Send PM | Track
JoelR
 
Role: Contributor
Score: 12330
CRank: (5)
Bubbles: (8)
Tracked by: 2 users
Ignored by: 7 users
Gender: -
Location: North America
Website:
 
 
 
Absolute Standards VS Relative Standards in Ratings
17 days 4 hours ago | by: JoelR
The following is personal opinion - you may not agree


I hate this crap about ratings in games.
With the new ratings winner being GTA IV it shows why I hate it... 

    GTA is given a "perfect" score and yet the game is not perfect.
Why? Well because it feels right or "they give games 10 that push the boundaries and revolutionize the industry".
    A feeling does not determine what is perfect.Perfection does.
Honestly as a developer it pisses me off more than a little
If a game is not ranked against an absolute standard - what are we
developing towards than?  
    Viewpoint? A moving target if there ever was one.
    Absolutes are things that can be aimed at...
feelings are much harder - every developer aims to create a good time
and many aim at technical as well as story perfection. 
    No score should ever be perfect as long as a single flaw is detected ever. I know this is an impossibility but it is a goal. 
GTA deserves a high score! but a perfect one? no.



You ask my personal feelings on how ratings should be done?
  1. it should take into account technical excellence
  2. it should take into account editorial excellence
  3. it should take into account gameplay excellence

using a number rating system is bad as it implies that there are "perfect scores" possible so maybe a more neutral ratings system like
abominable bad mediocre good excellent
it doesn't imply perfection but it does say that something is done in a manner that excels over the competition.



If you really want to use a numeric system  it should be based on absolutes and not on feelings and thus you should assign a number points to each section
2.5 to technical
2.5 to direction
5 to gameplay
______________
10 total

then you can deduct in areas where a game is flawed... and I would never expect higher then 9.9 as a perfect 10 again implies perfection.
    Finally I question the motives and the ethical behaviour of most reviewers and of their companies....
    If my company invited every journalist multiples of times to dances and dinners
and paid 80% of their normal yearly income to the companies that are reviewing my product I would be surprised if they didn't give me 100% ratings... that of course would not mean I deserve them, just that I bought em.

<< Back to JoelR's Blog - Comments(8)


 
| Info | Report
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News