Oblivion PR: SIXAXIS not an option for Oblivion, Rumble Better

miasma - 1043 days 14 hours ago

Rumble baby! Not sure how i feel about Sixaxis, tried it a little, gets boring real quick...
Rumble does put you into the the game more than if there isn't any. It's funny how you don't truly realize it until you try the same game experiences without it, and there this disconnect feeling to the game, rumble is definitly needed.
i think someone should make a rumble hat...yes a hat...LOL imagine the head trauma!!
sorry just cracking myself up.

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

OutpostCommand - 1043 days 13 hours ago

I do agree.
Its nicer to have rumble than not have it, but it is not something that makes me think
"Oh noes ! z0mg. t3h rumbl3 i5 7eh gonez0rd - w3 r te[-] d0omz0rd !"
If rumble is implemented 'Yay !', if not, 'Oh well'.
Its not a killer feature.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

N4G-GaMr - 1043 days 13 hours ago

I been gaming with rumble since Sony first introduced in back in the late 90's on the PS1. So for them to have it for so long then suddenly rip it out is a little different. But you are also right in saying there is alot of people that dont think it will drastically change their gaming experience. If enough people complained Sony would or will have to come up with a fix. Appearently their isnt enough of a stink about it.

* Especially since most of the complaining is done by Xbox fanboys and people that dont even own a PS3 nor have tried Sixaxis* (which I do find hilarious)

But there is a large amount of gamers that think like you and thats a good thing. Give me next Gen graphics, great controls, engrossing story lines and more than 5 hours of single player game play and you can keep the rumble. I can honestly make the statement.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

deep - 1043 days 13 hours ago

They Didn't buy Immersion. Immersion own the patent to rumble in controllers (of sorts - as rumble can be done in other ways...) - and only in the US might I add with your crazy patent laws....and so Microsoft paid them some money, whereas Sony didn't want to pay up.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

N4G-GaMr - 1043 days 12 hours ago

THAT IS SOME BITTER TRUTH.... Well said. Nice post.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Grown Folks Talk - 1043 days 12 hours ago

you better start being spiteful and making personal attacks on people quick. it's for your own good. , }

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Master of Menace - 1043 days 12 hours ago

Another post that misses the point.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

AppleSlime - 1043 days 12 hours ago

It's like some totally insist on behaving like children. And i'm almost positive you didn't bother reading any of #12 aside from "Sony lying"

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Master of Menace - 1043 days 12 hours ago

I don't recall making a comment on that post. But it still misses the point.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

TheMART at Xboxkings - 1043 days 11 hours ago

Don't agree.

Rumble is like a dissatisfier. If it's there you won't notice (better said: you take it for granted. It's normal it's there), but if it's gone you miss it period.

Anyone can say they don't but that's utterly bullsh!t. Go in any shooter, and you know when you get hit when the controller activates the rumble. Otherwise you only see that on screen. Go race a racegame and you feel the crash, you feel if you drive over different surfaces, get the MS force feedback wheel and you get the real experience.

They just had to include the motion sensing as a gimmick because without rumble and anything else people would have laughed right in their face. So they included it. But it's not as integrated as the WiiMote.

It's like the MS sidewinder for PC from 5 years back. Which people played for 5 minutes and saw it as a gimmick. Which the Sixaxis will be also. A gimmick, nothing more. Fun to have, but you won't miss it when it's not there. Intense gaming you don't want to swing all around the room. That's fungaming like the Wii with beer and friends. Real gaming starts with rumble, no discussion about it

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

Black Republican - 1043 days 9 hours ago

SIXAXIS is nice for a min or two, but lets face it, that gets boring, its not usefull in most games
the 360 has rumble
ps3 has sixaxis garbage
wii has best of all worlds, eben though i do not like it

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Black Republican - 1043 days 8 hours ago

let me enforce some truth
even if the developers had a few more months to work on it on the 360 it would also look better dumb ass
its like saying i made an awesome painting, i put it away for a few months then came back, would i not know what to do to make it better???

stupid answer for a stupid comment

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

hellraiser501 - 1043 days 8 hours ago

Is that when creating those versions Bethaside had to create a hole new engine for Oblivion and when they did the PS3 version all they had to do was port the already created engine to the new console and while porting they came across some upgrades they could ad to the new verion like new shader engine and upgraded textures, and from what I understand the 360/pc version are gonna get a patch that will make the 360 and pc version indistinguisable from the PS3 version, but I don't know the whole story behind thatso take this comment with a grain of salt but from my understanding thats what happend.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

FeralPhoenix - 1042 days 19 hours ago

I'll take Bethesda's word fo it, that they indeed "optimized" the game for PS3, and that some of those "optimizations" can't be done on the 360, but CAN YOU NOT CONSIDER the POSSIBILITY for 1 second that Bethesda has to "add a lil hype" because its essentially a "old game" being fixed up for the PS3, don't you think he wants to create some excitement for a game thats already been out for a year instead of just saying hey we "ported" Oblivion over to the PS3? Also...Oblivion looked sweet on 360 but quite frankly there are other games that looked better, so if it wasn't the best looking game, that indicates there was room for improvement....but lets just say your logic in this situation is correct, then when a Epic dev says Gears cannot be done on the PS3 we have to assume that the PS3 can't do things the 360 does -hmmm, same logic....is it true?

-No the TRUTH is that Oblivion could be "polished" and look just as good or better if Bethesda wanted to, and Gears will definitely need alot of work plus some(cough) extra RAM to get that puppy to look that good on PS3 -lol, I'm kidding the point is it CAN BE DONE, just differently, but seriously why should Bethesda bother with all the extra time and money when its not going to make 360 owners who didn't like it a year ago or those who already own it, say "WOW it looks a little better, NOW I have to go buy this game" and those who already own it are certainly not going to buy it again for a few "enhancements." -Bro, its a great game, but its old news for 360 owners, the dev's need to get PS3 fans excited, its like a car salesman, he doesn't need to offer the guy who brought a new 2006 Explorer last year in 2006 anything, he made the sale already-his work is done, as long as he served the customer well and hopefully the car runs great for __ yrs, then the guy might decide to comeback when he's interested in getting a new car, but in 2007 he's going to need to offer a few MORE INCENTIVES to sell that same 2006 model Explorer to a different "potential" customer -since basicly the car is last years model and the customer knows it.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report