the conspiracy theories people on N4G come up with about review scores from certain websites, some are absolutely hilarious.
From what I've gathered over the past week or so; if a Microsoft game gets a good review score it instantly means that Microsoft has paid for that score however if a Sony game gets a good score it instantly means that it's genuinely the best thing since sliced bread and that website is now credible because of it. I'd like to see the 'fanboys' reaction if Eurogamer and EDGE gave Uncharted 2 10's, would that then mean the sites are in the good books again until the next Microsoft exclusive?
Has anyone hear ever actually thought about just because the game is using an old engine and doesn't do anything new, it is still a good game? It is possible y'know, if the things which are in the game are incredibly well done, it deserves a good score. Killzone 2 got a good score and that did nothing new but just looked incredible yet it still got good scores.
Also, might I add before the 'fanboys' come out in force, I'm not specifically talking about ODST, just an in general thing.
View