That article didn't state anything that we didn't already know. The only fresh content came from a Sony enthusiast who has nothing better to do but kick up flame wars with his silly posts. I mean look at this gold:
"So where in that e-mail does it say “Bioshock is not coming to PS3″? All the e-mail states is that 2k have not announced it for the PS3….. YET."
Where in the email does it state Bioshock IS coming to the PS3 in that case? So we can conclude that 2K have not confirmed or denied a Bioshock port, incredible detective work.
"As you can see “PS3″ is listed after the comma. They denied it by saying the code is very early, but just goes to show it was in fact being coded on/for PS3, but was haulted due to a contract/deal with MS for it to be exclusive."
Yes, this is old and 2K have said that the initial plan was to make the game multi-platform before Microsoft made the deal, so how does this help his argument exactly? We already KNEW it was at one point being developed for the PS3 alongside the 360, but does anyone know how far it was into development before 2K focussed exclusively on the 360 version? No, they don't.
Maybe I'm being a little harsh, but rumours are exactly that - rumours.
View