamest reason i have EVER read, actually i had to buy a vga kabel for my 360 (component sucks) and i dont have hdmi because ms chose to rip me off by releasing several new skus over the time

GTA IV may eat our hard drives

- come on you cant be serious, bashing on a 5minute install is so childish. It's like feeling cool because you saw a movie a day earlier then your friend...
at least i have a harddrive standard.

that article is miles away from what i call journalism. Journalism requires you to research topics on boths sides, otherwise it,s not worth the paper printed on.

some may call me a fanboy after this comment but i am so sick of the ms camp bashing around the globe on such laughable claims, 360 has many superior games but gta is definatly not in that list.

Delive5845d ago

I'll give him 1 and 3. Live is easier to use to find friends and message and such. The DLC will make the game bigger. That's it. The DLC will cost. The online features cost. 1) as long as the PSN version has chat and friend invites, cool. 2)Controller? Really? I actually cramp up more with the 360 controller, using the trigger as a gas petal mostly. And I have a 12 foot USB cable I use with the PS3 controller. 3)Bigger is nice and all, but I never finished San Andreas. Got bored, just drove around for kicks. More land added in the DLC would be nice though. 4)HD cables. I didn't get HD cables with my 360, as a matter of fact, my 360 doesn't even have an HDMI port. 5) HDD Space. I store all of my media on the external 120gb drive, stream the other media from the PC and games, demos and content remain on the 200gb internal drive that I upgraded to. Nice feature. Nice price too for 200gb compared to 120gb 360 drive. To each his own. I know he'll enjoy it, I will too. Game on and quit bit.... complaining.

St05845d ago

The title for this post should be

"Worst Reasons to Play GTA IV on Xbox 360"

prunchess5845d ago

In a month or so we'll be reading articles with headings like,

"GTA IV Murders Thousands!"

and when you click the link it will say

"GTA IV Murders Thousands of XBOX 360's!"

GTA IV is going to kill so many 360's that it is probably going to cost MS another 50 million in replacing them! (if they actually do)

I completed San Andreas and I, like many many others, spent a lot of hours with this game running in my PS2. Considering this I'm expecting monumental hardware failures to plague the 360.

How will gamedaily spin that I wonder?

The Killer5845d ago (Edited 5845d ago )

bubbles for u, those 360 fanboys loves ignoring and taking bubbles!

EDIT

360 has many problems other than RROD, the only advantage 360 has is its old list of games and Live right now, by the end of the years it wont have any advantage, i wonder who will buy it!! maybe those who wants to own all consoles and very low budgets people!

miganda5845d ago (Edited 5845d ago )

i'll be the first to agree that this story is a waste of life. i do have to call you on some points.
1. the use of xbox live is richer and more player friendly. just the fact that sending game invites and chatting to people, whether their in the same game as you or not makes a big difference.
2.yes no hd cables is a rough one to swallow. that was another 35 bucks i had to kick out. if sony is gonna hype the ps3 as a true HD experience, the least they can do is provide the means to see it that way.(plus the comment about no hard drive is dumb because you dont have to buy the arcade version, but no matter which ps3 package you buy there is no hd cables or head set)
3.some thing the guy didn't even bring up. where's the head set? sure as hell not in my ps3 box.and you can say what you want about it, but that is not cool.thats why when i play ps3 online alot of people aren't even talking.
4.DLC! don't front. how can you spin dlc in a negative way? well their is one way. when it doesn't come out for ur system and ur just hating on it. so please, people need to stop trying to tear down GTA DLC. for the price microsoft payed does anyone really think the stuff is gonna suck? don't think so.

Silellak5845d ago

I plan on getting the 360 version of the game. I would do so even if I owned a PS3.

That being said, the reasons listed in this article are absolute fanboy garbage, and a sign of the decreasing quality of game journalism in general. It's a shame that online news media falls victim to the same problems as mainstream media - hype and sensationalism take presedence over legitimate news and reasoned opinions.

BulletBtweenUrEyes5845d ago

Personally, i dont get it when people try to convince you to purchase GTAIV for their console of preference. If you have a 360 then buy it for 360. if you have a PS3, then buy for PS3. If you have both them make your choice on your own. To the fanboys who say "I'm buying it for (insert console name here) cuz its better" You're saying it like you have a motherf***ing choice. YOU KNOW YOU DONT!!! Why you ask? Because why would you purchase both consoles(360/PS3) and completely trash talk any of em. Who downplays a console they spent damn near $300-$500 on. Thats like a months rent to most people living in an apartment. What are gaining from being a full-time fanboys. Last time i checked, MS and Sony weren't handing out checks or hiring. I wonder if there were a game called SMCIV(Suck My C*** IV) if you guys would argue "You can suck c***s better on 360, plus were getting DLC(Downloadable C***s) they cum in all shapes and sizes"

Genesis55845d ago (Edited 5845d ago )

Well I for one am sorry I read that article. Because it was a complete waste of time.

NO_PUDding5845d ago

I look back and laugh now, but that recent 5 minutes ago, I for some reason thought there might possibly have been some reasons I hadn't heard.

But it's still the same stale and most importantly WRONG reasons.

And for those who are saying people shouldn't downplay the DLC; we can downplay as much as you 'uplay' it. It's unconfirmed, and it's an experiment by Rockstar. I suspect that 50 mil paid for more than just DLC so I hate being accused of jealousy when I downplay it. Have your DLC if you ahve a ahrdrive, but I am blissfully happy without it.

sonarus5845d ago

@Silellak: My point exactly. Gamedaily are begining to sound a little bit to xbox360 fanboy for me. First they claim 360 is the greatest console of all time after only 2 yrs on the market now they come up with this silly nonsense

littletad5845d ago

"That being said, the reasons listed in this article are absolute fanboy garbage, and a sign of the decreasing quality of game journalism in general."

And why is this fanboy garbage? Because it's an opinion? Or would we be having this conversation if the ps3 was chosen instead of the 360? Doesn't the alarming "Agrees" for anything pro-Sony not ring a bell? Forbid the majority of fanboys don't have their console of choice getting special treatment. Since when should gaming sites remain "neutral". YOUR disagreeing with them is your right as well as his to list his own reasons which console is preferred. Case closed.

chaosatom3335845d ago

it's the highest agrees I have ever gotten, more bubbles please.

rexor07175845d ago

Its about why you should buy a 360. This article is total crap.PS3 is where its at, why else would the PS3 be getting a bundle.

CrazzyMan5845d ago

You complain about cables/install?
I COMPLAIN about RROD!

Guess, which one is more serious PROBLEM?!

jadenkorri5845d ago

Gamesdaily is beating the dead horse...honestly none of those reasons apply to playing GTA4, every reason was almost personlly based and not facts live vs psn (pay/free), xbot controller vs Dualshock (personal preferences), dlc...so what MS paid for it good for them, HD cables was the lamest excuse, first off a 19.99 extra cable on top of a 400 purchase is not gonna matter, and most of us already own HDMI cables anyways...but for the few 20 bucks is nothing...if your buying 400 dollar system, u can afford an extra 20...HD, well im glad rockstar made it optional for 360, if not all those core/arcade users would be screwed... and 5 mins mandatory...oh noes....Seriously thou, both games are exactly the same on launch...and im gonna laugh when ps3 GTA4 outsells 360 versions

dan-boy5845d ago (Edited 5845d ago )

but don't let it wind you up, the site is obviously in the pocket of microsoft! just look at all the adverts that were flashing up.

perhaps news from this site could be banned for being bias towards microsoft. then we could that other crap site banned aswell gameplayer.co.au a site which is blatantly bias towards sony!

i will be getting the 360 version though. even if i had a ps3 i would still be getting it for the 360. all my family and friends have them and i'm looking forward to the riots on'line. and the dlc is too tempting to ignore! haters hate it i know, but it does give you the option to expand on what will be an already extensive game! to say that it's irrelevant is just pure denial!

dylz5845d ago (Edited 5845d ago )

dude I only own a ps3 but jeez a littile serious there game daily is known for there humorus top tens, sevens and fives ect. get a life and stop worry about people having a joke at your console of choices expense get a life

Edit
lol wat a joke the gamer zone heavealy monitored this is a huge string of fanboy

gaffyh5845d ago

This article is a COMPLETE FANBOY article. I mean look at this point:

"Sony just released its rumble supported DualShock 3 and it pales in comparison to Microsoft's Xbox 360 controller, which not only feels great in the hands, but also allows us to use a rechargeable battery pack or two standard issue AA batteries"

That is a reason against the 360 controller because you have to go and buy a recharge pack or batteries, and somehow he makes it seem like a positive thing. Fanboy logic is twisted.

HD CABLES - erm... at least the PS3 cam with a HDMI port, my 360 didn't...

In fact this article isn't even about GTAIV, it's a fanboy article of how the 360 is better than the PS3.

somethingSQUISHY5844d ago

... I still haven't made my decision on which version to pick up -- and I will be picking up GTAIV. Of all the well documented and well supported pros/cons for each version I've come across, this article did not intelligently discuss any of them (they came close with the DLC paragraph).

The entire article was rife with contradictory sentiments (ex: expressing horror at the HDD space bogarted by a mandatory PS3 install, yet praising downloadable content for the 360; bemoaning the lack of included HD cables with the PS3, but oozing appreciation for recharge kits/battery packs not included with the 360 that were purchased separately).

The more articles like this I come across, the more I realize that I will never get a true idea of what version (if either) is better before April 29. I think I'll end up hanging back and waiting for reviews to come rolling in with some kind of consensus before I drop the green.

Feihc Retsam5844d ago (Edited 5844d ago )

If anybody ever doubted that SONY fanbots trolled this site, doubt no more. If nothing else, this article served as SONY fanboy bait, and man, they all bit.

cwir5844d ago

This one is by FAR the lamest, dumbest and the most naive article i have ever read about comparing xbox to ps3 :). Really. REALLY REALLY!!

The guy who wrote is an idiot :). Those "pros" of playing on xbox are the dumbest arguments he could possibly come up with..

I still cannot believe it :)

RobotIsTheFuture5844d ago (Edited 5844d ago )

I was gonna put my opinions on why the PS3 version works for me better (I don't own any next-gen console; but i'm plannin' on gettin' a PS3(my console of choice,no fanboyism in here) VERY VERY soon :D) but "chaosatom333" & "sonarus" made it pretty clear that THIS IS some FANBOY PHU*K'D UP SH*T.

These are the kind of ppl that goes out there talkin about how "HARDCORE GAMERS" they are. They say "I ONLY play MS/Sony/Nintendo consoles 'cause i'm a LOYAL buyer of MS/Sony/Nintendo" if you've ever actually said this or thought this you're definitely NOT a "HARDCORE GAMER" you're more like a fanboy. How could you call yourself a "HARDCORE GAMER" when you admit that you ONLY play on MS/Sony/Nintendo consoles. Thank God, I've played in MOST (NOT EVERY!!!) console that has been AROUND HERE (Puerto Rico). Still I don't call myself a "HARDCORE GAMER" 'cause I don't know what/who a "HARDCORE GAMER" is... ¿Somebody that hasn't ever cheated? ¿Somebody that has finished every game he's/she's played? ¿Somebody that finishes a game in a certain amount of time? ¿Somebody that's "THE BEST" in every game he/she plays? I don't know what/who a "HARDCORE GAMER" is... and certainly I DON'T CARE; ¿Why? 'Cause I enjoii my games, I don't care about retainin' an STUPID "imagination" award. I'd be enjoii'n my games while you care about finishin' it in 3 hours, or finishin' it w/ a higher score than mine. Yeah that's goOd, competittion is GREAT!!!; but kids/big kids takes it toO serious nowadays...lol big kids actin childish makes me sick. FO-SHO.

PS: Sorry for going waayy off the TOPIC, i felt i needed to say this SH*T.

***Enjoii Your Games No Matter What Console U Own. You Deserve It My Gamin' Brother...***

+ Show (25) more repliesLast reply 5844d ago
athlon7705845d ago

It is one thing to read that type of trash on a site like this where we, the fans of the system, can write pretty much whatever we want for all to see, but it is clearly another thing when a journalist at a gaming site is allowed to write what he did and allowed to hold his job.

moparful995845d ago

Most of that article was purely opinion based and not rooted in fact.. My biggest problem with the article is how he's b!tching about no hdmi cable with the ps3... Its kinda ironic that the 360 didnt even have an hdmi port until summer 07.. nearly a year after the ps3 launched.. and the 360 still doesnt come with an hdmi cable... Plus some fool up above is complaining about the ps3 not coming with a headset... You can get super cheap headsets anywhere. I bought a $20 logitech usb headset and it works great, also got a free bluetooth headset with warhawk... People have a general bias about something so they dig for things to denounce the object of their hatred. I could sit here all day and list things that I dont like about the 360 but wat purpose would that serve??? none... there is no way that I am going to sway someones opinion.. Thats why I hate these articles so much.. the only purpose that they serve is to start these online wars that never seem to be productive.. It only serves to make the rift between ps3 and 360 fans bigger........

NO_PUDding5845d ago (Edited 5845d ago )

= meh....

[in my opinion]

Herbert tholdpervert5845d ago (Edited 5845d ago )

right...which system have the 25GB blu ray again ?

Bladestar5845d ago

No brainer.. more is more.. no other way to put it... why is why the anti xbox 360 camp is trying so hard with RROD... because if you were to put the PS3 vs xbox 360 version of the game... it's a no brainer... this is the reason why... when a new xbox 360 game or multiplatform game is about to be release the number of article about RROD tripple... nothing scares the anti xbox 360 camp.... than for people to do some GAME comparisons... scary stuff... XBox 360 GTA Game > PS3 GTA Game... period...

sonarus5845d ago

Take it or leave it, that is still your opinion. If it runs the same on both consoles it will always be your opinion. I am telling you with fact even if the DLC is the size of san andreas i won't get it. Unless it does something revolutionary and it is a whole new game then i'm not getting it.

As it is right now DLC is the ONLY advantage 360 version has at least in my eyes. Achievements custom sound tracks and a lot of that other stuff i would place ahead of DLC but they aren't as important to me as they are to other people.

Bottom line is buying 360 version over PS3 version remains a personal preference and not based on fact end of story

shadowfish5845d ago

Sonarus = Legend. You just got bubbled.

Chris_GTR15845d ago

why have choice? just get the ps3 version and call it a day.
in game custom soundtrack!pfff who needs that in a 60 hour game anyways! achevments? F that. an expansion pack?? screw that , im happy with nothing. better framerate? no thanks im happy at 30 frames! an online where everyone talks? nah im happy playing silently cause a bluetooth headset is too expensive!

Daishi5845d ago (Edited 5845d ago )

If you just read most people comments you begin to see that both consoles have the version that absolutely suits them best. Most Sony fans here say they didn't finish the last few games or got board with it for hours. They already have free online, why would they shell out for DLC? The reason the 360 has achievements is the fact that more of them will hunt down every little secret and complete every single mission. They already pay for a premium service so more than likely they will pay for DLC (and is 14 cents a day that much for live anyway?). Which version is better? Probably the one you pay more to play. We are arguing over a cheesburger and a cheesburger with bacon, bacon is a nice extra but ONLY when you want to spend the extra $ for it.
P.S. I thought this article was written by a grade school kid...

NO_PUDding5845d ago

To be honest I finsiehd every single GTA.

GTAIII was most difficult, apart from the final mission on San Andreas.

But the DLC feels so gimmicky, and not Rockstars style, I think that's why I am so nonchalant about it. And I also know, whatever it is, I won't feel is worth having. I don't think the PS3 DLC will be worth having either.

moparful995845d ago

Seeing is more than observing with the eye's my friend... You say that RRoD is a defensive meassure used by the anti 360 crowd. Though it may be a commonly used tactic it is not a fabricated event.. It is rooted in fact... You retort with this side by side comparisson of games whenever 90% of the cross plat. games are generally on par with one another.. RRoD is fact, 360 games being superior however, is not. It's an opinion. You cannot dispute fact with opinion... Developers have no incentives to make one version better then the other, unless they are paid to do so... Hence the money hat that microsoft gave rockstar. That content would never have been made otherwise. So to say that the 360 version is superior is happenstance.. Moreso the content wont be available for another 6 months at least! How can you brag about content that is 6 months away and has yet to be seen.. Everyone assumes it will be this grandoise conent that will ruin the ps3.. I dont feel like waiting 6 months to pay for extra content for a game I already beat... I have nothing further to add......

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5845d ago
toughNAME5845d ago

quit reading my blog GameDaily

sephiroths_revenge5845d ago

my n4g friend

isnt gamedaily the website that rated xbox360 the best console ever created in there top 10 best video game consoel list

rexor07175845d ago

I now give as much credibility to that site as Gamespot. lol, what a joke.

Show all comments (439)
100°

Mainline Grand Theft Auto trailers ranked from best to worst

As we have all been graced by the release of Grand Theft Auto 6's trailer, we're ranking the best and worst GTA trailers to date.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
purple101139d ago

We be getting these posts All week now lads. Someone noticed a number plate ... Someone noticed a billboard... I can see it now

Just go on YouTube and watch one of the many videos dissecting the whole 1minite 30secs worth.

This site supposed to be for news.

roadkillers139d ago

These updates on N4G are going to ruin whats rest of this site. Unfortunate since I was one of the first members.. The site shows unsecure when i login as well.

130°

Grand Theft Auto 4 Anniversary: The Beginning of the Age of RAGE

Grand Theft Auto 4 is an important game for Rockstar, not least because it was the first title in the franchise to use the newly created RAGE engine.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
franwex356d ago

Wasn’t the Table Tennis game the first to use RAGE?

isarai356d ago

Was about to say the same, but they do say first "in the franchise" so 🤷

cammers1995356d ago

The fact it hasnt been remastered is insane.

Abear21356d ago

Rage engine made driving on the sidewalk in cinematic slow motion camera a blast

290°

Fifteen Years On, 'Grand Theft Auto IV' Is Still the Series’ Best

There’s never a bad time to relive its magic, and with rumours of a potential Grand Theft Auto IV remaster making the rounds, why wouldn’t you?

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
Machina359d ago

The series' most overhyped and overrated (especially by critics) more like.

Number1TailzFan359d ago

Not sure tbh.. I'd say 3 was the most overrated. It's pretty rough to go back to, it was quite rough even trying it just after Vice City. Lack of humour and vehicles that had the weight of polystyrene with top speeds to match.

VC & the stories games (even LCS) were all fun. I remember there being a lot of praise for GTA 3 on TV and in game mags, saying it was a Dreamcast killer of a game or words to that effect, and honestly after playing it on PC I didn't think it was that special and kind of dull, had the odd moment of fun but hardly anything. I heard they cut online multiplayer at the last moment for PC, shame because it could've made all the difference.

Would've loved to have seen what kind of cartoony GTA style game they could've done on Dreamcast as a competitor, I bet something along the lines of Simpsons Hit & Run would've worked well.

BlackTar187358d ago

@numberz How can the game that defined a generation and was copied by everyone be overrated? Was a asinine comment

seanpitt23358d ago

For me 4 was better than 5 was more realistic and the physics was on another level! 5 was a major let down in that department!

Number1TailzFan358d ago

@blacktar you have your opinion i have mine. I found the game dull, and it is for the most part. It set the foundation for the much superior SA and VC however.

KwietStorm_BLM358d ago

You say GTA III is overrated because it's rough to go back to and rough to play after Vice City. Your entire opinion is in hindsight. Of course it's rough going back to it today. It came out over 20 years ago. That doesn't take away from the fact that it pioneered a lot and was a paradigm shift for a lot of trends in game development today. Vice City in a lot of ways is just a more refined version of III. It was San Andreas that took the big leap forward from a design perspective. If III doesn't release, who knows if the open world genre would be what it is now. How can that be overrated?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 358d ago
1nsomniac358d ago (Edited 358d ago )

Not at all. My most played game of all time. Truly stunning accomplishment in gaming and with PC graphics mods it just took it to levels beyond anything that came before and possibly even after.

People who moan about it generally tend to be people who played it on under powered consoles and couldn’t handle the more realistic car physics. It was the slightly more realistic approach that made it stand out more. Absolutely love it. In fact I always said Vice city was my favourite of all time. But after going back to the remaster I realised 4 was actually the best.

Profchaos358d ago (Edited 358d ago )

I'm no critic and I consider it the best games in the franchise after recently replaying every entry it's story when paired in conjunction with it's DLC was and still is amazing.

shinoff2183358d ago

Lol. Fun fact. That dlc cost a certain green colored console 50 million for exclusiveness. Un heard of back then. Just to point out the hypocrisy of the 3rd party exclusive agenda going on.

Anyway how the dlc better then the base game by a mile. Lol imo

DigitallyAfflicted357d ago

I've enjoyed gta4 the most from all the others too.

DarXyde358d ago

San Andreas holds a special place in my heart. Honestly, I couldn't get into IV at all. Didn't even finish it. I had some pride in playing it at first because I'm originally a New Yorker, but it just didn't do it for me.

To each their own.

shinoff2183358d ago (Edited 358d ago )

Gta sa for sure. To this day my favorite. My least fav is gta 4 easily. Gta 4 made me feel like the dude in next friday trying to take the cd back talking about i cant get jiggy wit this.

Maybe looking back it would be 3 but 3 did so damn much for gaming in general. . My first gta was of course the top downs so the series has came a long way.

notachance357d ago

Yeah I remembered falling asleep playing the last mission in GTA4.. the most boring protagonist (out of all the voiced protag), and the town is too small.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 357d ago
-Foxtrot359d ago

Not really

Overrated

Boring

Liberty City despite being a reimagined version for the HD era lacked any variety

Lacked the GTA fun charm overall

Niko was bland compared to past protagonists like Tommy, CJ or Victor

blackblades358d ago (Edited 358d ago )

GTA 2 was the best, lol my only owned GTA game. Vice city was alright when I rented it back then. I cant really say which is the best cause those the only 2 games i played but GTA 2 was fun on PC back in the day. Closes game to it that I enjoyed was SR3 and I dont care what people say. That none serious tone was fun enjoyable.

banger88359d ago

Like hell it is. San Andreas was far better, much more fun and a better game overall.

isarai359d ago

Nah, it's a masterpiece in attention to detail and the amount of immersive systems at play. But it really isn't very fun, ESPECIALLY when compared to the previous games in the series. Like tons of things are just wonky and actively kneecap lots of experimentation, or is just lame. Like why do I take huge damage when falling into water, why can I only stand in very specific large trucks when they are moving but not smaller trucks and vehicles, why is the melee combat such a massive down grade from GTA SA and GTA IV, why is the euphoria nowhere near as reactive, why is being drunk using a rasterized animation of staggering rather than the far more entertaining euphoria GTAIV and RDR used when you were drunk, why do npc vehicles barely react to you popping there tires even at high speed, etc etc.

I've always loved playing around in GTA games world. Like the campaigns are great but the majority of my time was always spent just playing in the open world. Yet GTAV is the only game in the series I never really returned to after beating it, it just lacks that fun factor the others have, I spent more time in GTA SA remastered than GTAV

chicken_in_the_corn358d ago

It's one of my least favourite GTA games. It's clunky, the ai is exploitable, it's far too long and the writing is absolutely awful.

Show all comments (60)