This conference was the biggest "F' YOU!" to the "hardcore" crowd I could have ever imagined.
I owned every Nintendo console, the NES, the SNES, the N64 and I even endured the GameCube. What do these have in common with each other? It was about the games, games that would mark themselves as milestones of gaming history. Super Mario Bros., Zelda, Metroid - those are the games that made Nintendo what it is today, that revived the almost dead gaming market back then.
I understand their crusade for the "casual" market, it is probably the biggest market and therefor means sh'tloads of money. But I want to quote my father, who himself is not a passionate gamer, but he still enjoys them from time to time: "Isn't there a new Mario game for the DS?"
Super Mario 64 DS - a rehash, a good game, but not original. Basically, a benchmark to show the hardware (i.e. upgraded portable N64).
NEW Super Mario Bros. - based on the NES original. Good game, but it lacks a successor.
Remember back to the NES: 3 SMB games.
Remember back to the SNES: SMW and SMW2
How many Mario titles did the consoles after that have? SM64 and SMS.
I pray the Wii will have more Mario titles than just SMG (which I personally didn't like).
We didn't even have a new Zelda game on the Wii (TP is a GC port)...
What does Nintendo focus on? Brain Age. Cooking Navi. Wii Series. They churn out new IP after new IP, alienating the DS from what it was originally thought to be - a GAMING handheld. Same with the Wii (Wii Fit? How does that qualify as a game?)
Yeah, the Zelda and Mario guys are hard at work as Miyamoto said - but I hope they actually work on games and not on "Wii Clean The House".
Nintendo, thanks for all the wonderful years and the magnificient games, but you are losing me, more and more day by day.
View