430°

NG2 and NGS2 textures compared; night and day

GZ: It looks like Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 and Ninja Gaiden 2 graphics are night and day.

We've already spotted quite a few differences between the Xbox 360's Ninja Gaiden 2 and the PlayStation 3's Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2.

The former features a sub-HD resolution of 1120 by 585, whereas the latter has had the development time (and Team Ninja's experience developing the first Ninja Gaiden Sigma) to bump that resolution up to the high-definition 1280 by 720.

There's also another obvious difference that some gamers are disappointed with. The PS3 game doesn't feature the gore that made the Xbox 360 version so visceral. Instead of blood squirting from disembodied enemies, Sigma 2 spurts out purple sparks.

And now we've found another difference.
Alternative Sources:
deep - contributor
Published: 76 days 3 hours ago | Screenshots | PlayStation 3 | Xbox 360
 
 

12Next »
Showing: 1 - 50 of 86 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
Delta - 76 days 3 hours ago
1 -
Sigma 2 looks better no doubt about it.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Lou-Cipher - 76 days 3 hours ago
1.1 -
The difference is quite significant in the PS3's favor.
Shut this user up Let user speak
MmaFanQc - 76 days 3 hours ago
1.2 - damn ...
the 360 version was a beta?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Cold 2000 - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.3 -
Yeah a beta that scored higher:
http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/o...

NGS2: http://uk.ps3.ign.com/objec...

Lucky I didnt wait one year and a half for Sigma.

Its clear the wait wasnt worth it (unless you're a whore for graphics, in that case yeah...maybe)
Shut this user up Let user speak
FlipMode - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.4 -
Since when did IGN become the last word? Ill wait for more people to review it. And most likely Sigma will score better.
Shut this user up Let user speak
ReviewsArePolitics - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.5 -
"whereas the latter has had the development time (and Team Ninja's experience developing the first Ninja Gaiden Sigma) to bump that resolution up to the high-definition 1280 by 720."

lol @ excuses, the 360 is an easy platform to develop for. Besides, according to Itagaki, Sigma was developed by their "B-team". Just admit what you don't want to admit.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Cold 2000 - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.6 - flipmode
Well all the other sites are paid by MS so I only take into account IGN and PS only magazines just like you guys :)
Shut this user up Let user speak
Statix - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.7 - @Cold 2000
Just graphics? Obviously, you didn't do your research (not surprising consider you're an Xbox fanboy), but aside from the drastic improvement in graphics (almost generational difference) there's also new weapons, enemies, characters, and an online cooperative mode.

I'm glad I didn't pay $60 for a beta test with last-gen graphics (360 version).
Shut this user up Let user speak
starvinbull - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.8 -
Having played and loved the recent PS3 demo it's obvious which version is better but it seriously has been built with gore in mind and to remove it does diminish from what would be a top tier action game otherwise.

Not a GOW3 beater but certainly not a million miles away from it.
Shut this user up Let user speak
ZombieAutopsy - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.9 - @cold
what does score matter, we all know it looks better, has more gameplay, and touched up the frame-rate and such...its obviously a better version you just seem butthurt my friend and you have no reason to be so just cut it out.
Shut this user up Let user speak
tatotiburon - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.10 -
a beta WITH GORE
Shut this user up Let user speak
Cold 2000 - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.11 - zombie autopsy
That doesnt justify a extra 16 month wait.

And yeah Im sooooooooo butthurt right now.../s
Shut this user up Let user speak
Tomonobu Itagaki - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.12 -
Hold on, why talking about beta? Yes, Sigma 2 improved compared to Ninja Gaiden 2, but whoever played Ninja Gaiden 2 wont feel playing a beta. In Ninja Gaiden 2, you have dozens environments with twice more boss which fills over 20 hours of intense gameplay, epic battles and high challenge.

It's much more than any other game in the genre, and everyone knows Ninja Gaiden series remains unbeatable in terms of gameplay. So far, not a single game could take Ninja Gaiden 2's crown. Xbox 360 owners have been glad to play an awesome game and PS3 owners benefited of a development year in order to increase that unique experience.

That's not like some kind of game that are half-baked and 5 hours long with a sequel announced 6 months after its release. I'm not targeting Left4Dead at all. But with this game, people should agree that compared to Left4Dead 2, gamers have been taken as beta testers. But Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2? It's only the prolongation of one of the best action game available on next gen consoles.
Shut this user up Let user speak
FlipMode - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.13 -
"And yeah Im sooooooooo butthurt right now..."

Yah you seem it
Shut this user up Let user speak
ZombieAutopsy - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.14 -
sad thing is the wait was proly due to some deal with MS since they published it, and what does a wait matter if a game was suppose to be an "exclusive" and no one was expecting it to come to ps3 anyways.

Butthurt troll you are indeed cold. XDF FOR LIFE!!!
Shut this user up Let user speak
ultimolu - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.15 -
I like how Cold 2000 tried to spin this into which game had the better score. Seriously, that's really pathetic.

Even more pathetic, he brings up a game that has NOTHING to do with the topic. I would hope you're being sarcastic for your own sake.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Cold 2000 - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.16 - @Statix
By the way how dat Ghostbusters BETA going ??
Shut this user up Let user speak
AclayPS3 - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.17 -
"a beta WITH GORE"

I honestly don't see how more Gore makes Ninja Gaiden 2 more special, because other than that, Sigma 2 is the better version in every aspect.

Sigma 2 may not have all the gore, but that's where God of War 3 steps in and fills that void.

"By the way how dat Ghostbusters BETA going ??"

LOL, when in doubt, the 360 guys turn to Multiplatform games, but we all know that most PS3 exclusives shine over Multiplats, so that argument is just a joke.
Shut this user up Let user speak
N4XBOXG - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.18 -
you know someone is butthurt when they have to talk about a kids game like ghostbusters.
Shut this user up Let user speak
mastiffchild - 76 days 2 hours ago
1.19 -
Oh Cold you are daft sometimes. I bought the 360 game and the camera was awful and now I'm also thankful the gore's been turned down as well as the camera fixed!

I know some have made a big deal of it but, honestly, combined with the camera it made seeing exactly what was going on a mightmare at some points in NG2. I'm buying NGS2 purely because of those two points which, nearly, imo, made the 360 game a bit too much of a pain(and I'm a series fan!)-the extras on top are just an added bonus.

The lower review scores baffle me. The core gameplay hasn't altered, the camera's fixed and the game looks a lot better with no slowdown now either as well as the texture and res bump. All we can possibly assume is it's being marked dwn because the reviewers are ovsessed with gore! Seriously, even if you love blood and guts that's the only way in which you could say NG2 is the better game and , for me, everything else is more important(even if I'm pretending I liked the gore!).

Otherwise the games better all round and al I can think is it's marked down because they feel TN should have done even more-which still isn't fair when it's true that given both games for free you'd be daft to choose NG2 over Sigma. It's a lot better for the added polish and fixes and gore addicts apart it shouldn't even be an issue.

That said I do feel it's wronmg of KT not to patch the samera fix in for 360 only gamers. Extras for waiting a year is, imo, fair enough but when it's a tech issue that nearly wrecked the original game they REALLY should give it to all their customers, shouldn't they?

Anyway, Cold fella, if you're happy then that's fine but why pi55 on someone elses chips for no good reason. You're better than that mate.
1.20 Statix | 76 days 2 hours ago - deleted by mod -
Shut this user up Let user speak
Brutallyhonest - 76 days 1 hour ago
1.21 - @1.3 "Its clear the wait wasnt worth it (unless you're a whore for graphics, in that case yeah...maybe) "
Sigma 2 has more to offer then just better graphics and you know it.
You are not kidding anyone including yourself.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Omega Archetype - 76 days 1 hour ago
1.22 -
I guess that Cold guy doesn't realize that this is a different IGN team reviewing it. It's not the same guy, and both have different views on the game entirely.

I wonder what the score would be should the review come from the same exact person. I mean, there's absolutely no reason that NGS2 would not be better then NG2 considering the better resolution, visuals, content, online co-op with the exact same gameplay and extra characters. Even the lack of blood wouldn't take away from NGS2 being a better game.

It just doesn't seem logical to me, but because it's a different reviewer, it makes sense that one guys would maybe feel that the game isn't as good as the other feels it is. That's called a difference of opinion and everyone has one, yet not all are the same.
Shut this user up Let user speak
solidjun5 - 76 days 1 hour ago
1.23 - "And yeah Im sooooooooo butthurt right now.../s "
oh cold, you 360 fanboy, you do sound butthurt right now.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Chubear - 76 days ago
1.24 - @ OP
Apparently, not to IGN it doesn't lol
Shut this user up Let user speak
evrfighter - 76 days ago
1.25 -
I played the demo on my ps3...

Was a waste of bandwidth and my time -_-
Shut this user up Let user speak
Brutallyhonest - 76 days ago
1.26 - @1.25 "Was a waste of bandwidth and my time"
^irony
Shut this user up Let user speak
callahan09 - 75 days 23 hours ago
1.27 -
From the article: "There's also another obvious difference that some gamers are disappointed with. The PS3 game doesn't feature the gore that made the Xbox 360 version so visceral. Instead of blood squirting from disembodied enemies, Sigma 2 spurts out purple sparks."

I played the demo on PS3 and the full version on 360, and I don't even notice the difference in gore. The camera moves around so much during the action, for close-up shots, etc., and there's so much quick movement going on at a time, and so many enemies on screen, that I never even notice the extra blood on the 360 version. And on both versions, after each battle the whole area is strewn with torn limbs and blood splatters. The aftermath of a fight looks identical on both platforms, equally bloody and gory in terms of what's left lying on the ground. Not even worth mentioning the blood in either game, they're both very gory.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Reibooi - 75 days 23 hours ago
1.28 -
The funny thing is when I played the Original NG2 I thought it looked great but WOW the PS3 version looks incredible. It really is night and day.

I would also like to say that I don't mind the lack of insane amounts of blood. I mean it doesn't really change the way the game plays or anything.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Ju - 75 days 21 hours ago
1.29 -
That's quite hilarious how Sigma 2 gets talked down in the press and even here. The new version is quite an achievement and like some said, from a technical perspective this almost like a different generation to the first one. But we are still arguing about every crappy pixel in MP games, and yet this game is testament of a major improvement. Maybe its just the one year, but its so much more then just brushed up textures. Never seen comparison shots which are more obvious then this - and we are still arguing. Really hilarious. Well, and BTW, the demo on my machine runs crystal clear 1080. No idea if its upscaled, but it certainly is not blurry.
Shut this user up Let user speak
IaMs12 - 75 days 5 hours ago
1.30 -
Common Freaking sense people! Why are we comparing them then? The PS3 version is suppose to have better textures, im sure if the 360 version came out a year or so later as well it would be better looking.
2 Pootangpie | 76 days 2 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
Foliage - 76 days 2 hours ago
2.1 -
Even if you somehow missed the better lighting, shadows, and bump mapping... How can you miss the fact that they are completely different textures?

You bots really do see only what you want to. Every time your 360 goes in for repair does your brain turn off until it comes back? I mean... how far does this delusion go?
Shut this user up Let user speak
starvinbull - 76 days 1 hour ago
2.2 - @pootangpie
Completely different textures! Do your eyes not see them?
Shut this user up Let user speak
ninjagoat - 76 days 2 hours ago
3 -
sigma hands down
Shut this user up Let user speak
DJ - 76 days 2 hours ago
4 - We've seen this happen a lot.
PS3 games just have higher resolution textures. You can thank Blu-ray for that, as well as Cell. Dice likes Cell because it processes high-rez textures a lot faster than the 360's CPU.
Shut this user up Let user speak
deep - 76 days 2 hours ago
4.1 -
What about COD4?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Captain Tuttle - 76 days 1 hour ago
4.2 - We have seen it alot...
16 months more development time tends to make a better looking, smoother playing game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Evocation - 76 days ago
4.3 -
That is wrong on so many levels. :(
Shut this user up Let user speak
Elven6 - 75 days 22 hours ago
4.4 -
Using your logic every PS3 game should be 1080p or at least HD (720p), storage space plays a minimal role for HD gaming in the grand scheme of things, it all depends on your engine. What could are 1080p textures on your disc if your engine slows to a crawl trying to process them?

Regarding Ninja Gaiden 2, it was clear weeks before launch when Itagaki left that the game would have had issues, hell he was public about essentially leaving the game in an alpha phase before he and his team left.

Sigma 2 on the other hand benefits from a longer more uninterrupted development schedule.
Shut this user up Let user speak
OpenGL - 75 days 22 hours ago
4.5 -
Storage Space has absolutely nothing to do with the rendering resolution.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Sarcasm - 75 days 19 hours ago
4.6 -
"16 months more development time tends to make a better looking, smoother playing game. "

How exactly is it 16 months "MORE" development time? It's not like they've been working on it for 2 years and then another so called 16 months. They made the game in 16 months.

The basic core of the game like the story is probably the only thing they've really ported. But if you look at the screenshots, they re-did EVERYTHING. Textures, character models, lighting, resolution, new modes, new characters etc.

People stop trying to spin this because it's superior in all forms (except gore but that's subjective)
Shut this user up Let user speak
bpmurr - 76 days 2 hours ago
5 -
If you are going to do a comparison then do it with the same areas during the same time of day. I will say that Sigma look better but given the extra development time I would hope so.
Shut this user up Let user speak
deep - 76 days 2 hours ago
5.1 -
I don't think it matters though in this context...you can see the textures very clearly.

Be nice if they could add higher resolution images though.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Tomonobu Itagaki - 76 days 2 hours ago
5.2 -
Yes, lightings influence much on a texture perception, but this time, it's not a matter of lighting.
Shut this user up Let user speak
starvinbull - 76 days ago
5.3 -
"given the extra development time I would expect it to look better".

No sorry you're wrong. It didn't have "extra development time" it was developed over a period of no more than 18 months though probably several less months.

The reason TN were able to make NGS2 for the PS3 is because they rebuilt most of it for the PS3. The fact that the animations, character design, level designand FMV were possibly recycled doesn't take away from the fact yes NGS2 is a new game albeit very, very similar. New textures, characters, new environments, story elements, weapons, new framerate and new lighting.

They weren't starting from a completed NG2 with only the extra content to create. That would imply that almost all the content was recycled.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Foxgod - 76 days 2 hours ago
6 -
Yes, the ps3 textures are better.
And the 360 got the better gameplay.

Those who find the textures more important, get the ps3 version.
All the rest already played the game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
deep - 76 days 2 hours ago
6.1 -
Uh...why is the gameplay better in NG2? They're the same - except NGS2 has a better camera and framerate.
Shut this user up Let user speak
FlipMode - 76 days 2 hours ago
6.2 -
Don't pay attention to him deep, He's clearly on hard damage control.
Shut this user up Let user speak
AclayPS3 - 76 days 2 hours ago
6.3 -
The 360 version has the better gameplay?

Both of them have the exact same gameplay. The biggest difference is that Ninja Gaiden 2 has more Gore than Sigma 2, but more Gore doesn't make the gameplay better.

The PS3 version has the exact same gameplay, has better graphics, and has an Online Mode, it's the definitive version.
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News