It just really sucks when certain websites clearly show biased views against anything of their opposite preference of console especially the PS3. There's so many stupid and ridiculous statements that have been made by numerous websites whether its a blog or so-called professional reviewers. So I wont go back into the history of this nonsense, but I will talk about the present.
I happened to take part in the Killzone 2 multiplayer beta and I must say that this game is truly amazing on all fronts. It's pretty hard for games to impress me nowadays but this game truly did. The graphics are stunning, but its not about the graphics to me, its about game play which also happens to be on par with the graphics in a sense of the "wow" factor. From the guns to movement, the game has added true realism which sets this game apart from any fps. This is not a preview so I will keep this information in general. Let me just say, Killzone 2 is game that Sony can finally say is on the lvl or if not higher than a Gears of War in a sense of greatness as a whole. Its that GOOD, matter of fact its that GREAT. Killzone 2 is one of those games when you pick up and play, there's just nothing really bad you can say about it, basically you would say its a definite AAA title rather it's your cup of tea or not.
Well in the latest Gamespot hands-on or the "fat guy" in the 1up show, if you would have never played the beta you would think this game is just average with pretty graphics. Gamespot said "environments are static with no movable objects" in the mp beta hands-on, well anybody who's in the beta can tell you that was just a flat out LIE. Just about everything is movable, so I don't get why Gamespot made that statement. The "fat guy" in 1up's latest show criticized Killzone 2 for having realistic controls with realistic guns, lol. In opposition, read IGN's latest hands-on. They are praising Killzone 2 on every single angle but if you compare Gamespot and IGN's previews, you would think they are commenting on two different games.. Is this a sign come Feb. 2009? Anybody who's in the beta can tell you definitely that Killzone 2 is the next big thing but some of these websites are going to try to shoot down Sony's upcoming AAA title. Killzone 2 isn't a game that can go both ways with views, this game is no doubt a great game. Some may ask, why our views cant go both ways? What I mean by this is the general concessus for KZ2 should be very positive in a unbiased world. Reviewers have the right to critique KZ however they want, but don't lie about it. I welcome cold hard facts that are positive and negative about the game but so far the negative has been nothing but lies. Some of these reviewers do not want Sony to have their own "Halo" title. Come February 2009, we will clearly see who's bias against Sony and who's not. Rest assure, somebody will try to shoot down Killzone 2, its bound to happen and that's just sad.
As of right now, there are no monopolies in the games industry, and for the sake of the medium as a whole, they never should either.
A voice actor from The Coalition's third-person shooter series, Gears of War, has hinted at a new game announcement coming in June.
While many are fans of the Honkai Star Rail story so far, The Nerd Stash believes that the deaths of Robin and Firefly no longer carry much weight.
So let me get this straight. If people don't like the game and don't give it a 10/10 review, then they are biased against the PS3 and they want it to fail? LMFAO!
"Killzone 2 isn't a game that can go both ways with views, this game is no doubt a great game." Reviews are, by definition, an OPINION. Some people won't like the style of this game, but that doesn't mean they are biased against anything. They just don't enjoy the game as much as someone else. That's their right as a reviewer.
I'm in the beta too. The graphics are amazing, however I don't think the online ranks up there with a CoD4, Resistance 2, or Halo 3. Does that make me biased and do I want to this game and PS3 to fail? Hell no. Your logic in this blog is very fanboyish.
There is little doubt that fanboyism, on both sides, has infiltrated the reviewer arena. It is especially sad when reviewers forgo providing an honest review in order to promote one console by bashing another’s consoles game regardless of the games merits. I own both systems and like to play both. Sure I have a favorite system but I try not to let that bias my decision when referring a game to friends.
So you heard it here first folks! If you don't like KZ2 you are automatically biased! =)
I think you misunderstood what he tried tod say. If I'm not wrong he says that he has no problem if there are negative reviews or comments on certain points of the game, but what 'angers' him is to see that some website are making negative comments on things that are not true (like the static thing). I don't think he meant that all reviews should be positive, but that if they put some negative in it that it should at least be factual and true. Well that's what i understood from his post (I did not say it was my view, but I'm 'defending' him, because some are immediatly on the offensive against him for no reason, and I found I had to 'counterbalance' things here lol).
Peace :)
The problem isn't in recognizing a problem with a ps3 exclusive. The problem is heavily scrutinizing a ps3 exclusive while other games get a free pass. An example being killzone 2. The main criticism this game has been getting is for being generic, as in not doing anything new. If this detracts from the score than the same should be applied to other games that don't do anything new. The point is being fair and giving credit where it is do despite console preference. In the end a good game is a good game no matter if it's on the wii, 360 or ps3.