330°

Last Remnant PS3 Prospects Not Looking Good

Square Enix said that Last Remnant would be multi platform. And it certainly was, having been released on both the Xbox 360 and PC. But the other target platform for the game may not see the light of day. During an investors meeting today, Square Enix CEO Yoichi Wada made some comments that suggest PS3 owners could be out of luck.
Alternative Sources:
AndriaSang - contributor
Published: 136 days 19 hours ago | News | PlayStation 3
 
 

12Next »
Showing: 1 - 50 of 77 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
DragonWarrior_4 - 136 days 19 hours ago
1 -
Damn, and to think Squeenix thought they actually published a game worth having on the system? Such a shame to anyone who wanted to rent a crappy game and laugh about it.
Shut this user up Let user speak
zlatko - 136 days 18 hours ago
1.1 -
I beat it and invested close to 120 hours into it...maybe more. The "hiccups" "bugs" w/e you want to call them were auto fixed with installation to your hard drive, so for me these "issues" were non existent.

The main two problems with The Last Remnant are the same ones that IU and SO4 suffer from---sh*t story accompanied with poor dialogue with poor voice acting. So maybe 3 things, but I couple the last two together, since they go hand in hand. The battle system was awesome, music was great, side quests enjoyable, unique way of leveling things up, and above all a challenging game to however much time you put into it.

JRPG fans wouldn't be that disappointed with it honestly. It's a solid 7.8/10 from me. It's just too hard to overlook the two problems I listed though for most, and even I was just unwowed when the curtain fell on this game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Dark-vash - 136 days 18 hours ago
1.2 - I agree with you.
@ zlatko
I Agree with everything you said!But noticed A LOT of problems even with the HDD instalation...

I've finished the game too, spent a lot of time in it...
Shut this user up Let user speak
FantasyStar - 136 days 18 hours ago
1.3 -
Agreed, TLR is a good game and unique indeed, but the voice acting and poor story overall isn't so hot. Hell how is it that a a RPG can have a poor voice performance casts when story plus those matters more than gameplay? But anyhow, the game is worth something of a playthrough. For the record though, I thought Rush's VA did a decent job.
Shut this user up Let user speak
KampferZeon - 136 days 17 hours ago
1.4 - Summary
Those who would have already played it.

Being a PC/Console 360 exclusive doesn't change the fact that its a poorly executed average rating game.

There are better games to play on both system now.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Guitardr85 - 136 days 17 hours ago
1.5 -
Agreed! I went ahead and bought this game for the PC and the end result??? I regretted not pirating it, loL! PS3 users won't miss that much, and they get to keep their dignity by not feeling like they have to buy a subpar game just because its an RPG on the PS3!
Shut this user up Let user speak
Jim Hawking - 136 days 16 hours ago
1.6 - @1.1
I thought I was the only one who hated SO4's story/dialogue.

Bubbles
Shut this user up Let user speak
hulk_bash1987 - 136 days 16 hours ago
1.7 - Not surprising
Considering how lackluster the game was, both sales and review wise. Its not a lose for PS3 owners in my opinion. Square Enix just needs to concentrate on getting FF XIII out the gate.
Shut this user up Let user speak
blackpanther25 - 136 days 16 hours ago
1.8 - @zlatko
I agree the gameplay was ok, but it was lacking something. I swear i must be the only one who thought that they didn't finish their combat idea.

I mean they want you to have squads and stuff to really give you control, but at the same time you can't change people class, armors, or weapons (besides the main character). Instead they have these scenes where they will tell you that they need an item to upgrade their weapon.
I mean what is the point of giving us the ability to make squads if we can't "truly" create our own personalized squads.
Shut this user up Let user speak
gaffyh - 136 days 16 hours ago
1.9 -
Finished the game, was based too heavily on chance, not enough control of your characters during battle means you could lose a battle very quickly. This meant you had to take a very JRPG approach to every major battle, meaning you'd have to prepare heavily for the battle to win.

I don't think this even deserves to be ported, I'd rather that Square Enix work on a better game. This game was OK, but most people will hate it, only hardcore JRPG fans would actually invest enough time to finish it.
Shut this user up Let user speak
menoyou - 136 days 15 hours ago
1.10 -
who cares this game sux big time just like every rpg from square enix this gen so far
Shut this user up Let user speak
IdleLeeSiuLung - 136 days 14 hours ago
1.11 -
I don't think this game will really be missed for PS3 owners, but hey you could have gotten it for $10 at Best Buy on the 360 about a month ago.... It is probably dirt cheap now on ebay.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Halo3 MLG Pro - 136 days 13 hours ago
1.12 -
Yup. Put all the minor flaws aside and Last Remnant is a sweet jrpg. Gets a solid 8 from me.
Shut this user up Let user speak
FarEastOrient - 136 days 1 hour ago
1.13 -
In Japan the want of a PS3 version of the game is still there and ranks in the top 10 still.
Shut this user up Let user speak
zlatko - 135 days 22 hours ago
1.14 - @blackpanther
The battle system of minion recruits in the game got their equipment upgraded as your battle rank went up. For them to learn skills you just had to use them in battle successfully and keep doing so. If you were able to manually pick each characters equipment it'd be a ton of micromanagement, especially since the game actually was a new approach to the strategy RPG genre. The lead characters saying,"can I have X item?" was just an easy way to upgrade the ones you liked, and had an item that person was geared towards having for a good upgrade to how you were progressing them. As for the characters saying, "can we go look for item X?" it was just incentive for you to go out and grind more in hopes of finding the right items to give people better equipment.

The game was for sure 100% complete on the battle system portion end. The game even later as you play starts making very intelligent choices since your characters have developed enough for them. Early on if you pick a group to heal they would all focus on it or just defend if the healing was done. Later you may pick heal with your whole group, the healers within it are all set to do heals, but once health is healed enough, the extra healers will decide to do special attacks or normal attacks based on how much action points you had saved up with them.

The game leveled with you too, so if you are a person who just plows through the game for the story it will only be as hard your battle rank is but if you side quest and grind up then the game scales with you to challenge you more. My biggest issue with the games battles was if you do grind a lot, then the game starts to do the same two abilities on almost all bosses in some form to kill you. That completely defeats the strategic portion, because one would randomly kill a character on their turn, and another would turn them to stone if I remember right. One of those was uncureable too, so you basically had crunch time to make the most use of that group until they all died.(trying to keep them alive is pointless, since if they all wipe out you can just revive them all at full health).

Anyways yeah. The only thing future SE projects worry me about is the story/dialogue. Last Remnant, IU, and SO4 are all 100% fails on that portion. I mean in SO4 the lead character on my play through cried a total of 4 times. What a wimp. IU I don't even want to get into, since I spent 2 hours with it before I just called it trash and moved on. FF13's story needs to be a complete home run, because for me this is Square's last chance to prove they know how to tell a good story. Otherwise Atlus will become #1 at JRPGs with the Persona Series hands down. :)
Shut this user up Let user speak
blackpanther25 - 135 days 20 hours ago
1.15 - @zlakto
Well.. I guess if it didn't feel incomplete to you then that is good. Maybe i just didn't like the way they did it. Maybe i had certain expectations of the battle system since they said it was squad based either way
+Bub to you for convo
Shut this user up Let user speak
Delta - 136 days 19 hours ago
2 -
Good, Cause nobody whats a crappy JRPG that runs on UE3. It would be a waste of time and money for them.
Shut this user up Let user speak
hay - 136 days 18 hours ago
2.1 -
Well... They COULD make an improved port, but making Last Remnant a good game could cost them too much resources to make it profitable.
Shut this user up Let user speak
cgoodno - 136 days 18 hours ago
2.2 -
I hear the improvements they made in the PC port were well worth it compared to the 360 version. I do think it might be a bit for them to stretch themselves so far on this game with a PS3 port. More than likely the sales on the 360 and PC ended up being below expected so they've had to move on rather than try to port it to the PS3.
Shut this user up Let user speak
AKNAA - 136 days 18 hours ago
2.3 - I think SE knows that it would be a waste of time & money...
Porting this game to the PS3 is instant profit loss. why?
3 reasons:

1. SE knows that its not that easy to please Playstation owners(maybe 360 owners) when it comes to RPGs when you consider the good ones that were released on the PS1 & PS2.

2. If this game were to be ported to the PS3, it would end up being released almost near the same time frame as FF13, which of course you know what will happen...

3. The game just sucks period.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Dread - 136 days 17 hours ago
2.4 -
@AKNAA

it is easier to please 360 owners than playstation owners!?

get over yourself u arrogant fanboy.

that is the problem with sony this gen.. they were arrogant at the start (remember all the comments made by sony execs during the launch) and created an arrogant group of fanboys. But reality has humbled Sony a bit in the past years (thx god), perhaps u should follow suit.
Shut this user up Let user speak
AKNAA - 136 days 5 hours ago
2.5 - @dread
Me, a fanboys?! Not exactly. But I do prefer the PS3 over the 360.

Well, judging by how 360 fanboys prefer sales figures over the actual quality of a game kinda made me assume that quality does not matter just as long as it sells better than the PS3 version/ or rival game...
but hey, maybe its just me.
Didn't you guys thought the last remanent and ninja blade was the next big thing since it was exclusive and all?! Lol!
2.6 Ryudo | 135 days 21 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
AKNAA - 135 days 20 hours ago
2.7 - Lol! @ ryudo
multiple accounts you say?! Lol! don't be stupid. who ever has multiple accounts to agree with themselves are pretty pathetic if you ask me...
And before you run your useless mouth again, how do you know I have not played the game? tried it out at a friends house, along with all the other people who agreed with me and said that this game sucks? just because people don't agree that its good, you assume that we're blind mindless fanboys?! Lol! kid, Get the f4@K outtta here! you just said yourself that you played for about an hour and cannot give a final judgment yet, but strangely enough, you defend the last remanent like as if its your savior?! WTF?! if anything, your the one thats the mindless tw@t! 1 hour of playing it and you still can't confirm to yourself wether or not you like it?! feeling a little slow there?! talk about lack of brain cells... I'm sure all game demos must be useless to you in deciding weather or not you want to buy it huh?!
BTW, how am I trolling?! isn't this article concerning PS3 owners?
Shut this user up Let user speak
TheHater - 136 days 19 hours ago
3 - The game was vaporware to begin with for the PS3
Everyone with a brain would have figure that one out.
Shut this user up Let user speak
jackdoe - 136 days 17 hours ago
3.1 -
Yeah, especially since all word of it disappeared. Though I think it became vaporware the instant the 360 version hit and garnered horrendous reviews.
Shut this user up Let user speak
xXKingofStingXx - 136 days 19 hours ago
4 - Really?
We're out of luck?

Because we don't get Last Remnant?

LMAO!

i think we're some of the luckiest people to be spared of that horrendous experiment SE called a game. It's a shame to see one of yesteryears RPG titans reduced to peddling crap like this.

My how the mighty have fallen indeed...
Shut this user up Let user speak
jmare - 136 days 19 hours ago
5 -
It's the same thing as Haze. PS3 owners lucked out on TLR and 360 owners lucked out on Haze. Sh1t games are sh1t games no matter what platform they are on.

And fanboys disagree because of the poster, not the post. N4G is teh awesomez.
Shut this user up Let user speak
PELVIC THRUST ACTION - 136 days 14 hours ago
5.1 -
Except Haze was only about five or six hours of torture. The Last Remnant was at least 30-40 hours of torture. If I'm going to be force fed agony, I rather have it finished with as soon as possible.
Shut this user up Let user speak
mastiffchild - 136 days 1 hour ago
5.2 -
Also while the politics had yet to hit FRD Haze was still a decent looking project. Then it went exclusive, then middleware got pulled, then they had to rush in house effects and ohysics, then...you catch my drift. Fact is Haze looked and plaued better over a year before release than it ever did after the support got pulled-for what reason we may never know but I always thought it was opart of why it went from multi to exclusive.

My point ios we could guess(esp when no copies ponied up for review) that Haze wiould suck and it has an excuse at least-a good idea and good dev scuppered by situation, imo.

WTF is SE's excuse this gen? Played TLR on PC and couldn't be arsed finishing it-another great idea but thrown together with spit and kleenex rather than any care or thought. Frankly a 5/10 would be too kind for me. PS3 only gamers should feel very relieved they aren't getting it tbh. It speaks volumes that the once mightly SE don't even feel they can resurrect the game either-seems a good idea isn't enough for them these days-lets just pray that the passion to finish FF13 properl;y is still there.

If not, and that game fails to be EPIC(which, after all the sh1t created by SE this gen it needs to be-it fails and the knives won't half be out)then I truly fear that SE might face real trouble and regret not being able to release worldwide simultaneously. If the Japanese version bombs at the critics what price western success?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Monkey D Luffy - 136 days 19 hours ago
6 -
Who cares, i forgot about this game. It's a mediocre, rushed rpg that is almost a year old. It's drowned out by other rpgs anyways.

PS. if any sorta timed/ ambiguos exclusive title should be considered for ps3 it definitely should be Star Oce IV
Shut this user up Let user speak
guitarded77 - 136 days 18 hours ago
6.1 -
Star Ocean would be cool
Shut this user up Let user speak
lonestarmt - 136 days 17 hours ago
6.2 -
the only two JRPGS I wish the PS3 had was tales of vesipra which they are getting, and star ocean 4
Shut this user up Let user speak
Infernostew - 136 days 16 hours ago
6.3 -
Hate to be the rumor mill but a good friend of mine was asked to alpha test the ps3 version of Star Ocean 4. He beta tests for a lot of games and will be testing Thief 4 although he turned down tests on SO4 due to being busy with work. He said it will contain a brand new dungeon that was not in the US 360 version due to time constraints but it will be in the EU release of SO4 on 360.
Shut this user up Let user speak
SpoonyRedMage - 136 days 18 hours ago
7 -
I actually enjoyed the game but it was a mess technically. Installing helps a lot, now it only hiccups. The concepts I thought were great but some of them were implemented really badly.

Someone needs to slap Takai and SaGa team into shape though, Unlimited SaGa and The Last Remnant one after another just isn't acceptable. It's also because Takai doesn't like the PS3 that it's ended up like this.
Shut this user up Let user speak
bankai - 136 days 18 hours ago
7.1 - i agree
this game is an example of a great idea that was just poorly put together. lets see what SE will drop the ball on next, they have been doing it alot since the merge.
Shut this user up Let user speak
jackdoe - 136 days 16 hours ago
7.2 -
Square should just fire his ass as he and his team cost them millions only to produce a mediocre game that sold horrendously.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Pope_John_Paul_II - 136 days 18 hours ago
8 -
NO REALLY???? did people actually think this game would make an appearance on the PS3 after the ClusterF**k that made with this game on 360 Hardware running on UE3. if the game ran that bad on the 360, I wouldn't want to think about what would happen if it ran on the PS3, especially since it runs on UE3....

SE Should next time stop focusing on making a quick buck off of gamers by paying a license to an engine thats built for shooters; thats already done, but have no freaking idea on how to implement it on RPGs. Instead they should focus on what made them big in the industry in the first place, High Quality RPGs built from scratch.
Shut this user up Let user speak
SuperStrokey1123 - 136 days 18 hours ago
9 -
Anyone who actually still cares about this crappy game coming to PS3 please raise your hand... I doubt there is too many.
Shut this user up Let user speak
StanLee - 136 days 18 hours ago
9.1 -
*crickets*
Shut this user up Let user speak
fossilfern - 136 days 18 hours ago
10 -
THats alright played it on my friends PC the game is pretty dull. Not missing much at all
Shut this user up Let user speak
ShinnokDrako - 136 days 18 hours ago
11 -
PS3 owner are out of luck? Really, i'm laughing, cause i have the 360 version and i've never played a so bad done RPG/strategic RPG/JunkRPG whatever it is....
Shut this user up Let user speak
booyah007 - 136 days 18 hours ago
12 - Why am I not suprised.
Wada lied. Takai hates the PS3. SquareEnix has been sucking. Just come out and say it and stop lagging on your feet. Otherwise, you look pathetic in lots of people eyes.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Arknight - 136 days 18 hours ago
13 -
The company that was once my favorite developer when I was growing up now makes me sick to my stomach every time I see how far they have fallen...

Chrono, Cecil,Cloud, and Fei Fong-Wong are all turning in their graves.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Ramzadel - 136 days 18 hours ago
13.1 -
Oh man how right you are about those awesome heroes of Square lore, especially Fei Fong-Wong, best story yet.
Shut this user up Let user speak
NotSoSilentBob - 136 days 18 hours ago
13.2 -
I agree with you. Square Enix should just become Enix as they have forgotten the value of Square in their name.
Shut this user up Let user speak
biggame901 - 136 days 17 hours ago
13.3 -
Agreed and then some. Ever since the merger with Enix, SE has just been a disaster, one on top of the other.

At this point, FF13 and FFvs13 need to be brilliant. If not, SE will be in serious trouble.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Henry Cain - 136 days 18 hours ago
14 -
Does anyone really care. I think not.
Shut this user up Let user speak
PLAYSTATIONGENRATION - 136 days 18 hours ago
15 - ..
I would rather have infinite discovery
Shut this user up Let user speak
Jazz4108 - 136 days ago
15.1 -
360 is getting a exclusive on Magnacarta 2
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News