40°

Avid Gamer: Metal Gear Solid 4 Video Review

Avid Gamer writes:

"We said it was coming and we don't disappoint. This is the first, of hopefully many, video reviews. The biggest releases will be reviewed in the below format. Before you start criticising the voice work, yours truly did it. Since we've put this together, we've hired a talented individual to do the voice over in the future. (Ed - If I'm being low brow, yes I know I suck). The next video review will be Bad Company, with a bit more gusto. Enjoy."
Snoozer282 - contributor
Published: 551 days 2 hours ago | Review | PlayStation 3
 
 

Showing: 1 - 4 of 4 Comments
1 BilI Gates | 551 days 1 hour ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
clintos59 - 551 days 1 hour ago
1.1 - Thats what I was saying but people will always twist it and say...
8 isnt a bad number. Well duh it aint a bad number but this is a game that was hyped for all these years and surpassed its hype with all the praises and perfect reviews it got, unlike halo 3, and gta4 which were great games but didnt live up to its hype. Especially the reviewer who gave a it a 6, lol. Them and anyone else who gave this game a score lower then an 9 are not taken seriously anymore and have no credability at all.For example.

All those sites who gave MGS4 under a 9, I can almost bet u, they all gave halo 3 a 9 and higher score.

Edge and Eurogamer were trying to say that mgs4 had 90 minute cutscenes which was shot down from gamepro and after beating the game myself, just told me just how full of crap eurogamer and edge are with that statement and they shouldnt be reviewing ps3 games period just for the fanboy reviews they give. I mean they gave halo 3 a perfect 10 and then give mgs4 an 8, lol give me a break and quit your job and be a mcdonalds worker.

Also NZgamer gave MGS4 an 8.5 but yet they felt Battlefield Bad Company was a better all around game and gave Battlefield Bad Company a 9, lol. Yeah ok now that makes alot of sense, lol. Battlefield>> MGS4 in there eyes. Yeah come see me if battlefield bad company even makes it to be a contender for GOTY. :P

and then u have the 2 idiotic fanboy sites out of them all who we know are fanboys because they gave mgs4 a 7.9 and a 6, lol.
9.monstersandcritics.com Review: 79/100
10.Free Paper Review: 6/10
Wonder how much MS payed them for these reviews, lol.

Anyways MGS4 is a masterpiece and if there are reviews to go by, id say look at IGN, Gamespot, Gamepro, and Famitsu. Well gamespot has seemed kind of biased with early ps3 exclusives but it kind of seems they have become there old selfs again, so im trusting there reviews now. All I gotta say is MGS4 is the best game ive played this next gen and is on my top 3 best games ive played in my life. :)
Shut this user up Let user speak
crimsonfox - 551 days ago
2 - wait when is the meta going up
?????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????
Shut this user up Let user speak
Snoozer282 - 549 days 9 hours ago
3 -
In reference to the METRO review, UK newspapers are idiots and know nothing about games.

The guardian website had a picture of Crysis for its MGS4 review...
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News