Dude, R2 absolutely sucked. Resistance Fall of Man was great (i played it straight for over 16 months) but R2 is crap. The story short, poor quality and extremely disconnected. If they even make an R3, they should bring back the narrator as they had in R1. You are 100% correct though that they need to bring back the old rfom weapons and do away with the crap R2 weapons...the splicer? wraith? and Marksman? Are you kidding me? Those weapons are all crap and rip offs from other games anyway. IG WAS known for unique weapons with rfom but with R2 they sucked it up bad. THe only good additions of weapons in R2 is the updated Auger for sure and perhaps the Phoenix...but even that is kind of wack. For R3 they need to have a solid single player campaign (which they did not have in R2), dont worry about the total numbers in adversarial multiplayer. 60 is already too much. DO NOT GO ANY HIGHER. Instead, lower the number and increase the graphical quality of the character models in multiplayer because the R2 online models suck....bad. I WAS a huge IG fan but after R2 Im extremely skeptical about anything they put out. R2 imo was a complete waste of 60 bucks. Oh yeah, one more thing, TAKE YOUR TIME ON R3. Who gives a sh!t if you crank out 2 or 3 games a year if they are crap games. R2 should have been in development for at least another 6 months.
Ok, one more thing, I promise, DITCH THE 2 WEAPON SYSTEM! Its generic and a terrible change in R2. Bring back the weapon wheel and weapon spawns on the map.
View