AoC 360 Version "Still Being Worked On"

Syronicus - 134 days 11 hours ago

Let's be real here. This game is never coming out for our 360's. What will it take to make people realize that this game is vaporware? Maybe they need to name it" Age of Conan: Forever" just to give us all another hint?

Agree(3) | Disagree(8) | Report

phosphor112 - 134 days 11 hours ago

I thought AoC was slightly disappointing. Maybe I wasn't playing the game "right" or something, but I found more fun going back to my high lvl raids in WoW. Atleast its not like StarWars Galaxy...hey ...I'll be an ENTERTAINER...wtf?...anyway. AoC is a good game, just doesn't suit my fancy.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Leord - 134 days 13 hours ago

some games are worth paying for...

Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report

Pennywise - 134 days 13 hours ago

Leord, agreed... but AoC is not one of those games worth paying for.

Agree(7) | Disagree(6) | Report

PLAYSTATIONGENRATION - 134 days 11 hours ago

is WOW its not worth the price tag...the current price of MMO monthly is crazy..

Agree(2) | Disagree(4) | Report

Maticus - 133 days 15 hours ago

Crazy price? 30p a day to play WoW - that's nothing. 30p for potentially hours of gameplay, I don't know what people complain about.

I'd actually pay more. Not that I'd like it, but I would.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Elven6 - 134 days 12 hours ago

Age of Conan was successful at launch like many MMO's, it started to fade afterwards but is now apparently on the rise again. The problem is the XBL infrastructure among other things, it needs tweaking to work with MMOs and now apparently Microsoft has a deal on the table.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Murderdolls - 134 days 7 hours ago

You pay monthly because MMOs are constantly being updated.

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

outlawlife - 134 days 5 hours ago

doesn't matter how much you update the same derivative formula it isn't worth it in my eyes

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

free2game365 - 134 days 4 hours ago

These games are expensive to maintain, if you don't want to pay for them, don't play them. Also Age Of Conan did many new things with combat in MMOs. It seems to me you just don't like these styles of games, but when it comes down to it, most people who play MMOs pay monthly fees for them so obviously $15 a month isn't a big deal to most people.

Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report

Chaos Striker - 134 days 3 hours ago

There also exists the Guild Wars model though, and so far it has seemingly worked. I am more favorable towards this model: pay a one time price when you first buy it (i.e. $50) and for each expansion you pay $50 as what has been the case for Guild War's expansions. Then, they conduct a few micro-transactions. This way, you can leave the game and come back anytime without having to deal with the monthly subscription hassle. Minor and major updates are also free. I don't know why more developers are not utilizing this model. It seems to integrate the best aspects of the different payment models and provide a game that has lasting appeal.

Also, this type of model would work perfectly with consoles given the one time fee and micro-transactions.

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

free2game365 - 134 days 4 hours ago

I don't think you realize this, but Funcom doesn't publish WoW or The Old Republic

Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report