PS3 to get exclusive Mirror's Edge DLC

The Power of Red - 479 days 7 hours ago

At least Sony didn't pay 50 mil for it.

Agree(42) | Disagree(2) | Report

Mitchell - 479 days 6 hours ago

Microsoft is gonna get a taste of the... No, they're gonna choke on their own medicine.

Mirror's Edge is one of the hottest, most anticipated titles in Q4 2008; not only will it run and perform better visually (PS3 lead platform) and have Trophies on the PS3, but now you get more out of the game on the PS3.

I wouldn't be surprised if other titles like Dead Space and Prince Of Persia go the same route.

Agree(24) | Disagree(10) | Report

xhairs9 - 478 days 16 hours ago

At least Sony gets exclusive DLC for games that aren't dead after 30% of gameplay.

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

Idonthatejustcreate - 479 days 10 hours ago

When the DLC comes out for GTAIV,fallout3 and Mirrors edge we will be playing better and less old games than those with top notch graphics and great replayability =)

The exclusive DLC is not that big of a deal that people would like it to be.

Agree(10) | Disagree(1) | Report

Jake the Muss - 479 days 10 hours ago

I agree Fishy. I'm not sold on the idea of exclusive content for some groups but having others miss out, solely decided by purchase format. Those that parted with money to purchase the goods should be equally rewarded.

I am yet to be convinced that DLC is a system seller either. I welcome those to correct me maturely, but DLC seems to me to be less of a way to sell systems and more of a way to score points. First Microsoft scores with GTA DLC, then Fallout DLC, so Sony strikes back with Mirrors Edge DLC and Bioshock exclusive content.

DLC doesn't really benefit either party (publisher or console maker) - think about it. An exclusive game will move (a) console, yes. But here, its available on 3 formats, so it wont. EA will still get the same revenue, regardless of your choice of format. But at (console of choice) HQ, someone gets to say "Ha ha, take that!". Its tit for tat in a fierce business rivalry. I fail to see that Sony will really benefit from paying (if indeed they did) for DLC, but gain more from reminding Microsoft that they can and will play the same game (figuratively, not literally).

That, and if your the type of person that takes satisfaction solely from someone else loss, then you best seek some medical help.

Agree(5) | Disagree(0) | Report

dogseye_deadhorse - 479 days 9 hours ago

yeah agree but if Warhawk was multi and i couldnt download the new expansion for it (jetpacks) because of exclusive dlc, I'D BE REAL PISSED..

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

superaktieboy - 479 days 8 hours ago

QFT.. i too think that DLC shouldn't be exclusive, DLC exclusivity is not game exclusivity .. if a game is exclusive, the dlc will be available to everyone who has bought the game (unless its someone stupid enough to buy the game but not the console lol).. but if only the DLC is exclusive.. the other will feel left out.. they'll probably not buy it at all..

sorry EA.. stupid move!!

oh and prepare for 360 fans saying 'OMG im getting 360 version coz i don't care about DLC' and PS3 fans saying 'OMG im getting PS3 version coz i want DLC' same thing happened with GTA and will happen with MiEd and FO3

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

TheHater - 479 days 7 hours ago

Couldn't agree more Fishy. I prefer a game to be exclusive to a console, rather than having exclusive contents to a consoles for a game.

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

solidsnakus - 478 days 21 hours ago

i agree with you , but i dont think this post is true. its EA were talking about here, they held back to later release gun packs in battlefield just to make more money. so im shure they wont make exclusive content for either console unless they were paid a large amount of $$ which sony has a reputation for being on the stingy side of things by not paying to keep DMC,GTA,RE5,FF13 and countless other games exclusive.

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

RememberThe357 - 478 days 18 hours ago

But if I was going to get it on the 360 I'd be a little pissed. We don't even know what the DLC will be so I would get my panties in a bunch just yet. Exclusive DLC is a really crappy idea though I have to admit.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Idonthatejustcreate - 479 days 10 hours ago

The only parts which worries me about this game is length and replayability.

I really hope that it's like 20 hours long and has multiplayer with a mode like Capture the runner and Foot race. But I don't think this is the case...

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

Dark General - 479 days 10 hours ago

I'm not really concerned with the length of the game. I'm sure it'll be the (current) standard of about 12 to 15 hours of gameplay. I don't think there's any multiplayer component and honestly i'm glad. I prefer single player games. If a game does single player and multiplayer i expect it to be awesome for both and not a halfassed attempt at single and good multiplayer. Or vice versa. But i'am quite biased as i prefer single player games only to games with single and multiplayer.

Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report

SixTwoTwo - 479 days 10 hours ago

I share your concerns about Mirrors Edge which why I am more interested in games like Far Cry 2, LBP, and Resistance 2. Each of these titles have features that should give them tremendous amounts of replayability for many months. ME is a rent for me.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

Dark General - 479 days 10 hours ago

I don't mind replayability but to be honest i usually replay the games i buy 2 times. Usually. If a game is for to me i'll replay it a few times. It's just like when i was younger (and probably others) when we were younger our parent couldn't buy us a bunch of video games. So what did we do? We'd replay the hell out of the games we did have, i'm still pretty much the same way even some 15 years later.

I can't wait for LBP either. I know i'll suck at creating levels but at least i'll have fun smacking my girlfriend with my sackboy along with a few of my friends. I'll probably create alot of different little sackpeople and just run a muck through the levels.

EditL: *Laughs my ass off* You're right Tacki. Maybe i should reword that a little bit there.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

Tacki - 479 days 9 hours ago

"i'll have fun smacking my girlfriend"

Watch out for the rumors that you go around beating your girlfriend, man! LOL!

Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report

GarandShooter - 478 days 22 hours ago

@ Tacki

You edited his sentence...and I believe it could have been done better...

'i'll have fun smacking my girlfriend with my sack'

What do you think?

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

Tacki - 478 days 21 hours ago

I did think of that as well. But for whatever reason I went another way. A less kinky way. lol

There's so many things you could do with a comment like that though. Even in its current form. For example...

"i'll have fun smacking my girlfriend with my sackboy along with a few of my friends."

Sounds like Dark General is having a LittleBigOrgy.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

ShadowRyuX - 478 days 18 hours ago

"i'll have fun smacking my girlfriend with my sackboy along with a few of my friends."

You don't know how many "naughty" ideas could easily form from that statement...

Anyways, I like that the PS3 is finally getting some decent treatment. Too bad I am not really interested in this game...

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

Dark General - 478 days 14 hours ago

*Laughs my ass off* Yeah i noticed when i edited what i said. It was originally "I'll have fun smacking my girlfriend and some of my friends with my sackboy". Then i changed it to it's current form. It's still alot you could think of that could be tooken a couple of different ways (pun intended) but i'd take orgy jokes over abruisive boyfriend jokes.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

Idonthatejustcreate - 479 days 10 hours ago

A super tight deadline maybe?

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

plain rice - 479 days 10 hours ago

I f**king agree. I hate the idea of preplanned DLC.

Agree(9) | Disagree(1) | Report

whoelse - 479 days 10 hours ago

A deadline... and they want you to give them more money.

Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report

mfwahwah - 479 days 3 hours ago

Why, with 50 million dollars in their pocket, you'd think Rockstar would add the GTA IV DLC before it was released. Same with Fallout 3. Trying to insult the PS3 with this news makes you look not only like a troll, but a person with an IQ lower than their shoe size.

Agree(3) | Disagree(3) | Report

Mc Fadge - 479 days 10 hours ago

It is indeed the lead platform :3

Agree(5) | Disagree(0) | Report

BattleAxe - 479 days 2 hours ago

There was an article that said EA will be using the PS3 as its lead platform for all of its games starting in the near future.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Fishy Fingers - 479 days 9 hours ago

Why are they releasing at a similar time? Are they similarly sized and priced?

It just them securing some DLC, I dont think it's their "answer" to the GTA DLC, that would probably be InFamous.

Also, your idea of "success" is sales figures that dont effect you, my idea of "success" is DLC I actual thought was worth the price and was enjoyable.

Then again I seem to be in the minority now, someone who enjoys playing the games rather than the cooperations.

Agree(7) | Disagree(1) | Report

Jake the Muss - 479 days 9 hours ago

Well Firstkn1ghT, if Sony decide to release this DLC free of charge, and considering you will most likely have to pay for GTA's DLC, then I can tell you exactly which one will be more successful.

Irregardless, that depends on how exactly you quantify "successful" in the first place.

EDIT: Beat me to it again, Fishy.

Agree(6) | Disagree(0) | Report

bunbun777 - 479 days 4 hours ago

Regardless sir. No such thing as irregardless. Carry on.

*gets back in car- drives off into the night*

Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report

Kyur4ThePain - 479 days 1 hour ago

Kn1ght, you are such a complete idiot it's mind bending.

Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report

Tmac - 478 days 22 hours ago

There answer for GTA4 DLC is NOT paying 50 MILL for a game you will probably never touch again. Lolz, Xbox.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

orakga - 479 days 3 hours ago

$3.99 - White Skin
$3.99 - Black Skin
$3.99 - Hispanic Skin
$3.99 - "Dude" Skin

and..... $9.99 - Bikini Outfit!!!

GOGOGOGO~!!

Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report

Jamegohanssj5 - 479 days 9 hours ago

Who knows? Maybe the content could be stuff they wanted to put in the game, but didn't because of the limited disc space on the 360? That's what I think.

TGSI

Agree(2) | Disagree(2) | Report

fermcr11 - 479 days 8 hours ago

You guys are really blind (fanboys believe what they want to believe, and thats it) ... do you really believe Sony is the Virgin Mary?

Don't tell you believe that Sony did not pay for the exclusivity of Haze (they just droped the other platforms and went to the platform whith less consoles sold)?

Every company pays for exclusivity, that's the way it goes. Only blind fanboys don´t believe that. WAKE UP PEOPLE.

Agree(3) | Disagree(8) | Report

power of Competence - 478 days 14 hours ago

Might want to tell everyone how you magically know Sony paid for this exclusive content.

http://www.1up.com/do/newsS...

A source like that would be valid.

"Every company pays for exclusivity, that's the way it goes. Only blind fanboys don´t believe that. WAKE UP PEOPLE."

So it's inconceivable that one company could POSSIBLY prefer working with Sony as a company or could possibly prefer their hardware? It's impossible for that to happen? Don't tell me how things go, especially if you're an idiot. Good day.

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

Sir_Ken_Kutaragi - 479 days 10 hours ago

But i need to play a Demo 1st because i get ill playing some games!!! :-/ i.e i can't play 'DOOM' on PS1 or 'Half-Life' on PS2(That was before i hated Valve!!!) ;-D
(i get dizzy and nauseous...bit like when i see a xBox 360!!!)
It's Strange because i can play TimeSplitters all day!!! ;-P
And i did!!! And i still do!!! ;-D

PS3 to get exclusive [Enter every 2009 game here] DLC ;-P

Agree(5) | Disagree(0) | Report

Gazman - 479 days 9 hours ago

To true its looks good, just hope it plays good

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

Patchstation 3 - 479 days 7 hours ago

See this what I can't stand...When PS3 does it, you droids are all for it.

I thought Blu-ray was the future. What happened? Why didn't they release it on day one? I'm 100% sure there was more room left in the Blu-ray to put the DLC in.

Agree(3) | Disagree(11) | Report

juuken - 479 days 7 hours ago

Did I say I was for the downloadable content dumbass? I made it clear that I wasn't happy with Sony doing it but sometimes you have to fight fire with fire.

If the game is good, I'll pick it up. May I ask what's wrong with that?
I don't care about the DLC. I just want to play the game if it's good. If it has DLC, then more power to the PS3 version?

Your hatred for Sony is so blinding that you had to make up a name just to insult it.

Agree(4) | Disagree(4) | Report

Sir_Ken_Kutaragi - 479 days 6 hours ago

Not sure if anyone noticed on this!!!;)

PS3 DLC = Down Loadable COOLNESS;)

xBox 360 DLC = Down Loadable CR*P!!! ;-D

Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report

Patchstation 3 - 479 days 6 hours ago

Don't get me wrong I do not hate Sony...No, no, no hate is such an ugly word. I do own a select few of Sony's wonderful products.

However, the PS3 is another story...As for the name Playstation, Delaystation, Piece of Sh!t 3 were all already taken so I had to settle for Patch....Anyway, If you dont like what Sony did, why are you still supporting it by buying the game? You droids are funny.

Sir_Ken_Kutaragi you are one of the biggest used douchbags on N4G...Everytime I read your post I lose a couple of brain cells.

Agree(4) | Disagree(11) | Report

juuken - 479 days 6 hours ago

"However, the PS3 is another story...As for the name Playstation, Delaystation, Piece of Sh!t 3 were all already taken so I had to settle for Patch....Anyway, If you dont like what Sony did, why are you still supporting it by buying the game? You droids are funny."

Then let me ask this?

Why do you hate the Playstation 3?

Is it because of the shortcomings back in 2007?

I can understand that because I was seconds away from selling my PS3 but I'm just glad I didn't.

Or is it because of Sony's arrogance?

Or is it because you're jealous that the system will surpass the 360 in terms of sales, graphical power, and gameplay?

Patchstation...you are a f*cking moron once again, picking fights with people as usual. If Ken is the douchebag, then you are the biggest douchebag on this site. I find it incredibly stupid that you would stoop *that* low to create an account to insult a console when you've never came up with valid reasons as to why you hate it in the first place.

I said that if the game is good, I would buy it.

If there are good games for a system that I own, I would buy it. As much as I think Sony shouldn't have taken this approach, sometimes you have to fight fire with fire. Hopefully this game turns out good and Sony didn't waste their time with it.

Go on, slam the disagree with your multiple accounts like the baby that you are.

Agree(4) | Disagree(4) | Report

Patchstation 3 - 479 days 6 hours ago

I don't hate the PS3 but to answer your question Because Sony's PS3 lacks originality.

Agree(3) | Disagree(4) | Report

juuken - 479 days 6 hours ago

"I don't hate the PS3 but to answer your question Because Sony lacks originality."

In what way? You say they lack originality and yet you can't seem to elaborate on that? What, Microsoft is full of originality? What the hell, did they invent light or the spinning wheel? How can you sit down there and say Sony lacks originality when you can't even back up your own sh*t?

So let me get this straight...you hate Sony because they lack originality?

No...I think you just want to jump on the bandwagon for hating on Sony, that's all.

You know why I hate Microsoft?

1. Because they lack originality. Yep, they lack originality. Instead of working on their own 1st party exclusives so they can sell more consoles, they run around with their heads cut off, thinking that they should have bragging rights over 3rd party games. They want to talk sh*t about 1st party games mattering the most when all this time they've made games like DMC4, GTAIV, and most recently FFXIII go multiplatform when they could have strengthened their first party.

People won't buy a console for multiplatform games. They will buy it for *true* exclusives.

2. The RROD: I will never, and I mean NEVER touch a 360 until this is solved completely. Microsoft will have to do a LOT of things to convince me on why I should get a 360. So far, their titles are lackluster and they're cutting prices like crazy just to survive against the PS3's onslaught.

3. Arrogance: Sure, Sony was arrogant, but Microsoft by far has been the most arrogant corporation period. They care nothing about competition-they want to crush it. That's how they got ahead in the computer industry and they're using those same tactics in the gaming industry.

You're still not giving me a real reason why you hate the PS3 or Sony. That's not a valid reason if you can't back it up.

Slam the disagree button Patchbaby because you clearly love doing it.

Agree(5) | Disagree(6) | Report

Patchstation 3 - 479 days 5 hours ago

You know why I hate Microsoft?

1. Because they lack originality. Yep, they lack originality. Instead of working on their own 1st party exclusives so they can sell more consoles, they run around with their heads cut off, thinking that they should have bragging rights over 3rd party games. They want to talk sh*t about 1st party games mattering the most when all this time they've made games like DMC4, GTAIV, and most recently FFXIII go multiplatform when they could have strengthened their first party.

Wait a minute...Didn't Sony did the same to Nintendo. Making sure to secure almost all 3rd party titles. FFVII was a kick in the nuts to the fans when Sony got the exclusive. Mega man, Metal Gear, Contra and ect...Sony grabed them all.

RROD...this all Sony's fanboys know. What about the PS2? At least MS give the a 3 year warranty. Sony never even bother to take matters into their own hands. My PS2 broke and did I get any compensation? NO. The Consumers had to literaly bring Sony to court to fix their PS2 problem.

Look at all Sir Howard Stringer's comment and you will see is an arrogant d!ck.

Microsoft is learning from Sony's tactics. At least MS brought alot of fresh ideas to the gaming public, but for the last 15 years what has Sony done to change gaming....Errrr NOTHING!!!!

Agree(5) | Disagree(4) | Report

juuken - 479 days 5 hours ago

"Wait a minute...Didn't Sony did the same to Nintendo. Making sure to secure almost all 3rd party titles. FFVII was a kick in the nuts to the fans when Sony got the exclusive. Mega man, Metal Gear, Contra and ect...Sony grabed them all."

The issue with FFVII was clearly different and you know it.

Sony didn't grabbed them *all*. The Metal Gear series ended up on the Playstation 2 because Konami preferred the Playstation brand. Hideo Kojima was behind the Metal Gear franchise and he chose the Playstation brand for his series. It had nothing to do with the fact Sony gobbled them up as you so put it.

Microsoft couldn't stand FFXIII staying on the PS3 because it would have generated a lot of sales and move consoles, since there are some people who still haven't upgraded to the Playstation 3. No wonder they were so smug when Square announced that it was coming to the 360.

"RROD...this all Sony's fanboys know. What about the PS2? At least MS give the a 3 year warranty. Sony never even bother to take matters into their own hands. My PS2 broke and did I get any compensation? NO. The Consumers had to literaly bring Sony to court to fix their PS2 problem."

The PS2's failure rate was nowhere NEAR the failure rate of the 360 to begin with. I find it so incredibly funny that you 360 fanatics *always* bring up the PS2 and make it sound as if it was catastrophic beyond degree.

Microsoft admitted themselves that all 360's were prone to break.

http://www.fastsilicon.com/...
http://www.gamegrep.com/new...
http://www.1up.com/do/newsS...

That is why I stayed away from the 360 when it launched. There is no way in hell I would waste my money on a system that's beyond faulty. You can say that Microsoft fixed the problem by issuing warranties but they actually swept the problem under the rug instead of recalling the damn systems.

"Look at all Sir Howard Stringer's comment and you will see and arrogant d!ck."

Arrogant d*ck? How was he arrogant? Come on Patchbaby, show me that you're an intelligent lemming instead of a c*ckcucker who likes sucking Microsoft's wee-wee.

"Microsoft is learning from Sony's tactics."

Then how come we haven't seen any true 1st party exclusives yet? Why were they touting multiplatform games at E3? How is it that Gears 2 and Fable II were the only two exclusives at E3 and they were third party? How come they ripped off of Singstar and Buzz T.V?

"At least MS brought alot of fresh ideas to the gaming public, but for the last 15 years what has Sony done to change gaming....Errrr NOTHING!!!!"

What fresh new ideas Patchbaby? You haven't named them. You haven't list them. Microsoft has barely made a dent in the gaming industry. Sony has been in the gaming industry LONGER than you think so I don't know where *you* get by saying they've never done anything.

You are a waste of breath Patchbaby because you never seem to back up your idiotic claims. You just hate Sony for unwarranted reasons, other than the fact you jump on the bandwagon.

Agree(2) | Disagree(4) | Report

Patchstation 3 - 479 days 5 hours ago

Are you blind?

HDD, XBLA, Marketplace, Achievements and the list goes on...All I may add Sony copied.

Agree(3) | Disagree(4) | Report

pixelsword - 479 days 3 hours ago

...Insomniac did; They called them skill points, and those games were on the PS2 first. Microsoft just ripped-off Insomniac.

Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report

ravinshield - 479 days 3 hours ago

now FONY is trying to be like microsoft with the exclusives DLC, what a bunch of @ssh@oles

Agree(3) | Disagree(7) | Report

Amp - 479 days 1 hour ago

Very Innovative, its great to have your gaming library grow with new experiences, cant wait. watch out for 'Gangster' hes a 15 year old full of amp energy drink, he can swear like a sailor!

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

juuken - 479 days 10 hours ago

I'm not happy with it either, but sometimes you have to fight fire with fire.

Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report

heyheyhey - 479 days 9 hours ago

well if they're going to do it, they might as well get DLC for a game that could actually benefit from DLC- like Resi 5, FF13 etc etc

Mirrors Edge will be a great game, but i doubt DLC will give the experience much milage

i could be wrong of course, but it just seems to me like Sony targeted the wrong game with this DLC strategy

Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report

Snukadaman_ - 479 days 9 hours ago

I guess the thing is since microsoft did it first its such a scumbag move for even sony to do it.

Agree(2) | Disagree(5) | Report

morganfell - 479 days 8 hours ago

Sony did this as a point. They were trying to help Microsoft. Think of it as teaching. They were saying, "Look MS, let us show you that if you have to do this then pick a non-ass game."

Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report

juuken - 479 days 7 hours ago

...You never have anything remotely intelligent to say do you? How about shutting your mouth up for a change? I still don't understand, until this day why you 360 fanatics hate Sony with such a burning passion. I have my reasons for hating Microsoft but I have yet to see a 360 fanbrat justify their reasons for hating Sony.

Keep in mind that if Nintendo didn't help create Sony, Microsoft would have never been in the gaming industry the way they are today.

And heyheyhey, we'll have to see how this plays out.

Agree(2) | Disagree(3) | Report

TheHater - 479 days 7 hours ago

I agree hayhayhay. I hate when MS do these DLC moves, and now Sony just did the same. I just hope Sony realize their mistake, and put their money to good use.

Then again, I can try to understand why they did this. Everyone Sony fans has been complaining that Sony isn't spending money on getting exclusive contents on their games like MS is doing with third party studios. Everyone that is complaining it happy right now, but the other people, such as myself, are disappointed. Why? Because Sony should be using that money to support or help create new IPs, marketing their games, and supporting their first party studio even more.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

Snukadaman_ - 478 days 21 hours ago

No i dont hate sony..I only hate the ps3...I own 46 psp games along with a psp...no homebrew for me...I think the psp is far superior then the nintendo ds with its extras like playing movies and listening to internet radio....thats the same argument most of you blind droids use....its far superior then the xbox with its other capabilities....sound familiar??...only difference is I invested in a psp and in its current state I wont be investing in ps3...I think your fatass is really blind to buy into sonys bullsh*t about the ps3...I dont sit here and praise every xbox game like it is the second coming...and you honestly think you bring anything relevant to these discussions...no you dont..so just shut up and put me on ignore or something...you and your kind will figure it out soon enough.

Agree(0) | Disagree(3) | Report

morganfell - 478 days 14 hours ago

Look out, we have to save the patient. Too late, someone dialed the wrong number because here is the Waaaaaaaambulance.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

caffman - 478 days 11 hours ago

problem with them fighting fire with fire is that the PS3 fans are getting burned. If its exclusive content, put it on the disk to start with! blu-rays are supposed to be able to hold anything a game can through at them so why not put it on the disk, not have people have to pay for extra, and make themselves more popular?

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

morganfell - 477 days 15 hours ago

Because devs still think the PS3 and 360 versions have to be equal out the door.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

KBDuB - 479 days 1 hour ago

It's 1-800-785-2345
Or.
It's 1-800-Suk-aDik

Give it a try..

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

caffman - 478 days 11 hours ago

I'll play the demo first and if I like it enough to get DLC for it, I'll get it on PS3. If not I'll still get it but on 360!

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

KBDuB - 479 days 1 hour ago

Lol. The PS3 gets stronger every day.. yes.
And.. you get dumber every day.

You're not going to blame anyone paying for it? Well, why not? Every time the 360 gets DLC it's because MS supposedly pays for it. See, so if you're not going to say the Sony payed for it, then HUSH next time the 360 get DLC. Moron..

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

KBDuB - 478 days 23 hours ago

What are you talkin about? Lol.

You always say that MS pays for DLC whenever exclusive DLC arrives on the 360. Why aren't you going to say that Sony payed for it? Hy-Hypo-Hypocrite! =)

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

KBDuB - 478 days 23 hours ago

Possibly. But, I'm sure "my" GTA DLC will be better.. Lol. Why'd you say "your GTA DLC" ahahaaa =)

I don't see what DLC would add to a game like this. I don't see it adding as much as what GTA could offer.

Agree(0) | Disagree(2) | Report