Some comments...
IGN
graphics 9.0
gameplay 9.0
Everyone else is going to give 10's so let's give it a 9.5 Overall (?????). Also the site that gave HS's graphics a 9.0 and halo's 3 graphics also a 9.0 must have blind reviewers...
That about sums it up for all sites
For every site that gave it a 10/10:
10/10 is a perfect score, the game must have the greatest graphics, the greatest gameplay, everything must be perfect. It seems to me that 8/10 reviews. in terms of graphics described the game simply ok and good. How it is that the same game sites gave it a 10/10? Give it a 9/10, I'll understand it, even give it a 9.5/10 but when you're saying that the graphics are just ok how can you give it a 10/10? I think that game sites, in the majority american ones are simply afraid that if they
talk down Halo 3 they'll loose readers and they simply cannot afford it. Most of these sites also gave Halo 2 a perfect score later to admit that the game didn't deserve it a all. Most of them will also say the same again in a year or 2...
Gears is far more greater than Halo 3 will ever be IMO
Only Kotaku had some balls to call it like it is, probably the best review out there...
View