Interesting. I guess the real question should be what defines a sequel?
More of the same, an expansion of the same. I can see why the writer drew parallels to Street Fighter, because a sequel in that sense is just 'more' with a few improvements here and there. (And on the subject of rubbish sequels American Psycho 2 - has to be worst sequels of sequels).
I guess in this day and age, is it really fair to sell something like new, if you haven't really developed any thing new?
Would Terminator 2 be as cool, if they just continued where the first left off, but video edited the original to make a second movie? (maybe some CGI for some different locations)
View
