It appears to me that the advent of the internet has led to the decline of the Professional Journalist and Reviewers. While in past ages. We, the consumer, can rely on a review of any product. Reviewers, then, seemed to have a certain standard which to review any product. Based upon quality, Enjoyment, Depth, and the competition. what has come before and what is expected.
With the internet, as many people have said in the beginning, this is quickly crumbling. More and more reviews are opinions. Yes they have always been opinions, but opinions based upon a standard, not solely on what just one person rights. This is the reason for the wide variety in reviews, as well as constant 10s/5s/100%.
When was the last time in a 12 month period has so many games been awarded this review.
This 7/10 for haze is mind-bogging. The reviewer rips it up, then goes and gives it a 7/10 worth the rush. the best thing going for it from what I can tell is that it runs at 30fps and the multi-player. In this day and age a FPS must have a great story or Great multi-player, if not both to suceed. HALOs CODs or Bioshock.
Everything else this game is adequate. the graphics are decent. the storyline and dialogue are laughable moments.
Perhaps the reviewer loves FPS, I do not. I can name a few I like. Bioshock, GoldenEye, Halo, FEAR, COD4. But that, therein lies the problem, personal preference is taking the front seat too much, objective reviews are being put on the back burner.
Based on this review I would give it 6. not Terrible just almost average. But then there comes in personal prefence and make it a 7.
It all reminds me of an EMINEM song, rapping against source. 5 mics you were a classic, Nas biggie. now anything less than 3.5 your a POS. With so much "5 Mics" in the videogame world, is it the Games that are great, or the reviewers and politics behind the reviewing system that is flawed...?
View