Screenshot Comparison: Uncharted 2 vs. Crysis

DasBunker - 72 days 3 hours ago

uncharted 2 looks amazing.. but c' mon we all know PCs are more powerful.. why dont you try to compare it to other consoles games?!.. oh wait..

Agree(33) | Disagree(6) | Report

fishd - 72 days 2 hours ago

Very different style,One aim for photorealism the other one aim for a vibrant,cartoony look

Agree(18) | Disagree(1) | Report

Panthers - 72 days 2 hours ago

SOME PCs are more powerful. I know my PC would not be able to run Crysis at that level, or UC2 for that matter.

Agree(8) | Disagree(1) | Report

JsonHenry - 72 days 2 hours ago

This is not really a fair comparison. But I gotta say that UC2 looks fantastic regardless of whether or not Crysis looks better or not.

Agree(9) | Disagree(0) | Report

marinelife9 - 72 days 2 hours ago

When PS3 games come out they get compared to Crysis or real life.

When Wii games come out they get compared to 360 games.

Agree(31) | Disagree(5) | Report

TK421 - 72 days 2 hours ago

The animations make Uncharted look so good.

Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report

Elaine Benes - 72 days 1 hour ago

This is past "stupidity", its now bordering "pathetic", and closing in on "desperate".

Agree(6) | Disagree(1) | Report

Consoldtobots - 72 days 1 hour ago

honestly the only thing Crysis has over UC2 is resolution, texture sizes and memory. That being said IMO UC2 is light years beyond Crysis in what it actually accomplishes on screen. Crysis is for spec whores UC2 is for gamers.

Agree(16) | Disagree(17) | Report

stevenhiggster - 72 days 1 hour ago

This is a bit stupid, they are both games with guns in them. Thats where the similarity ends.
Why don't they compare it to what Crysis would look like running on a PC that cost £250 ? And lets see what kinda frame rate they get too.

Agree(9) | Disagree(4) | Report

Strikepackage Bravo - 72 days 1 hour ago

now I have heard plenty of you PS3 fans claim PS3 has the best graphics in gaming, period, I think even IGN or Gametrailers claimed some crap like that once.

You guys also claimed the Cell is FAR more powerful than any measly intel or AMD chip. But now that we see side by side screens of Crysis making Uncharted look like a PS2 game, you claim this is not fair to compare??? What gives guys?

Agree(5) | Disagree(31) | Report

stevenhiggster - 72 days 1 hour ago

Behave yourself Strike.
Look at the resolution the guy claims to have taken those screens at. Even a muppet knows they are purely pretty screen grabs. I don't imagine there are many PC's that could actually run the game at that resolution. Certainly not with anything like a playable frame rate. And anyway, Crysis is the ONLY game on any platform that looks better than any PS3 exclusive.

Agree(9) | Disagree(4) | Report

ia_studio - 71 days 23 hours ago

Where did they get this 1080p screens of uncharted?

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

thewhoopimen - 71 days 22 hours ago

I was about to remark the exact same thing. I'm sure it behooves many a fanboy that the only titles pushing the graphics envelopes these days come from the humble console lol. Frankly I find the people harping crysis amusing. Is there anything else?

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

PROFIT - 71 days 22 hours ago

que "empire strikes back" melody

anyways, consoles and pc's each have their games.

I, personally couldnt live without either.

@1.10: well, by your way of thinking...that certainly makes the 360 look like ps1.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Tachyon_Nova - 71 days 22 hours ago

Uncharted 2 is probably the best looking PS3, make that console, game to date. Killzone 2 has better quality almost across the board, but UC2 looks better.

But don't compare it to Crysis, it's an unfair comparison, nothing on the PS3, not even CryEngine 3 games will be comparable to Crysis. Even if they do manage to come close to Crysis, by then Crysis 2 will be out, and will set the bar even further out of reach. This isn't an attack on the PS3, it's a very powerful piece of machinery, particularly given its price. But it's just stupid to compare console games to PC games, although the price difference between a gihe-end PC + 1080p monitor and a PS3 + 720 TV isn't really as large as people think.

@ piroh: Are you really trying to tell me that only hardcore PC fans can tell the difference between Crysis and UC2? Get real.

@ People saying UC2 is second best lookign game period: I disagree. Far Cry 2 looks pretty poor on consoles, but it is better on PC than UC2.

Agree(4) | Disagree(3) | Report

Syronicus - 71 days 13 hours ago

I would like you to dig deep and find us all a few quotes from anybody here that ever said such things. Then, I will point at those quotes and call whoever they came from a stupid fanboy. Those allegations are false and you know it. Only an idiot would say those things and only a troll would make them up. So which is it?

Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report

SaiyanFury - 71 days 13 hours ago

They're two completely different games on 2 completely different platforms. I can run Crysis on near highest settings in 1680x1050 with 4x AA and it runs no less than 50 FPS. Comparing a game like Uncharted 2 that was developed on a closed hardware architecture shouldn't be compared to a game that can run on open hardware that is PC-based. Crysis runs and looks great on my PC. Uncharted 2 looks great and runs great on the PS3. Different systems, different games. The two shouldn't be compared.

Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report

jack_burt0n - 71 days 3 hours ago

9800GTX+oc sli owner bought cheap, I can get crysis running pretty good.

But I still see this and am floored at its AAA quality, and even in the beta the presentation leaves crysis flapping about like a screaming korean soldier :)

http://www.gametrailers.com...

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

menoyou - 71 days 3 hours ago

Crysis might have more polygons, but that's about where its claim to fame ends. Killzone 2 and Uncharted 2 both have better art direction, animation, gameplay, sound, etc. And honestly, if you knew anything about developing games you would know that creating a graphically intensive game like Crysis is actually easier than optimizing for current hardware.

When people bring up how great Crysis is, it just shows their ignorance as anyone with just a little bit of knowledge understands that its a poorly developed game.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

2Spock - 71 days 3 hours ago

People can say Crysis looks better all day long. But the fact of the matter is Uncharted 2 blows the doors of Crysis far as gameplay and features.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

danfry - 71 days 2 hours ago

This is Crysis running with its settings fully maxed out, running at least 1920x1200 res. Sure it looks nice as a screen shot, but I bet it would be unplayable - probably running at about 8 or 12 frames per second.

I have a decent PC running a Core i7 processor with 6 Gigs of triple channel ram with 2 ATI Radeon 4870 graphics cards in Crossfire and I still can't run Crysis at these settings - sure I can have almost everything on high settings but only at a max of 1280x960 resolution.

So unless you have about £1800 worh of PC rig, you will not be able to play Crysis looking like the screen shots in this article. Pound for Pound the PS3 kicks the PC's ass.

You may have £1800 knocking around to buy a super PC rig, but for what - only a handfull of games that have been released over the last few years - Uncharted 2 FTW

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

madpuppy - 70 days 21 hours ago

To be honest, Crysis is a great looking game, if you want to be fair, run crysis on 500megs of ram and nvidia 7 series video card ( the ps3 nvidia equivalent)

Uncharted, I feel holds it’s own with less than half the hardware specs, and the cell picking up the slack.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Jack Pyro - 72 days 1 hour ago

most of the fanboyism you'll find on here, most PS3 gamers are good dudes, and as a gamer period, I've always had respect for PC gaming, because lets face it, it truly is the superior platform.

That being said, Uncharted 2 looks bloody amazing, but it looks bloody amazing in a different way from Crysis, I would like to say that their both graphical powerhouses that look and play amazing...so I will!

Agree(5) | Disagree(0) | Report

stevenhiggster - 72 days 1 hour ago

Also you tend find that like my self, a lot of PS3 gamers are also PC gamers.
It's the only 2 platforms you need for gaming heaven ;-)

Agree(6) | Disagree(1) | Report

Kenshinhimurasz - 72 days ago

Agree PC game look amazing compared to ps2/n64 game back in the days, that where i expanded my gaming experience with game like CS, WC3, Star Craft, Diablo, HalfLife, Sims. We all know that PC are powerful with game like Crysis. I haven't played it yet because my computer can handle it, but i can tell that it look better. When comparing UC2 to other games on ps3/x360 nothing matches it. Back to UC2 demo

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

MegaPowa - 71 days 3 hours ago

The problem is ps3 owners can't respect wii and 360 owners which is just sad...

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Elaine Benes - 72 days 1 hour ago

...yeah thats hott...

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

TheRedTerror - 72 days 1 hour ago

want to make out with an alien that eats people...its an experience you'll never regret...lol

ontopic though, the games look great and play great...the end

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

ambientFLIER - 71 days 23 hours ago

because I love you

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

Fishy Fingers - 72 days 2 hours ago

Indeed, just being compared to Crysis is surely a honour for any console game.

Although I will say, Uncharted looks like that for everyone, while Crysis on the other hand is only achievable to that degree on very few peoples rigs.

Agree(9) | Disagree(0) | Report

house - 71 days 17 hours ago

i agree i myself love star craft and avp gaming heaven

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Fishy Fingers - 72 days 2 hours ago

The advantage of unified hardware for a developer.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Consoldtobots - 72 days 1 hour ago

fail

it was BASED on the 7800 chipset, Sony had nvidia make some serious modifications to it. Stuff that neither will reveal to this day.
Add that to the fact that you can split the rendering pipeline between the RSX and SPUs we can't actually compare it to pc GPUs. It is MUCH more advanced than anything seen on PC even to this day.

Agree(2) | Disagree(5) | Report

Fishy Fingers - 72 days 1 hour ago

"It is MUCH more advanced than anything seen on PC even to this day."

Ummm.... no its not. PS3 is a powerful piece of tech, but let's not get carried away.

Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report

FantasyStar - 72 days 1 hour ago

You mean "unified" as in "only one set of hardware to work with?", or "unified" as in "steamlined architecture bounded by shared ram, mem controller, data controller"

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

Fishy Fingers - 72 days 1 hour ago

Unified, meaning the developers know exactly what hardware their game/engine will run on, allowing them to concentrate and squeeze out as much from that hardware as possible. As apposeed to PC where they have to cater to countless CPUs, GPUs, operating systems etc, configurations.

Case in point, if we all ran exactly the same spec PCs, we'd get better results as the developers can cater to exactly that.

So yeah, one set of hardware.

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

Kleptic - 72 days ago

the RSX being based on the 7800 is true, but it doesn't paint the whole picture...

a PS3 definitely CAN do things that a regular G78 equipped PC (assuming it also has a processor of that time period as well) could not...the Cell can handle sometimes 30-40% of actual rendering calculations (at least according to GG in numerous tech interviews; i'd take their word for it)...which is just overhead removed from the GPU entirely...

but that still does not mean a PS3 can keep up with the latest PC gpu's...not even close...

but the PS3's biggest weakness is not the cpu, or the gpu...its memory...same with the 360...both consoles should have had at least a gig...and PC's would not have become so blatantly better as quickly...

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

jack_burt0n - 71 days 3 hours ago

@Consoldtobots

Wow u actually know what ur talking about nice, bubs2u.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

champ21 - 71 days 3 hours ago

they compare games against crysis because crysis is the best looking bar none.. nothing comes close to it.

imo anyone thinking uncharted even looks close to crysis is fooling themselves.

keep comparing boys.. i am sure sony has you all brainwashed.

ill wait until sony has their next title out and again blindly ppl will compare it against crysis until crysis 2 is out ;-)

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

CernaML - 72 days 2 hours ago

Pretty ironic that you say something like that over the internet.

Agree(5) | Disagree(4) | Report

Pandamobile - 72 days 2 hours ago

Internet tough guy right here. You know he gets all the ladies.

Agree(8) | Disagree(4) | Report

agentfoxe-n4g - 72 days 2 hours ago

Nice rip, dude. Well done.
:-)

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

Xlll - 71 days 3 hours ago

You do understand he could use his PS3 to post that right? That aside there ain't nothing wrong with an updated PC.

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

champ21 - 71 days 3 hours ago

@don

keep paying your taxes noob. 10usd$ plus for every game bought.. what a rip off lol

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

Nelson M - 72 days 2 hours ago

On Split Screen.Com
Forza 3 Vs Pole Position
http://blogs.theage.com.au/...

Agree(5) | Disagree(2) | Report

Double07 - 72 days 2 hours ago

Ahahaha Nelson ftw =D

Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report

napoleon_ist - 72 days 1 hour ago

@Nike: hey smartass let's compare screenshots of GT5 Prologue Downshift Session 2008 (3840x2160@240fps) with your Crysis would you kid?
http://playstation.joystiq....

Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report

Pandamobile - 72 days ago

I built a $500 PC for my friend that can run Crysis on high settings at 30+ FPS.

Nice try though.

Agree(6) | Disagree(5) | Report

SmokeyMcBear - 71 days 23 hours ago

LIES!!!... add up the GPU... CPU... all computer hardware components.. power supply motherboard... all that.. monitor.. keyboard... mouse... and tell me you spend less than 500 bucks. You friend probably had a lot of previous components to which you added some hardware to make it run crysis.

Agree(3) | Disagree(3) | Report

RedDragan - 71 days 4 hours ago

Maybe this stuff fell off the back of a truck and that is why he got it for $500... or maybe he just dreamt it!! XD

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Xlll - 71 days 3 hours ago

I wouldn't mind seeing a parts list (include the wires/cables, screen, kb and mouse - Thats all part of building a PC) and see for myself how much it cost.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

nycredude - 71 days 3 hours ago

While you are compiling a non-existent list, can you please clarify what you mean by 30+ fps? Cause that could mean 35 fps, which is sad on a tricked out pc... Just saying.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

champ21 - 71 days 3 hours ago

imo 500usd these days is enough to get a pc built these days that would be 2x-3x as powerful as any of the consoles and yea it would run crysis just fine 1200p atleast high settings.

keep telling yourself 5000usd.. truth is you are just paying sony needless taxes per game for no benefit. fanboys lol.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

dkgshiz - 71 days 5 hours ago

UC2 mops the floor with that game either way. It got a 10/10 from Eurogamer! EUROGAMER!!!!! There one of the most biased sites Ive ever seen and they even gave UC2 a perfect score!

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

ULTIMATE_REVENGE - 71 days 1 hour ago

Only joking (^_^)

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report